RESUMO
Purpose: Infection with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a tough nut to crack. Carrimycin is a novel recombinant macrolide antibiotic, and has good anti-infection effects in vivo. At present, it is rarely reported for treatment of CRAB infection. We present a case where a patient with COVID-19 complicated by CRAB infection was successfully treated with a combination therapy including carrimycin, offering clinical insights and experience. Patients and Methods: The patient infected with CRAB was cured by carrimycin combined with tigecycline and amikacin ultimately. We analyzed and summarized the therapeutic regimen and disease feature to provide reference for clinical treatment. Results: The patient was admitted to emergency observation wards with fever and was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia. During the treatment, his condition worsened. He had a fever, cough, and expectoration. After 3 days of empirical treatment with meropenem, tested positive for A. baumannii infection by the next-generation sequencing, and CRAB was detected in blood and sputum culture. Then, he was administered with tigecycline and amikacin immediately for 5 days, however the therapeutic effect was not significant. The patient still remained in a high inflammatory response. Ultimately, the treatment regimen was changed to carrimycin combined with tigecycline and amikacin for 7 days, and then carrimycin combined with tigecycline for 10 days, the patient's clinical condition gradually improved. The patient received carrimycin monotherapy for 7 days, then discharged. Conclusion: Carrimycin may be a bright alternative for CRAB infection as one of the drugs in combination therapy, especially in a patient with hyperinflammatory response.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: High-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) refers to the onset of breathlessness, cough, and fever at rest after arriving at high altitudes. It is a life-threatening illness caused by rapid ascent to high altitudes. Furosemide is controversial in HAPE treatment but is routinely used in China. Further research is needed to assess its efficacy and impact on HAPE management and prognosis. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of furosemide for HAPE. METHODS: A retrospective was conducted to analysis of patients with HAPE admitted to the People's Hospital of Shigatse City from January 2018 to September 2023. Patients were divided into furosemide group and non-furosemide group for further analysis. Clinical variables including demographic information, comorbidities, vital signs, inflammatory markers, biochemical analysis, CT severity score and prognostic indicators were collected. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients were enrolled, with 209 patients in the furosemide group and 64 patients in the non-furosemide group. The furosemide group showed a significantly decrease in CT severity scores compared to the non-furosemide group. Subgroup analysis showed that the longer the duration of furosemide use, the more pronounced the improvement in lung CT severity scores. But there were no significant differences in length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Furosemide helps alleviate pulmonary edema in HAPE patients, but further research is needed to clarify its impact on prognosis.