Effectiveness and safety of a novel, collapsible pessary for management of pelvic organ prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Pessaries are an effective treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, yet currently available pessaries can cause discomfort during removal and insertion. An early feasibility trial of an investigational, collapsible pessary previously demonstrated mechanical feasibility during a brief 15-minute office trial. Longer-term, patient-centered safety and efficacy data are needed. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of the investigational vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse at 3 months. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, 7-center, open-label equivalence study with participants serving as their own controls. Subjects were current users of a Gellhorn or ring pessary with ≥stage 2 prolapse. Subjective and objective data were collected at baseline for 1 month while subjects used their current pessary. Data were then collected throughout a 3-month treatment phase with the study pessary. The primary outcome was change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 score. Secondary outcome measures included objective assessment of prolapse support, changes in the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7, and pain with insertion and removal, measured using a visual analog scale. Data from subjects fitted with the study pessary were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach, and those who dropped out were assigned scores at the upper limit of the predefined equivalence limits. Secondary per protocol analyses included subjects who completed treatment. The study was powered to 80% with a minimal important change equivalence limit of 18.3 points on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scale. Square root transformations were used for nonparametric data, and P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 78 subjects were enrolled, however, 16 withdrew before study pessary placement. The study pessary was fitted in 62 subjects (50 ring and 12 Gellhorn pessary users), and 48 (62%) completed the 3-month intervention. The change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scores at 3 months demonstrated equivalence when compared with the subjects' baseline scores (mean difference, -3.96 [improvement]; 90% confidence interval, -11.99 to 4.08; P=.002). Among those completing study, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scores, equivalence was not demonstrated and scores favored the study pessary (mean difference, -10.45; 90% confidence interval, -20.35 to 0.54; P=.095). Secondary outcomes included objective measures of support, which were similar (mean difference: Ba, 0.54 cm; Bp, 0.04 cm, favoring study pessary; improvement in mean Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 scores for those who completed the trial: before, 32.23; after, 16.86; P=.019), and pain with insertion and removal, which was lower with the study pessary than with the subject's own pessary (mean difference visual analog scale score insertion, 9.91 mm; P=.019; removal, 11.23 mm; P=.019). No serious adverse events related to the pessary were reported. CONCLUSION: Equivalence was demonstrated in the primary outcome of the study pessary when compared with current, noncollapsible pessaries in terms of change in severity and bother of pelvic floor symptoms. Among participants who completed the trial, the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 improved with study pessary use and change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scores were nonequivalent, favoring the study pessary. Subjects reported significantly lower pain scores with both pessary insertion and removal with the novel collapsible pessary when compared with their standard pessary.

Impact of solifenacin on diary-recorded and patient-reported urgency in patients with severe overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: It is widely recognized that patient perception of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms can vary considerably from mild to severe bother. This post hoc analysis reports outcomes in patients with severe OAB symptoms at baseline taken from the VESIcare Efficacy and Safety in PatieNts with Urgency Study (VENUS). METHODS: VENUS was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of solifenacin (5 or 10 mg/day, flexibly dosed) in OAB patients. The primary endpoint in VENUS was mean change from baseline to study end in urgency episodes/day using 3-day bladder diaries. Secondary endpoints included other diary endpoints (frequency, incontinence, and nocturia), warning time (WT; time between first sensation of urgency to voiding), and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of urgency (the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale [IUSS] and Urgency Perception Scale [UPS]) and of symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL) (the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition [PPBC] and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire). For this analysis, severe OAB was defined as baseline PPBC score ≥5 (1 = no problems, 6 = many severe problems). TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00454896. RESULTS: In total, 158/707 (22.3%) patients in the full analysis set (FAS) reported severe OAB symptoms. Solifenacin reduced mean urgency episodes/day versus placebo in the severe subgroup (-4.6 vs. -3.1, p = 0.1150), similar to the significant reduction observed in the FAS (-3.9 vs. -2.7, p < 0.0001). Solifenacin also improved the other diary endpoints and PRO measures in the severe subgroup; these changes were consistent with the significant solifenacin- versus placebo-related improvements for the FAS. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild/moderate, and few patients taking solifenacin or placebo discontinued treatment in the severe subgroup (4.5% vs. 6.5%) or FAS (6.5% vs. 4.6%). Key limitations are that VENUS was not powered to detect treatment differences in subgroups, and that the lack of a standardized definition of OAB symptom severity may limit the generalizability of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe OAB symptoms showed objective and subjective improvements in symptoms, symptom bother, HRQL, and urgency severity with solifenacin similar to the FAS. Solifenacin was also well-tolerated in this subgroup.

Solifenacin for overactive bladder: secondary analysis of data from VENUS based on baseline continence status.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: VENUS evaluated the efficacy of solifenacin on urgency in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). We hypothesized that solifenacin would be comparably efficacious in continent and incontinent patients. METHODS: VENUS was a 12-week, placebo-controlled trial in patients with OAB. Treatment efficacy was assessed using bladder diaries and patient-reported outcome measures. The primary endpoint was the change in daily urgency episodes. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted using baseline continence status. RESULTS: Solifenacin reduced urgency episodes versus placebo in continent (-3.4 vs. -2.3) and incontinent patients (-4.2 vs. -2.9) and incontinence episodes (-2.1 vs. -1.2) in that subgroup; 58% versus 42% of incontinent patients receiving solifenacin versus placebo were continent at study end. In both cohorts, solifenacin- versus placebo-treated patients showed greater improvements in perceptions of urgency severity, symptom bother, and health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis demonstrates the efficacy of solifenacin regardless of baseline continence status.

Pathophysiology of anal incontinence, constipation, and defecatory dysfunction.

Anorectal disorders cause significant discomfort and embarrassment in women. The onset typically follows childbirth and symptoms increase with age. This article discusses anal incontinence, defecatory dysfunction, rectal prolapse, and constipation.

Solifenacin for overactive bladder: patient-reported outcomes from a large placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent, chronic condition that can negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQL). Treatment goals are to improve symptoms and HRQL. We assessed the efficacy of solifenacin in OAB patients using several patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, with a focus on urgency severity. Results for the primary endpoint, reductions in daily urgency episodes, and other bladder-diary variables have been recently reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 12-week multicenter trial, 739 patients (aged >or= 18 years) were randomized to flexibly dosed solifenacin (5/10 mg) or placebo. Prespecified secondary PRO measures included the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS), Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q). Appropriate statistical tests compared treatment-group differences in continuous and categorical data. RESULTS: In the full analysis set, patients who received solifenacin (n = 357) versus placebo (n = 350) showed significant improvements on the IUSS and UPS; treatment-group differences were 0.4 (P < 0.0001) and 0.2 (P = 0.0018), respectively. On the PPBC, significantly more patients taking solifenacin (66%) than placebo (48%) perceived fewer bladder-related problems (P < 0.0001) by week 12. On the OAB-q, solifenacin was superior to placebo for the Symptom Bother and total HRQL scales and for 3 of the 4 HRQL domains at study end (P

Treatment with solifenacin increases warning time and improves symptoms of overactive bladder: results from VENUS, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin treatment for overactive bladder (OAB) with a focus on urgency-related endpoints. Changes in number of urgency episodes were evaluated as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included changes in conventional diary-based OAB symptoms. We also measured warning time (defined as the time from first sensation of urgency to voiding). METHODS: We randomized patients (n = 739) to once-daily solifenacin or placebo for 12 weeks. Solifenacin 5 mg or matching placebo was administered for 4 weeks; dose could be maintained or adjusted at weeks 4 and 8. Participants completed 3-day micturition diaries at multiple study visits; warning time was recorded at baseline and week 12. RESULTS: At study end, the mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours decreased by 3.91 (from 6.15 to 2.24) with solifenacin and by 2.73 (from 6.03 to 3.30) with placebo (P < .0001 between groups). Other diary-recorded symptoms (incontinence and micturition frequency) were also significantly more reduced with solifenacin compared with placebo. Median warning time increased 31.5 seconds (baseline, 67.8 seconds) with solifenacin, significantly longer (P = .008) than the median increase of 12.0 seconds (baseline, 65.0 seconds) observed with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Solifenacin treatment significantly reduced episodes of urgency and other key symptoms of OAB. Solifenacin is the first antimuscarinic to demonstrate significant warning time improvement at approved dosing, as shown in a large OAB study population. This is the largest OAB clinical trial yet conducted to evaluate warning time and diary variables in the same study population.

Pyometra complicating a LeFort colpocleisis.

An 81-year-old woman presented with uterine procedentia and incomplete bladder emptying. She initially experienced significant relief of her symptoms with a pessary but developed chronic vaginal bleeding and discharge. She subsequently underwent a LeFort colpocleisis. She presented to the office 7 weeks later complaining of a persistent vaginal discharge and loss of appetite. She was admitted to the hospital and was diagnosed with a pyometra and underwent a supracervical hysterectomy without complications.

Suture erosion rates and long-term surgical outcomes in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament suspension with braided polyester suture.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe suture erosion rates and long-term surgical outcomes in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament suspension (SSLS) using braided polyester suture. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing SSLS for vaginal prolapse between 1999 and 2005. Outcomes included rate and timing of suture erosion and related symptoms, additional treatment, and long-term success rates. RESULTS: Sixty-four of 92 subjects had SSLS with braided polyester suture and had an average follow-up of 26.5 months. Suture-related complications occurred in 36% of patients. Mean time to presentation was 18.9 months. Vaginal bleeding occurred in 74%, and suture removal was required in 70% of patients with symptoms. Recurrent prolapse developed in 27% of patients, but additional therapy was required in only 6%. CONCLUSION: Permanent braided polyester sutures are associated with a high rate of suture-related complications over the long term and frequently require additional intervention to resolve associated symptoms.

Morbidity and mortality rates of elective gynecologic surgery in the elderly woman.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in elderly women who undergo gynecologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The charts of 54 consecutive women ages 70 to 85 years who underwent major gynecologic surgery between June 1998 and November 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean age was 76.7 years. Fifty procedures (92.6%) were performed for pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence. Forty-nine of the procedures were performed vaginally, and 27 of the procedures (50%) were performed with the use of general anesthesia. Postoperative cardiac complications occurred in five patients (10%), including three myocardial infarctions, two of which were fatal. Other complications included benign cardiac arrhythmias in two patients, slow return of gastrointestinal function in five patients (9.3%), and transient mental status changes in four patients (7.4%). The mean length of stay was 4 days. CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications occurred infrequently among elderly women who underwent gynecologic surgery. Although age alone is not a contraindication to elective surgery, there may be increased risks for geriatric women.