A tale of two leeches: Toward the understanding of the evolution and development of behavioral neural circuits.

In the animal kingdom, behavioral traits encompass a broad spectrum of biological phenotypes that have critical roles in adaptive evolution, but an EvoDevo approach has not been broadly used to study behavior evolution. Here, we propose that, by integrating two leech model systems, each of which has already attained some success in its respective field, it is possible to take on behavioral traits with an EvoDevo approach. We first identify the developmental changes that may theoretically lead to behavioral evolution and explain why an EvoDevo study of behavior is challenging. Next, we discuss the pros and cons of the two leech model species, Hirudo, a classic model for invertebrate neurobiology, and Helobdella, an emerging model for clitellate developmental biology, as models for behavioral EvoDevo research. Given the limitations of each leech system, neither is particularly strong for behavioral EvoDevo. However, the two leech systems are complementary in their technical accessibilities, and they do exhibit some behavioral similarities and differences. By studying them in parallel and together with additional leech species such as Haementeria, it is possible to explore the different levels of behavioral development and evolution.

Gap junction expression is required for normal chemical synapse formation.

Electrical and chemical synapses provide two distinct modes of direct communication between neurons, and the embryonic development of the two is typically not simultaneous. Instead, in both vertebrates and invertebrates, gap junction-based electrical synapses arise before chemical synaptogenesis, and the early circuits composed of gap junction-based electrical synapses resemble those produced later by chemical synapses. This developmental sequence from electrical to chemical synapses has led to the hypothesis that, in developing neuronal circuits, electrical junctions are necessary forerunners of chemical synapses. Up to now, it has been difficult to test this hypothesis directly, but we can identify individual neurons in the leech nervous system from before the time when synapses are first forming, so we could test the hypothesis. Using RNA interference, we transiently reduced gap junction expression in individual identified neurons during the 2-4 d when chemical synapses normally form. We found that the expected chemical synapses failed to form on schedule, and they were still missing months later when the nervous system was fully mature. We conclude that the formation of gap junctions between leech neurons is a necessary step in the formation of chemical synaptic junctions, confirming the predicted relation between electrical synapses and chemical synaptogenesis.

Types of taste circuits synaptically linked to a few geniculate ganglion neurons.

The present study evaluates the central circuits that are synaptically engaged by very small subsets of the total population of geniculate ganglion cells to test the hypothesis that taste ganglion cells are heterogeneous in terms of their central connections. We used transsynaptic anterograde pseudorabies virus labeling of fungiform taste papillae to infect single or small numbers of geniculate ganglion cells, together with the central neurons with which they connect, to define differential patterns of synaptically linked neurons in the taste pathway. Labeled brain cells were localized within known gustatory regions, including the rostral central subdivision (RC) of the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST), the principal site where geniculate axons synapse, and the site containing most of the cells that project to the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) of the pons. Cells were also located in the rostral lateral NST subdivision (RL), a site of trigeminal and sparse geniculate input, and the ventral NST (V) and medullary reticular formation (RF), a caudal brainstem pathway leading to reflexive oromotor functions. Comparisons among cases, each with a random, very small subset of labeled geniculate neurons, revealed "types" of central neural circuits consistent with a differential engagement of either the ascending or the local, intramedullary pathway by different classes of ganglion cells. We conclude that taste ganglion cells are heterogeneous in terms of their central connectivity, some engaging, predominantly, the ascending "lemniscal," taste pathway, a circuit associated with higher order discriminative and homeostatic functions, others engaging the "local," intramedullary "reflex" circuit that mediates ingestion and rejection oromotor behaviors.