Clinical and pathological characteristics of renal cell carcinomas with MiTF translocation.

INTRODUCTION: Microphthalmia Transfactor Family (MiTF) translocation renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) represent a rare subtype of renal cell cancers. They are diagnosed in young patients and have a poor prognosis. The aim of our study was to analyze the clinical and pathological features of patients with MiTF RCC. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We performed a retrospective, monocentric, descriptive study including all patients operated for RCC between January 2015 and January 2023. The diagnosis of MiTF RCC was suspected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Survival data according to histological subtype (MiTF versus ccRCC) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). A descriptive cohort analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of the 960 patients included, 19 (2%) had FISH-confirmed MiTF tumors. The median age at diagnosis was 42 years [18-75], the sex ratio was 1.11 females for 1 male, and 4 (21%) patients were immediately metastatic. Median RFS was 21months for patients in the MiTF group and was significantly lower than that of ccRCC patients, HR=4.33 [CI95% 2.06; 9.10; P<0.001]. Of the 11 patients with cT1-T2 tumors, 9 (81.8%) were treated with nephron sparing-surgery, with 2 (22.2%) harbored local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that patients with MiTF translocation RCC have a significantly lower RFS than non-MiTF RCC patients. Nephron sparing surgery must be weighted by the high risk of recurrence in this particularly young population.

Is "Kidney Stone Calculator" efficient in predicting ureteroscopic lithotripsy duration? A holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers comparative analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of Kidney Stone Calculator (KSC), a flexible ureteroscopy surgical planning software, to predict the lithotripsy duration with both holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (TFL). METHODS: A multicenter prospective study was conducted from January 2020 to April 2023. Patients with kidney or ureteral stones confirmed at non-contrast computed tomography and treated by flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy were enrolled. "Kidney Stone Calculator" provided stone volume and subsequent lithotripsy duration estimation using three-dimensional segmentation of the stone on computed tomography and the graphical user interface for laser settings. The primary endpoint was the quantitative and qualitative comparison between estimated and effective lithotripsy durations. Secondary endpoints included subgroup analysis (Ho:YAG-TFL) of differences between estimated and effective lithotripsy durations and intraoperative outcomes. Multivariate analysis assessed the association between pre- and intraoperative variables and these differences according to laser source. RESULTS: 89 patients were included in this study, 43 and 46 in Ho:YAG and TFL groups, respectively. No significant difference was found between estimated and effective lithotripsy durations (27.37 vs 28.36 min, p = 0.43) with a significant correlation (r = + 0.89, p < 0.001). Among groups, this difference did not differ (p = 0.68 and 0.07, respectively), with a higher correlation between estimated and effective lithotripsy durations for TFL compared to Ho:YAG (r = + 0.95, p < 0.001 vs r = + 0.81, p < 0.001, respectively). At multivariate analysis, the difference was correlated with preoperative (volume > 2000 mm3 (Ho:YAG), 500-750 mm3 SV and calyceal diverticulum (TFL)), operative (fragmentation setting (p > 0.001), and basket utilization (p = 0.05) (Ho:YAG)) variables. CONCLUSION: KSC is a reliable tool for predicting the lithotripsy duration estimation during flexible ureteroscopy for both Ho:YAG and TFL. However, some variables not including laser source may lead to underestimating this estimation.

Young urologists and kidney transplantation training: A survey designed by the French Transplantation Committee of the French Association of Urology (CTAFU) and the French Association of Urologists in training (AFUF).

OBJECTIVE: In France, kidney transplantations (KT) are mainly performed by urologist. Young urologists and residents are involved in this activity mostly performed in emergency. How do they feel about KT training? Is KT an attractive part of the urologist activity? METHODS: This survey has been designed in the form of a questionnaire by the French Committee of Kidney Transplantation (CTAFU) and the French Association of Urologists in training (AFUF). It has been sent by e-mail to all the AFUF members. Interest in KT and performance of the training were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 126 members filed the form. Among the residents, 51.5% feel secure to perform KT at the end of their residency. KT is considered as an interesting surgery for 92.1% of the participants: 76.5% are willing to get involved in KT during their residency/fellowship. Among the participants, 44% are willing to continue a long-term involvement. Among the residents, 65.9% consider their practical training insufficient: 56.8% have been supervised for a KT performance during their residency and 86% declare a lack of practical training and had a patient-based learning. Among the residents, 92.1% declare an insufficient theorical training. Among the residents, 33.3% say the schedules of transplantation limit their interest in KT. Among the participants, 34.4% receive a transplant bonus in addition to the usual on-call salary. CONCLUSION: Young urologists wish to continue their involvement in KT activity, but improved theoretical and practical training are essential. In addition, the conditions under which this activity is performed and remunerated are a matter of concern.

Primary angiosarcoma of the kidney: A challenging diagnosis.

Angiosarcoma is a rare malignancy derived from endothelial cells, which behaves aggressively. Primary angiosarcoma of the kidney is even rarer, and its clinical and radiological presentations do not differ from clear cells renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Management protocols are not standardized, although nephrectomy is usually performed. Subsequent treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and lately, targeted therapies) vary considerably. Herein, we report the case of a middle-aged patient harboring primary angiosarcoma of the left kidney and discuss its presentation and management in light of current guidelines. The case is described for its rarity and masquerading nature.

Performance of a Region of Interest-based Algorithm in Diagnosing International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group ≥2 Prostate Cancer on the MRI-FIRST Database-CAD-FIRST Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows high sensitivity for International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) ≥2 cancers. Many artificial intelligence algorithms have shown promising results in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI. To assess a region-of-interest-based machine-learning algorithm aimed at characterising GG ≥2 prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI. METHODS: The lesions targeted at biopsy in the MRI-FIRST dataset were retrospectively delineated and assessed using a previously developed algorithm. The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) score assigned prospectively before biopsy and the algorithm score calculated retrospectively in the regions of interest were compared for diagnosing GG ≥2 cancer, using the areas under the curve (AUCs), and sensitivities and specificities calculated with predefined thresholds (PIRADSv2 scores ≥3 and ≥4; algorithm scores yielding 90% sensitivity in the training database). Ten predefined biopsy strategies were assessed retrospectively. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: After excluding 19 patients, we analysed 232 patients imaged on 16 different scanners; 85 had GG ≥2 cancer at biopsy. At patient level, AUCs of the algorithm and PI-RADSv2 were 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70-82) and 80% (CI: 74-85; p = 0.36), respectively. The algorithm's sensitivity and specificity were 86% (CI: 76-93) and 65% (CI: 54-73), respectively. PI-RADSv2 sensitivities and specificities were 95% (CI: 89-100) and 38% (CI: 26-47), and 89% (CI: 79-96) and 47% (CI: 35-57) for thresholds of ≥3 and ≥4, respectively. Using the PI-RADSv2 score to trigger a biopsy would have avoided 26-34% of biopsies while missing 5-11% of GG ≥2 cancers. Combining prostate-specific antigen density, the PI-RADSv2 and algorithm's scores would have avoided 44-47% of biopsies while missing 6-9% of GG ≥2 cancers. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and a lack of PI-RADS version 2.1 assessment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The algorithm provided robust results in the multicentre multiscanner MRI-FIRST database and could help select patients for biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY: An artificial intelligence-based algorithm aimed at diagnosing aggressive cancers on prostate magnetic resonance imaging showed results similar to expert human assessment in a prospectively acquired multicentre test database.

Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients: Outcomes for a Large Contemporary Cohort and a Matched Comparison to Patients Without a Transplant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is unknown whether renal transplant receipt (RTR) status can affect perioperative and oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP). Our aim was to evaluate oncological and functional outcomes of RTR patients treated with RP for cN0M0 prostate cancer (PCa) via comparison with a no-RTR cohort. METHODS: RTR patients who had undergone RP at seven European institutions during 2001-2022 were identified. A multi-institutional cohort of no-RTR patients treated with RP during 2004-2022 served as the comparator group. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:4 was used to match no-RTR patients to the RTR cohort according to age, prostate-specific antigen, and final pathology features. We used Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox, logistic, and Poisson log-linear regression models to test the outcomes of interest. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: After PSM, we analyzed data for 102 RTR and 408 no-RTR patients. RTR patients experienced higher estimated blood loss (EBL), longer length of hospital stay (LOS) and time to catheter removal, higher postoperative complication rates, and a lower continence recovery rate (all p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, RTR independently predicted unfavorable operative time (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.25), LOS (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.32-1.86), EBL (OR 2.24, 95% CI 2.18-2.30), and time to catheter removal (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.68-2.21), but not complications or continence recovery. There were no significant differences for any oncological outcomes (biochemical recurrence, local or systemic progression) between the RTR and no-RTR groups. While no PCa deaths were recorded, the overall mortality rate was significantly higher in the RTR group (17% vs 0.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although RP is feasible for RTR patients, the procedure poses non-negligible surgical challenges, with longer operative time and LOS and higher EBL, but no major differences in terms of complications and continence recovery. The RTR group had similar oncological outcomes to the no-RTR group but significantly higher overall mortality related to causes other than PCa. Therefore, careful selection for RP is required among candidates with previous RTR. PATIENT SUMMARY: Removal of the prostate for prostate cancer is possible in patients who have had a kidney transplant, and cancer control outcomes are comparable to those for the general population. However, transplant patients have a higher risk of death from causes other than prostate cancer and the prostate surgery is likely to be more challenging.

[CamiCon study: Evaluation of a new tool for automated and connected voiding calendar]. / Étude CamiCon : évaluation d'un nouvel outil pour la réalisation d'un calendrier mictionnel automatisé et connecté.

INTRODUCTION: A voiding diary (VD) is a key element in the evaluation of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) at initial presentation and during treatment to assess its effectiveness. In order to be clinically relevant, it must be performed over 3 days according to the International Continence Society (ICS). Unfortunately, some patients find it cumbersome. We aimed to evaluate the reliability and patient satisfaction when using a connected tank device. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted a single-center prospective study including 41 patients. Each patient completed a paper voiding diary and then a diary with Diary Pod® (DP) or inversely depending on the study arm. Data from 34 patients were collected. After completion of both diaries, patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire sent by email via GoogleForm. Study statistics were performed with Jamovi® and Excel® software. RESULT: Data from 34 patients were analyzed. There was a statically significant difference (P=0.046) between the mean volume calculated from the paper VD and that calculated from the connected VD (DP). There was no statistically significant difference (P=0.112) between the mean number of daytime voids, mean number of nighttime voids (P=0.156), mean water intake (P=0.183) reported on the paper VD and the connected VD. Thirteen (42%) paper VD and 1 connected VD did not include documentation of the presence or absence of urine leakage or urgency. There was no statistically significant difference between the two calendars regarding the presence or absence of urine leakage (P=0.180) and urinary urgency (P=0.564). Eighty-four percent (26/31) preferred the connected tank to the usual method (paper/pen), while 55% (17/31) and 29% (9/31) of the participants respectively answered that the DP was "very definitely" or "definitely" an aid for performing VD. Nevertheless, 39% (12/31) and 55% (17/31) considered its price to be high or fair and only 22% (7/31) were inclined to buy it. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the Diary connected reservoir Pod® is a reliable and innovative tool for voiding schedules. It facilitates data collection for the majority of patients (83%) and could, through better patient compliance, provide better quality data and help their interpretation by the physician. These factors could encourage the implementation of the connected voiding diary as a diagnostic tool. It would also be used for the assessment of treatment effectiveness in daily clinical practice as well as in research. Its cost remains a major obstacle, judged by 39% of patients to be too high, and could therefore be proposed in specific situations requiring precise data.

