Cost-Utility Analysis of a Latanoprost Cationic Emulsion (STN1013001) versus Other Latanoprost in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension and Concomitant Ocular Surface Disease in Germany.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility and economic value of STN1013001, a latanoprost cationic emulsion vs other latanoprost formulations (henceforth latanoprost) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) and concomitant ocular surface disease (OSD) in Germany. METHODS: An early 5-year Markov model-supported cost-utility analysis was performed to estimate costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life-years saved (LYS) for STN1013001 vs latanoprost from the German health system perspective. The model included seven mutually exclusive health states and adopted a 1-year cycle length. The model was populated with pooled data derived, by means of a questionnaire, from a convenience sample of five German glaucoma specialists. Remaining data were derived from published sources. Data provided by the ophthalmologists included annual treatment adherence probabilities, utility values and resource utilization. The half-cycle correction as well as a discount rate of 3.0% per year were applied to costs (expressed in €2020), life-year saved (LYS) and QALYs. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was contrasted against the informal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold for incremental LYS saved or QALY gained (€30,000) proposed for Germany. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (OWSA; PSA) tested the robustness of the base case ICUR. RESULTS: Over the 5-year time horizon, STN1013001 strongly dominates latanoprost as it is less costly (€1003.65 vs €1145.37; -12.37%) and produces more QALYs (2.612 vs 2.365; +10.44%) per notional patient. Baseline findings were robust against all the variations included in OWSA. PSA shows that STN1013001 has a 100% probability of being cost-effective vs Latanoprost at each WTP threshold for incremental QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Once on the market, STN1013001 will provide a cost-effective and possibly strongly dominant therapy vs latanoprost for OAG/OHT+OSD patients from a German health system perspective. Future empirical research should confirm these findings.

Aflibercept for Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Routine Clinical Practice in Germany: Twelve-Month Outcomes of PERSEUS.

PURPOSE: To explore real-world effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Germany. DESIGN: A 24-month, prospective, noninterventional, noncontrolled, multicenter observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 848) with nAMD treated with IAI. METHODS: Patients (n = 988) were screened at 67 study sites. Therapeutic decisions were made by the treating physician. Primary end point analysis was performed after 12 months for the entire study cohort and for predetermined subgroups of treatment-naïve and previously treated patients. Additionally, outcomes with regular injection intervals (bimonthly after 3 monthly injections) were compared with those of patients with irregularities in their treatment regimen. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the mean change in visual acuity (VA) from baseline after 12 months. Other key end points included the proportions of patients gaining 15 letters or more and patients with reading vision (≥70 letters). Furthermore, the number of injections, anatomic measurements, and safety data were recorded. RESULTS: Mean ± standard deviation VA improvement was 5.3±17.4 letters in treatment-naïve patients and -0.1±15.6 letters in previously treated patients (P ≤ 0.0001), and that of the total study group was 2.9±16.8 letters. Baseline VA was 53.4±17.9 letters for treatment-naïve patients, 52.9±18.4 letters for previously treated patients, and 53.2±18.1 letters for the total patient population. Treatment pattern was associated with VA outcome: best outcomes-an average VA gain of 8.0±17.7 letters-were seen in treatment-naïve patients in the regularly treated population, whereas irregularly treated, treatment-naïve patients achieved a mean VA gain of only 4.0±17.1 letters. Among previously treated patients, regular treatment also was associated with better outcomes (+3.1±10.7 vs. -1.1±16.8 letters). For the total study group, the mean VA gain was the following: regularly treated population, 6.1±15.6 letters; irregularly treated population, 1.5±17.1 letters (P = 0.008). No cases of endophthalmitis were observed during the first 12 months of the study. Adverse events were in line with the known safety profile of IAI. CONCLUSIONS: After 12 months of treatment with IAI, treatment-naïve patients showed substantial functional benefit, whereas previously treated patients maintained their VA. With regular IAI treatment, it seems that similar results as those in pivotal IAI studies can be achieved in routine clinical practice.

