Effect of Increasing Blood Pressure on Brain Tissue Oxygenation in Adults After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: To examine if increasing blood pressure improves brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Level-I trauma center teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Included patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age and with severe (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 9) TBI who had advanced neuromonitoring (intracranial blood pressure [ICP], PbtO2, and cerebral autoregulation testing). INTERVENTIONS: The exposure was mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation with a vasopressor, and the primary outcome was a PbtO2 response. Cerebral hypoxia was defined as PbtO2 less than 20 mm Hg (low). MAIN RESULTS: MAP challenge test results conducted between ICU admission days 1-3 from 93 patients (median age 31; interquartile range [IQR], 24-44 yr), 69.9% male, White (n = 69, 74.2%), median head abbreviated injury score 5 (IQR 4-5), and median admission GCS 3 (IQR 3-5) were examined. Across all 93 tests, a MAP increase of 25.7% resulted in a 34.2% cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) increase and 16.3% PbtO2 increase (no MAP or CPP correlation with PbtO2 [both R2 = 0.00]). MAP augmentation increased ICP when cerebral autoregulation was impaired (8.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.06). MAP augmentation resulted in four PbtO2 responses (normal and maintained [group 1: 58.5%], normal and deteriorated [group 2: 2.2%; average 45.2% PbtO2 decrease], low and improved [group 3: 12.8%; average 44% PbtO2 increase], and low and not improved [group 4: 25.8%]). The average end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) increase of 5.9% was associated with group 2 when cerebral autoregulation was impaired (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: MAP augmentation after severe TBI resulted in four distinct PbtO2 response patterns, including PbtO2 improvement and cerebral hypoxia. Traditionally considered clinical factors were not significant, but cerebral autoregulation status and ICP responses may have moderated MAP and ETCO2 effects on PbtO2 response. Further study is needed to examine the role of MAP augmentation as a strategy to improve PbtO2 in some patients.

A Global Review of the Perioperative Care of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Undergoing Microsurgical Repair of Ruptured Intracerebral Aneurysm.

INTRODUCTION: To describe the perioperative care of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who undergo microsurgical repair of a ruptured intracerebral aneurysm. METHODS: An English language survey examined 138 areas of the perioperative care of patients with aSAH. Reported practices were categorized as those reported by <20%, 21% to 40%, 41% to 60%, 61% to 80%, and 81% to 100% of participating hospitals. Data were stratified by Worldbank country income level (high-income or low/middle-income). Variation between country-income groups and between countries was presented as an intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Forty-eight hospitals representing 14 countries participated in the survey (response rate 64%); 33 (69%) hospitals admitted ≥60 aSAH patients per year. Clinical practices reported by 81 to 100% of the hospitals included placement of an arterial catheter, preinduction blood type/cross match, use of neuromuscular blockade during induction of general anesthesia, delivering 6 to 8 mL/kg tidal volume, and checking hemoglobin and electrolyte panels. Reported use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring was 25% (41% in high-income and 10% in low/middle-income countries), with variation between Worldbank country-income group (ICC 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-2.76) and between countries (ICC 0.44, 95% CI 0.00-0.68). The use of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection was low (2%). Before aneurysm securement, variable in blood pressure targets was reported; systolic blood pressure 90 to 120 mm Hg (30%), 90 to 140 mm Hg (21%), and 90 to 160 mmHg (5%). Induced hypertension during temporary clipping was reported by 37% of hospitals (37% each in high and low/middle-income countries). CONCLUSIONS: This global survey identifies differences in reported practices during the perioperative management of patients with aSAH.

Benchmarking Hospital Practices and Policies on Intrahospital Neurocritical Care Transport: The Safe-Neuro-Transport Study.

An electronic survey was administered to multidisciplinary neurocritical care providers at 365 hospitals in 32 countries to describe intrahospital transport (IHT) practices of neurocritically ill patients at their institutions. The reported IHT practices were stratified by World Bank country income level. Variability between high-income (HIC) and low/middle-income (LMIC) groups, as well as variability between hospitals within countries, were expressed as counts/percentages and intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 246 hospitals (67% response rate; n = 103, 42% HIC and n = 143, 58% LMIC) participated. LMIC hospitals were less likely to report a portable CT scanner (RR 0.39, 95% CI [0.23; 0.67]), more likely to report a pre-IHT checklist (RR 2.18, 95% CI [1.53; 3.11]), and more likely to report that intensive care unit (ICU) physicians routinely participated in IHTs (RR 1.33, 95% CI [1.02; 1.72]). Between- and across-country variation were highest for pre-IHT external ventricular drain clamp tolerance (reported by 40% of the hospitals, ICC 0.22, 95% CI 0.00-0.46) and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during IHT (reported by 29% of the hospitals, ICC 0.46, 95% CI 0.07-0.71). Brain tissue oxygenation monitoring during IHT was reported by only 9% of the participating hospitals. An IHT standard operating procedure (SOP)/hospital policy (HP) was reported by 37% (n = 90); HIC: 43% (n= 44) vs. LMIC: 32% (n = 46), p = 0.56. Amongst the IHT SOP/HPs reviewed (n = 13), 90% did not address the continuation of hemodynamic and neurophysiological monitoring during IHT. In conclusion, the development of a neurocritical-care-specific IHT SOP/HP as well as the alignment of practices related to the IHT of neurocritically ill patients are urgent unmet needs. Inconsistent standards related to neurophysiological monitoring during IHT warrant in-depth scrutiny across hospitals and suggest a need for international guidelines for neurocritical care IHT.

Caseworker Cultural Mediator Involvement in Neurocritical Care for Patients and Families With Non-English Language Preference: A Quality Improvement Project.

Objective To describe Harborview Medical Center's experience with the involvement of caseworker cultural mediators (CCM) for patients requiring neurocritical care. Methods Using univariate and multivariate analysis (model adjusted for age, Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Scores, mechanical ventilation, transition to comfort measures only (CMO), and death by neurologic criteria), we examined CCM team members' involvement in the care of Amharic/Cambodian/Khmer/Somali/Spanish/Vietnamese patients admitted to our neurocritical care service between 2014-2022, factors associated with CCM utilization, and changes in CCM utilization after a QI initiative was implemented in 2020 to encourage healthcare providers to consult the CCM team. Results Compared to eligible patients (n=827) who did not receive CCM referral, patients with CCM involvement (n=121) were younger (49 [interquartile range, IQR 38,63] vs. 56 [IQR 42,68] years, p = 0.002), had greater illness severity (admission GCS 8.5 [IQR 3,14] vs. 14 [IQR 7,15], p < 0.001, SOFA scores (5 [IQR 2,8] vs. 4 [IQR2,6], p = 0.007), and more frequently required mechanical ventilation (67% vs. 40%, odds ratio, OR 3.07, 95% CI 2.06,4.64), with higher all-cause mortality (20% vs. 12%, RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09, 2.95), and with a higher rate of transition to CMO (11.6% vs. 6.2%, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03;3.66). The CCM QI initiative was independently associated with increased CCM involvement (aOR 4.22, 95% CI [2.32;7.66]). Overall, 4/10 attempts made by CCMs to reach out to the family to provide support were declined by the family. CCMs reported providing cultural/emotional support (n=96, 79%), end-of-life counseling (n=16, 13%), conflict mediation (n=15, 12.4%), and facilitating goals of care meetings (n=4, 3.3%). Conclusions Among eligible patients, CCM consultations appeared to occur in patients with higher disease severity. Our QI initiative increased CCM involvement.

Compassion, communication, and the perception of control: a mixed methods study to investigate patients' perspectives on clinical practices for alleviating distress and promoting empowerment during awake craniotomies.

PURPOSE: To inquire into clinical practices perceived to mitigate patients' intraoperative distress during awake craniotomies. METHODS: This mixed-methods study involved administration of Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale and PTSD Checklist prior to the awake craniotomy to evaluate anxiety and information-seeking related to the procedure and symptoms of PTSD. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale and Depression Module of the Patient Health Questionnaire were administered before and after the procedure to evaluate generalized anxiety and depression. Patient interviews were conducted 2-weeks postprocedure and included a novel set of patient experience scales to assess patients' recollection of intraoperative pain, overall distress, anxiety, distress due to noise, perception of empowerment, perception of being well-prepared, overall satisfaction with anaesthesia management, and overall satisfaction with the procedure. Qualitative data were analysed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Participants (n = 14) had undergone an awake craniotomy for tissue resection due to primary brain tumours or medically-refractory focal epilepsy. Validated self-report questionnaires demonstrated reduced levels of generalized anxiety (pre mean = 8.66; SD = 6.41; post mean= 4.36; SD = 4.24) following the awake craniotomy. Postprocedure interviews revealed very high satisfaction with the awake craniotomy and anaesthesia management and minimal levels of intraoperative pain, anxiety, and distress. The most stressful aspects of the procedure included global recognition of medical diagnosis, anxiety provoked by unfamiliar sights, sounds, and sensations, a perception of a lack of information or misinformation, and long periods of immobility. Important factors in alleviating intraoperative distress included the medical team's ability to promote patient perceptions of control, establish compassionate relationships, address unfamiliar intraoperative sensations, and deliver effective anaesthesia management. CONCLUSION: Compassion, communication, and patient perception of control were critical in mitigating intraoperative distress. Clinical practice recommendations with implications for all clinicians involved in patient care during awake craniotomies are provided. Use of these interventions and strategies to reduce distress are important to holistic patient care and patient experiences of care and may improve the likelihood of optimal brain mapping procedures to improve clinical outcomes during awake craniotomies.

Retraction notice to "The growth mindset in medical education: A call for faculty development" [EClinicalMedicine 29-30 (2020) 100648].

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100648.].