WNT-dependent interaction between inflammatory fibroblasts and FOLR2+ macrophages promotes fibrosis in chronic kidney disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health problem driven by myofibroblast accumulation, leading to interstitial fibrosis. Heterogeneity is a recently recognized characteristic in kidney fibroblasts in CKD, but the role of different populations is still unclear. Here, we characterize a proinflammatory fibroblast population (named CXCL-iFibro), which corresponds to an early state of myofibroblast differentiation in CKD. We demonstrate that CXCL-iFibro co-localize with macrophages in the kidney and participate in their attraction, accumulation, and switch into FOLR2+ macrophages from early CKD stages on. In vitro, macrophages promote the switch of CXCL-iFibro into ECM-secreting myofibroblasts through a WNT/ß-catenin-dependent pathway, thereby suggesting a reciprocal crosstalk between these populations of fibroblasts and macrophages. Finally, the detection of CXCL-iFibro at early stages of CKD is predictive of poor patient prognosis, which shows that the CXCL-iFibro population is an early player in CKD progression and demonstrates the clinical relevance of our findings.

Thermoablative Treatment of De Novo Tumor in Kidney Allograft.

BACKGROUND: The overall cancer risk increases in transplant patients, including in kidney allografts. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of patients with kidney allograft malignant tumors who underwent percutaneous thermal ablation. METHODS: We included 26 renal allograft tumors, including 7 clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCCs), 16 papillary RCCs, 1 clear-cell papillary RCC, and 2 tubulocystic RCCs, treated in 19 ablation sessions. Outcomes of thermal ablation therapy were assessed, including technical success, adverse events, local tumor progression, development of metastases, survival after thermal ablation, and changes in renal function. RESULTS: Success rate was achieved in all ablation sessions (primary success rate: 96%; secondary success rate: 100%). No adverse events were observed in grades 3, 4, or 5. The median follow-up period was of 34 mo (15-69 mo). Two patients died during follow-up from a cause independent of renal cancer. The median decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate 1 y after procedure was -4 (interquartile range, -7 to 0) mL/min/1.73 m 2 . One patient returned to dialysis within the year of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous thermal ablation shows convincing results for treating malignant renal graft tumors and should be a useful treatment option. The shorter hospitalization time, the advantage of avoiding a potentially challenging dissection of the transplant, and the excellent preservation of allograft function appear encouraging to extend this indication.

Should You Fix Testicular Prosthesis? A Satisfaction Survey From a Monocentric Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether testicular prosthesis should be fixed. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric study including 169 patients who had implantation of testicular prosthesis between January 2013 and December 2022. Patients answered a telephone questionnaire regarding prosthesis characteristics and satisfaction. RESULTS: Prosthesis was sutured for 59 patients (34.9%) out of 169. 146 patients answered the questionnaire. Satisfaction was excellent regarding size, weight, consistency, and shape. A position too high was a major complain in both groups. Pain and discomfort were significantly higher in the fixed group (30.8% vs 9.78%, P < .001). Few patients reported discomfort with the anchor prosthesis (22.9%). CONCLUSION: Overall satisfaction of the prosthesis is high but discomfort and high positioning are the two items remaining to improve. Our study suggests that fixing prosthesis is a cause of discomfort and won't allow a better positioning.

Effect of Recipient Body Mass Index on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the Transplant Committee from the French Association of Urology.

CONTEXT: The impact of recipient obesity on kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise all available evidence on the outcomes of KT in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2) versus nonobese patients (BMI <30 kg/m2). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Search was conducted in the MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify all studies reporting the outcomes of KT in obese versus nonobese recipients. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Fifty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Delayed graft function and surgical complications were significantly higher in obese recipients (delayed graft function: relative risk [RR]: 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-1.57, p < 0.01; surgical complications: RR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.36-2.22, p < 0.0001). Five-year patient survival (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-1.00, p = 0.01), 10-yr patient survival (RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.97, p = 0.006), and 10-yr graft survival (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96, p = 0.01) were significantly inferior in the obese group. CONCLUSIONS: KT in obese recipients was associated with lower patient and graft survival, and higher delayed graft function, acute rejection, and medical and surgical complications than nonobese recipients. In the current situation of organ shortage and increasing prevalence of obesity, ways to optimize KT in this setting should be investigated. PATIENT SUMMARY: Compared with nonobese population, kidney transplantation in obese recipients has inferior patient and graft survival, and higher medical and surgical complications.

