Impact of steroids on the immune profiles of children with asthma living in the inner-city.

Background: Inner-city asthma is associated with high morbidity and systemic steroid use. Chronic steroid use impacts immune function; however, there is a lack of data with regard to the extent of immunosuppression in patients with asthma and who are receiving frequent systemic steroids. Objective: To identify the impact of frequent systemic steroid bursts on the immune function of children with asthma who live in the inner city. Methods: Children ages 3-18 years with asthma were divided into study (≥2 systemic steroid bursts/year) and control groups (0-1 systemic steroid bursts/year). Lymphocyte subsets; mitogen proliferation assay; total immunoglobulin G (IgG) value, and pneumococcal and diphtheria/tetanus IgG values were evaluated. Results: Ninety-one participants were enrolled (study group [n = 42] and control group [n = 49]). There was no difference in adequate pneumococcal IgG value, diphtheria/tetanus IgG value, mitogen proliferation assays, lymphocyte subsets, and IgG values between the two groups. Children who received ≥2 steroid bursts/year had a significantly lower median pneumococcal IgG serotype 7F value. Most of the immune laboratory results were normal except for the pneumococcal IgG value. Most of the participants (n/N = 72/91 [79%]) had an inadequate pneumococcal IgG level (<7/14 serotypes ≥1.3 µg/mL). The participants with inadequate pneumococcal IgG level and who received a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 (PPSV23) boost had a robust response. There was no significant difference in infection, steroid exposure, asthma severity, or morbidities between those with adequate versus inadequate pneumococcal IgG values. Conclusion: Children with asthma who live in the inner city and receive ≥2 steroid bursts/year do not have a significantly different immune profile from those who receive ≤1 steroid bursts/year do not have a significantly different immune profile from those who do not. Although appropriately vaccinated, most participants had an inadequate pneumococcal IgG level, regardless of steroid exposure and asthma severity. These children may benefit from PPSV23.

Anaphylaxis: Long-term management and resources.

Background: Anaphylaxis is an acute life-threatening event that requires emergent diagnosis and treatment. However, focus on prevention of anaphylaxis is essential in reducing anaphylaxis recurrences and associated mortality. Objective: This literature review was aimed to be a comprehensive resource for practicing allergists in managing anaphylaxis in the long term. We discussed the role of the allergist in the long-term outpatient management of anaphylaxis through identifying risk factors, allergen avoidance, prevention of recurrences, and patient education. Methods: A medical literature search that focused on several areas of long-term management of anaphylaxis was conducted. Results: Patients evaluated by an allergist are more likely to have their anaphylaxis trigger identified, to have their underlying mast cell disorder diagnosed, and to receive desensitization or allergen immunotherapy. Allergists can prevent fatal anaphylaxis by preventing and treating anaphylaxis in patients with ischemic heart disease and by optimally treating patients with comorbid asthma. Allergists can offer specific prevention strategies for allergenic trigger and cofactor avoidance. Education should be focused on patients with a higher risk for recurrence of anaphylaxis, such as those patients with a history of severe symptoms or anaphylaxis, with a peanut and/or tree nut trigger, or with a history of asthma, or female gender. Patient counseling involves providing individualized action plans at each visit and discussing proper use, storage, and safety of epinephrine autoinjectors. Multiple doses of epinephrine need to be prescribed to those who are at risk for severe food-induced, venom immunotherapy-related, or venom-induced anaphylaxis. Wording on medical identification products should be reviewed by the allergist. Anaphylaxis resources for health-care providers are summarized in the article. Conclusion: Ongoing education, providing personalized anaphylaxis action plans, reducing risk factors, and avoiding triggers are key to anaphylaxis prevention and long-term management.

Management of Anaphylaxis.

The key to managing anaphylaxis is early epinephrine administration. This can improve outcomes and prevent progression to severe and fatal anaphylaxis. Delayed or lack of administration of epinephrine is associated with fatal reactions. Positioning in a recumbent supine position, airway management, and intravenous fluids are essential in its management. Antihistamines and glucocorticosteroids should not be prescribed in place of epinephrine. ß-adrenergic agonists by inhalation are indicated for bronchospasm associated with anaphylaxis despite optimal epinephrine treatment. Long-term management of anaphylaxis includes the identification and avoidance of triggers; identification of cofactors, such as mast cell disorders; patient, parent, and caregiver education, and interventions to reduce allergen sensitivity, such as the use of venom immunotherapy for Hymenoptera hypersensitivity. Long-term management is covered in other articles. Consultation with an allergist/immunologist is recommended when necessary.