RESUMO
We compared egg size phenotypes and tested several predictions from the optimal egg size (OES) and bet-hedging theories in two North American desert-dwelling sister tortoise taxa, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai, that inhabit different climate spaces: relatively unpredictable and more predictable climate spaces, respectively. Observed patterns in both species differed from the predictions of OES in several ways. Mean egg size increased with maternal body size in both species. Mean egg size was inversely related to clutch order in G. agassizii, a strategy more consistent with the within-generation hypothesis arising out of bet-hedging theory or a constraint in egg investment due to resource availability, and contrary to theories of density dependence, which posit that increasing hatchling competition from later season clutches should drive selection for larger eggs. We provide empirical evidence that one species, G. agassizii, employs a bet-hedging strategy that is a combination of two different bet-hedging hypotheses. Additionally, we found some evidence for G. morafkai employing a conservative bet-hedging strategy. (e.g., lack of intra- and interclutch variation in egg size relative to body size). Our novel adaptive hypothesis suggests the possibility that natural selection favors smaller offspring in late-season clutches because they experience a more benign environment or less energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., winter) than early clutch progeny, that emerge under harsher and more energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., summer). We also discuss alternative hypotheses of sexually antagonistic selection, which arise from the trade-offs of son versus daughter production that might have different optima depending on clutch order and variation in temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) among clutches. Resolution of these hypotheses will require long-term data on fitness of sons versus daughters as a function of incubation environment, data as yet unavailable for any species with TSD.
RESUMO
Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules comprise a family of polymorphic cell surface receptors consisting of classical 1 a molecules that present antigenic peptides and nonclassical 1 b molecules. Gene expression for human classical and nonclassical MHC class I molecules has been shown to be differentially regulated by interferon, with variation in the nucleotide sequence of promoter regions, resulting in differences in interferon inducibility and basal levels of gene transcription. In this study on porcine classical and nonclassical swine leukocyte Ag (SLA) class I molecules, we show alignments of putative regulatory elements in the promoters of the three functional classical class I genes, SLA-1, SLA-2, and SLA-3; two nonclassical 1 b genes, SLA-6 and SLA-7; and a MIC-2 gene. Promoter elements were cloned upstream from a luciferase reporter gene, and the basal and inducible activities of each were characterized by expression in Max cells, an immortalized pig cell line that responds to interferon and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). All three classical class I but not nonclassical promoters responded to interferon. This was confirmed by the transactivation of SLA-1, but not SLA-7, after the co expression with interferon regulatory factors (IRFs), IRF-1, IRF-2, IRF-3, IRF-7, and IRF-9. Classical class I genes were activated by cotransfection with nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) p65 and by treatment of cells with TNF-alpha, although, unlike human promoter there was no synergistic effect with interferon. The greatest effect on classical class I promoters was coexpression with the class II transactivator (CIITA), important for constitutive transactivation. These results determine the differential regulation of porcine classical and nonclassical MHC class I and reflects their importance in antigen presentation during infection.