Preservative-free bimatoprost 0.03% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications for primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension commonly contain preservatives that can cause ocular surface damage in many patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of, and compliance to, preservative-free (PF) bimatoprost 0.03% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (IOP ≥18 mmHg) in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: This open-label study observed patients who were switched to PF bimatoprost 0.03% for medical reasons. IOP was measured at baseline and ~12 weeks later at the final visit, and the change in IOP was calculated. Tolerability and continuation of therapy were assessed at two follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of 1,830 patients were included in the study, and complete IOP data were available for 1,543 patients. Mean IOP was reduced by 23% from 21.64 mmHg to 16.59 mmHg (P<0.0001). In subgroup analyses, the mean IOP was significantly reduced compared with baseline, regardless of prior therapy, including those previously treated with PF monotherapy. A total of 85.7% of physicians reported the IOP-lowering efficacy of PF bimatoprost 0.03% to be as expected or better than expected. Adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 5.7% of patients, and there were no serious AEs reported. The most common AEs were eye irritation (1.7%) and hyperemia (1.4%). Physician-reported treatment compliance was reported as better than (48.7%) or equal to (43.6%) prior treatment in most patients. Most patients (82%) were expected to continue PF bimatoprost 0.03% after the end of the study. CONCLUSION: This observational study showed that, in clinical practice, switching to PF bimatoprost 0.03% was associated with a significant IOP reduction from baseline. There was a low AE rate. PF bimatoprost 0.03% may, therefore, be an effective treatment option for patients who are intolerant of preservatives or have an inadequate response to prior IOP-lowering treatments.

A prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study of Optive Plus(®) in the treatment of patients with dry eye: the prolipid study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of Optive Plus(®), an artificial tear containing castor oil, in patients with dry eye, in a routine clinical setting. METHODS: This was a prospective, noninterventional study of patients with dry eye who switched from a prior therapy or who were naïve to treatment (n=1,209). Patients were issued Optive Plus(®) artificial tears. Dry eye severity, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer score, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score, and patient assessment of symptoms were recorded at baseline and at the follow-up visit (4 weeks after starting Optive Plus(®)). RESULTS: The cause of dry eye was determined to be aqueous deficiency, lipid deficiency, or a mixture of aqueous and lipid deficiency (in 19.5%, 20.1%, and 47.8%, respectively, of the total study population). The severity of dry eye decreased from baseline to the follow-up visit, showing a decrease of the more severe levels (2-4) and a concurrent increase in mild level (1) of the rating scale. Patients reported an improvement in dry eye symptoms over the duration of the study, specifically 74.2% (n=152), 85.4% (n=182), and 82.4% (n=417) of patients in the aqueous-deficient, lipid-deficient, and mixed-deficiency groups, respectively. TBUT was measured in 475 patients. Baseline measurements for mean and standard deviation were 9.0±3.5, 7.1±3.6, and 6.6±3.0 seconds for the aqueous-deficient, lipid-deficient, and mixed-deficiency groups, respectively. These increased to 10.5±3.5, 10.0±3.6, and 9.2±3.1 seconds at the final visit. Overall, 92.5% of all patients were satisfied with the use of Optive Plus(®), and 86% said they would purchase Optive Plus(®). Ten percent of patients reported adverse events, and 1.8% of all patients experienced treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Optive Plus(®) was well tolerated and effective in reducing the signs and symptoms of all types of dry eye but is recommended for lipid-deficient dry eye patients.

