Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 117(46): 775-782, 2020 11 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33533711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There have not yet been any prospective registry studies in Germany with active investigation of the long-term survival of patients with sepsis. METHODS: The Jena Sepsis Registry (JSR) included all patients with a diagnosis of sepsis in the four intensive care units of Jena University Hospital from January 2011 to December 2015. Long-term survival 6-48 months after diagnosis was documented by asking the treating general practitioners. The survival times were studied with Kaplan-Meier estimators. Cox regressions were calculated to show associations between possible predictors and survival time. RESULTS: 1975 patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. The mean time of observation was 730 days. For 96.4% of the queries to the general practitioners, information on long-term survival was available. Mortality in the intensive care unit was 34% (95% confidence interval [32; 37]), and in-hospital mortality was 45% [42; 47]. The overall mortality six months after diagnosis was 59% [57; 62], the overall mortality 48 months after diagnosis was 74% [72; 78]. Predictors of shorter survival were age, nosocomial origin of sepsis, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, and renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: The nearly 75% mortality four years after diagnosis indicates that changes are needed both in the acute treatment of patients with sepsis and in their multi-sector long-term care. The applicability of these findings may be limited by their having been obtained in a single center.


Assuntos
Sepse , Choque Séptico , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Bioresour Technol ; 255: 58-66, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29414173

RESUMO

A Coupled Aerobic-anoxic Nitrous Decomposition Operation (CANDO) was performed over five months to investigate the performance and dynamics of nitrogen elimination and nitrous oxide production from digester reject water under real feed-stream conditions. A 93% conversion of ammonium to nitrite could be maintained for adapted seed sludge in the first stage (nitritation). The second stage (nitrous denitritation), inoculated with conventional activated sludge, achieved a conversion of 70% of nitrite to nitrous oxide after only 12 cycles of operation. The development of an alternative feeding strategy and the addition of a coagulant (FeCl3) facilitated stable operation and process intensification. Under steady-state conditions, nitrite was reliably eliminated and different nitrous oxide harvesting strategies were assessed. Applying continuous removal increased N2O yields by 16% compared to the application of a dedicated stripping phase. These results demonstrate the feasible application of the CANDO process for nitrogen removal and energy recovery from ammonia rich wastewater.


Assuntos
Reatores Biológicos , Desnitrificação , Óxido Nitroso , Nitritos , Nitrogênio , Rios , Esgotos , Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos , Águas Residuárias , Água
3.
Trials ; 15: 283, 2014 Jul 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25015838

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sepsis sequelae include critical illness polyneuropathy, myopathy, wasting, neurocognitive deficits, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and chronic pain. Little is known howlong-term sequelae following hospital discharge are treated. The aim of our study is to determine the effect of a primary care-based, long-term program on health-related quality of life in sepsis survivors. METHODS/DESIGN: In a two-armed randomized multicenter interventional study, patients after sepsis (n = 290) will be assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months. Patients are eligible if severe sepsis or septic shock (ICD-10), at least two criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), at least one organ dysfunction and sufficient cognitive capacity are present. The intervention comprises 1) discharge management, 2) training of general practitioners and patients in evidence-based care for sepsis sequelae and 3) telephone monitoring of patients. At six months, we expect an improved primary outcome (health-related quality of life/SF-36) and improved secondary outcomes such as costs, mortality, clinical-, psycho-social- and process-of-care measures in the intervention group compared to the control group. DISCUSSION: This study evaluates a primary care-based, long-term program for patients after severe sepsis. Study results may add evidence for improved sepsis care management. General practitioners may contribute efficiently to sepsis aftercare. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U1111-1119-6345. DRKS00000741, CCT-NAPN-20875 (25 February 2011).


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Protocolos Clínicos , Sepse/mortalidade , Sobreviventes , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Sepse/psicologia
4.
Trials ; 15: 112, 2014 Apr 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24708672

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Panic disorder and agoraphobia are debilitating and frequently comorbid anxiety disorders. A large number of patients with these conditions are treated by general practitioners in primary care. Cognitive behavioural exposure exercises have been shown to be effective in reducing anxiety symptoms. Practice team-based case management can improve clinical outcomes for patients with chronic diseases in primary care. The present study compares a practice team-supported, self-managed exposure programme for patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in small general practices to usual care in terms of clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a cluster randomised controlled superiority trial with a two-arm parallel group design. General practices represent the units of randomisation. General practitioners recruit adult patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia according to the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10). In the intervention group, patients receive cognitive behaviour therapy-oriented psychoeducation and instructions to self-managed exposure exercises in four manual-based appointments with the general practitioner. A trained health care assistant from the practice team delivers case management and is continuously monitoring symptoms and treatment progress in ten protocol-based telephone contacts with patients. In the control group, patients receive usual care from general practitioners. Outcomes are measured at baseline (T0), at follow-up after six months (T1), and at follow-up after twelve months (T2). The primary outcome is clinical severity of anxiety of patients as measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). To detect a standardised effect size of 0.35 at T1, 222 patients from 37 general practices are included in each group. Secondary outcomes include anxiety-related clinical parameters and health-economic costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials [http://ISCRTN64669297].


Assuntos
Agorafobia/terapia , Terapia Implosiva , Transtorno de Pânico/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Projetos de Pesquisa , Agorafobia/diagnóstico , Agorafobia/economia , Agorafobia/psicologia , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Alemanha , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Terapia Implosiva/economia , Transtorno de Pânico/diagnóstico , Transtorno de Pânico/economia , Transtorno de Pânico/psicologia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA