Why the Indian Health Care Improvement Act Has Failed to Effectively Fund Workforce Development for the Indian Health Service.

The Indian Health Service (IHS) faces severe workforce shortages due to underfunding and underdevelopment of clinical training programs. Unlike other direct federal health care systems that have implemented clinical training paradigms as central parts of their success, the IHS has no formalized process for developing such programs internally or in partnership with academic institutions. While the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA) authorizes mechanisms by which the IHS can support overall workforce development, a critical portion of the act (U.S. Code 1616p) intended for developing clinical training programs within the agency remains unfunded. Here, we review the funding challenges of the IHCIA, as well as its authorized and funded workforce development programs that have only partially addressed workforce shortages. We propose that through additional funding to 1616p, the IHS could implement clinical training programs needed to prepare a larger workforce more capable of meeting the needs of American Indian/Alaska Native communities.

Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake in Great Plains American Indian Communities.

With the development of the COVID-19 vaccine in late 2020, the importance of understanding the drivers of vaccine acceptance and vaccine hesitancy is important for the health of American Indian and Alaska Native communities. We conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous survey in October 2021 using established quantitative methods of virtual surveys to reach tribal members living on three reservations in the Great Plains (N = 679). We conducted multivariate analyses using logistic regression to assess the association between independent variables and COVID-19 vaccination status after adjusting for confounding. Respondents were more likely to have received a COVID-19 vaccine if they were older, had a full-time job, had previously received a flu vaccination, reported a higher level of trust in the health care system, had increased access to vaccinations, were able to isolate, or if they held a desire to keep their family safe. This study is one of the first to offer insights into the associations and possible determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among American Indians in the Great Plains and was completed as part of the National Institutes of Health Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics of Underserved Populations consortium. We identified a set of demographic, socioeconomic, and motivational factors that are associated with COVID-19 vaccination uptake among Great Plains American Indians and Alaska Natives. It is possible that future vaccine uptake may be enhanced through economic development, strengthening health care operations and care quality, and focusing vaccination messaging on family and community impact.

Rural Internal Medicine Residencies: Models, Facilitators, Barriers, and Equity Considerations.

Rural communities in the USA on average experience higher mortality rates and greater physician shortages than urban communities, especially rural communities that are historically Black, American Indian, and Alaska Native. Graduate medical education resources in the USA are concentrated within teaching hospitals in non-rural settings. The federal government has recently established several pathways to expand rural graduate medical education. In the 2010s, most of the expansion and innovation in rural graduate medical education occurred in family medicine. In the 2020s, internal medicine has also begun to increase its rural graduate medical education footprint. Rural internal medicine residency training models include Rural Track Programs (RTPs), in which training is split between urban and rural training sites. RTPs, though the cornerstone of rural residency expansion in family medicine, raise complex issues in internal medicine. We review the structure of RTPs, alternate rural residency training pathways, and the facilitators and challenges of each pathway with respect to internal medicine training.

COVID-19 Testing Factors Among Great Plains American Indians.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 created unparalleled challenges for vulnerable communities, especially among American Indians and Alaska Natives. An effective COVID-19 response requires a tribally driven effort to understand the perspectives of Tribal members on testing and to ensure that delivery strategies are grounded in the cultural values, traditions, and experiences of the Tribes. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous survey in October 2021 using established methods to reach Tribal members residing in three Reservations in the Great Plains (N = 679). Multivariate analyses were conducted using logistic regression to assess the association between independent variables and COVID-19 testing uptake after adjusting for confounding. RESULTS: After multivariate adjustment, a respondent's employment status, ability to isolate if diagnosed with COVID-19, and endorsing that COVID-19 testing is only needed if one has symptoms were significantly correlated with having been previously tested for COVID-19. Participants without a full-time job were about half as likely to have been tested for COVID-19 compared to those with full-time jobs. Participants who reported not being able to isolate if they tested positive for COVID-19 and participants who did not think testing was needed if asymptomatic were also half as likely to be tested. CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring that everyone has the ability to isolate, that people who are not working have easy access to testing, and that everyone understands the value of testing after exposure are key steps to maximizing testing uptake. Efforts will only be successful if there is continued investment in programs that provide free testing access for everyone on Reservations.

