Custom total knee arthroplasty combined with personalised alignment grants 94% patient satisfaction at minimum follow-up of 2 years.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to report detailed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction rates for computed tomography (CT)-based custom TKA at minimum follow-up of 2 years. The hypothesis was that custom TKA combined with 'personalised alignment' would yield equivalent or better PROMs compared to values reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses on off-the-shelf (OTS) TKA. METHODS: Of an initial cohort of 150 custom TKAs, four died (unrelated to surgery), one required a revision, and five refused participation, leaving 140 patients for analysis. Patients completed pre- and post-operative PROMs (Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster osteoarthritis index (WOMAC)) as well as overall level of satisfaction. Proportions that attained a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were calculated for OKS and FJS. Clinical findings were compared to the average scores reported for PROMs in recent systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses on OTS TKA. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the clinical findings as means, standard deviations (SD) and ranges, or numbers and percentages. RESULTS: At mean follow-up 33.5 ± 4.5 months, 94% (135/143) were either satisfied or very satisfied. Proportions that achieved PASS were 89% for OKS (120/135), and 85% for FJS (118/139). Median OKS, WOMAC and KOOS Symptoms and Pain scores were all within the 4th quartile of medians reported in systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum follow-up of two years following custom TKA combined with 'personalised alignment', 94% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied, and the PASS criteria were achieved in 89% for OKS and 85% for FJS, all of which compare favourably to published outcomes of OTS TKA. Direct comparisons to the literature may not be appropriate, however, considering the heterogeneity of patient demographics and alignment techniques. Randomised controlled trials with sufficient statistical power are needed to corroborate these findings and generalise them to unselected TKA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective cohort study.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Malalignment and resulting complications are major challenges in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) which patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is proposed to alleviate. Previous PSI meta-analyses of TKA outcomes typically do not differentiate between PSI systems and assess relatively few outcomes, so the value of their findings is limited. VISIONAIRE™ cutting guides (Smith + Nephew Inc., Memphis, TN, USA) is a PSI system based on preoperative magnetic resonance and X-ray imaging. A systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis, focussed specifically on VISIONAIRE, were conducted to assess TKA accuracy, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes, compared with conventional instrumentation (CI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SLR was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies published until March 2022. Depending on statistical heterogeneity, meta-analyses were performed for outcome measures with fixed effect (I2 < 50%) or random-effects models (I2 ≥ 50%). Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios and continuous outcomes were reported as mean differences. Descriptive analyses were performed for outcomes not amenable to meta-analysis. RESULTS: Outcomes for VISIONAIRE versus CI were reported in 25 studies. Compared with CI, VISIONAIRE reduced odds of mechanical outliers by 40% (p < 0.0001), with no statistically significant differences in odds of overall coronal, sagittal, or rotational plane component outliers. VISIONAIRE improved surgical efficiency (operating room, turnover, and tourniquet times reduced by 7.3% (p = 0.02), 42% (p = 0.022), and 15.9% (p = 0.01), respectively), lowering the odds of blood transfusion by 53% (p = 0.01) and shortening patients' hospital stays (11.1% reduction; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between groups in incidence of postoperative complications and (descriptively analyzed) return-to-function outcomes. CONCLUSION: Options for PSI in TKA differ substantially, and it is important to assess the outcomes of individual systems. The current findings suggest that VISIONAIRE guides can lead to improved alignment accuracy and surgical efficiency compared with CI, without compromising postoperative safety and return-to-function outcomes.

Custom TKA combined with personalised coronal alignment yield improvements that exceed KSS substantial clinical benefits.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report Knee Society Scores (KSS) at 12-month follow-up in a series of 266 knees that received custom TKA. The hypothesis was that custom TKA combined with personalised alignment would yield improvements greater than substantial clinical benefits (SCB) of KSS Knee and Function. METHODS: From a consecutive series of 905 patients (918 knees) that received primary TKAs, 261 (29%) patients (266 knees) received computed tomography (CT)-based posterior-stabilised cemented custom TKA. Knees were aligned aiming to preserve or restore constitutional alignment within predetermined limits of 85°-95° for femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA), and 175°-183° for hip knee ankle (HKA) angle. The KSS Knee and Function were collected preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, to determine if patients achieved SCB. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to determine associations between KSS scores (Knee and Function) and patient demographics as well as pre- and postoperative radiographic alignments. RESULTS: Of the initial cohort of 261 patients, 4 (1.8%) were reoperated for patellar resurfacing, 1 (0.4%) for lavage to treat infection, and 1 (0.4%) had arthroscopy to treat a stiff knee with < 90° range of motion. Complete clinical records were available for 227 patients (232 knees, 87%) that comprised 102 men (5 bilateral) and 125 women. At 12-month follow-up, mean improvements in KSS Knee and Function scores were, respectively, 61.0 ± 13.0 and 42.7 ± 16.7, which exceeded the SCB of KSS. Comparison of knees inside versus outside the target zone revealed no differences in KSS Knee (94.1 ± 9.1 versus 94.3 ± 9.0, n.s.) and Function (96.1 ± 9.2 versus 96.3 ± 8.9, n.s.). Multivariable analysis revealed worse KSS Knee in knees with preoperative FMA > 95° (ß = - 6.21; p = 0.023), but no association between KSS Function and patient demographics or pre- and postoperative radiographic alignments. CONCLUSIONS: Custom TKA combined with personalised alignment yielded improvements that exceeded substantial clinical benefits of KSS Knee and Function scores. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of custom TKA with 'personalised alignment' and encourage further investigations using comparative studies at longer follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Custom total knee arthroplasty facilitates restoration of constitutional coronal alignment.

PURPOSE: To describe a strategy for coronal alignment using a computed tomography (CT) based custom total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system, and to evaluate the agreement between the planned and postoperative Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle, Femoral Mechanical Angle (FMA) and Tibial Mechanical Angle (TMA). METHODS: From a consecutive series of 918 primary TKAs, 266 (29%) knees received CT-based posterior-stabilized cemented custom TKA. In addition to a preoperative CT-scan, pre- and post-operative radiographs of weight-bearing long leg, anterior-posterior and lateral views of the knee were obtained, on which the FMA, TMA and HKA angles were measured. CT-based three-dimensional (3D) models enabled to correct for cases with bony wear by referring to the non-worn areas and to estimate the native pre-arthritic angles. The alignment technique aimed to preserve or restore constitutional alignment (CA) within predetermined limits, by defining a 'target zone' based on three criteria: 1) a ± 3° (range 87°-93°) primary tolerance for the femoral and tibial resections; 2) a ± 2° secondary tolerance for component obliquity, extending the bounds for FMA and TMA (range 85°-95°); 3) a planned HKA angle range of 175°-183°. Agreement between preoperative, planned and postoperative measurements of FMA, TMA and HKA angle were calculated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Preoperative radiograph and CT-scan measurements revealed that, respectively, 73 (28%) and 103 (40%) knees were in the 'target zone', whereas postoperative radiographs revealed that 217 (84%) TKAs were in the 'target zone'. Deviation from the planned angles were - 0.5° ± 1.8° for FMA, - 0.5° ± 1.8° for TMA, and - 1.1° ± 2.1° for HKA angle. Finally, the agreement between the planned and achieved targets, indicated by ICC, were good for FMA (0.701), fair for TMA (0.462) and fair for HKA angle (0.472). CONCLUSION: Using this strategy for coronal alignment, 84% of custom TKAs were within the 'target zone' for FMA, TMA and HKA angles. These findings support the concepts of emerging personalized medicine technologies, and emphasise the importance of accurate strategies for preoperative planning, which are key to achieving satisfactory 'personalised alignment' that can further be improved by customisation of implant components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Bicompartmental, medial and patellofemoral knee replacement might be able to maintain unloaded knee kinematics.

INTRODUCTION: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are standard procedures for treating knee joint arthritis. Neither UKA nor TKA seems to be optimally suited for patients with bicompartmental osteoarthritis that affects only the medial and patellofemoral compartments. A bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) was designed for this patient group. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a BKA and TKA in restoring the kinematics of the knee joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, three types of knee arthroplasties (BKA, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining, and posterior cruciate ligament-resecting TKA) were biomechanically tested in six freshly frozen human cadaveric specimens. Complete three-dimensional kinematics was analyzed for each knee arthroplasty during both passive and loaded conditions in a validated knee kinematics rig. Infrared motion capture cameras and retroreflective markers were used for recording data. RESULTS: No significant differences could be found between the three types of arthroplasties. However, similar kinematic changes between BKA and a native knee joint were documented under passive conditions. However, in a weight-bearing mode, a significant decrease in femoral rotation during the range of motion was found in arthroplasties compared to the native knee, probably caused by contraction of the quadriceps femoris muscle, which leads to a decrease in the anterior translation of the tibia. CONCLUSIONS: Kinematics similar to that of the natural knee can be achieved by BKA under passive conditions. However, no functional advantage of BKA over TKA was detected, which suggests that natural knee kinematics cannot be fully imitated by an arthroplasty yet. Further prospective studies are required to determine the anatomic and design factors that might affect the physiologic kinematics.

[New technologies (robotics, custom-made) in unicondylar knee arthroplasty-pro]. / Neue Technologien (Robotik, "custom made") in der unikondylären Endoprothetik ­ Pro.

BACKGROUND: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty offers the advantage that partial degenerative changes can be addressed with partial prosthetic solutions, thus preserving as much of the native joint as possible, including the cruciate ligaments. On the other hand, the number of revisions is still higher than for total knee endoprosthetics. In the literature, the causes mentioned are insufficient fit of the components as well as surgical errors. The use of new technologies to achieve a better fit and higher surgical precision and reproducibility, therefore, represents a promising approach. INDIVIDUAL ENDOPROSTHETICS: Individual endoprosthetics offers the advantage that the prosthesis is adapted to the individual anatomy of each patient and not the patient's anatomy to the prosthesis, as is the case with standard prostheses. This allows for an optimal fit of the prosthesis while avoiding excessive bone resections and soft tissue releases. ROBOTICS: The use of robotics in endoprosthetics makes it easier to correctly perform bone resections and align components. This ensures high and reproducible precision even for surgeons with lower case numbers. Studies on individual unicondylar endoprosthetics and robotics are reporting promising results. However, long-term results of high-quality randomized studies must be awaited in order to make a scientifically sound statement.

Reduced joint-awareness in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty compared to cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: There is rising impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement in joint arthroplasty over the past years. Bicruciate-retaining implants have shown more physiologic knee kinematics and provide superior proprioceptive capacities. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the functional properties of this new implant design lead to improved PRO results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: This prospective, controlled trial compares PRO of bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA) to unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) and standard posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA). We evaluated 102 patients (34 patients in each group) 18 months postoperatively after knee arthroplasty. Primary outcome measure was the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). RESULTS: The BCR-group showed the same level of joint awareness as the UKA-group (p = 0.999). The second control group of PS-TKA patients had a lower mean score value in the FJS compared to the BCR-group (p = 0.035) and UKA-group (p = 0.031). There was no correlation of age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and the FJS. No relevant floor- or ceiling effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study found reduced joint awareness for BCR-TKA compared to a standard total knee arthroplasty. The score values of the BCR-group were equal to the UKA-group. Further prospective, randomized studies to investigate long-term survivorship of bicruciate-retaining implants are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Proprioception after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty is comparable to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Rising expectations in functional performance of total knee joints are inciting further improvement of knee arthroplasty implants. From a patient-centred view, bicruciate-retaining models provide a more natural feeling knee. However, there is no evidence of functional advantage for these implants. The aim of this study was to evaluate balance ability as a measure of proprioception in patients with a bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: A prospective, controlled trial was conducted to compare balance ability in 60 patients after arthroplasty of the knee for osteoarthritis. We compared patients with a bicruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty (BCR group) to a control group of patients with a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA group) and another control group of patients with a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS group). The patient population comprised 30 women (50.0 %) and 30 men in three cohorts of 20 each. The mean age was 62.1 ± 8.0 years (range 43-78). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 9 months post-operatively. The evaluation included clinical, radiological, and balance testing-a single-leg stance with eyes closed compared to eyes open. The difference in area of sway between eyes closed and eyes open represents static balance ability after knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: Perioperative data showed that there was no intra-operative fracture of the intercondylar eminence. There was a decreased post-operative knee extension 9 months post-operative in the BCR group, which was not clinically relevant in any case. We recorded a lower difference in the area of sway between eyes closed and eyes open (ΔA (ec-eo)) for the BCR group (p = 0.01) and the UKA group (p = 0.04) compared to the PS group. CONCLUSIONS: This study found superior static balance ability after preservation of both cruciate ligaments in arthroplasty of the knee, indicating superior proprioceptive function. Hence, BCR implants could provide improved functional properties. Superior proprioceptive function of bicruciate-retaining implants can be an important factor in implant selection. Further prospective, randomized studies to investigate kinematics and long-term survivorship of bicruciate-retaining implants are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Validation of the German Forgotten Joint Score (G-FJS) according to the COSMIN checklist: does a reduction in joint awareness indicate clinical improvement after arthroplasty of the knee?

PURPOSE: Evaluation of further improvement in treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee requires measurement tools with a high discriminatory power. In this context, joint awareness in everyday life is seen as crucial criterion. Purpose of this study was to adapt and validate a German version of the "Forgotten Joint Score" (FJS) according to the COSMIN checklist. METHODS: We evaluated a German translation of the FJS for reliability, validity and responsiveness according to the COSMIN checklist. Therefore, patients with an artificial knee joint completed the G-FJS questionnaire twice at intervals of at least 2 weeks. In addition, the Knee Society Score, the Oxford Knee Score, the Tegner Activity Scale, a Visual Analogue Scale, the EuroQol-5D (EQ 5-D), and a subjective assessment of the limitations were recorded. RESULTS: Between June and December 2014, one hundred and five patients (average age 65.2 years) completed both questionnaires and were available for data analysis. Test-retest reliability of the FJS was high with an ICC = 0.80 (95 % CI 0.69, 0.90) and with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 (95 % CI 0.92, 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The German translation of the FJS is a viable tool for the postoperative monitoring after arthroplasty of the knee. This is the first study providing data on test-retest reliability of the FJS. The FJS is a reliable and valid measurement tool for evaluation of patient rated outcome in patients with an artificial knee joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Validating cohort study, Level 1b.

Measuring tibial component rotation of TKA in MRI: What is reproducible?

PURPOSE: Correct rotational alignment of components is crucial for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Defining landmarks on the tibia that allow for reproducible measurement of component rotation seems to be more challenging than on the femoral side. This study compares the reproducibility of three different measurement techniques. SCOPE: A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of 55 patients following TKA was conducted. The rotation of the tibial components was determined using three different reference lines: a tangent to the posterior tibial margin, the tibial epicondylar axis, and the tibial tubercle. Data were analyzed for intra- and inter-observer reliability using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), and a variance comparison between measurement techniques via F-test. RESULTS: Highest reliability and lowest variances for measurement of tibial component rotation were achieved by relation to the tibial epicondylar axis and posterior tibial margin. The tibial tubercle proved to be less reliable (ICC 0.632 (interobserver) and 0.526 (intraobserver)), and variances were significantly higher in comparison with the other two techniques. CONCLUSION: Based on the presented MRI data, measurements of the tibial component rotation are done best using the posterior tibial margin and the tibial epicondylar axis. The tibial tubercle measurement proved to be less reliable for this purpose. We suggest that all three reference lines will be used for assessment of a painful knee following TKA to allow for informed decision making and for choice of best treatment options for the patient.

Improved tibial component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was introduced in an attempt to reduce positional outliers of components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesized that PSI could help with the positioning of tibial components in optimal rotational alignment. METHODS: A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of 58 patients following TKA was conducted. Of these, 30 operations were performed using PSI and 28 using conventional instrumentation. The rotation of the tibial components was determined in MRI using three different reference lines: a tangent to the dorsal tibial condyles, the tibial epicondylar line, and the tibial tubercle. Deviations >9° were considered outliers. Also internal rotation >1° was considered an outlier. Data were analyzed statistically for positional outliers using the Chi-squared test. RESULTS: There was excellent inter- and intraobserver reliability with low standard deviations for the determination of tibial component rotation using the tangent to the dorsal condyles and the tibial epicondylar line as reference. Using the dorsal tangent as reference, there were eight components in excessive external rotation (28.6 %) and one component being in relative internal rotation (5.4°) in the conventional group, while there were two components in excessive external rotation in the PSI group (6.7 %). Using the tibial epicondyles as reference, there were seven components in excessive external rotation (21.4 %) and one component being in relative internal rotation (4.4°) in the conventional group; while there were two components in excessive external rotation in the PSI group (6.7 %). These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Measurements based on the tibial tubercle showed poor reproducibility in terms of intra- and interobserver reliability and was of little use in the context of the research question. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In this setup, PSI was effective in significantly reducing outliers of optimal rotational tibial component alignment during TKA. Anatomy of the proximal tibia does not deliver clear landmarks that are prominent and consistent. This makes both, MRI analysis as well as cutting jig production and intraoperative placement a challenge.

