Insights into Nuclear Cardiology in the United States from the first 3 years of the ImageGuide Registry.

BACKGROUND: Data registries facilitate knowledge acquisition and quality improvement. ImageGuide is a registry developed by the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology collecting data since 2015, providing insight into current nuclear cardiology practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: HIPAA de-identified data on > 100 practice- and patient-related variables from 19 US practices were obtained from ImageGuide. Continuous variables are reported as the mean ± standard deviation; discrete variables are reported as N (%). Practices were from 12 states; 9520 studies were submitted. The average patient was a 66-year-old man. Chest pain was the most common indication; 96% of studies were appropriate. Rest/stress 1-day studies were most common; stress/rest 1- and 2-day studies comprised < 5%. Tc-99 m was the most common radiopharmaceutical. Tl-201 was used in 14% of rest studies. Most studies were not corrected for attenuation. 89% were of good or better quality. 62% of studies were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Practice diversity is limited, but patient demographics are reflective of reported current practice. Most studies are appropriate and may obviate the need for invasive testing. Radiation dosimetry could be decreased with wider adoption of stress/rest studies and avoidance of Tl-201. ImageGuide will be an important tool to guide non-invasive cardiac imaging in the future.

A cluster-based approach for integrating clinical management of Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 28% of adults have ≥3 chronic conditions (CCs), accounting for two-thirds of U.S. healthcare costs, and often having suboptimal outcomes. Despite Institute of Medicine recommendations in 2001 to integrate guidelines for multiple CCs, progress is minimal. The vast number of unique combinations of CCs may limit progress. METHODS AND FINDINGS: To determine whether major CCs segregate differentially in limited groups, electronic health record and Medicare paid claims data were examined in one accountable care organization with 44,645 Medicare beneficiaries continuously enrolled throughout 2015. CCs predicting clinical outcomes were obtained from diagnostic codes. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering defined 13 groups having similar within group patterns of CCs and named for the most common CC. Two groups, congestive heart failure (CHF) and kidney disease (CKD), included 23% of beneficiaries with a very high CC burden (10.5 and 8.1 CCs/beneficiary, respectively). Five groups with 54% of beneficiaries had a high CC burden ranging from 7.1 to 5.9 (descending order: neurological, diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular, chronic pulmonary). Six groups with 23% of beneficiaries had an intermediate-low CC burden ranging from 4.7 to 0.4 (behavioral health, obesity, osteoarthritis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, 'other'). Hypertension and hyperlipidemia were common across groups, whereas 80% of CHF segregated to the CHF group, 85% of CKD to CKD and CHF groups, 82% of cancer to Cancer, CHF, and CKD groups, and 85% of neurological disorders to Neuro, CHF, and CKD groups. Behavioral health diagnoses were common only in groups with a high CC burden. The number of CCs/beneficiary explained 36% of the variance (R2 = 0.36) in claims paid/beneficiary. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying a limited number of groups with high burdens of CCs that disproportionately drive costs may help inform a practical number of integrated guidelines and resources required for comprehensive management. Cluster informed guideline integration may improve care quality and outcomes, while reducing costs.

Improving compliance with Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) reporting standards: A serial comparison of 523 labs over seven years.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate reporting compliance of laboratories applying for serial accreditation by the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) and compare compliance based on laboratory characteristics. METHODS: All laboratories applying for IAC accreditation for the first time in 2008 and then twice more (2011-2014) were evaluated for compliance with 18 reporting elements. The elements were ranked into three severity groups (high/moderate/low). RESULTS: Reports from 523 laboratories were evaluated. The percentage of laboratories with reporting issues by cycle was 66.2% for cycle 1, 36.7% for cycle 2, and 43.8% for cycle 3 (p < .001). For most of the 18 elements, there was a significant decrease in the percentage of labs with issues. Less moderate and high severity errors were seen over time. Also, the mean non-compliant elements per laboratory decreased from 5.78 ± 2.72 at cycle 1, down to 1.25 ± 1.77 at cycle 3. CONCLUSIONS: In facilities applying for 3 consecutive IAC accreditation cycles, reporting compliance with IAC Standards improved between cycles 1-2 and 1-3. No significant improvement occurred between cycles 2-3. Although the quality of reports improved overall, problems remain in quantifying myocardial perfusion defects, documenting report approval date, and integrating stress and imaging reports.

Improved compliance with reporting standards: A retrospective analysis of Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Nuclear Cardiology Laboratories.

BACKGROUND: In 2011, Tilkemeier et al reported significant nuclear cardiology laboratory noncompliance with reporting standards. The aim of this study was to identify and examine noncompliant reporting elements with the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Nuclear/PET (IAC) Reporting Standards and to compare compliance between 2008 and 2014. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of compliance with 18 reporting elements utilizing accreditation findings from all laboratories applying for accreditation in 2008 and 2014. RESULTS: 1816 labs applying for initial or subsequent accreditation were analyzed for compliance. The mean reporting noncompliance per lab decreased from 2008 to 2014 (2.48 ± 2.67 to 1.24 ± 1.79, P < .001). Noncompliance decreased across lab types, labs with Certification Board of Nuclear Cardiology physicians on staff, and by geographic region (P < .001). Overall severity of reporting issues decreased. Facilities with compliant reports increased from 35.0% in 2008 to 57.1% in 2014 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Continuing medical education, accreditation, and other instructional activities aimed at improving nuclear cardiology reporting appear to have made a positive impact over time with the number and severity of noncompliance decreased. More labs are now compliant with the IAC Standards and, thus, reporting guidelines. However, the need for continued educational efforts remains.

The feasibility of exercise videogames for cardiovascular risk reduction among adults: a pilot for "Wii heart fitness".

BACKGROUND: More than 30% of the U.S. population is prehypertensive, and the recommended treatment of lifestyle modification includes increased physical activity. Exercise videogames (EVG) are widely marketed to Americans as a means of increasing fitness. This study aimed to examine EVG among a sample of prehypertensive adults, to determine (1) feasibility and acceptability of EVG for physical activity, and (2) assess changes in (1) estimates of cardiovascular fitness and risk indices, and psychosocial constructs. METHODS: Participants with prehypertension completed a 12-week program including; 36, 1-hour sessions; supervised EVG program using Nintendo Wii platform and games. Assessments were at baseline and 13 weeks. Paired t-tests were conducted. RESULTS: Fourteen adults (84% female; mean age=53 years; 93% Caucasian; 87% employed) completed the study. The study retention rate was 74% and all participants reported satisfaction and enjoyment in the intervention and using the Wii for exercise. Despite the small sample size, significant improvements were seen in: physical activity minutes (P<0.01), peak heart rate (P=0.02), resting systolic blood pressure (P=0.02), and hip circumference (P=0.03). Significant improvements were also seen in the 36-item short-form survey (SF-36) as for general health (P=0.05), role limitations due to emotional problems (P=0.04), and vitality (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support that an EVG program is feasible, acceptable, and promising in promoting benefit to cardiovascular fitness and psychosocial health. These data provide pilot data for the necessary randomized clinical trials to examine efficacy and sustainability of EVG for adult engagement in physical activity for cardiovascular health promotion.

Nationwide Laboratory Adherence to Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Radiation Dose Reduction Practices: A Report From the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Data Repository.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine current laboratory practices for radiation effective doses for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and laboratory adherence to guideline-directed radiation reduction practices. BACKGROUND: A recent focus on radiation dose reduction for cardiovascular imaging has led to several published guidelines and consensus statements detailing performance metrics for laboratory practices. We sought to examine laboratory adherence to optimized radiation dose protocol recommendations among 5,216 submitted cases from 1,074 MPI laboratories evaluated for Intersocietal Accreditation Commission accreditation. METHODS: Eligible imaging centers included MPI laboratories enrolled in the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission data repository of accreditation applications from 2012 to 2013. Accreditation requires submission of 3 to 5 cases for evaluation of a range of representative cases. Based on standard dosimetry for rest and stress MPI, an effective dose (in millisieverts) was calculated. Model simulations were performed to estimate guideline-directed effective doses. RESULTS: The average effective dose was 14.9 ± 5.8 mSv (range 1.4 to 42.4 mSv). A 1-day technetium Tc 99m protocol was used in 82.9% of cases, whereas a 2-day technetium Tc 99m and dual isotope protocol was used in 7.5% of submitted cases. Only 1.5% of participating imaging centers met current guidelines for an average laboratory radiation exposure ≤9 mSv, whereas 10.1% of patient effective doses were >20.0 mSv. A model simulation replacing the radiation exposure of dual isotope MPI with that of a 1-day technetium Tc 99m protocol reduced the proportion of patients receiving an effective dose >20 mSv to only 2.7% of cases (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory laboratory accreditation for MPI allows for examination of current radiation dosimetry practices. Current guidelines for reduced patient-specific radiation exposure are rarely implemented, with few laboratories meeting recommendations of ≤9 mSv for 50% of patients. Increased educational efforts and the development of performance measures for laboratory accreditation may be required to meet current radiation dose-reduction standards.

Predictors of Delayed Accreditation of Echocardiography Laboratories: An Analysis of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Database.

