Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vaccine ; 30(6): 1170-80, 2012 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22178096

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although influenza vaccination is widely recommended for immunosuppressed people, the same immune dysfunction that can increase the risk of contracting influenza might also compromise vaccine effectiveness, especially during pandemics. Clinical data have highlighted the role of adjuvants in improving vaccine efficacy. As uremic patients are especially vulnerable to infections, it is recommended that they should be vaccinated yearly against influenza. This paper presents the results of a pilot clinical trial, conducted in hemodialyzed patients with an adjuvated pandemic H1N1v influenza vaccine alone and combined with Thymosin-alpha 1. METHODS: Subjects were subdivided into 3 treatment groups receiving: the adjuvated pandemic influenza vaccine (Focetria) only (first treatment group), and the Vaccine+Thymosin alpha 1 (Zadaxin) at a dose of 3.2 and 6.4 mg (second and third treatment groups respectively). The immunoresponse was assessed on days 0, 21, 42, 84 and 168 after vaccine administration by means of Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI), Microneutralization (MN) and Single Radial Hemolysis (SRH) assays. The CHMP regards HI as the gold standard test to evaluate the immune response to influenza vaccines before influenza vaccines are licensed. The CHMP criteria are slightly different in adults (18-60-year-old subjects) and the elderly (>60 years old). Indeed, 40% of seroconversion, 70% of subjects seroprotected 21 days after vaccination, and a 2.5-fold increase in GMR (Geometric Mean Ratio) are required in adults, while in the elderly, the corresponding threshold values are: 30%, 60% and a 2-fold increase. All these criteria must be met for the licensing of a pandemic influenza vaccine. Safety evaluation was performed by means of Adverse Event (AE) recording, laboratory assays (hematology and chemistry), electrocardiogram, and assessment of vital signs. RESULTS: Three populations were considered: Intention-To-Treat (ITT) (94 patients), Per Protocol (PP) (82 patients), and Safety population (99 patients). With regard to the Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) and the Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) of HI on Day 21 in the ITT population, both "Vaccine+Thymosin alpha 1" groups presented better results than the "Vaccine only" group. A large proportion of ITT patients in the two Vaccine+Thymosin alpha 1 groups achieved seroconversion by Day 21. On Day 42, the decrease in the GMT of HI was greater in the Vaccine+Thymosin alpha 1 groups than in the vaccine only group. Similar results were obtained in the PP population. The CHMP criteria were fully met in the groups treated with Vaccine+Thymosin alpha 1. No AE was found to be related to Thymosin alpha 1 nor to the Focetria vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Although further studies in larger hemodialyzed populations are necessary, it can be concluded that Thymosin alpha 1 enhanced the immunogenicity of the pandemic influenza vaccine used. Moreover, it proved safe and well tolerated, and did not affect hematology or blood-chemistry values.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Timosina/análogos & derivados , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoensaio , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Diálise Renal , Timalfasina , Timosina/administração & dosagem , Timosina/efeitos adversos , Uremia/imunologia , Uremia/terapia , Adulto Jovem
2.
G Ital Nefrol ; 26(1): 90-3, 2009.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19255968

RESUMO

We report a case of Kaposi's sarcoma in a patient who received a double kidney transplant in 2005. Immunosuppression was induced with rapamycin and antilymphocyte serum while maintenance therapy consisted of rapamycin, corticosteroids and mycophenolic acid. The patient developed delayed graft function but no rejection. In November 2006 and March 2007 two graft biopsies were taken because of a significant rise in serum creatinine; they revealed chronic allograft nephropathy and polyomavirus infection. Meanwhile a skin biopsy of the leg was performed to determine the nature of a discolored lesion. The morphohistological diagnosis was Kaposi's sarcoma. For this reason rapamycin was stopped and steroid treatment gradually reduced. Specific therapy with doxorubicin was started; radiological and endoscopic examination excluded disseminated disease while serological tests were positive for antibodies to HHV-8, a virus known to cause Kaposi's sarcoma. Unfortunately, withdrawal of antirejection therapy caused loss of the graft, so the patient had to start dialysis. In this report we stress the possible development of malignancy in transplanted patients who are given rapamycin. Rapamycin is known to be an antirejection drug and to have antineoplastic activity; the major risk of malignancy is probably related to immunosuppression rather than the type of drugs used to obtain it.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Sarcoma de Kaposi/induzido quimicamente , Sirolimo/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA