The etiology and mortality of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a devastating neurological presentation. There is a paucity of large studies on NORSE as it is a relatively new clinical syndrome. The aim of this review was to summarize the etiologies and establish a mortality rate for NORSE. Two independent authors systematically searched the following electronic databases from January 1, 2005 April 20, 2021: PubMed, Embase, OVID, Scopus, Web of Science, "Clinicaltrials.gov," and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry. We included all primary research studies of NORSE in adults and excluded commentaries, reviews, pre-clinical studies, and pediatric populations. Etiology was extracted from all studies meeting eligibility criteria, whereas data relating to treatments, hospital stay, functional outcomes, and mortality were extracted from studies with sample size ≥5. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of mortality rate with meta-regression testing for significant covariates. Of 1482 studies, 109 case reports and case series met our criteria, comprising 395 cases of NORSE. The most common etiology was cryptogenic in 197 cases (49.9%), followed by autoimmune in 143 cases (36.2%). The pooled mortality rate was 22% (95% confidence interval 17%-27%; N studies  = 15), with low heterogeneity ( I 2  = 0%). Meta-regression revealed that year of study, treatment with ketogenic diet or immunotherapy, percentage of cryptogenic cases, and length of intensive care unit stay were not significant covariates for mortality. Common treatments included antiseizure medications (median 5), general anesthesia, and immunotherapy such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange. Mean length of intensive care admission was 33.4 days, with 52% of cases diagnosed with epilepsy on discharge. Neurocognitive impairment was a common sequela of NORSE. NORSE is associated with a high mortality. Half of cases remain cryptogenic, which presents a diagnostic challenge. Future focus should be on elucidating the underlying neurobiology and determining the most effective therapeutic interventions.

Time to Reconsider Occupation Induced De Quervain's Tenosynovitis: An Updated Review of Risk Factors.

De Quervain's tenosynovitis (DQT) is described to be an attritional and degenerative process, triggered by stenosing inflammation of the tendon sheath in the first dorsal compartment of the wrist. Understanding and targeting the risk factors associated with DQT will help clinicians and patients to reduce its prevalence. This review aims to evaluate the current literature surrounding the risk factors which were divided into the anatomical, patient, and occupational factors associated with the condition. The two main anatomical variations associated with DQT are subcomparmentalization and multiple tendon slips of the abductor pollicus longus (APL) and extensor pollicus brevis (EPB) tendons. DQT is more common in females and is often noted in pregnancy and the postpartum period. When considering occupational factors, work-related activity has not been shown to be a direct cause of DQT, despite leading organisations supporting the converse.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and neurological disorders: a scoping review.

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a group of antidiabetic medications with a favourable cardiovascular, renal and overall safety profile. Given the limited treatment options available for neurological disorders, it is important to determine whether the pleiotropic effects of SGLT2i can be utilised in their prevention and management. Methods: All articles published before 20 March 2021 were systematically searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO and ClinicalTrials.gov. Overall, 1395 titles were screened, ultimately resulting in 160 articles being included in the qualitative analysis. Screening and data extraction were conducted by two independent authors and studies were excluded if they were not an original research study. Findings: Of the 160 studies, 134 addressed stroke, 19 cognitive impairment, 4 epilepsy and 4 movement disorders, encompassing a range from systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials to bioinformatic and animal studies. Most animal studies demonstrated significant improvements in behavioural and neurological deficits, which were reflected in beneficial changes in neurovascular units, synaptogenesis, neurotransmitter levels and target receptors' docking energies. The evidence from the minority clinical literature was conflicting and many studies did not reach statistical significance. Interpretation: SGLT2i may exert neurological benefits through three mechanisms: reduction in cardiovascular risk factors, augmentation of ketogenesis and anti-inflammatory pathways. Most clinical studies were observational, meaning that a causal relationship could not be established, while randomised controlled trials were heterogeneous and powered to detect cardiovascular or renal outcomes. We suggest that a longitudinal study should be conducted and specifically powered to detect neurological outcomes.

Risk factors and outcomes associated with anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anastomotic leaks (AL) are a major complication after esophagectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to determine identify risks factors for AL (preoperative, intra-operative, and post-operative factors) and assess the consequences to outcome on patients who developed an AL. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 31 December 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modeling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration CRD42018130732). This review identified 174 studies reporting outcomes of 74,226 patients undergoing esophagectomy. The overall pooled AL rates were 11%, ranging from 0 to 49% in individual studies. Majority of studies were from Asia (n = 79). In pooled analyses, 23 factors were associated with AL (17 preoperative and six intraoperative). AL were associated with adverse outcomes including pulmonary (OR: 4.54, CI95%: 2.99-6.89, P < 0.001) and cardiac complications (OR: 2.44, CI95%: 1.77-3.37, P < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (mean difference: 15 days, CI95%: 10-21 days, P < 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (OR: 5.91, CI95%: 1.41-24.79, P = 0.015). AL are a major complication following esophagectomy accounting for major morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis identified modifiable risk factors for AL, which can be a target for interventions to reduce AL rates. Furthermore, identification of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors will facilitate risk stratification and prediction of AL enabling better perioperative planning, patient counseling, and informed consent.

The Association Between Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Glycemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Individual studies have reported conflicting effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on glycemia. We systematically reviewed the effects of SSRIs on glycemia and whether metabolic and psychological factors moderated these effects. METHODS: We systematically searched for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of SSRIs on glycemia (fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) as a primary or secondary outcome. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted to compute an overall treatment effect. Meta-regression tested whether depression, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, treatment duration, and weight loss moderated treatment effects. RESULTS: Sixteen randomized controlled trials (n = 835) were included and glycemia was usually a secondary outcome. Overall, SSRIs improved glycemia versus placebo (pooled effect size (ES) = -0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.48 to -0.21; p < .001, I = 0%). Individually, fluoxetine (ES = -0.29, 95% CI = -0.54 to -0.05; p = .018) and escitalopram/citalopram (ES = -0.33, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.07; p = .012) outperformed placebo, but paroxetine (ES = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.58 to 0.19; p = .33) did not. Results were similar in populations selected for depression as those not. Across studies, baseline insulin resistance (p = .46), treatment duration (p = .47), diabetes status (p = .41), and weight loss (p = .93) did not moderate changes. Heterogeneity for all analyses was nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: SSRIs seem to have an association with improvement in glycemia, which is not moderated by depression status, diabetes status, or change in weight across studies. Future powered trials with longer treatment duration are needed to confirm these findings. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD4201809239.