BACKGROUND: Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Echocardiography accreditation involves a broad-based evaluation of a given echocardiography facility's daily operation. An in-depth analysis of the most frequent noncompliant accreditation items provides learning opportunities for improvement of echocardiographic practice and facilities. METHODS: Data from 3,260 facilities applying for accreditation from 2011 to 2013 were analyzed to assess five key elements, each including multiple variables. The key elements included staff qualifications, imaging protocols, image quality, reporting, and documentation of quality improvement activities. Site characteristics for each facility were also analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of facilities (n = 2,020) demonstrated deficiencies resulting in delayed accreditation. Deficiencies were less frequently observed at hospital-based facilities, facilities applying for reaccreditation, and facilities with credentialed sonographers. The most frequent deficiencies were related to reports (48%), followed by staff qualifications (46%), quality improvement (45%), image quality (44%), and protocols (43%). Both reports and image quality had the highest average numbers of deficiencies per facility, with 2.0 ± 1.0 and 1.83 ± 0.82, respectively. The most common deficient variables were lack of documented continuing medical education (25%), incomplete protocols (36%), incomplete interrogation of aortic stenosis from multiple views (34%), incomplete reports (36%), and insufficient annual summary of quality improvement activities (45%). CONCLUSIONS: Accreditation is delayed for a majority of facilities seeking Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Echocardiography accreditation because of major deficiencies or noncompliance. By focusing on staff continuing medical education, adoption and implementation of standard imaging protocols, ensuring acceptable image quality, using standards in reporting, and implementing quality improvement programs, echocardiography facility performance and quality as compared with the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Echocardiography standards may be improved.

The nuclear cardiology report: problems, predictors, and improvement. A report from the ICANL database.

BACKGROUND: The quality of nuclear cardiology reports is essential for the effective communication of results of cardiac radionuclide imaging and has never been evaluated for compliance with the ICANL standards. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate required reporting elements and site characteristics to determine differences in the compliance of applicant nuclear cardiology laboratories with The ICANL Standards, and identify potential mechanisms for improvement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Site characteristics and the 18 elements of the ICANL nuclear cardiology reporting standard ranked by level of importance were evaluated in 1,301 labs applying for accreditation from 1/1/08 to 1/1/09. A majority of labs were non-compliant (57.2%) with ≥1 of the 18 elements, mean number of errors 2.13 ± 2.58. There were significant differences among applications with different accreditation decisions, first application and repeat applications, and region of the United States. Laboratories with multiple re-accreditations had significantly increased compliance. These findings were confirmed following analysis of the ranked importance of the non-compliant elements. CONCLUSIONS: Nuclear cardiology reports have a high degree of non-compliance with the current ICANL standards. There were identifiable characteristics defining labs more likely to be non-compliant. Feedback from prior applications improves compliance with reporting standards on subsequent applications.

Gender disparity and the appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate use criteria (AUC) were developed to guide the use of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). While MPI use has grown exponentially, women remain under tested. Given this bias in testing, we sought to determine if gender disparity exists in tests categorized by appropriateness and the role of referral bias. METHODS: The AUC were applied to 314 consecutive MPI. Analysis of variance and chi-squared tests were used for analysis. Gender disparity was assessed using correlation matrices comparing baseline to gender reversed data. RESULTS: Of the 314 studies, 263 were appropriate, 34 inappropriate, and 17 uncertain. Women had 68% of inappropriate studies, and 82% of uncertain studies (P < .01). Cardiologists ordered more appropriate studies than primary care physicians (PCPs) in women (86% vs 71%, P = .04). Among studies ordered by cardiologists and PCPs, a higher percentage of studies were appropriate in men vs women (96% vs 86%, P = 0.05 and 88% vs 71% P = .003), respectively. Gender reversal demonstrates disparity in the AUC tool with 46 (15%) not correlating (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing patient gender and ordering physician, the majority of inappropriate and uncertain studies were ordered in women by PCPs, indicating a continuing need for education among PCPs, particularly as the AUC apply to women.

Prevalence and characteristics of multiple psychiatric disorders in cardiac rehabilitation patients.

PURPOSE: Anxiety and depressive disorders have been established as independent risk factors for the development of and recovery from coronary heart disease (CHD). However, few studies have reported on the prevalence and personal characteristics of comorbid psychiatric disorders (PD) among cardiac populations. This project examined the prevalence of comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders among men and women with CHD commencing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and the demographic, medical, and psychosocial characteristics among those meeting multiple PD criteria. METHODS: Participants were 143 CHD patients (M age, 61 years; SD, 11.2; 70% men, 91% Caucasian, 64% married) entering CR who were evaluated via a semistructured, psychiatric interview to assess both current and lifetime prevalence rates of PD. Demographic, medical, and psychosocial variables were also assessed. RESULTS: Approximately 45% met criteria for at least 1 anxiety disorder, and 20% met criteria for either major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder either at the time of evaluation or in their lifetime. Across all participants, 26% met criteria for >or=2 PD. Of those with a depressive disorder, 76% also met criteria for at least 1 anxiety disorder. Participants with comorbid PD were of younger age and female and reported less education (P < .01). Comorbidity was also associated with self-reported overall diminished physical, emotional, and social quality of life, depression, and anxiety. CONCLUSION: Comorbid PD are highly prevalent in the CR setting and are associated with specific demographic characteristics and reduced quality of life. These data offer additional support that routine screening for PD is warranted in outpatient cardiac settings.