Associations with other cancer-related biomarkers might contribute to poor outcomes in RAS-altered, younger patients with colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer in younger adults. In patients undergoing liver resection with RAS-altered CRCs, there is evidence suggesting younger patients have worse outcomes than older patients. To explain this pattern, differences in associations between RAS status and other cancer-related biomarkers in tumors from younger versus older patients with CRC were evaluated in a cohort of 925 patients with CRC, 277 (30.0%) of whom were ≤50 years old, and 454 (49.1%) who had RAS-altered tumors. For 3 biomarkers, RNF43, APC, and microsatellite instability (MSI), the association with RAS status was significantly modified by age after adjustment for multiple testing. Specifically, younger patients with RAS-altered tumors were more likely to be MSI-high, RNF43 mutated, and APC wild type. These differences might contribute to the observed pattern of diminished survival in younger versus older patients with CRC with RAS-mutated tumors undergoing liver metastasis resection.

Value of next generation sequencing (NGS) testing in advanced cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: The availability of targeted therapies for oncology patients is increasing. Available genomic tests to identify treatment-eligible patients include single gene tests and gene panel tests, including the whole-exome, whole-transcriptome OncoExTra test. We assessed the costs and clinical benefits of test choice. METHODS: A Microsoft Excel-based model was developed to evaluate test choice in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Treatment pathways were based on NCCN guidelines and medical expert opinion. Inputs were derived from published literature. Annual economic results and lifetime clinical results with OncoExTra testing were projected per-tested-patient and compared with single gene testing and no testing. Separately, results were estimated for a US health plan without the OncoExTra test and with its use in 5% of patients. RESULTS: Compared with no genomic testing, OncoExTra test use increased costs by $4,915 per patient; however, 82%-92% of individuals across tumour types were identified as eligible for targeted therapy or a clinical trial. Compared with single gene testing, OncoExTra test use decreased costs by $9,966 per-patient-tested while increasing use of approved or investigational targeted therapies by 20%. When considering a hypothetical health plan with 1 million members, 858 patients were eligible for genomic testing. Using the OncoExTra test in 5% of those eligible, per-member per-month costs decreased by $0.003, ranging from cost-savings of $0.026 in NSCLC patients to a $0.009 increase in prostate cancer patients. Cost-savings were driven by reduced treatment costs with increased clinical trial enrolment and reduced direct and indirect medical costs associated with targeted treatments. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the required simplifications in modelling complex conditions that may not fully reflect evolving real-world testing and treatment patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to single-gene testing, results indicate that using next generation sequencing test such as OncoExTra identified more actionable alterations, leading to improved outcomes and reduced costs.

Survival and predictors of outcome in patients with acute leukemia admitted to the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Predictors of outcome and rates of successful discharge have not been defined for patients with acute leukemia admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in the US. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 90 patients with acute leukemia (no history of bone marrow transplant) admitted to an ICU from 2001-2004. The primary endpoints were improvement and subsequent discharge from the ICU, discharge from the hospital, and 2-month survival after hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints were 6- and 12-month survival. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors predicting outcome. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 54 years and 48 (53%) were male. The most common reason for ICU transfer for all patients was respiratory compromise. The majority of all patients (68%) were eventually placed on ventilator support and approximately half required pressors. During the ICU course, 29 patients (32%) improved and subsequently resumed aggressive leukemia management, and 24 patients (27%) survived to be discharged from the hospital. The 2-, 6-, and 12-month overall survival was 24 (27%), 16 (18%), and 14 (16%), respectively. Higher APACHE II score, use of pressors, undergoing bone marrow transplantation preparative regimen, and adverse cytogenetics predicted worse outcome. Newly diagnosed leukemia, type of leukemia, or age did not. CONCLUSIONS: One of 4 patients with acute leukemia survived an ICU admission to be discharged from the hospital and were alive 2 months later. A diagnosis of acute leukemia should not disqualify patients from an ICU admission.

Intimal pulmonary artery sarcoma presenting as dyspnea: case report.

