Impact of virtual reality training on mastoidectomy performance: a prospective randomised study.

PURPOSE: The opportunities for surgical training and practice in the operating room are in decline due to limited resources, increased efficiency demands, growing complexity of the cases, and concerns for patient safety. Virtual reality (VR) offers a novel opportunity to enhance surgical training and provide complementary three-dimensional experience that has been usually available in the operating room. Since VR allows viewing and manipulation of realistic 3D models, the VR environment could enhance anatomical and topographical knowledge, in particular. In this study, we explored whether incorporating VR anatomy training improves novices' performance during mastoidectomy over traditional methods. METHODS: Thirty medical students were randomized into two groups and taught mastoidectomy in a structured manner. One group utilized a VR temporal bone model during the training while the other group used more traditional materials such as anatomy books. After the training, all participants completed a mastoidectomy on a 3D-printed temporal bone model under expert supervision. Performance during the mastoidectomy was evaluated with multiple metrics and feedback regarding the two training methods was gathered from the participants. RESULTS: The VR training method was rated better by the participants, and they also needed less guidance during the mastoidectomy. There were no significant differences in operational time, the occurrence of injuries, self-assessment scores, and the surgical outcome between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our results support the utilization of VR training in complete novices as it has higher trainee satisfaction and leads to at least as good results as the more traditional methods.

The effect of virtual reality on temporal bone anatomy evaluation and performance.

PURPOSE: There is only limited data on the application of virtual reality (VR) for the evaluation of temporal bone anatomy. The aim of the present study was to compare the VR environment to traditional cross-sectional viewing of computed tomography images in a simulated preoperative planning setting in novice and expert surgeons. METHODS: A novice (n = 5) and an expert group (n = 5), based on their otosurgery experience, were created. The participants were asked to identify 24 anatomical landmarks, perform 11 distance measurements between surgically relevant anatomical structures and 10 fiducial markers on five cadaver temporal bones in both VR environment and cross-sectional viewings in PACS interface. The data on performance time and user-experience (i.e., subjective validation) were collected. RESULTS: The novice group made significantly more errors (p < 0.001) and with significantly longer performance time (p = 0.001) in cross-sectional viewing than the expert group. In the VR environment, there was no significant differences (errors and time) between the groups. The performance of novices improved faster in the VR. The novices showed significantly faster task performance (p = 0.003) and a trend towards fewer errors (p = 0.054) in VR compared to cross-sectional viewing. No such difference between the methods were observed in the expert group. The mean overall scores of user-experience were significantly higher for VR than cross-sectional viewing in both groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the VR environment, novices performed the anatomical evaluation of temporal bone faster and with fewer errors than in the traditional cross-sectional viewing, which supports its efficiency for the evaluation of complex anatomy.

Virtual reality improves the accuracy of simulated preoperative planning in temporal bones: a feasibility and validation study.

PURPOSE: Consumer-grade virtual reality (VR) has recently enabled various medical applications, but more evidence supporting their validity is needed. We investigated the accuracy of simulated surgical planning in a VR environment (VR) with temporal bones and compared it to conventional cross-sectional image viewing in picture archiving and communication system (PACS) interface. METHODS: Five experienced otologic surgeons measured significant anatomic structures and fiducials on five fresh-frozen cadaveric temporal bones in VR and cross-sectional viewing. Primary image data were acquired by computed tomography. In total, 275 anatomical landmark measurements and 250 measurements of the distance between fiducials were obtained with both methods. Distance measurements between the fiducials were confirmed by physical measurement obtained by Vernier caliper. The experts evaluated the subjective validity of both methods on a 5-point Likert scale qualitative survey. RESULTS: A strong correlation based on intraclass coefficient was found between the methods on both the anatomical (r > 0.900) and fiducial measurements (r > 0.916). Two-tailed paired t-test and Bland-Altman plots demonstrated high equivalences between the VR and cross-sectional viewing with mean differences of 1.9% (p = 0.396) and 0.472 mm (p = 0.065) for anatomical and fiducial measurements, respectively. Gross measurement errors due to the misidentification of fiducials occurred more frequently in the cross-sectional viewing. The mean face and content validity rating for VR were significantly better compared to cross-sectional viewing (total mean score 4.11 vs 3.39, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study supports good accuracy and reliability of VR environment for simulated surgical planning in temporal bones compared to conventional cross-sectional visualization.