Dental care utilization in Massachusetts before and after initiation of medication for opioid use disorder: A cross-sectional study of a state all-payer claims database.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) are at higher risk of poor oral health. Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has been shown to improve outcomes for patients with OUD, but it is unknown how initiation of MOUD affects access to oral health services. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all individuals in the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database prescribed oral buprenorphine-naloxone or injectable naltrexone from 2013 to 2016. We evaluated dental utilization in the year before and after beginning MOUD. A logistic regression predicting dental utilization was conducted. RESULTS: Among the 54,791 individuals, rates of dental utilization were low both before and after MOUD (10.5% and 10% with a dental visit, respectively). Of those who did not have a dental visit in the year before starting MOUD, 95.1% did not have a dental visit in the year after. Rates of various procedure types were comparable before and after MOUD. In a logistic regression, a prior dental visit was associated with 9.82 times the odds (95% CI 9.14-10.55) of having a dental visit after starting MOUD; increasing age, being prescribed naltrexone, having a mood disorder or HIV, year of initiation or being on Medicaid were also associated with having a dental visit. Male patients and those with Medicare or private insurance were less likely to have a dental visit. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating MOUD did not substantially result in increased dental access or substantial changes in dental procedures received. Patients receiving treatment for OUD may require additional support to access dental care.

Siamit: A Novel Academic-Tribal Health Partnership in Northwest Alaska.

PROBLEM: American Indians and Alaska Natives hold a state-conferred right to health, yet significant health and health care disparities persist. Academic medical centers are resource-rich institutions committed to public service, yet few are engaged in responsive, equitable, and lasting tribal health partnerships to address these challenges. APPROACH: Maniilaq Association, a rural and remote tribal health organization in Northwest Alaska, partnered with Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School to address health care needs through physician staffing, training, and quality improvement initiatives. This partnership, called Siamit, falls under tribal governance, focuses on supporting community health leaders, addresses challenges shaped by extreme geographic remoteness, and advances the mission of academic medicine in the context of tribal health priorities. OUTCOMES: Throughout the 2019-2020 academic year, Siamit augmented local physician staffing, mentored health professions trainees, provided continuing medical education courses, implemented quality improvement initiatives, and provided clinical care and operational support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Siamit began with a small budget and limited human resources, demonstrating that relatively small investments in academic-tribal health partnerships can support meaningful and positive outcomes. NEXT STEPS: During the 2020-2021 academic year, the authors plan to expand Siamit's efforts with a broader social medicine curriculum, additional attending staff, more frequent trainee rotations, an increasingly robust mentorship network for Indigenous health professions trainees, and further study of the impact of these efforts. Such partnerships may be replicable in other settings and represent a significant opportunity to advance community health priorities, strengthen tribal health systems, support the next generation of Indigenous health leaders, and carry out the academic medicine mission of teaching, research, and service.

Clinician Experiences of Care Provision in the Correctional Setting: A Scoping Review.

Little is known about the experiences of correctional health care providers and how their experiences impact the correctional health care system. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines, multiple databases were searched. Each abstract was read by two reviewers with a third for consensus as needed. Full-text articles were selected through a second round of review. Of 4,467 citations, 61 were selected for full-text evaluation and 23 were ultimately included. Major themes identified were the distinctive working environment, burnout, and the presence of ethical dilemmas, including the tension between security and clinical considerations. This scoping review identified a limited number of articles centered on the health care provider experience in the correctional setting.