The treatment of proximal humeral fracture in adults.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of proximal humeral fractures lies between 105 and 342 per 100 000 persons per year. Around the world, this type of fracture remains a major challenge for treating surgeons. While non-displaced fractures can be managed conservatively, displaced ones are often treated surgically. METHODS: Selective literature review. RESULTS: There are still no evidence-based schemes or guidelines for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, and very few prospective randomized trials are available. The few that have been published recently show a trend in favor of conservative treatment, but they were carried out on small groups of patients and their findings are not directly generalizable. For younger patients, the goal of treatment is generally anatomical repositioning and osteosynthetic stabilization; for older patients, primary treatment with a prosthesis is a further option. Depending on the mode of treatment, complications can arise such as shoulder stiffness, necrosis of the humeral head, pain, infection, loss of reposition, and "cutting out." CONCLUSION: Current evidence supports the individualized treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Treatment decisions must always be made jointly with the patient in consideration of his or her individual needs and characteristics. Particularly for elderly patients, the possibility of conservative treatment should be carefully considered. If conservative treatment is not possible, then the type of operation performed should also be a function of the surgeon's individual skills and experience with particular types of implant.

Long-term cost and efficacy analysis of latanoprost versus timolol in glaucoma patients in Germany.

AIM: To evaluate 5-year effectiveness and cost between latanoprost or timolol monotherapy in a pilot trial. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-center trial performed at 6 sites in Germany of patients who had a diagnosis of primary open-angle or pigmentary glaucoma, in at least one eye, initiated on monotherapy with latanoprost or timolol maleate. Qualified consecutive charts were reviewed in which 5-year efficacy, safety and cost data was abstracted. RESULTS: Seventy-seoen latanoprost and 49 timolol patients were included, at the final visit no difference existed between the two groups in disc parameters including: rim area, rim area/disc area ratio, cup volume or vertical cup/disc ratio (P>0.05). There was no difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) between the initial latanoprost (17.4±2.6) and timolol (16.3±2.8mmHg) groups. There was less change in medicines over the follow-up period (0.1 vs 0.8) and fewer medications at the final visit (1.2 vs 1.8) with latanoprost compared to timolol. No patient treated with latanoprost discontinued therapy during follow-up, while 12% discontinued timolol mostly due to inadequate IOP control. Cost/year was less with initial timolol ($458±236) as compared to latanoprost ($552±202). CONCLUSION: Patients begun on latanoprost or timolol and followed over 5 years may have similar clinical outcomes. However, timolol patients may require more medicines and medicine changes to control IOP for long-term, but at a lower cost.

Multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study of bimatoprost 0.01% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Bimatoprost 0.01% was developed for improved tolerability over bimatoprost 0.03%, while maintaining efficacy in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). This multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study was designed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of bimatoprost 0.01% in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Data were collected from 10,337 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension attending 1334 centers in Germany. The primary efficacy outcome was mean change in IOP in each eye from baseline to 10-14 weeks after initiation of bimatoprost 0.01%. Target IOP, prior therapies, additional treatments, and adverse events were also assessed. All treatment decisions were at the physicians' discretion. RESULTS: Bimatoprost 0.01% significantly lowered mean IOP from baseline by -4.1 mmHg (P < 0.0001) in all patients after a mean of 10.45 weeks. In patients without previous treatment, bimatoprost 0.01% reduced mean IOP from baseline by -6.5 mmHg (P < 0.0001). Bimatoprost 0.01% also significantly reduced IOP in patients previously treated with monotherapy of ß-blockers, prostaglandin analogs, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors or bimatoprost 0.03%. No adverse events were reported by 93.9% of patients during treatment with bimatoprost 0.01%; the most commonly reported adverse events were eye irritation (2.0%), ocular hyperemia (1.4%), and conjunctival hyperemia (1.2%). Physicians and patients rated tolerability and adherence as high, and most patients said they would continue with bimatoprost 0.01% treatment. CONCLUSION: Bimatoprost 0.01% can produce additional IOP-lowering effects when used in routine clinical practice in patients who have received prior therapy, in addition to lowering IOP in previously untreated patients. A high rate of continuation of therapy with bimatoprost 0.01% was observed in patients who switched from a variety of different medications. The results suggest that bimatoprost 0.01% is a suitable first-choice therapy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Morphology of the first metatarsal head and hallux rigidus: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: Treatment options for hallux rigidus include several conservative and surgical measures. The aetiology leading to the disease has not sufficiently been examined so far. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the anatomical configuration of the first metatarsal head of 120 metatarsal bones of different collectives aiming to find a possible correlation between the geometry of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and manifestation of hallux rigidus. Wet human cadaveric specimens and macerated dry specimens served as material. The relevant parameters used for analysis were an axis running through the metatarsal head, the anatomical longitudinal axis, and the radius of curvature of the first metatarsal bone. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the radius of curvature of osteoarthritic and healthy subjects. Using the binary logistic regression, we were able to predict the probability of an occurrence of hallux rigidus in dependence of the radius of curvature. Furthermore, we were enabled to calculate a correct prediction for the appearance of osteoarthritis in 85 % of the healthy subjects, and 73 % of the osteoarthritic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: A consolidated view of the factors indicates that persons with a high risk for the appearance of hallux rigidus should be identified by measuring the radius of curvature in conventional radiographs and preventive measures to postpone the occurrence of clinically relevant hallux rigidus considered.