Positive side effects of Ca antagonists for osteoarthritic joints-results of an in vivo pilot study.

BACKGROUND: We have shown previously that some calcium antagonists inhibit hyaluronan export, loss of proteoglycans, and degradation of collagen from osteoarthritic cartilage. Clinically approved calcium antagonists normally are prescribed for cardiac arrhythmia. In the present study, we compared the effect of these drugs on osteoarthritic patients which had received no medication and patients which were also diagnosed for cardiac arrhythmias and were treated with calcium antagonists. The effects and the side effects of the used drugs were analyzed. METHOD: We used the Lequesne questionnaire to examine patients with osteoarthritis (212 patients, control group receiving no calcium antagonists) and patients with cardiac arrhythmia and osteoarthritis (188 patients treated with various calcium antagonists). The answers of the questionnaires were transformed into the Lequesne scoring system quantifying the severity of the disease. The Lequesne score is a standardized questionnaire focused on osteoarthritis. It is a 24-scale questionary in which low scores indicate low functional activity. RESULTS: The data showed that the mean score of the control group (6.2) was higher than the treated group (5.2), the drugs differed in their efficiency. Verapamil had a slightly worse score and Azupamil, Escor, Felodipine, and Nifedipine showed no alteration. Adalat, Amlodipine, Carmen, Nitrendipin, and Norvasc lead to an improvement. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that inhibition of hyaluronan export may have a beneficial effect on human osteoarthritis.

Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was introduced in an attempt to reduce positional outliers of components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesized that PSI could help with the positioning of femoral components in optimal rotational alignment. METHODS: A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of 94 patients following TKA was conducted. Of these, 46 operations were performed using PSI and 48 using conventional instrumentation. The rotation of the femoral components was determined in the MRI and deviations>3° were considered outliers. Data were analyzed for positional outliers, observer reliability, and a variance comparison between implant groups. RESULTS: There was excellent inter- and intraobserver reliability with low standard deviations for the determination of femoral component rotation. There were significantly more outliers in the conventional (22.9%) group than in the PSI group (2.2%, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: In this setup, PSI was effective in significantly reducing outliers of optimal rotational femoral component alignment during TKA.

A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Several authors have observed that standard instrumentation (SI) may be insufficient for addressing component malalignment. Patient-matched cutting blocks (PMCB) technology was introduced to improve surgeons' ability to achieve a neutral postoperative mechanical axis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The current retrospective study was designed to compare the ability of SI and PMCB to achieve a hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) within ±3° of the ideal alignment of 180°. METHODS: Between October 2009 and December 2012, 170 TKAs in 166 patients (four bilateral) using VISIONAIRE (Smith & Nephew) PMCB technology were performed. Additionally, 160 TKAs in 160 consecutive patients that had received a total knee arthroplasty using SI during the same time period were used as a control group, All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. Standardized pre- and postoperative long-leg standing x-rays were retrospectively evaluated to compare the two patient cohorts. RESULTS: X-rays were available for analysis for 156 knees in the SI group and 150 in the PMCB group. The average post-surgical HKA was 178.7 ± 2.5 in the SI group and 178.4 ± 1.5 in the PMCB group. However, the rate of ± 3° outliers was 21.2 % in the SI group and 9.3 % in the PMCB group. There were no intraoperative complications with the use of PMCB technology or SI. CONCLUSIONS: PMCB technology proved superior to conventional instrumentation in achieving a neutral mechanical axis following TKA. Further follow-up will be needed to ascertain the long-term impact of these findings.

Femoro-tibial kinematics after TKA in fixed- and mobile-bearing knees in the sagittal plane.

PURPOSE: Lack of the anterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty results in paradoxical movement of the femur as opposed to the tibia under deep flexion. Total knee arthroplasty with mobile-bearing inlays has been developed to provide increased physiological movement of the knee joint and to reduce polyethylene abrasion. The aim of this study was to perform an in vitro analysis of the kinematic movement in the sagittal plane in order to show differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA in comparison with the natural knee joint. METHODS: Seven knee joints of human cadaver material were used in a laboratory experiment. Fixed- and mobile-bearing inlays were tested in sequences under isokinetic extension in so-called kinemator for knee joints, which can simulate muscular traction power by the use of hydraulic cylinders, which crossover the knee joint. As a target parameter, the a.p. translation of the tibio-femoral relative movement was measured in the sagittal plane under ultrasound (Zebris) control. RESULTS: The results show a reduced tibial a.p. translation in relation to the femur in the bearing group compared to the natural joint. In the Z-axis, between 110° and 50° of flexion, linear movement decreases towards caudal movement under extension. Admittedly, the study did not show differences in the movement pattern between "mobile-bearing" and "fixed-bearing" prostheses. CONCLUSION: Results of this study cannot prove functional advantages of mobile-bearing prostheses for the knee joint kinematic after TKA. Both types of prostheses show typical kinematics of an anterior instability, hence they were incapable of performing physiological movement.

