Lyophilized Filovirus Glycoprotein Vaccines: Peroxides in a Vaccine Formulation with Polysorbate 80-Containing Adjuvant are Associated with Reduced Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Both Mice and Non-Human Primates.

Zaire ebolavirus, Sudan ebolavirus, and Marburg marburgvirus are the filoviruses most commonly associated with human disease. Previously, we administered a three-dose regimen of trivalent vaccines comprising glycoprotein antigens from each virus in mice and non-human primates (NHPs). The vaccines, which contained a polysorbate 80-stabilized squalane-in-water emulsion adjuvant and were lyophilized from a solution containing trehalose, produced high antibody levels against all three filovirus antigens. Subsequently, single-vial formulations containing a higher concentration of adjuvant were generated for testing in NHPs, but these vaccines elicited lower neutralizing antibody titers in NHPs than previously tested formulations. In order to explain these results, in the current work we measured the size of adjuvant emulsion droplets and the peroxide levels present in the vaccines after lyophilization and reconstitution and tested the effects of these variables on the immune response in mice. Increases in squalane droplet sizes were observed when the ratio of adjuvant to trehalose was increased beyond a critical value, but antibody and neutralizing antibody titers in mice were independent of the droplet size. Higher levels of peroxides in the vaccines correlated with higher concentrations of adjuvant in the formulations, and higher peroxide levels were associated with increased levels of oxidative damage to glycoprotein antigens. Neutralizing titers in mice were inversely correlated with peroxide levels in the vaccines, but peroxide levels could be reduced by adding free methionine, resulting in retention of high neutralizing antibody titers. Overall, the results suggest that oxidation of glycoprotein antigens by peroxides in the polysorbate 80-stabilized squalane-in-water emulsion adjuvant, but not lyophilization-induced increases in adjuvant emulsion droplet size may have been responsible for the decreased neutralizing titers seen in formulations containing higher amounts of adjuvant.

Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine and its metabolites.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Atomoxetine is a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and is primarily eliminated via cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6). The pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine and its primary metabolites were investigated in 10 adults with hepatic impairment (6 moderate, 4 severe) and 10 age- and sex-matched control subjects, all being genotyped as CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. METHODS: A single oral 20-mg dose of atomoxetine was given. Multiple blood samples were collected for 48 hours in healthy subjects and for 120 hours in patients. Urine was collected up to 24 hours. Before atomoxetine administration (10-20 days), sorbitol clearance and debrisoquin (INN, debrisoquine) metabolic ratio were determined as markers of hepatic blood flow and CYP2D6 activity, respectively. RESULTS: The systemic clearance of atomoxetine was significantly reduced in those with hepatic impairment compared with controls, thereby resulting in increased exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, 1.58 versus 0.85 microg. h(-1). mL(-1); P =.035) but no change in maximum concentration. Mean 4-hydroxyatomoxetine area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to time t and maximum concentration were increased approximately 7-fold and 2-fold, respectively (P =.0001 and P =.0056, respectively). For the glucuronide conjugate of 4-hydroxyatomoxetine, the mean half-life was longer and the mean area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and the maximum concentration were lower (P =.0028, P =.003, and P =.0001, respectively). The sorbitol clearance was lower and the debrisoquin metabolic ratio was higher, reflecting reduced hepatic blood flow and decreased CYP2D6 activity, respectively. Decreased atomoxetine clearance in patients with hepatic impairment was clearly correlated with decreased CYP2D6 activity and decreased hepatic blood flow. Mean atomoxetine plasma protein binding was lower in patients with hepatic impairment compared with controls (96.5% versus 98.7%, P =.0008). Atomoxetine was well tolerated in the 2 populations. CONCLUSION: For patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder who have hepatic impairment, dosage adjustment is recommended. Initial target doses should be reduced to 25% and 50% of the normal dose for patients with severe and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively.

Disposition and metabolic fate of atomoxetine hydrochloride: the role of CYP2D6 in human disposition and metabolism.

The role of the polymorphic cytochrome p450 2D6 (CYP2D6) in the pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine hydrochloride [(-)-N-methyl-gamma-(2-methylphenoxy)benzenepropanamine hydrochloride; LY139603] has been documented following both single and multiple doses of the drug. In this study, the influence of the CYP2D6 polymorphism on the overall disposition and metabolism of a 20-mg dose of (14)C-atomoxetine was evaluated in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer (EM; n = 4) and poor metabolizer (PM; n = 3) subjects under steady-state conditions. Atomoxetine was well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and cleared primarily by metabolism with the preponderance of radioactivity being excreted into the urine. In EM subjects, the majority of the radioactive dose was excreted within 24 h, whereas in PM subjects the majority of the dose was excreted by 72 h. The biotransformation of atomoxetine was similar in all subjects undergoing aromatic ring hydroxylation, benzylic oxidation, and N-demethylation with no CYP2D6 phenotype-specific metabolites. The primary oxidative metabolite of atomoxetine was 4-hydroxyatomoxetine, which was subsequently conjugated forming 4-hydroxyatomoxetine-O-glucuronide. Due to the absence of CYP2D6 activity, the systemic exposure to radioactivity was prolonged in PM subjects (t(1/2) = 62 h) compared with EM subjects (t(1/2) = 18 h). In EM subjects, atomoxetine (t(1/2) = 5 h) and 4-hydroxyatomoxetine-O-glucuronide (t(1/2) = 7 h) were the principle circulating species, whereas atomoxetine (t(1/2) = 20 h) and N-desmethylatomoxetine (t(1/2) = 33 h) were the principle circulating species in PM subjects. Although differences were observed in the excretion and relative amounts of metabolites formed, the primary difference observed between EM and PM subjects was the rate at which atomoxetine was biotransformed to 4-hydroxyatomoxetine.

Effect of potent CYP2D6 inhibition by paroxetine on atomoxetine pharmacokinetics.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the effect of potent CYP2D6 inhibition byparoxetine on atomoxetine disposition in extensive metabolizers. This was a single-blind, two-period, sequential studyin 22 healthy individuals. In period 1, 20 mg atomoxetine bid was administered to steady state. In period 2, 20 mg paroxetine was administered qd for 17 days. On days 12 through 17, 20 mg atomoxetine bid were coadministered. Plasma pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine, 4-hydroxyatomoxetine, and N-desmethylatomoxetine was determined at steady state in each treatment period. Plasma pharmacokinetics of paroxetine were determined after the 11th and 17th doses. Paroxetine increased C(ss,max), AUC0-12, and t1/2 of atomoxetine by approximately 3.5-, 6.5-, and 2.5-fold, respectively. After coadministration with paroxetine, increases in N-desmethylatomoxetine and decreases in 4-hydroxyatomoxetine concentrations were observed. No changes in paroxetine pharmacokinetics were observed after coadministration with atomoxetine. It was concluded that inhibition of CYP2D6 by paroxetine markedly affected atomoxetine disposition, resulting in pharmacokinetics similar to poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 substrates.