Clinical Reproducibility of the Stone Volume Measurement: A "Kidney Stone Calculator" Study.

BACKGROUND: An accurate estimation of the stone burden is the key factor for predicting retrograde intra-renal surgical outcomes. Volumetric calculations better stratify stone burden than linear measurements. We developed a free software to assess the stone volume and estimate the lithotrity duration according to 3D-segmented stone volumes, namely the Kidney Stone Calculator (KSC). The present study aimed to validate the KSC's reproducibility in clinical cases evaluating its inter-observer and intra-observer correlations. METHODS: Fifty patients that harbored renal stones were retrospectively selected from a prospective cohort. For each patient, three urologists with different experience levels in stone management made five measurements of the stone volume on non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) images using the KSC. RESULTS: the overall inter-observer correlation (Kendall's concordance coefficient) was 0.99 (p < 0.0001). All three paired analyses of the inter-observer reproducibility were superior to 0.8. The intra-observer variation coefficients varied from 4% to 6%, and Kendall's intra-observer concordance coefficient was found to be superior to 0.98 (p < 0.0001) for each participant. Subgroup analyses showed that the segmentation of complex stones seems to be less reproductible. CONCLUSIONS: The Kidney Stone Calculator is a reliable tool for the stone burden estimation. Its extension for calculating the lithotrity duration is of major interest and could help the practitioner in surgical planning.

Contrast enhancement early after renal malignancy cryoablation: imaging findings associated with benignity.

OBJECTIVES: Contrast enhancement by MRI done early after cryoablation for renal malignancies may suggest residual tumor (RT). However, we have observed MRI enhancement within 48 h of cryoablation in patients who had no contrast enhancement 6 weeks later. Our purpose was to identify features of 48-h contrast enhancement in patients without RT. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous cryoablation of renal malignancies in 2013-2020, exhibited cryoablation-zone MRI contrast enhancement 48 h later, and had available 6-week MRI scans. Persistent or growing CE at 6 weeks vs. 48 h was classified as RT. A washout index was calculated for each 48-h MRI, and its performance for predicting RT was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: We included 60 patients with 72 cryoablation procedures and 83 cryoablation zones exhibiting 48-h contrast enhancement; mean age was 66 ± 17 years. Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma accounted for 95% of tumors. Of the 83 48-h enhancement zones, RT was observed in eight while 75 were benign. The 48-h enhancement was consistently visible at the arterial phase. Washout was significantly associated with RT (p < 0.001) and gradually increasing contrast enhancement with benignity (p < 0.009). A washout index below - 1.1 predicted RT with 88% sensitivity and 84% specificity. CONCLUSION: MRI contrast enhancement 48 h after cryoablation of renal malignancies was usually benign. Washout was associated with residual tumor, with a washout index value below - 1.1 exhibiting good performance in predicting residual tumor. These findings may help to guide decisions about repeat cryoablation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement 48 h after cryoablation of renal malignancies rarely indicates residual tumor, which is characterized by washout with a washout index lower than - 1.1. KEY POINTS: • Contrast enhancement at the arterial phase of magnetic resonance imaging done 48 h after cryoablation of a renal malignancy is usually benign. • Residual tumor manifesting as contrast enhancement at the arterial phase is characterized by subsequent marked washout. • A washout index below - 1.1 has 88% sensitivity and 84% specificity for residual tumor.

[Nephron sparing in the management of localized solid renal mass]. / Épargne néphronique dans la prise en charge des tumeurs rénales malignes solides localisées.