Benefits of using customized instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: results from an activity-based costing model.

OBJECTIVE: The growing demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) associated with the efforts to contain healthcare expenditure by advanced economies necessitates the use of economically effective technologies in TKA. The present analysis based on activity-based costing (ABC) model was carried out to estimate the economic value of patient-matched instrumentation (PMI) compared to standard surgical instrumentation in TKA. METHODOLOGY: The costs of the two approaches, PMI and standard instrumentation in TKA, were determined by the use of ABC which measures the cost of a particular procedure by determining the activities involved and adding the cost of each activity. Improvement in productivity due to increased operating room (OR) turn-around times was determined and potential additional revenue to the hospital by the efficient utilization of gained OR time was estimated. RESULTS: Increased efficiency in the usage of OR and utilization of surgical trays were noted with patient-specific approach. Potential revenues to the hospital were estimated with the use of PMI by efficient utilization of time saved in OR. Additional revenues of 78,240 per year were estimated considering utilization of gained OR time to perform surgeries other than TKA. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis suggests that use of PMI in TKA is economically effective when compared to standard instrumentation.

Frontal plane alignment after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments.

PURPOSE: Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is regularly associated with favorable outcomes, considerable research efforts are still underway to improve its ability to achieve a neutral postoperative mechanical axis. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was introduced with this and other goals in mind. The current retrospective study was designed to determine whether PSI would lead to a hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) within ±3° of the ideal alignment of 180°. METHODS: A long-leg x-ray of the knee was performed after an average of 3.5 months (SD, three to four months), following 124 TKAs performed by a single surgeon using PSI technology (VISIONAIRE; Smith & Nephew). In addition to HKA, the zone of the mechanical axis (ZMA; zone of the tibial base plate where the mechanical axis of the limb intersects with the tibial base plate) was analysed, with the ideal intersection occurring centrally. RESULTS: There were 100 knees (average age, 66.8 years) with follow-up data available. The average HKA changed from 175.5±5.6° preoperatively to 178.5±1.7° postoperatively. The rate of ±3° and ±5° HKA outliers was 11 % and 3 %, respectively. In terms of ZMA, the mechanical axis passed through the central third of the knee in the majority of cases (93 knees, 93 %). There were no intra-operative complications with the use of PSI. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSI technology was able to achieve a neutral mechanical axis on average in patients undergoing TKA. Further follow-up will be needed to ascertain the long-term impact of these findings.

Highly conforming polyethylene inlays reduce the in vivo variability of knee joint kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

The use of highly conforming polyethylene inlays in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides improved anteroposterior stability. The aim of this fluoroscopic study was to investigate the in vivo kinematics during unloaded and loaded active extension with a highly conforming inlay and a flat inlay after cruciate retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thirty one patients (50 knees) received a fixed-bearing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty (Genesis II, Smith & Nephew, Schenefeld, Germany) for primary knee osteoarthritis. Twenty two of them received a flat polyethylene inlay (PE), nine a deep dished PE and 19 were in the control group (physiological knees). The mean age at the time of surgery was 62 years. Dynamic examination with fluoroscopy was performed to assess the "patella tendon angle" in relation to the knee flexion angle (measure of anteroposterior translation) and the "kinematic index" (measure of reproducibility). Fluoroscopy was performed under active extension and flexion, during unloaded movement, and under full weight bearing, simulated by step climbing. No significant difference was observed between both types of polyethylene inlay designs and the physiological knee during unloaded movement. Anteroposterior (AP) instability was found during weight-bearing movement. The deep-dish inlay resulted in lower AP translation and a non-physiological rollback. Neither inlay types could restore physiological kinematics of the knee. Despite the fact that deep dished inlays reduce the AP translation, centralisation of contact pressure results in non-physiological rollback. The influence of kinematic pattern variability on clinical results warrants further investigation.