Current therapies and challenges for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-related infections.

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections and contributes to significant increase in morbidity and mortality especially when associated with medical devices and in biofilm form. Biofilm structure provides a pathway for the enrichment of resistant and persistent phenotypes of S. aureus leading to relapse and recurrence of infection. Minimal diffusion of antibiotics inside biofilm structure leads to heterogeneity and distinct physiological activity. Additionally, horizontal gene transfer between cells in proximity adds to the challenges associated with eradication of biofilms. This narrative review focuses on biofilm-associated infections caused by S. aureus, the impact of environmental conditions on biofilm formation, interactions inside biofilm communities, and the clinical challenges that they present. Conclusively, potential solutions, novel treatment strategies, combination therapies, and reported alternatives are discussed.

Clinical Outcomes With Extended Versus Intermittent Infusion of Anti-Pseudomonal Beta-Lactams in Patients With Gram-Negative Bacteremia.

Background: Administration of doses via an extended infusion (EI) is an important strategy to optimize beta-lactams. Available data on the impact of EI on outcomes largely focus on clinical cure or mortality in critically ill patients or those with resistant pathogens. The potential benefits of EI extend beyond these populations and outcomes, and further study is warranted. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who received cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, or meropenem for Gram-negative bacteremia via EI or intermittent infusion. Patients were matched 1:1 based on study drug, sepsis severity, intensive care unit (ICU) status, bacteremia source, and pathogen. Outcomes assessed included time to clinical stabilization, rates of treatment failure, mortality, recurrence, and length of stay (LOS). Results: Two hundred sixty-eight patients were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Forty-two percent of patients were in the ICU at infection onset and the most common pathogen was Escherichia coli (41%). After adjusting for residual differences between groups, receipt of EI was independently associated with shorter time to clinical stability (adjusted odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, .22-.47), time to defervescence, and time to white blood cell count normalization. Furthermore, EI was associated with a lower incidence of treatment failure, decreased recurrence of bacteremia, and shorter LOS. There was no difference in mortality. These findings were consistent regardless of patient location (ICU vs ward), baseline renal function, source of bacteremia, or study drug received. Conclusions: These findings suggest that EI beta-lactams are an important stewardship strategy to improve clinical outcomes in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia.

Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin in Combination With Beta-Lactam Agents: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin (VAN)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is increased when VAN is combined with certain beta-lactams (BLs) such as piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) but has not been evaluated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). Our aim was to investigate the AKI incidence of VAN in combination with C/T (VAN/C/T) compared with VAN in combination to TZP (VAN-TZP). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, observational, comparative study across the United States. The primary analysis was a composite outcome of AKI and risk, injury, failure, loss, end stage renal disease; Acute Kidney Injury Network; or VAN-induced nephrotoxicity according to the consensus guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for confounding variables and stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis to assess the time to nephrotoxicity between the 2 groups. RESULTS: We included VAN/C/T (n = 90) and VAN-TZP (n = 284) at an enrollment ratio of 3:1. The primary outcome occurred in 12.2% vs 25.0% in the VAN-C/T and VAN-TZP groups, respectively (P = .011). After adjusting for confounding variables, VAN-TZP was associated with increased odds of AKI compared with VAN-C/T; with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.308 (95% confidence interval, 1.560-6.993). Results of the stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis with log-rank time-to-nephrotoxicity analysis indicate that time to AKI was significantly shorter among patients who received VAN-TZP (P = .004). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that TZP was consistent with the primary analysis (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our results suggest that the AKI is not likely to be related to tazobactam but rather to piperacillin, which is a component in VAN-TZP but not in VAN-C/T.

Incorporating preauthorization into antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow reduces Clostridioides difficile and gastrointestinal panel testing.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether incorporating mandatory prior authorization for Clostridioides difficile testing into antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow could reduce testing in patients with alternative etiologies for diarrhea. DESIGN: Single center, quasi-experimental before-and-after study. SETTING: Tertiary-care, academic medical center in Ann Arbor, Michigan. PATIENTS: Adult and pediatric patients admitted between September 11, 2019 and December 10, 2019 were included if they had an order placed for 1 of the following: (1) C. difficile enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in patients hospitalized >72 hours and received laxatives, oral contrast, or initiated tube feeds within the prior 48 hours, (2) repeat molecular multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GIPAN) testing, or (3) GIPAN testing in patients hospitalized >72 hours. INTERVENTION: A best-practice alert prompting prior authorization by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) for EIA or GIPAN testing was implemented. Approval required the provider to page the ASP pharmacist and discuss rationale for testing. The provider could not proceed with the order if ASP approval was not obtained. RESULTS: An average of 2.5 requests per day were received over the 3-month intervention period. The weekly rate of EIA and GIPAN orders per 1,000 patient days decreased significantly from 6.05 ± 0.94 to 4.87 ± 0.78 (IRR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.93; P = .010) and from 1.72 ± 0.37 to 0.89 ± 0.29 (IRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.77; P = .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified an efficient, effective C. difficile and GIPAN diagnostic stewardship approval model.