Significance of HLA-matching and anti-HLA antibodies in heart transplant patients receiving induction therapy?

OBJECTIVES: Though Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matching benefits are demonstrated in renal transplantation, evidence in heart transplantation is lacking, and its clinical feasibility is uncertain. Post-transplantation anti-HLA antibodies are being increasingly studied in organ transplantation, with diverging conclusions between transplantated organs. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively the influence of HLA matching and anti-HLA antibodies on overall survival, acute rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy in 309 patients receiving induction therapy and triple-drug immunosuppression. RESULTS: The average number of HLA-A/B/DR mismatches between donor and recipient was 4.9 ± 1. The majority of mismatches was for Class I HLA-A/B with an average of 3.3, then for Class I HLA-DR with an average of 1.6. Overall, the HLA-A/-B/-DR mismatches had no influence on the cardiac allograft survival (p = 0.28). However, HLA-DR mismatches were negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection (p = 0.04). Our analysis found anti-HLA antibodies in 27% of recipients, de novo anti-HLA antibodies in 16% of recipients, and donor-specific anti-HLA (DSA) antibodies in 8% of recipients. Furthermore, de novo DSA had no influence on the 5-year survival (78% with DSA vs. 92% without DSA; p = 0.49), which may be masked by the limited number of recipients in analysis By univariable analysis, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on severe cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy. CONCLUSIONS: HLA-DR mismatch was negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection but had no influence on cardiac allograft survival. In this study, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy. The results of this study add to the controversy on the impact of allo-antibodies in heart transplant recipients receiving induction therapy and contemporary immunosuppression.

Allosensitization in bridge to transplant Novacor left ventricular assist device patients: analysis of long-term outcomes with regard to acute rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy.

BACKGROUND: The true relevance of allosensitization in patients benefiting from left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as bridge to transplant (BTT) is still debated. Available registry data referred to numerous devices precluding LVAD-specific analysis. Therefore, we studied all patients with Novacor LVAD prior to transplantation. METHODS: From 1985 to 2006, 37 Novacor LVADs were implanted as BTT, with 30 patients surviving to transplantation (81%). Post-LVAD sensitization was determined for anti-HLA-class I and class II IgGs. Study endpoints were overall survival and/or graft loss, > or =3A cellular rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy (CAV). The results from LVAD patients were compared to non-LVAD primary heart transplant recipients (n=318). RESULTS: After LVAD insertion, 5 out of 27 patients available for analysis developed anti-HLA antibodies (18.5%). The mean anti-HLA titer after Novacor LVAD implantation was 14% [SD 31]. Actuarial 5- and 10-year patient/graft survival for LVAD and non-LVAD transplant recipients were 73% and 55%, and 70% and 55%, respectively (p=NS). Overall prevalence of rejection > or =3A was 23.3 % (LVAD group) and 18.9% (non-LVAD group) (p=NS). At follow-up, the respective incidence of CAV was 8% (LVAD group) and 32.4% (non-LVAD group) (p<0.01). However, mean follow-up was significantly different for LVAD and non-LVAD patients, 46 vs 90 months (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, allosensitization occurred infrequently after Novacor LVAD implantation. Secondly, analysis of outcome variables shows that Novacor-LVAD BTT patients can anticipate similar survival to non-LVAD patients, thus minimizing the impact of allosensitization after LVAD implantation.