Topical application of a novel anti-interleukin-17A antibody fragment penetrates psoriatic skin: Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase Ib study.

Interleukin (IL)-17A underlies the pathogenesis of chronic plaque psoriasis (CPP). Well-tolerated, effective IL-17A inhibitors for mild-to-moderate CPP are needed. ZL-1102 is a novel antibody fragment targeting IL-17A. To assess the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and skin penetration of a topical 1% ZL-1102 hydrogel in patients with mild-to-moderate CPP, a two-part, Phase Ib study was conducted. Open-label Part A: six patients received a single topical application of ZL-1102 onto a psoriatic plaque; double-blind Part B: 53 patients were randomised 1:1 to twice-daily ZL-1102 or vehicle for 4 weeks. Key primary endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), tolerability and changes in local psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). TEAEs occurred in two (33.3%) patients in Part A and in 16 (59.3%) and 13 (50.0%) patients in the ZL-1102 and vehicle arms, respectively, in Part B. No grade ≥3 TEAEs were seen with ZL-1102. ZL-1102 led to numerically greater changes in local PASI versus vehicle (-28.8% vs. -17.2%), with good local tolerability. The trend towards local PASI improvement was accompanied by biomarker changes based on RNA sequencing, indicative of ZL-1102 penetration into psoriatic plaques. Topical ZL-1102 showed good safety, local tolerability and a trend towards improved local PASI; skin penetration was observed without measurable systemic exposure. ACTRN12620000700932.

RNA Interference Therapy Targeting Apolipoprotein C-III in Hypertriglyceridemia.

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3) inhibits triglyceride clearance by reducing lipoprotein lipase­mediated hydrolysis and hepatocyte uptake of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. ARO-APOC3, a hepatocyte-targeting RNA interference therapeutic, inhibits APOC3 messenger ribonucleic acid expression, lowering triglyceride levels. The objective of this trial was to assess the safety, pharmacodynamic variables, and pharmacokinetic variables of ARO-APOC3 treatment. METHODS: Healthy participants and adults with hypertriglyceridemia were randomly assigned to receive escalating single (day 1) or repeat (days 1 and 29) doses, respectively, of subcutaneous injections of ARO-APOC3 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg or placebo; they were followed up until day 113. Additional cohorts of healthy participants and adults with chylomicronemia received repeat doses of open-label ARO-APOC3. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and side effect profile of ARO-APOC3. Key secondary and exploratory objectives included pharmacokinetic variables and changes in serum APOC3, triglyceride, and cholesterol levels. RESULTS: Eighty-eight participants received ARO-APOC3 and 24 participants received placebo across double-blind and open-label cohorts. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of transient, mild to moderate liver transaminase changes occurred in 10 participants: 1 patient receiving ARO-APOC3 25 mg, 5 patients receiving ARO-APOC3 50 mg, and 4 participants receiving ARO-APOC3 100 mg (1 healthy participant and 3 patients with hypertriglyceridemia). These events were asymptomatic, and transaminase levels returned to near baseline by the end of the trial. No AEs related to thrombocytopenia or platelet declines were reported. In the hypertriglyceridemia cohorts, the day 113 mean changes from baseline in APOC3 at the 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-mg doses were −62.0%, −81.7%, −90.1%, and −94.4%, respectively, compared with −1.6% with placebo. This corresponded to median changes in triglyceride levels of −65.6%, −69.9%, −81.2%, and −81.0% compared with −2.8% with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this small trial of short duration, ARO-APOC3 was associated with few AEs and reduced serum levels of APOC3 and triglycerides in healthy participants and patients with hypertriglyceridemia. (Funded by Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03783377.)

Efficacy and safety of a universal influenza A vaccine (MVA-NP+M1) in adults when given after seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine immunisation (FLU009): a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: In animal, epidemiological, and human challenge studies, a pre-existing T-cell response to internal proteins of influenza A has been associated with improved virological and disease outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess whether inducing additional responses to conserved CD4 and CD8 T-cell antigens provides added benefit to standard influenza vaccination. METHODS: We designed a phase 2b, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of a recombinant viral-vectored vaccine (modified vaccinia Ankara expressing virus nucleoprotein and matrix protein 1; MVA-NP+M1), which has been shown to induce both CD4 and CD8 T cells, at eight outpatient clinical trial sites in Australia over two consecutive influenza seasons. We recruited non-immunosuppressed adults (≥18 years) who had received the 2019 quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) vaccine within 28 days before study enrolment and randomisation (day 0). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) according to a computer-generated random sequence to receive one dose of 1·5 × 108 plaque-forming units of MVA-NP+M1 or saline (placebo) intramuscularly. Randomisation was stratified by age (<65 years or ≥65 years). The patients and trial assessors were masked to treatment assignment. During the subsequent influenza seasons, participants with symptoms related to respiratory illness or influenza-like illness were to attend the clinic within 72 h of symptom onset for two nasal swabs for influenza testing by quantitative RT-PCR. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of laboratory-confirmed influenza in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety (solicited adverse events within 7 days and unsolicited adverse events within 28 days after study vaccination, and serious adverse events for the study duration) was assessed in all randomly assigned participants who received at least one vaccination (according to the treatment received). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03880474. FINDINGS: Between April 2 and June 14, 2019, 2152 adults were randomly allocated and received MVA-NP+M1 (n=1077) or placebo (n=1075), comprising the efficacy (ITT) analysis set. Participants were followed up throughout the 2019 Australia influenza season (May 1 to Oct 15, 2019). 419 (19·5%) of 2152 participants were aged 65 years or older. The incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza did not differ between the MVA-NP+M1 group (35 of 1077 participants; 3·25% [95% CI 2·31-4·44]) and the placebo group (23 of 1075; 2·14% [1·39-3·14]; Fisher's exact p=0·14). 23 severe solicited local injection site reactions were reported in 13 (0·6%) of 2152 participants, 22 of which were reported in the MVA-NP + M1 group (in 12 [1·1%] participants). 100 severe systemic events were reported in 45 (4·2%) MVA-NP + M1 recipients, and 20 were reported in 14 (1·3%) placebo recipients. Three unsolicited grade 3 events in three participants (two headache and one nausea, all in the MVA-NP+M1 group) were deemed vaccine related. 21 serious adverse events were reported in 18 (1·7%) of 1077 participants in the MVA-NP+M1 group and 25 serious adverse events were reported in 22 (2·0%) of 1075 participants in the placebo group; none were considered vaccine related. The trial was stopped after one season for futility on the recommendation of the data monitoring committee. INTERPRETATION: MVA-NP+M1 was well tolerated with no vaccine-associated serious adverse events. A vaccine designed to induce moderate T-cell responses to the cross-reactive internal proteins of influenza A did not lead to improved incidence when given within 28 days after standard QIV immunisation. A greater magnitude of T-cell response with a different vaccine or regimen, or localisation in the lungs via alternative delivery, such as intranasal or aerosol, might be successful and require further investigation. FUNDING: Vaccitech.