Patient-Related Predictors of Treatment Failure after Two-Stage Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment has high failure rates even after two-stage revision. Risk factors for treatment failure after staged revision for PJI are not well defined, nor is it well established how they correlate with the risks of developing an index PJI. Identifying modifiable risk factors may allow preoperative optimization, while identifying non-modifiable risk factors can influence surgical options or advise against further surgery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to better define predictors of treatment failure in two-stage revision for PJI. METHODS: The Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched from their inception in December 1976 to April 15, 2023. Studies comparing patient-related variables between patients successfully treated who had two-staged revision total hip arthroplasty and patients with persistent infections were included. Studies were screened, and two independent reviewers extracted data, while a third resolved discrepancies. Meta-analysis was performed on these data. There were 10,052 unique studies screened, and 21 studies met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. RESULTS: There was good-quality evidence that obesity, liver cirrhosis, and previous failed revisions for PJI are non-modifiable risk factors, while intravenous drug use and smoking are modifiable risk factors for treatment failure after two-stage revision for hip PJI. Reoperation between revision stages was also significantly associated with an increased risk of treatment failure. Interestingly, other risk factors for an index PJI including male gender, American Society of Anaesthesiology score, diabetes mellitus and inflammatory arthropathy did not predict treatment failure. Evidence on Charlson Comorbidity Index was limited. DISCUSSION: Patients with a smoking history, obesity, intravenous drug use, previous failed revision for PJI, reoperation between stages and LC are more likely to experience TF after two-stage revision THA for PJI. Modifiable risk factors include smoking and IVDU and these patients should be referred to services for cessation as early as possible before two-stage revision THA.

Effectiveness and safety of enhanced postoperative care units for non-cardiac, non-neurological surgery: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The proposed systematic review will evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of enhanced post-operative care (EPC) units on patient and health service outcomes in adult patients following non-cardiac, non-neurological surgery. INTRODUCTION: The increase in surgical procedures globally has placed a significant economic and societal burden on health care systems. Recognizing this challenge, EPC units have emerged as a model of care, bridging the gap between traditional, ward-level care and intensive care. EPC offers benefits such as higher staff-to-patient ratios, close patient monitoring (eg, invasive monitoring), and access to critical interventions (eg, vasopressor support). However, there is a lack of well-established guidelines and empirical evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of EPC units for adult patients following surgery. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will include studies involving adult patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing any elective or emergency non-cardiac, non-neurological surgery, who have been admitted to an EPC unit. Experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational study designs will be eligible. METHODS: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The search strategy will identify published and unpublished studies from the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Scopus, as well as gray literature sources, from 2010 to the present. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data, and critically appraise selected studies using standardized JBI assessment tools. Where feasible, a statistical meta-analysis will be performed to combine study findings. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42023455269.

A systematic review of neurological airway respiratory cardiovascular other-surgical severity (NARCO-SS) score as a pediatric perioperative scoring system.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify and synthesize the available evidence of the neurological airway respiratory cardiovascular other-surgical severity (NARCO-SS) score as compared to other pediatric specific perioperative scoring systems. DESIGN: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. All studies in all languages comparing NARCO-SS with pediatric perioperative scoring systems against outcomes were included. Records were screened and data were extracted by three independent reviewers into standardized pilot-tested extraction templates. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL (from inception to February 2023). REVIEW METHODS: The references were uploaded to a validated software for systematic reviews (Rayyan) and screened against the inclusion criteria. Full text of included studies were reviewed and the available data were tabulated. We conducted Risk of Bias analysis on the included studies using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). RESULTS: A meta-analysis could not be performed due to differences in outcome definitions across the included studies. Correlations between NARCO-SS scores, ASA-PS scores and the predefined outcomes of each study were presented as a narrative synthesis. The included studies were determined to have a high risk of bias using the PROBAST. CONCLUSIONS: This review has identified a need for high-quality studies assessing NARCO-SS before recommendations for clinical practice can be made. Addressing its limitations and enhancing the NARCO-SS through targeted refinements of its individual descriptive categories could potentially lead to improvement in its overall predictive accuracy and facilitate wider adoption into clinical practice.

An examination of geographic access to outpatient stroke rehabilitation services in Tennessee, a stroke belt state.

BACKGROUND: While over half of US stroke patients were discharged to home, estimates of geographic access to outpatient stroke rehab facilities are unavailable. The objective of our study was to assess distance and travel time to the nearest outpatient stroke rehab facility in Tennessee, a high stroke prevalence state. METHODS: We systematically scraped Google Maps with the terms "stroke", "rehabilitation", and "outpatient" to identify Tennessee stroke rehab facilities. We then averaged/aggregated Census block-level travel distance and travel time to determine the mean travel distance/time to a facility for each of the 95 Tennessee counties and the overall state. Comparisons of mean travel time/distance were made between rural and urban counties and between low, medium, and high stroke prevalence counties. RESULTS: We found that 79% of facilities were in urban areas. Significantly higher median of mean travel times and distances (p values both <0.001) were observed in rural (22.0 miles, 31.6 min) versus urban counties (10.5 miles, 18.4 min). High (21.5 miles, 32.5 min) and medium (18.7 miles, 28.3 minutes) stroke prevalence counties, which often overlap with rural counties, had significantly higher median of mean travel times and distance than low stroke prevalence counties (7.3 miles, 14.5 min). CONCLUSIONS: Rural Tennessee counties were faced with high stroke prevalence, inadequate facilities, and significantly greater travel distance and time to access care. Additional efforts to address transportation barriers and accelerate telerehabilitation implementation are crucial for improving equal access to stroke aftercare in these areas.

Effectiveness of erector spinae plane block for rib fracture analgesia: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review will investigate the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block as an analgesic technique for patients with rib fractures compared with all other standard management techniques. Comparisons will be made with both nerve blocks (neuraxial techniques and peripheral nerve blocks) and systemic treatment (with patient-controlled analgesia and/or per required need analgesia for breakthrough pain). INTRODUCTION: Erector spinae plane block is a well-established rescue analgesia option for patients with rib fractures. The use of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in clinical practice has been largely based on observational data, with recent randomized controlled trials examining it against several other options for analgesic management. This review will compare the erector spinae against all other management techniques used in practice for rib fractures to determine whether this is the most effective analgesic technique. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The review will include all randomized controlled and pseudo-randomized controlled trials examining ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for the analgesic management of traumatic rib fractures. All other study designs will be excluded. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ISRCTN registry will be searched to identify all relevant ongoing clinical trials. Study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted into software for statistical analysis (including meta-analysis where possible). REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023414849.

Using Geographic Information Systems in health disparities research: Access to care considerations.

In health disparities research, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) provide nurse researchers with powerful tools to incorporate spatial factors, such as access to care and related attributes like socioeconomic and environmental characteristics, into their studies. This article educates nurse scientists about GIS-based research benefits and considerations (focusing on access-to-care factors) and the influence of various access-to-care metrics on research outcomes. We present an overview of GIS in nursing and health disparities research, along with findings from our 2022 study examining access to care's relationship with county-level mortality rates in Tennessee, especially in areas where rural hospitals closed between 2010 and 2019. We highlight three distinct access-to-care measures (Euclidean distances and road network-based travel times based on county and census tract centroids), showcasing how different calculations impact our modeling results. Our results underscore the importance of understanding the choice of access-to-care metrics in GIS-based research to draw valid conclusions.

A cross-sectional examination of post-myocardial infarction physical activity levels among US rural and urban residents: Findings from the 2017-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to examine the relationship between rural residence and physical activity levels among US myocardial infarction (MI) survivors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using nationally representative Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys from 2017 and 2019. We determined the survey-weighted percentage of rural and urban MI survivors meeting US physical activity guidelines. Logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between rural/urban residence and meeting physical activity guidelines, accounting for sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: Our study included 22,732 MI survivors (37.3% rural residents). The percentage of rural MI survivors meeting physical activity guidelines (37.4%, 95% CI: 35.1%-39.7%) was significantly less than their urban counterparts (45.6%, 95% CI: 44.0%-47.2%). Rural residence was associated with a 28.8% (95% CI: 20.0%-36.7%) lower odds of meeting physical activity guidelines, with this changing to a 19.3% (95% CI: 9.3%-28.3%) lower odds after adjustment for sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: A significant rural/urban disparity in physical activity levels exists among US MI survivors. Our findings support the need for further efforts to improve physical activity levels among rural MI survivors as part of successful secondary prevention in US high-MI burden rural areas.

Estimates of short sleep duration among US rural and urban women with prediabetes.

BACKGROUND: Short sleep duration (SSD) (<7 hours/night) is linked with increased risk of prediabetes to diabetes progression. Despite a high diabetes burden in US rural women, existing research does not provide SSD estimates for this population. METHODS: We used national Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys to conduct a cross-sectional study examining SSD estimates for US women with prediabetes by rural/urban residence between 2016-2020. We applied logistic regression models to the BRFSS dataset to ascertain associations between rural/urban residence status and SSD prior to and following adjustment for sociodemographic factors (age, race, education, income, health care coverage, having a personal doctor). RESULTS: Our study included 20,997 women with prediabetes (33.7% rural). SSD prevalence was similar between rural (35.5%, 95% CI: 33.0%-38.0%) and urban women (35.4%, 95% CI: 33.7%-37.1). Rural residence was not associated with SSD among US women with prediabetes prior to adjustment (Odds Ratio: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.87-1.14) or following adjustment for sociodemographic factors (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.92-1.22). Among women with prediabetes, irrespective of rural/urban residence status, being Black, aged <65 years, and earning <$50,000 was linked with significantly higher odds of having SSD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the finding that SSD estimates among women with prediabetes did not vary by rural/urban residence status, 35% of rural women with prediabetes had SSD. Efforts to reduce diabetes burden in rural areas may benefit from incorporating strategies to improve sleep duration along with other known diabetes risk factors among rural women with prediabetes from certain sociodemographic backgrounds.

A framework of freshwater services flow model into assessment on water security and quantification of transboundary flow: A case study in northeast China.

Ecosystem service flow dynamics which establish the linkage between human and nature is essential in an ecosystem service assessment. This study constructed an ecosystem service flow model of freshwater flow then utilized it to assess the water-related ecosystem services in northeast China. We included the provision, consumption, and spatial flow of freshwater services in an index to assess the water security condition and quantified the services trans-boundary flow from the northeast forest belt (NFB) in northeast China. Our results showed that large areas (50.54%, 55.10% and 52.90%, respectively) of northeast China received upstream freshwater service in three years. The water security condition of northeast China deteriorated from 2005 to 2015 with the change of water security index considering water flow (WSIflow), mainly influenced by precipitation and agriculture water consumption. Approximately 4.16 billion m3 of freshwater service were delivered from NFB to surrounding regions demonstrating the importance of NFB in terms of ecosystem service provision. In addition, 73 key watersheds (4.71% of total area) within NFB that significantly affect the trans-boundary flow were further identified. We suggested that local government should advocate develop water-saving agriculture and livestock water quotas. Moreover, priorities should be given to protect the key watersheds within NFB in order to maintain the supply of freshwater service. This study provided a framework for exploring suitable strategies for managing water resources and laid a foundation for promoting the ecological compensation in the future.

A cross-sectional analysis of 2017 stroke symptoms recognition at the US regional level.

OBJECTIVES: Stroke symptom recognition is critical in reducing time to treatment, but it is not known whether the increased support for stroke education programs during the last several years has led to an improvement in regional stroke symptom recognition levels since they were last assessed in the mid-2010s. METHODS: We used the most current estimates of recognition from the 2017 National Health Interview Survey to examine regional recognition levels for individual stroke symptoms and correct identification of all five stroke symptoms. RESULTS: Recognition of individual stroke symptoms was ≥76% in all regions, but correct identification of all stroke symptoms was lower ranging from 68.8 to 70.2%. Recognition of sudden numbness or weakness of face, arm, or leg, especially on one side (Northeast: 94.9%, Midwest: 95.8%, South: 93.8%, West: 94.5%) was the highest and recognition of sudden headache with no known cause (Northeast: 77.6%, Midwest: 76.4%, South: 77.7%, West: 76.5%) was the lowest for all regions. DISCUSSION: We observed similar stroke symptom recognition levels in each US region with little improvement since the mid-2010s. Additional effort should be made to increase recognition of sudden headache with no known cause in US regions with current high prevalence of stroke risk factors.

Nonadherence in diabetes care among US adults with diabetes by stroke status.

OBJECTIVE: Effects of stroke (i.e., memory loss, paralysis) may make effective diabetes care difficult which can in turn contribute to additional diabetes related complications and hospitalization. However, little is known about US post-stroke diabetes care levels. This study sought to examine diabetes care levels among US adults with diabetes by stroke status. METHODS: Using 2015-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys, the prevalence of nonadherence with the American Diabetes Association's diabetes care measures (<1 eye exam annually, <1 foot exam annually, <1 blood glucose check daily, <2 A1C tests annually, no receipt of annual flu vaccination) was ascertained in people with diabetes by stroke status. A separate logistic regression model was run for each diabetes care measure to determine if nonadherence patterns differed by stroke status after adjustment for stroke and diabetes associated factors. RESULTS: Our study included 72,630 individuals, with 9.8% having had a stroke. Nonadherence levels varied for each diabetes care measure ranging from 20.4-42.2% for stroke survivors and 22.8-44.0% for those who had never had stroke. By stroke status, nonadherence with diabetes management measures was comparable except for stroke survivors having both a lower prevalence (30.2% versus 40.1%) and odds of nonadherence (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.82) with daily blood glucose check than those who had never had stroke. CONCLUSION: While nonadherence with diabetes management does not vary by stroke status, considerable nonadherence still exists among stroke survivors with diabetes. Additional interventions to improve diabetes care may help to reduce risk of further diabetes complications in this population.

Impact of excluding nursing home COVID-19 cases when assessing the relationship between county-level social distancing behavior and COVID-19 cases across the US during the early phase of the pandemic, February 2020-May 2020.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a cross-sectional nationwide study examining how exclusion of nursing home COVID-19 cases influences the association between county level social distancing behavior and COVID-19 cases throughout the US during the early phase of the pandemic (February 2020-May 2020). METHODS: Using county-level COVID-19 data and social distancing metrics from tracked mobile devices, we investigated the impact social distancing had on a county's total COVID-19 cases (cases/100,000 people) between when the first COVID-19 case was confirmed in a county and May 31st, 2020 when most statewide social distancing measures were lifted, representing the pandemic's exponential growth phase. We created a mixed-effects negative binomial model to assess how implementation of social distancing measures when they were most stringent (March 2020-May 2020) influenced total COVID-19 cases while controlling for social distancing and COVID-19 related covariates in two scenarios: (1) when COVID-19 nursing home cases are not excluded from total COVID-19 cases and (2) when these cases are excluded. Model findings were compared to those from February 2020, a baseline when social distancing measures were not in place. Marginal effects at the means were generated to further isolate the influence of social distancing on COVID-19 from other factors and determine total COVID-19 cases during March 2020-May 2020 for the two scenarios. RESULTS: Regardless of whether nursing home COVID-19 cases were excluded from total COVID-19 cases, a 1% increase in average % of mobile devices leaving home was significantly associated with a 5% increase in a county's total COVID-19 cases between March 2020-May 2020 and about a 2.5% decrease in February 2020. When the influence of social distancing was separated from other factors, the estimated total COVID-19 cases/100,000 people was comparable throughout the range of social distancing values (25%-45% of mobile phone devices leaving home between March 2020-May 2020) when nursing home COVID-19 cases were not excluded (25% of mobile phones leaving home: 163.84 cases/100,000 people (95% CI: 121.81, 205.86), 45% of mobile phones leaving home: 432.79 cases/100,000 people (95% CI: 256.91, 608.66)) and when they were excluded (25% of mobile phones leaving home: 149.58 cases/100,000 people (95% CI: 111.90, 187.26), 45% of mobile phones leaving home: 405.38 cases/100,000 people (95% CI: 243.14, 567.62)). CONCLUSIONS: Exclusion of nursing home COVID-19 cases from total COVID-19 case counts has little impact when estimating the relationship between county-level social distancing and preventing COVID-19 cases with additional research needed to see whether this finding is also observed for COVID-19 growth rates and mortality.

A Cross-Sectional Comparison of US Adult Diabetes Screening Levels by Disability Status.

Diabetes is a potentially life-threatening metabolic condition that disproportionately affects US adults with a disability. Diabetes screening is key to early disease detection and prompt treatment, but it is not known whether US adults with a disability receive similar levels of diabetes screening as individuals without a disability. We compared diabetes screening levels in US adults with a disability to those without one. Using national 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys, we determined the prevalence of diabetes screening by disability status in US adults who fall under the American Diabetes Association's recommended screening guidelines: those younger than 45 years old with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 and those aged 45 years and older. We used logistic regression modelling to examine the impact of disability status on diabetes screening while adjusting for diabetes associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. In people with a disability, around 50% of those younger than 45 years old with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and 33% of those 45 years or older did not receive screening. In the under 45 years with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 screening group, individuals with a disability had a slightly higher but non-significant prevalence, but a lower adjusted odds of diabetes screening compared to those without a disability. People with a disability under age 45 had a slightly lower but again non-significant prevalence but a higher adjusted odds of diabetes screening than did those without a disability who were age 45 or older. Additional interventions are needed to improve diabetes screening levels among US adults with a disability at high risk of developing diabetes as screening is a critical initial step in the diabetes management process.

A comparison of post-stroke hypertension medication use between US Stroke Belt and Non-Stroke Belt residents.

Although hypertension is a contributing factor to higher stroke occurrence in the Stroke Belt, little is known about post-stroke hypertension medication use in Stroke Belt residents. Through the use of national Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys from 2015, 2017, and 2019; we compared unadjusted and adjusted estimates of post-stroke hypertension medication use by Stroke Belt residence status. Similar levels of post-stroke hypertension medication use were observed between Stroke Belt residents (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.33) and non-Stroke Belt residents. After adjustment, Stroke Belt residents had 1.14 times the odds of post-stroke hypertension medication use (95% CI: 0.92, 1.41) compared to non-Stroke Belt residents. Findings from this study suggest that there is little difference between post-stroke hypertension medication use between Stroke Belt and non-Stroke Belt residents. However, further work is needed to assess whether use of other non-medicinal methods of post-stroke hypertension control differs by Stroke Belt residence status.

The Influence of Social Distancing on COVID-19 Mortality in US Counties: Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the impact of social distancing on COVID-19 mortality in the United States have predominantly examined this relationship at the national level and have not separated COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes from total COVID-19 deaths. This approach may obscure differences in social distancing behaviors by county in addition to the actual effectiveness of social distancing in preventing COVID-19 deaths. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the influence of county-level social distancing behavior on COVID-19 mortality (deaths per 100,000 people) across US counties over the period of the implementation of stay-at-home orders in most US states (March-May 2020). METHODS: Using social distancing data from tracked mobile phones in all US counties, we estimated the relationship between social distancing (average proportion of mobile phone usage outside of home between March and May 2020) and COVID-19 mortality (when the state in which the county is located reported its first confirmed case of COVID-19 and up to May 31, 2020) with a mixed-effects negative binomial model while distinguishing COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes from total COVID-19 deaths and accounting for social distancing- and COVID-19-related factors (including the period between the report of the first confirmed case of COVID-19 and May 31, 2020; population density; social vulnerability; and hospital resource availability). Results from the mixed-effects negative binomial model were then used to generate marginal effects at the mean, which helped separate the influence of social distancing on COVID-19 deaths from other covariates while calculating COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 people. RESULTS: We observed that a 1% increase in average mobile phone usage outside of home between March and May 2020 led to a significant increase in COVID-19 mortality by a factor of 1.18 (P<.001), while every 1% increase in the average proportion of mobile phone usage outside of home in February 2020 was found to significantly decrease COVID-19 mortality by a factor of 0.90 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: As stay-at-home orders have been lifted in many US states, continued adherence to other social distancing measures, such as avoiding large gatherings and maintaining physical distance in public, are key to preventing additional COVID-19 deaths in counties across the country.

Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of psychological distress in patients with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of psychological distress in people with asthma.Data sources: Electronic searches were performed in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed/Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Health Technology Assessment Database and Web of Science (inception to April 2019).Study selections: Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) or controlled clinical trials investigating the effect of pharmacological interventions for psychological distress in people with asthma. Records were screened and data extracted by two independent authors into standardized pilot-tested extraction templates. Data was analyzed according to standard Cochrane methodology and entered into Review Manager Software version 5.3.Results: From 5,689 studies, six RCTs (n = 215) met inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review, of which four studies were included in the meta-analysis. A meta-analysis of four studies (n = 158) indicated no evidence of an effect for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (Citalopram or Escitalopram) on reduction of psychological distress in adult patients with asthma. Similarly, antiepileptic medication (Levetiracetam) was no better than placebo in the treatment of psychological distress in people with asthma. Adverse events were poorly reported across all studies but were slightly increased among intervention participants compared to control participants.Conclusions: There was great heterogeneity between studies and overall poor methodological quality providing insufficient evidence to make recommendations for or against the use of pharmacotherapy in asthma patients with psychological distress. Further confirmatory trials are warranted to make recommendations for clinical practice.

Influence of sexual orientation on diabetes management in US adults with diabetes.

AIM: Although the risk of developing diabetes is high among US sexual minorities (SM) (lesbian, gay, bisexual), little is known about diabetes management in this population. We examined the impact of sexual orientation on current US diabetes management levels in a geographically diverse sample of people with diabetes (PWD). METHOD: Adult PWDs were identified from the 2015-2018 cross-sectional Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. We determined the unadjusted percentage and the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of noncompliance with American Diabetes Association (ADA) diabetes management measures (< 1 eye exam annually, < 1 foot exam annually, < 1 blood glucose check daily, < 2 A1C tests annually, no receipt of annual flu vaccination, never receiving pneumococcal vaccination, never taking a diabetes management course) in PWDs by SM status. RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses revealed a high level of noncompliance with diabetes management among SMs and especially for annual flu vaccination (40.1-52.3%) and diabetes management education (38.4-48.4%). Compared to heterosexuals, lesbian women were more noncompliant for most and bisexual men and bisexual women for all diabetes management measures. We observed that SMs had slightly higher adjusted levels of noncompliance than heterosexuals only for annual foot exams (OR: 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-1.46) and diabetes management education (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.81-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of noncompliance with ADA diabetes management guidelines in SM PWDs indicates a need for additional efforts to elucidate the factors that contribute to noncompliance in SMs, information that can be used to develop appropriate interventions to improve diabetes management for this population.

A cross-sectional analysis of binge drinking levels in US myocardial infarction survivors.

BACKGROUND: Although binge drinking is associated with higher myocardial infarction (MI) incidence, little is known about binge drinking patterns in US MI survivors, at elevated risk for recurrent MIs. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of and what factors are associated with binge drinking in US MI survivors. METHODS: We compared the prevalence of binge drinking between MI survivors and those without a MI history in 2016-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. Logistic regression was used to examine which sociodemographic factors are associated with binge drinking in these groups. RESULTS: 8.7% of MI survivors (1.1 million people nationwide) were binge drinkers. Among MI survivors; being young, male, Hispanic, having higher income, and having lower educational attainment were associated with increased binge drinking. CONCLUSIONS: The sizable number of US MI survivors who binge drink suggests interventions to reduce this behavior are warranted, especially among specific sociodemographic groups of this population.

Rickettsia typhi central nervous system infection.

A 39 year-old male was residing along the south coast of Texas, the USA, presented with fever, myalgias, headaches, and weight loss for ten days. Symptoms and manifestations progressed to include nuchal rigidity, photophobia, hyponatremia, thrombocytopenia, and transaminitis despite the intravenous administration of ceftriaxone and azithromycin. A lumbar puncture performed in the Emergency Department yielded pleocytosis and glucose cerebrospinal fluid/serum ratio of 0.35, suggestive of meningoencephalitis. Conglomerate data raised the suspicion of meningitis secondary to a zoonotic acquired infection, which was later confirmed to be Rickettsia typhi. Doxycycline is the drug of choice for the suspected Rickettsia disease. After doxycycline administration, the patient improved and was discharged home asymptomatic.