The association between number of learners and pharmacist and technician levels of burnout.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the relationship between learner load and pharmacist and pharmacy technician burnout. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the association between burnout and the number of learners (residents, students, and new employees) assigned to pharmacists or pharmacy technicians. METHODS: A validated survey to measure burnout and professional fulfillment was administered to employees of a university health system's pharmacy service in 2019. A threshold analysis determined the optimal cutoff for number of learners trained that maximized the ability to predict binary outcomes. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used, and effect sizes between percentages were reported. Finally, the adjusted associations between number of learners and outcomes were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 448 pharmacy staff members were included in the analysis. Of those, 57% (n = 254) worked in ambulatory care, 27.4% (n = 122) worked in an inpatient setting, and 15.7% (n = 70) worked in infrastructure. Pharmacists working in an inpatient setting who reported training 4 or more learners per year indicated significantly higher rates of burnout than those training fewer learners on both a single-item burnout assessment (64.3% vs 31.0%; P = 0.01; effect size, 0.68) and a 10-item burnout assessment (54.8% vs 13.8%; P = 0.01; effect size, 0.91). Similar results were not observed in pharmacists working in ambulatory care and infrastructure positions or in pharmacy technicians. CONCLUSION: Added precepting and training responsibilities may be associated with higher levels of burnout among pharmacy team members, particularly inpatient pharmacists.

Burnout, professional fulfillment, sleep impairment, and self-compassion within an academic medical center pharmacy department.

PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of burnout, professional fulfillment, sleep impairment, and self-compassion within an academic medical center pharmacy department across varying job titles and practice settings. METHODS: In fall 2019, pharmacy staff completed a REDCap-based survey that consisted of a validated instrument relating to burnout, professional fulfilment, sleep-related impairment, and self-compassion. Burnout was measured by both single-item and extended 10-item questions on the survey. Survey outcomes from each domain were compared between pharmacists and pharmacy technicians/interns, as well as among practice settings (inpatient, ambulatory care, and infrastructure). RESULTS: A total of 593 surveys were completed by pharmacy personnel, representing a preliminary response rate of 71.8% (593/826). A total of 505 survey responses were analyzed (235 [46.5%] for pharmacists and 270 [53.5%] for pharmacy technicians/interns). Inpatient pharmacists reported the highest level of burnout (50.7%), followed by ambulatory care pharmacists (29.3%) and those working in infrastructure (24.3%). Pharmacy technicians working in infrastructure reported the highest level of burnout (36.4%), followed by inpatient (30.8%) and ambulatory care (28.3%) pharmacy technicians. There was no association between job type or location and burnout according to both single-item and 10-item burnout measures. A higher rate of burnout, sleep impairment, and decreased self-compassion and a lower rate of professional fulfillment were observed for inpatient pharmacists compared to pharmacists in ambulatory care or infrastructure. Except for higher rates of reported professional fulfillment, a similar trend was observed for pharmacy technicians. CONCLUSION: Burnout was reported across the pharmacy team regardless of practice site.

Use of a Feedback Survey as a Part of a Wellness Champions Program to Improve Academic Faculty Satisfaction and Burnout: Implications for Burnout in Academic Health Centers.

BACKGROUND: Faculty and trainee well-being at academic medical centers is a nationwide concern. In response, the University of Utah Health created a system-wide provider wellness program that used individual faculty champions who were empowered to 1) examine the unique needs of their department or division using a lens of quality improvement, 2) design projects to address well-being, and 3) measure impact of projects addressing well-being. One team used a feedback tool to attempt to improve the well-being of Family Medicine faculty by better understanding challenges and developing a roadmap for action. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effectiveness of an anonymous feedback tool on faculty well-being. METHODS: The Division of Family Medicine developed and implemented a quarterly anonymous faculty survey to facilitate an ongoing improvement process for faculty wellness in 2016. The faculty survey identified thematic concerns, which were used to develop constructive solutions and systemic changes. RESULTS: A closed loop feedback structure provided rich faculty input into impacts on burnout and professional well-being. Sense of control (good to optimal) over workload among faculty increased significantly (p = 0.011) from 10% to 42% over one year exhibiting a large effect size (Cohen's h = 0.751). Faculty burnout, using a single item emotional exhaustion question validated to the Maslach Burnout Inventory, was reduced from 48% to 25% showing a medium effect size (Cohen's h = 0.490 with p = 0.097). Work related stress was reduced from 72% to 50% demonstrating clinical significance (Cohen's h = 0.465) but not statistical significance (p = 0.154)-an effect which was more noticeable when comparing means between years (Cohen's d=0.451with p = 0.068). Response rate was 100% in 2016 (29/29) and 92% (23/25) in 2017. CONCLUSION: This faculty survey, which has since been adopted by other groups at the University of Utah, could help improve well-being in a variety of health care professions.