Incidence of acute type A aortic dissection in emergency departments.

Due to the symptoms, patients with acute type A aortic dissection are first seen by the ambulance service and diagnosed at the emergency department. How often an aortic dissection occurs in an emergency department per year has been studied. The incidence in the emergency department may be used as a quality marker of differential diagnostics of acute chest pain. A multi-institutional retrospective study with the municipal Berlin hospital chain Vivantes and its Department of Pathology and the Charité - University Medicine Berlin was performed. From the Berlin Hospital Society, the annual numbers of publicly insured emergency patients were obtained. Between 2006 and 2016, 631 aortic dissections were identified. The total number of patients treated in the emergency departments (n = 12,790,577) was used to calculate the "emergency department incidence." The autopsy data from six clinics allowed an estimate on how many acute type A aortic dissections remained undetected. Across all Berlin hospitals, the emergency department incidence of acute type A aortic dissection was 5.24 cases in 100,000 patients per year. In tertiary referral hospitals and, particularly, in university hospitals the respective incidences were markedly higher (6.7 and 12.4, respectively). Based on the autopsy results, about 50% of the acute type A aortic dissection may remain undetected, which would double the reported incidences. Among different hospital types the emergency department incidences of acute type A aortic dissection vary between 5.93/100,000 and 24.92/100,000. Aortic dissection; Incidence; Emergency Department; Epidemiology.

Acute type A aortic dissection: Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in emergency care - surgical delay because of initial misdiagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissection requires immediate surgical treatment, but the correct diagnosis is often delayed. This study aimed to analyse how initial misdiagnosis affected the time intervals before surgical treatment, symptoms associated with correct or incorrect initial diagnosis and the potential of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score to improve the sensitivity of initial diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 350 patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Patients were divided into two groups: initial misdiagnosis (group 0) and correct initial diagnosis of acute type A aortic dissection (group 1). Symptoms were analysed as predictors for the correct or incorrect initial diagnosis by multivariate analysis. Based on these findings, the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score was calculated retrospectively; a result ⩾2 was defined as a positive score. RESULTS: The early suspicion of aortic dissection significantly shortened the median time from pain to surgical correction from 8.6 h in patients with an initial misdiagnosis to 5.5 h in patients with the correct initial diagnosis (p<0.001). Of all acute type A aortic dissection patients, 49% had a positive Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score. Of all initial misdiagnosed patients, 41% had a positive score (⩾2). The presence of lumbar pain (p<0.001), any paresis (p=0.037) and sweating (p=0.042) was more likely to lead to the correct initial diagnosis. CONCLUSION: An early consideration of acute aortic dissection may reduce the delay of surgical care. The suggested Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score may be a useful tool to improve the preclinical assessment.

Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients With Type-A Aortic Dissection Is Associated With 30-Day Mortality.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic parameters in patients with type-A acute aortic dissection (ATAAD) and to analyze whether impaired preoperative left ventricular function was associated with short- and long-term survival. To enable multivariable analysis, established risk factors of ATAAD were analyzed as well. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center study. SETTING: The German Heart Center Berlin. PARTICIPANTS: The retrospective data of 512 patients with ATAAD who were treated between 2006 and 2014 were analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preoperative versus postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), right ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and right ventricular end-diastolic diameter were not significantly different, and the mean values were within the reference ranges. Because of the surgical intervention, incidences and severities of aortic regurgitation and pericardial effusion decreased. In multivariable logistic analysis, the authors identified age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, p < 0.001), preoperative LVEF ≤35% (OR 2.20, p = 0.003), any ischemia (Penn non-Aa) (OR 2.15, p < 0.001), and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR 1.04, p < 0.001) as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, tamponade, or shock, and pre-existing cardiac disease, were not predictors of death. CONCLUSION: After surgery, aortic insufficiency and pericardial effusion decreased, whereas cardiac functional parameters did not change. Severe LV dysfunction was identified as a new independent predictor of 30-day mortality.