Reconstruction of a Bryan and Morrey type I capitellar fracture in a sawbone model with four different fixation devices: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated 4 different fixation devices for the reconstruction of a standardised Bryan and Morrey capitellar shear fracture in a sawbone model. Outcome measurements were the quality of reduction, time for reconstruction and stability. METHODS: 80 standardised Bryan and Morrey type I fractures were created for 5 different orthopaedic surgeons in 80 sawbones. Each surgeon reconstructed 16 fractures with 2mm K-wires, 3mm Herbert screws, 2.7 mm AO screws and 2.2mm fine-threaded wires (Fragment Fixation System: FFS). 4 fractures were allocated to each method with a standardised reconstruction procedure. Quality of reduction and time for reconstruction were measured after definitive fixation. Biomechanical testing was performed using a shear loading model with the application of monocyclic or polycyclic stress to the reconstructed capitulum. RESULTS: There was no difference in the quality of reduction with the different fixation devices. Herbert and AO screw fixation was slower than the other implants (p<0.05). No difference in the time for reconstruction was observed with K-wires and FFS. Failure load was less for K-wires compared to FFS, Herbert screws and AO screws (p<0.05). With polycyclic loading, residual deformation was higher with K-wire reconstruction compared to FFS, Herbert screws and AO screws (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: When using four different fixation devices, the fixation of standardised Bryan and Morrey type I fractures in the sawbone model differs when it comes to the time needed for reduction, but not in the quality of reduction. Stability was the same for the implants used, except for the K-wires. There is no argument in favour one of the screw implants over another in clinical use.

Outcome of surgery after macula-off retinal detachment - results from MUSTARD, one of the largest databases on buckling surgery in Europe.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomical success rate of scleral buckling surgery in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and to evaluate the differences in outcome between patients suffering macula-off retinal detachment and those without a macular involvement. METHODS: As a retrospective interventional case series, Munster Study on Therapy Achievements in Retinal Detachment (MUSTARD) is one of the largest ever established of retinal detachment patients and their outcome after buckling surgery, with 4325 patients who underwent surgery between 1980 and 2001. In 53.94% (n = 2134) of 3956 patients with nontraumatic retinal detachment, the macula was involved. The main outcome measure was the achievement of dry anatomical attachment of the retina. RESULTS: The success rate in patients with macula-off retinal detachment is 80.46% and thus 7.78% lower (p < 0.01) than that in those patients with their macula intact whose success rate amounted to 88.24%. The overall success rate of all 4325 MUSTARD patients was 83.98%. CONCLUSIONS: Scleral buckling is an established and mostly successful method for the treatment of retinal detachment. As our case series has demonstrated, even eyes with macula-off can be treated successfully by this procedure, thereby avoiding the complications of primary vitrectomy.