Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1244, 2024 May 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711074

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: A notable research gap exists in the systematic review and meta-analysis concerning the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov to retrieve articles related to the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of RSV prefusion F vaccines, published through September 8, 2023. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 22 randomized controlled trials involving 78,990 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The RSV prefusion F vaccine exhibited a vaccine effectiveness of 68% (95% CI: 59-75%) against RSV-associated acute respiratory illness, 70% (95% CI: 60-77%) against medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness, and 87% (95% CI: 71-94%) against medically attended severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness. Common reported local adverse reactions following RSV prefusion F vaccination include pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site, and systemic reactions such as fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea, and chills. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that vaccines using the RSV prefusion F protein as antigen exhibit appears broadly acceptable efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety in the population. In particular, it provides high protective efficiency against severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease.


Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Vacinas contra Vírus Sincicial Respiratório , Humanos , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Vírus Sincicial Respiratório/imunologia , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano/imunologia , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Viral Immunol ; 37(4): 216-219, 2024 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717823

RESUMO

In May 2022, mpox began to spread worldwide, posing a serious threat to human public health. Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavaria Nordic (MVA-BN) is a live attenuated orthopoxvirus vaccine that has been authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as the vaccine of choice for the prevention of mpox. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of all currently published literature on the efficacy and safety of the MVA-BN vaccine in the real world, showing that the MVA-BN vaccine is effective and safe, with efficacy of up to 75% with a single dose and up to 80% with a two-dose vaccine. Meanwhile, we found that subcutaneous injection has lower local and systemic adverse events than intradermal injection, regardless of single- or two-dose vaccination, and subcutaneous injection is better tolerated in children, the elderly, or people with underlying medical conditions. These results have important reference value for clinical practice.


Assuntos
Eficácia de Vacinas , Vacinas Atenuadas , Humanos , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Poxviridae/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Poxviridae/imunologia , Vaccinia virus/imunologia , Vaccinia virus/genética , Vacinação , Injeções Subcutâneas , Injeções Intradérmicas , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Orthopoxvirus/imunologia , Orthopoxvirus/genética , Criança
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA