RESUMO
Arrhythmic storm is a clinical emergency associated with high mortality, which requires multi-disciplinary management. Reprogramming of the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) aimed at reducing shocks, adrenergic blockade using beta-blockers, sedation/anxiolysis, and blockade of the stellate ganglion represent the first simple and effective manoeuvres, but further suppression of arrhythmias with antiarrhythmics is often required. A low-risk patient (e.g. monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, functioning ICD, and haemodynamically stable) should be managed with a beta-blocker (possibly non-selective) plus amiodarone, in addition to sedation with a benzodiazepine or dexmedetomidine; in patients at greater risk (high burden and haemodynamic instability), autonomic modulation with blockade of the stellate ganglion and the addition of a second antiarrhythmic (lidocaine) should be considered. In patients refractory to these measures, with advanced heart failure, general anaesthesia with intubation and the establishment of a haemodynamic circulatory support should be considered. Ablation, performed early, appears to be superior in terms of mortality and reduction of future shocks compared with titration of antiarrhythmics.
RESUMO
Electrocardiographic algorithms are particularly useful to differentiate, in the presence of a wide complex tachycardia, between supraventricular aberrancy and ventricular tachycardias (VT). There are numerous limitations to the sensitivity and specificity of these algorithms including the presence of accessory pathways, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, congenital heart diseases, electrolytes impairments, and artificial pacing. Once the diagnosis of VT has been reached, other algorithms can help in localizing the origin of the ventricular arrhythmia. These approaches are also limited by the anatomic structure of where the arrhythmia originates. This article illustrates the difficulties in applying common algorithms in many clinical circumstances.