Fever after intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedures in children.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper was to study the incidence and clinical significance of fever after intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedures in children. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed all children subjected to an intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedure between 2004 and 2015. Body temperature 6 days postoperatively, symptoms and signs, and eventual cerebrospinal fluid analysis were evaluated. Fever was defined as temperature above 38 °C. RESULTS: Fifty-five children (mean age 4.8 years) had 67 procedures. Forty-three children (47 procedures, 70 %) developed fever, mostly the day of surgery (n = 17; 25 %) or the next day (n = 33; 49 %). All children who were clinically ill (n = 9, including 7 with fever) suffered serious illness, as opposed to none of the children with fever without being clinically ill (n = 36). Fever was unrelated to gender, indication for, and type of procedure and did not influence ETV success rate at 3 months. Children under 1 year less frequently developed fever (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Fever frequently develops after intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedures in children and follows a rather predictable course, peaking the day of surgery and/or the next day, and rapidly subsiding thereafter. Fever is not a cardinal symptom except when combined with other symptoms in children who are clinically ill (which most of them are not). Close observation avoiding invasive diagnostic tests may suffice for those who are not clinically ill, while extra attention should be paid to those whose temperature rises after day 2 especially when clinically ill, as they likely suffer serious illness. We recommend to closely observe children after any intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedure for at least 5 days.

Risk factors for infections related to external ventricular drainage.

BACKGROUND: External ventricular drainage (EVD) is frequently used in neurosurgery for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage in patients with raised intracranial pressure. The major complication of this procedure is an EVD-related infection, i.e., meningitis or ventriculitis. The purpose of the present retrospective single centre study is to assess the possible causes of these infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-eight patients were included in the period from January 1993 until April 2005. Patient and disease demographics, as well as EVD data, and the occurrence of infection were reviewed, compared, and included in a risk-analysis study. RESULTS: The population's mean age was 56 +/- 15 years and the sexes were equally distributed. Most frequently, the indication for EVD was hydrocephalus due to intraventricular haemorrhage (48.2%). An infection was documented in 23.2% of all patients. Duration of EVD drainage appeared to be a risk factor for infection (>11 days: OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.8-9.2, p = 0.001). CSF sampling frequency was also a significant risk-factor (no sampling: OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.2-0.5, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: We found a relatively high percentage of EVD-related infections. After multivariate analysis there appears to be a relation with duration of drainage and frequent CSF sampling. As a result, a new EVD protocol is proposed in our institution that we believe will decrease the number of EVD-related infections to a minimum.