Oral Health Status of Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with poor oral health, as well as reduced access to dental care. A large percentage of patients hospitalized in the United States carry a diagnosis of diabetes; however, the oral health status of patients with diabetes who are hospitalized is unknown. METHODS: All patients meeting inclusion criteria on the general medicine service of a tertiary care hospital were invited to participate. Subjects were asked about their access to dental care and perceptions of their oral health. A dental hygienist conducted examinations, including decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) and periodontal screening and recording (PSR) indices on a subset of subjects. RESULTS: The 105 subjects had a mean age of 69 ± 12 years and a median A1C of 7.5 ± 2.1%. Rates of comorbidity and polypharmacy were high. The mean number of DMFT was 23.0 ± 7.2, with 10.1 ± 7.2 missing teeth. Forty- four percent of subjects had a removable prosthesis. Sixty-eight percent had a PSR index ≥4 in at least one sextant, indicating moderate periodontal disease. CONCLUSION: Rates of missing teeth, removable prostheses, and periodonal inflammation were high among hospitalized patients with diabetes, but patients did not perceive their oral health to be poor. Health care providers should be aware of the oral health risks of patients with diabetes during hospitalization, and dentists should consider screening patients with diabetes for recent hospitalization.

The 2019 Partial Government Shutdown and Its Impact on Health Care for American Indians and Alaska Natives.

The 2018-9 partial government shutdown created a 35-day gap in federal appropriations for the Indian Health Service and tribal health programs. With ongoing challenges for American Indian and Alaska Native health systems, including clinician shortages and poor health outcomes, the funding gap engendered substantial health risks. Other federal health systems have been sheltered from this and past shutdowns through receiving their appropriations in advance. Several approaches exist to implementing advance appropriations, including instituting advance appropriations across Bureau of Indian Affairs and Indian Health Service programs; or by moving Indian Health Service funding to the same appropriation as the Department of Health and Human Services. Furthermore, building and strengthening health partnerships with non-federal institutions, such as academic medical centers, may help distribute financial risk and strengthen care systems.

Opioid and Amphetamine Treatment Trends Among American Indians in the Great Plains.

OBJECTIVES: Traditionally underserved populations in the United States, particularly rural and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities, are disproportionately impacted by the opioid and amphetamine epidemics and have a higher risk for substance use disorders. AI/AN communities in the American Great Plains face exceptional health risks. We aim to describe recent trends in opioid and amphetamine treatment admissions for AI/ANs living in the Great Plains relative to that of the general population. METHODS: We used data from the 2014 to 2016 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS) Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) for Admissions. We extracted opioid and amphetamine treatment admissions for self-identified AI/AN and non-AI/AN patients living in the Great Plains: North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Iowa. Average annual admission rates were calculated and compared from 2014 to 2016 for AI/AN versus non-AI/AN populations. RESULTS: While opioid and amphetamine treatment admissions from 2014 to 2016 increased in both AI/AN (49 vs 80 per 10,000) and non-AI/AN (20 vs 26 per 10,000) populations, the rate of increase was significantly greater among AI/ANs (64% vs 32%; P < 0. 01). These trends are largely reflective of increased amphetamine use treatment admissions observed in both AI/AN and non-AI/AN populations. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment admissions for opioid and amphetamine use have increased from 2014 to 2016 for both AI/AN and non-AI/AN individuals in the Great Plains, driven largely by amphetamine use. AI/AN individuals were observed to seek care at a much higher rate. This increase in treatment admissions suggests increasing demand for services, which, in turn, necessitates greater investment of resources into AI/AN health facilities to address opioid and amphetamine use disorder in this underserved population.

Evaluation of an Interprofessional Student-Faculty Collaborative Clinic in a Jail.

Jail-based student-run clinics, though uncommon, have the potential to impact the future health workforce. We evaluated, via a survey of student attitudes and a collection of lessons learned, a student-faculty collaborative clinic that was implemented in a jail in 2015. Clinic participation led to significantly greater student volunteer ratings of the importance of collaborating with oral health providers and of comfort in providing care to incarcerated populations. We report lessons learned regarding logistical considerations, volunteer behavior, and common issues arising in clinic visits. The clinic proved feasible and sustainable over several years, offering a new model for the involvement of trainees in correctional health care.

Who Should Make Decisions for Unrepresented Patients Who Are Incarcerated?

The United States has a high incarceration rate. Incarceration is associated with increased risk for cancer, chronic illness, serious mental illness, and substance use disorder. People who are incarcerated are less likely to be offered or participate in advance care planning, less likely to document their treatment preferences, and might not have a surrogate if one is needed. This article explores medical decision making for patients who are incarcerated and unrepresented and considers advantages and disadvantages of different classes of decision makers for them.