Germline RTEL1 Variants in Telomere Biology Disorders.

Rare germline variation in regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1 (RTEL1) is associated with telomere biology disorders (TBDs). Biallelic RTEL1 variants result in childhood onset dyskeratosis congenita and Hoyeraal-Hreidarsson syndrome whereas heterozygous individuals usually present later in life with pulmonary fibrosis or bone marrow failure. We compiled all TBD-associated RTEL1 variants in the literature and assessed phenotypes and outcomes of 44 individuals from 14 families with mono- or biallelic RTEL1 variants enrolled in clinical trial NCT00027274. Variants were classified by adapting ACMG-AMP guidelines using clinical information, telomere length, and variant allele frequency data. Compared with heterozygotes, individuals with biallelic RTEL1 variants had an earlier age at diagnosis (median age 35.5 vs. 5.1 years, p < 0.01) and worse overall survival (median age 66.5 vs. 22.9 years, p < 0.001). There were 257 unique RTEL1 variants reported in 47 publications, and 209 had a gnomAD minor allele frequency <1%. Only 38.3% (80/209) met pathogenic/likely pathogenic criteria. Notably, 8 of 209 reported disease-associated variants were benign or likely benign and the rest were variants of uncertain significance. Given the considerable differences in outcomes of TBDs associated with RTEL1 germline variants and the extent of variation in the gene, systematic functional studies and standardization of variant curation are urgently needed to inform clinical management.

Relating to the Body Under Chronic Cancer Threat: Implications for Psychosocial Health Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer Predisposition Syndromes.

Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer predisposition syndromes often experience significant physical and psychosocial burdens. These burdens include cancer worry and potentially distressing bodily changes due to risk-reducing procedures (e.g., mastectomy) or cancer treatments. This qualitative-descriptive study explored how AYAs with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) relate and adjust to their bodies under the chronic threat of cancer. Methods: Participants were enrolled in the National Cancer Institute's LFS study. This analysis included 42 AYAs with LFS aged 15-39 years at enrollment who completed one or two telephone interviews that explored LFS-related bodily experiences and challenges. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. Results: The majority of participants (n = 26/42, 62%) had ≥1 primary cancer. The mean age at first cancer diagnosis was 21 years (range = 0.5-35 years). Participants described challenges relating to the body due to frequent self-monitoring, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging scans, risk-reducing surgeries, and/or cancer treatments. Heightened body awareness and vigilance not only prompted self-protective behaviors but also triggered worry and distress. AYAs coped with bodily changes and concerns by seeking doctors' reassurance, engaging in health-protective behaviors, and reframing perceptions of their altered bodies. Conclusion: Findings suggest AYAs with cancer predisposition syndromes such as LFS experience difficulties relating and adjusting to the body that may compromise psychosocial health. Our results demonstrate that these difficulties may arise across the time course of genetic disease, including before a cancer diagnosis. Clinicians might support AYAs by conducting routine psychosocial risk assessments, providing anticipatory guidance regarding body-related challenges, sharing peer support resources, and referring to mental health providers, as needed.

How do young people with a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome understand and experience cancer survivorship? "With Li-Fraumeni syndrome, it's just an intermission".

OBJECTIVES: Adolescents and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors face unique medical and psychosocial sequalae, including chronic health conditions, late effects of treatment and fear of recurrence. The meaning of cancer survivorship may be further complicated for AYAs with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. This study used a patient-centered framework to investigate how AYAs with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) consider cancer survivorship. METHODS: An interprofessional team conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with AYAs (aged 18-41, mean 31 years) enrolled in the National Cancer Institute's LFS Study (NCT01443468). Twenty had experienced at least one cancer diagnosis. Interview data were thematically analyzed by an inter-professional team using interpretive description and grounded theory methods. FINDINGS: Participants viewed "survivorship" as a period marked by no evidence of formerly diagnosed disease. By contrast, participants felt the label "survivor" was tenuous since LFS is characterized by multiple primary malignancies and uncertainty about intervals between one diagnosis and the next. Many AYAs viewed survivorship as requiring a high degree of suffering. Though many personally rejected "survivor" identities, almost all articulated its various functions including positive, negative, and more complicated connotations. Instead, they chose language to represent a range of beliefs about survival, longevity, prognosis, and activism. CONCLUSIONS: AYAs with LFS struggle with the term "survivor" due to their multi-organ cancer risk, short intervals between malignancies, and evolving identities. Loved ones' cancer-related suffering informed perspectives on survivorship. Survivorship care for AYAs with cancer risk syndromes requires interprofessional interventions that address their unique biomedical and psychosocial needs.

