Efficacy and Safety of Pacritinib vs Placebo for Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19 remain high despite advances in standard of care therapy, and the role of anti-inflammatory agents that inhibit the interleukin 6/JAK2 pathway is still being elucidated. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the oral JAK2/IRAK1 inhibitor pacritinib vs placebo in the treatment of adults with severe COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial enrolled hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 at 21 centers across the US between June 2020 and February 2021, with approximately 1.5 months of safety follow-up per patient. Data analysis was performed from September 2021 to July 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard of care plus pacritinib (400 mg per os on day 1 followed by 200 mg twice daily on days 2-14) vs placebo, for 14 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was death or need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) by day 28. All-cause mortality and safety were also assessed. Results: A total of 200 patients were randomized to pacritinib (99 patients; 56 men [56.6%]; median [range] age, 60 [19-87] years) or placebo (101 patients; 64 men [63.4%]; median [range] age 59 [28-94] years). The percentage requiring supplementary oxygen was 99.0% (98 patients) in the pacritinib group vs 98.0% (99 patients) in the placebo group. The percentage who progressed to IMV, ECMO, or death was 17.2% (17 patients) in the pacritinib group vs 22.8% (23 patients) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.28-1.35; P = .23). Among patients with elevated interleukin 6, the rate was 17.5% (11 of 63 patients) in the pacritinib group vs 30.4% (21 of 96 patients) in the placebo group. The adverse event rate was similar for pacritinib vs placebo (78.1% [75 patients] vs 80.2% [81 patients]), with no excess in infection (14.6% [14 patients] vs 19.8% [20 patients]), bleeding (8.3% [8 patients] vs 10.9% [11 patients]), or thrombosis (8.3% [8 patients] vs 7.9% [8 patients]). Rates of grade 3 or higher adverse events were lower with pacritinib than placebo (29.2% [28 patients] vs 40.6% [41 patients]). Conclusions and Relevance: The study did not meet its primary end point in patients with severe COVID-19. Subgroup analyses may indicate specific populations with hyperinflammation that could benefit from pacritinib, although further clinical trials would be needed to confirm these effects. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04404361.

Effect of Statin Coadministration on the Risk of Daptomycin-Associated Myopathy.

Background: Daptomycin-associated myopathy has been identified in 2%-14% of patients, and rhabdomyolysis is a known adverse effect. Although risk factors for daptomycin-associated myopathy are poorly defined, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) monitoring and temporary discontinuation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or "statins," has been recommended. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, matched case-control risk factor analysis in adult and pediatric patients from 2004 to 2015. Patients in whom myopathy (defined as CPK values above the upper limit of normal) developed during daptomycin treatment were matched 1:1 to no-myopathy controls with at least the same duration of therapy. Risk factors independently associated with myopathy were determined using multivariable conditional logistic regression. Secondary analysis was performed in patients with rhabdomyolysis, defined as CPK values ≥10 times the upper limit of normal. Results: Of 3042 patients reviewed, 128 (4.2%) were identified as having daptomycin-associated myopathy, 25 (0.8%) of whom had rhabdomyolysis; 121 (95%) of the 128 were adults, and the mean duration of therapy before CPK elevation was 16.7 days (range, 1-58 days). In multivariate analysis, deep abscess treatment (odds ratio, 2.80; P = .03), antihistamine coadministration (3.50; P = .03), and statin coadministration (2.60; P = .03) were independent risk factors for myopathy. Obesity (odds ratio, 3.28; P = .03) and statin coadministration (4.67; P = .03) were found to be independent risk factors for rhabdomyolysis, and older age was associated with reduced risk (0.97; P = .05). Conclusions: Statin coadministration with daptomycin was independently associated with myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. This is the first study to provide strong evidence supporting this association. During coadministration, we recommend twice-weekly CPK monitoring and consideration of withholding statins.

Reducing Inappropriate Testing for the Evaluation of Diarrhea Among Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is one of the most common illnesses in the United States. Evaluation frequently does not follow established guidelines. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a computerized physician order entry-based test guidance algorithm with regard to the clinical, financial, and operational impacts. METHODS: Our population was patients with diarrheal illness at a tertiary academic medical center. The intervention was a computerized physician order entry-based test guidance algorithm that restricted the use of stool cultures and ova and parasites testing of diarrhea in the adult inpatient location vs nonintervention sites, which were the emergency department, pediatric inpatient and adult and pediatric outpatient locations. We measured stool culture, ova and parasites, and Clostridium difficile testing rates from July 1, 2012 to January 31, 2016. Additionally, we calculated advisor usage, consults generated, accuracy of information, and cost savings. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in stool culture and ova and parasites testing rates at the adult inpatient (P = .001 for both), pediatric (P < .001 for both), and adult emergency department (P < .001; P = .009) locations. The decrease at the intervention site was immediate, whereas the other locations showed a delayed but sustained decrease that suggests a collateral impact. A significant increase in the rate of stool culture and ova and parasites testing was observed in the outpatient setting (P = .02 and P = .001). We estimate that $21,931 was saved annually. CONCLUSIONS: A point-of-order test restriction algorithm for hospitalized adults with diarrhea reduced stool testing. Similar programs should be considered at other institutions and for the evaluation of other conditions.

Provider knowledge of trivalent inactivated and high-dose influenza vaccines.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess provider knowledge about trivalent inactivated and high dose influenza vaccines. Hence, a 20-item survey was distributed to providers within the Internal Medicine department at an urban academic medical center. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-one (24.5%) providers responded. The correct response rate was 63.2%. The highest performing subspecialties were infectious diseases (80.5%), endocrinology (69.2%), and pulmonary (68%). Those who received an influenza vaccine during the most recent season scored significantly higher than those who did not (63.6% vs. 43.6%, p=.001). Areas where respondents did poorly included questions pertaining to contraindications to immunizations (27.4%), common adverse events after immunization (29.2%), target antigen (73.5%), number of strains in the trivalent inactivated vaccine (62.9%), and time to immunity (61.4%). High dose vaccine knowledge was poor, with 37% of providers unaware of its existence. CONCLUSION: Significant gaps in provider knowledge exist regarding both trivalent inactivated and high dose influenza vaccines.