BACKGROUND: We report a case of pulmonary sarcoma which is a rare cause of the common symptom of dyspnea. CASE PRESENTATION: A fifty-one year old previously healthy male presented to the emergency room with complaints of dyspnea on exertion. A cardiac workup including an exercise stress test was negative but an echocardiography showed pulmonary stenosis. Cardiac MRI showed a large mass extending from the pulmonic valve to both the right and left pulmonary arteries suggestive of sarcoma. A complete resection and repair of the pulmonary artery was done and adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide was recommended. The patient is currently disease free after eighteen months. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary artery sarcomas are a difficult diagnosis. The diagnosis may remain elusive for some time until the proper imaging techniques are utilized to make a diagnosis. Earlier and accurate diagnosis may lead to earlier interventions and improve survival.

Short communication: phase I clinical and gene modulatory evaluation of tamoxifen and IFN-alpha2b.

Preclinical studies had determined that tamoxifen and interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b) synergistically inhibited growth of both estrogen-receptor positive and negative murine tumor xenografts and had combined antiangiogenic effects and that tamoxifen potentiated IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) expression. A phase I trial in 26 patients was conducted using the combination to define tolerance and potentiation of ISG expression. IFN- alpha2b at a dose of 3 x 10(6) units/m(2) daily was given subcutaneously (s.c.), and tamoxifen was initiated as a loading dose of 150 mg/m(2) and then 60 mg/m(2) twice daily on day 8. At this initial dose, reduction of dose of IFN- alpha2b was required in 4 of 11 patients, primarily because of fatigue. Another group of patients was treated with an identical tamoxifen dose but with IFN-alpha2b reduced to 2 x 10(6)/m(2) U; this was better tolerated. As the projected serum tamoxifen level to reduplicate preclinical effects was 300 mg/m(2), dose escalation in a third cohort was undertaken; it had to be discontinued secondary to grade III or IV toxicity in 2 of 2 patients. Increases in products of transcriptionally regulated ISGs, beta (2)-microglobulin, neopterin, and ISG15 were assessed. All ISGs increased after IFN-alpha2b, but only ISG15 had a further significant rise after initiation of tamoxifen. Because at doses not limited by unacceptable toxicities, no marked potentiation of ISGs by tamoxifen could be identified, clinical evaluation of the combination was terminated.

Phase II study of lenalidomide in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide (LEN) is a structural and functional analogue of thalidomide that has demonstrated enhanced immunomodulatory properties and a more favorable toxicity profile. A Phase II, open-label study of LEN in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was conducted to determine its safety and clinical activity. METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC received LEN orally at a dose of 25 mg daily for the first 21 days of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Time to treatment failure, safety, and survival were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In total, 28 patients participated in the trial and were included in the current analysis. Three of 28 patients (11%) demonstrated partial responses and continued to be progression-free for >15 months. Eleven patients (39%) had stable disease that lasted >3 months, including 8 patients who had tumor shrinkage. In total, 6 patients (21%) remained on the trial, and 5 additional patients continued to be followed for survival. The median follow-up for those 11 patients was 13.5 months (range, 8.3-17.0 months). The median survival had not been reached at the time of the current report. Serious adverse events included fatigue (11%), skin toxicity (11%), and neutropenia (36%). CONCLUSIONS: LEN demonstrated an antitumor effect in metastatic RCC, as evidenced by durable partial responses. LEN toxicities were manageable. Further studies will be required to assess the overall activity of LEN in patients with metastatic RCC.

Endothelin receptor antagonists: rationale, clinical development, and role in prostate cancer therapeutics.

The endothelins (ETs), which include ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, and their receptors ET-A and ET-B, play a major role in tumor growth, proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and bone metastasis. Atrasentan is a novel and selective inhibitor of ET-1 and ET-A. In vitro and in vivo data show that this oral agent is capable of inhibiting tumor cells in vitro. More recently, this agent was studied in several phase I trials with refractory carcinoma patients. Subsequently, phase II and III clinical trials evaluating atrasentan in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma have suggested that targeting this pathway may be a new therapeutic strategy in the treatment of solid malignancies, specifically, prostate cancer.