Managing a malignant renal tumor requires, first of all, a reflection on the necessity of its treatment. It must consider the renal function, altered at the time of diagnosis in 50% of cases. The treatment method chosen depends on many factors, in particular, the predicted residual renal function, the risk of chronic kidney disease, the need for temporary or long-term dialysis, and overall long-term survival. Other factors include the size, position, and number of tumors and a hereditary tumor background. When a renal-sparing management alternative is available, total nephrectomy should no longer be performed in patients with small malignant renal masses (cT1a). This may consist of surgery (partial nephrectomy or lumpectomy), percutaneous thermo-ablation (by radiofrequency, microwave, or cryotherapy). In patients with limited life expectancy, imaging-based surveillance may be proposed to suggest treatment in case of local progression. Good coordination between urologist, radiologist, nephrologist, and sometimes radiotherapist should allow optimal management of patients with a malignant renal tumor with or without underlying renal failure.

Impact of newly diagnosed prostate cancer at time of evaluation for renal transplantation.

Systematic screening for prostate cancer is widely recommended in candidates for renal transplant at the time of listing. There are concerns that overdiagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer may result in reducing access to transplant without demonstrated oncological benefits. The objective of the study was to assess the outcome of newly diagnosed prostate cancer in candidates for transplant at the time of listing, and its impact on transplant access and transplant outcomes according to treatment options. This retrospective study was conducted over 10 years in 12 French transplant centers. Patients included were candidates for renal transplant at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis. Demographical and clinical data regarding renal disease, prostate cancer, and transplant surgery were collected. The primary outcome of the study was the interval between prostate cancer diagnosis and active listing according to treatment options. Overall median time from prostate cancer diagnosis to active listing was 25.0 months [16.4-40.2], with statistically significant differences in median time between the radiotherapy and the active surveillance groups (p = .03). Prostate cancer treatment modalities had limited impact on access and outcome of renal transplantation. Active surveillance in low-risk patients does not seem to compromise access to renal transplantation, nor does it impact oncological outcomes.

Gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab for kidney metastatic collecting duct and medullary carcinomas: Results of a prospective phase II trial (BEVABEL-GETUG/AFU24).

BACKGROUND: Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) and collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) are rare entities with a poor outcome. First-line metastatic treatment is based on gemcitabine + platinum chemotherapy (GC) regimen but retrospective data suggest enhanced anti-tumour activity with the addition of bevacizumab. Therefore, we performed a prospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of GC + bevacizumab in metastatic RMC/CDC. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 open-label trial in 18 centres in France in patients with metastatic RMC/CDC and no prior systemic treatment. Patients received bevacizumab plus GC up to 6 cycles followed, for non-progressive disease, by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The co-primary end-points were objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (ORR-6; PFS-6). PFS, overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary end-points. At interim analysis, the trial was closed due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2019, 34 of the 41 planned patients have been enroled. After a median follow-up of 25 months, ORR-6 and PFS-6 were 29.4% and 47.1%, respectively. Median OS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6-24.2). Seven patients (20.6%) discontinued bevacizumab because of toxicities (hypertension, proteinuria, colonic perforation). Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 82% patients, the most common being haematologic toxicities and hypertension. Two patients experienced grade 5 toxicity (subdural haematoma related to bevacizumab and encephalopathy of unknown origin). CONCLUSION: Our study showed no benefit for bevacizumab added to chemotherapy in metastatic RMC and CDC with higher than expected toxicity. Consequently, GC regimen remains a therapeutic option for RMC/CDC patients.

Management and Outcome After Early Renal Transplant Vein Thrombosis: A French Multicentre Observational Study of Real-Life Practice Over 24 Years.

Early (<14 days) renal transplant vein thrombosis posttransplant (eRVTPT) is a rare but threatening complication. We aimed to assess eRVTPT management and the rate of functional renal transplantation. Of 11,172 adult patients who had undergone transplantation between 01/1997 and 12/2020 at 6 French centres, we identified 176 patients with eRVTPT (1.6%): 16 intraoperative (Group 1, G1) and 160 postoperative (Group 2, G2). All but one patient received surgical management. Patients in group G2 had at least one imaging test for diagnostic confirmation (N = 157, 98%). During the operative management of the G2 group, transplantectomy for graft necrosis was performed immediately in 59.1% of cases. In both groups, either of two techniques was preferred, namely, thrombectomy by renal venotomy or thrombectomy + venous anastomosis repair, with no difference in the functional graft rate (FGR) at hospital discharge (p = NS). The FGR was 62.5% in G1 and 8.1% in G2 (p < 0.001). Numerous complications occurred during the initial hospitalization: 38 patients had a postoperative infection (21.6%), 5 experienced haemorrhagic shock (2.8%), 29 exhibited a haematoma (16.5%), and 97 (55.1%) received a blood transfusion. Five patients died (2.8%). Our study confirms the very poor prognosis of early renal graft venous thrombosis.