Shwachman Diamond syndrome: narrow genotypic spectrum and variable clinical features.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Shwachman Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (IBMFS) associated with pancreatic insufficiency, neutropenia, and skeletal dysplasia. Biallelic pathogenic variants (PV) in SBDS account for >90% of SDS. We hypothesized that the SDS phenotype varies based on genotype and conducted a genotype-phenotype correlation study to better understand these complexities. METHODS: We reviewed records of all patients with SDS or SDS-like syndromes in the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) IBMFS study. Additional published SDS cohorts were reviewed and compared with the NCI cohort. RESULTS: PVs in SBDS were present in 32/47 (68.1%) participants. Biallelic inheritance of SBDS c.258 + 2T > C and c.183_184TA > CT was the most common genotype in our study (25/32, 78.1%) and published cohorts. Most patients had the SDS hallmark features of neutropenia (45/45, 100%), pancreatic insufficiency (41/43, 95.3%), and/or bony abnormalities (29/36, 80.6%). Developmental delay was common (20/34, 58.8%). Increased risk of hematologic malignancies at young ages and the rarity of solid malignancies was observed in both the NCI cohort and published studies. CONCLUSIONS: SDS is a complex childhood illness with a narrow genotypic spectrum. Patients may first present to primary care, gastroenterology, orthopedic, and/or hematology clinics. Coordinated multidisciplinary care is important for diagnosis and patient management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00027274. IMPACT: The clinical and genetic spectrum of Shwachman Diamond Syndrome was comprehensively evaluated, and the findings illustrate the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for these complex patients. Our work reveals: 1. a narrow genotypic spectrum in SDS; 2. a low risk of solid tumors in patients with SDS; 3. patients with SDS have clinical manifestations in multiple organ systems.

The causes of Fanconi anemia in South Asia and the Middle East: A case series and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Fanconi anemia (FA) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome associated with characteristic dysmorphology primarily caused by biallelic pathogenic germline variants in any of 22 different DNA repair genes. There are limited data on the specific molecular causes of FA in different ethnic groups. METHODS: We performed exome sequencing and copy number variant analyses on 19 patients with FA from 17 families undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation evaluation in Pakistan. The scientific literature was reviewed, and we curated germline variants reported in patients with FA from South Asia and the Middle East. RESULTS: The genetic causes of FA were identified in 14 of the 17 families: seven FANCA, two FANCC, one FANCF, two FANCG, and two FANCL. Homozygous and compound heterozygous variants were present in 12 and two families, respectively. Nine families carried variants previously reported as pathogenic, including two families with the South Asian FANCL founder variant. We also identified five novel likely deleterious variants in FANCA, FANCF, and FANCG in affected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the importance of determining the genomic landscape of FA in diverse populations, in order to improve understanding of FA etiology and assist in the counseling of families.

Population Frequency of Fanconi Pathway Gene Variants and Their Association with Survival After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is most frequently immune-mediated; however, rare inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, such as Fanconi anemia (FA), may be causal and can present as aplastic anemia (AA). FA is primarily an autosomal recessive disorder caused by the presence of 2 pathogenic variants in a single FA/BRCA DNA repair pathway gene. Patients with SAA often undergo genetic testing during clinical evaluation that may identify single deleterious alleles in FA pathway genes. We quantified the rate of germline single deleterious alleles in 22 FA genes using both a general population database (3234 variants, 125,748 exomes) and in a cohort of patients with SAA undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (21 variants in 730 patients). The variants were classified as deleterious using in silico tools (REVEL, MetaSVM, VEP) and database resources (ClinVar, LOVD-FA). We found similar rates of single deleterious alleles in FA genes in both groups (2.6% and 2.9%). The presence of a single deleterious variant in a gene for FA in SAA HCT recipients did not affect the overall survival after HCT (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.95; P  = 0.71), or post-HCT cancer risk (P = 0.52). Our results demonstrate that the identification of a germline monoallelic deleterious variant in an FA gene in patients with idiopathic SAA does not influence the outcome of HCT. Our findings suggest that there is no need for special treatment considerations for patients with SAA and a single deleterious FA allele identified on genetic testing.