Modified Surgical Model for Genitourinary Vascularized Composite Allotransplantations: An Anatomical Study.

SUMMARY: Total penile reconstruction represents a surgical challenge. Autologous reconstructions offer limited aesthetic results and variable urinary function recovery. To date, five genitourinary vascularized composite allotransplantations have been performed worldwide. However, in all cases, vascular complications have been reported. The objective of this study was to develop a modified surgical model for penile allotransplantation to limit the number of microsurgical anastomoses and ensure vascular reliability. The authors studied penile allotransplantation by performing dissections on 12 subjects. The study was carried out to ensure the vascularization of the entire penis shaft while limiting the number of anastomoses. The penis vasculature includes numerous angiosomes between its different subunits. The penile skin envelope is supplied by both external and internal pudendal vessels. The cavernous and spongy bodies are supplied by terminal branches of the internal pudendal vessels. The anterior pubic osteotomy approach allows access to the root of the cavernous bodies and to the Alcock ducts. This modified surgical model for penile allotransplantation could help future teams involved in genitourinary vascularized composite allotransplantations to improve urinary and sexual function. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The authors introduce an improved surgical technique for penile transplantation that enhances vascularization and graft viability. This innovative procedure optimizes blood flow through meticulous microsurgical anastomosis, resulting in improved functional outcomes. Its potential to revolutionize penile transplantation warrants further exploration and validation within the surgical community.

Active surveillance in renal transplant patients with prostate cancer: a multicentre analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Due to medical improvements leading to increased life expectancy after renal transplantation and widened eligibility criteria allowing older patients to be transplanted, incidence of (low-risk) prostate cancer (PCa) is increasing among renal transplant recipients (RTR). It remains to be established whether active surveillance (AS) for PCa represents a safe treatment option in this setting. Therefore, we aim to compare AS discontinuation and oncological outcomes of AS for PCa of RTR vs. non-transplant patients. METHODS: Multicentre study including RTR diagnosed with PCa between 2008 and 2018 in whom AS was initiated. A subgroup of non-RTR from the St. Antonius hospital AS cohort was used as a control group. Comparison of RTR vs. non-RTR was performed by 2:1 propensity score matched survival analysis. Outcome measures included tumour progression-free survival, treatment-free survival, metastasis rates, biochemical recurrence rates and overall survival. Patients were matched based on age, year of diagnosis, PSA, biopsy ISUP grade group, relative number of positive biopsy cores and clinical stage. RESULTS: A total of 628 patients under AS were evaluated, including 17 RTRs and 611 non-RTRs. A total of 13 RTR cases were matched with 24 non-RTR cases. Median overall follow-up for the RTR and non-RTR matched cases was, respectively, 5.1 (IQR 3.2-8.7) years and 5.7 (IQR 4.8-8.1) years. There were no events of metastasis and biochemical recurrence among matched cases. The matched-pair analysis results in a 1-year and 5-year survival of the RTR and non-RTR patients were, respectively, 100 vs. 92%, and 39 vs. 76% for tumour progression, 100 vs. 91% and 59 vs. 76% for treatment-free survival and, respectively, 100 vs. 100% and 88 vs. 100% for overall survival. No significant differences in tumour progression-free survival (p = 0.07) and treatment-free survival were observed (p = 0.3). However, there was a significant difference in overall survival comparing both groups (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: AS may be carefully considered in RTR with low-risk PCa. In our preliminary analysis, no major differences were present in AS outcomes between RTR and non-RTR. Overall mortality was significantly higher in the RTR subgroup.