Does Clockwise Rotation of Maxillomandibular Complex Using Surgery-First Approach to Correct Mandibular Prognathism Improve Facial Appearance?

BACKGROUND: Facial aesthetics may be optimized based on a deeper understanding of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to delineate facial soft tissue changes after clockwise rotation (CWR) of the maxillomandibular complex (MMC) to correct mandibular prognathism using the surgery-first approach. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients over 18 years of age with skeletal Class III malocclusion in the craniofacial center. The patients were excluded with previous history of craniofacial syndrome, orthognathic surgery trauma, infection at surgical sites, chin deviation (menton deviation ≥4 mm), 2 or more missing data points after surgery, or without informed consent. This study compared significant facial changes before (T0) and after orthodontic debonding (T1) in the CWR and control groups. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The patients were divided in accordance with maxillary occlusal plane change (OPC) after surgery into CWR (OPC >4°) and control (OPC ≤4°) groups. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was frontal lip curvature (FLC: Right Cheilion-Stomion-Left Cheilion, degree) with or without upper lip curving upward at T1, where upper lip curving upward was considered more favorable. COVARIATES: The covariates included age, sex, and various cephalometric measurements. ANALYSES: The Mann-Whitney U test, paired, and independent t-test were implemented to compare the intragroup and intergroup differences. Statistical significance was indicated by P value <.05. RESULTS: The study comprised 34 patients (21 women) in the control group and 37 (29 women) in the CWR group; their mean ages were 23.64 ± 4.38 and 24.21 ± 3.84 years, respectively (P value = .562). At T1, the CWR group had significant increased FLC (P value = .001), alar width (P value = .034), and lower vermilion height (P value = .018), and decreased lower lip length (P value = .004). The high FLC group had significant decreased upper lip projection (P value = .002) and increased nasolabial angle (P value = .013). The significant relationship between CWR and high FLC was supported by the χ2 test (P value = .018) and multiple logistic regression (P value = .017). CONCLUSION: Greater CWR of the MMC increased FLC and lower vermilion height and reduced lower lip length. High FLC resulting from the CWR of the MMC improved facial appearance by moving the upper lip curve upward.

Does Clockwise Rotation of Maxillomandibular Complex Using Surgery-First Approach to Correct Mandibular Prognathism Affect Surgical Movement and Stability?

PURPOSE: Orthognathic surgery (OGS) using the surgery-first approach (SFA) can decrease treatment time and increase patient satisfaction. Clockwise rotation (CWR) of the maxillomandibular complex to correct mandibular prognathism leads to optimized functional, aesthetic, and stable outcomes. This study examined the combined effect of SFA and CWR of the maxillomandibular complex to correct mandibular prognathism by comparing the surgical movement before (T0) and immediately after OGS (T1) and the stability between T1 and 12 months after OGS (T2). METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent SFA involving Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, with or without genioplasty. Based on the occlusal plane (OP) change at T0-T1, the patients were divided into CWR (OP > 4°) and control (C) groups (OP ≤ 4°). The predictor variable was OP change at T0-T1. The primary outcome variable was the stability of pogonion (Pog) at T1-T2. The covariates included demographic factors, cephalometric measurements (anterior facial height, posterior facial height, OP, mandibular plane angle, incisor mandibular plane angle, overjet, and overbite), and 3-dimensional landmark displacement (anterior nasal spine, A-point, upper central incisor, upper first molar, lower central incisor, lower first molar, Pog, gonion, and condylion). An independent t-test was used to compare between these 2 groups when appropriate. The level of significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The sample included 28 patients (17 females) in the C group and 36 (24 females) in the CWR group; the mean ages were 23.89 ± 3.35 and 24.08 ± 4.02 years, respectively. For the surgical movement at T0-T1, the CWR group showed an association with vertical movement of the maxilla at posterior nasal spine (P = .005), anterior nasal spine (P < .001), and A-point (P < .001) and horizontal backward movement of the mandible at B-point (P < .001), Pog (P < .001), and gonion (P = .042). At T1-T2, all landmarks remained stable without clinically significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical movement in the CWR group could vertically displace the maxilla and setback mandible more than that in the C group. Postoperative skeletal stability remained the same between the 2 groups at 1 year after OGS.

Are Signs of Degenerative Joint Disease Associated With Chin Deviation?

PURPOSE: Degenerative joint changes commonly affect the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and can result in chin deviation. However, the extent of degenerative TMJ changes and chin deviation has not been well-characterized. The present study sought to correlate degenerative TMJ changes with condylar volume, grayscale measures, and chin deviation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present cross-sectional study had enrolled women with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were acquired preoperatively. For each condyle, degenerative TMJ signs were analyzed and the condylar volume and grayscale were measured. The predictor variable was the presence of degenerative TMJ signs, classified as categorical data: 0, if none; 1, only present in 1 joint; and 2, present in both joints. The primary outcome variable was a chin deviation of 3 mm or more. Other associated variables were grouped by age, cephalometric data, and 3-dimensional condylar measurements. Descriptive bivariate statistics were computed, and univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify any associations between degenerative TMJ disease and chin deviation. RESULTS: We included 85 patients, who were classified into 2 groups: less than 3 mm of chin deviation (n = 43) and 3 mm or more of chin deviation (n = 42). The presence of more than 10 degenerative TMJ signs was significantly associated with the presence of 3 mm or more of chin deviation (P < .001). In multiple regression models, the presence of subcortical sclerosis in 1 joint and in both joints (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.698; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.051 to 13.012; adjusted OR, 5.001; 95% CI, 1.461-17.119, respectively) correlated significantly with the presence of 3 mm or more of chin deviation (P < .05). The volume difference between the 2 condyles was significantly greater in the group with more than 10 degenerative TMJ signs and 3 mm or more of chin deviation than in the group with 10 or fewer degenerative TMJ signs and less than 3 mm of chin deviation (P = .016 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In women with skeletal Class III malocclusion, the presence of more than 10 degenerative TMJ signs increased the prevalence of 3 mm or more of chin deviation. The presence of subcortical sclerosis in either 1 or both joints and volume differences between the 2 condyles were associated with greater chin deviation.

Does Sleep Quality Affect Temporomandibular Joint With Degenerative Joint Changes?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to answer the following question: Among female patients who have skeletal Class III malocclusion, does poor sleep quality increase the prevalence of degenerative joint changes in the temporomandibular joints (DJC-TMJ)? MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a prospective cohort study and enrolled female patients who required orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal Class III malocclusion from January 2014 to December 2017. This is the first serial study to identify the relationship between sleep quality and DJC-TMJ before orthognathic surgery. The predictor variable was sleep quality, documented either as poor, indicated by a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score of 5 or greater, or as good, indicated by a PSQI score of less than 5. The primary outcome variable was the presence of 5 or more DJC-TMJ signs or fewer than 5 DJC-TMJ signs. Other associated variables were grouped into the following categories: demographic variables (age and body mass index) and cephalometric data. Descriptive bivariate statistics were computed and univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with DJC-TMJ. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 52 patients grouped as follows: good sleep quality group (n = 25, PSQI score < 5) and poor sleep quality group (n = 27, PSQI score ≥ 5). Poor sleep quality was significantly associated (P = .027) with an increase in DJC-TMJ signs. In the multiple regression model, a PSQI score of 5 or greater (adjusted odds ratio, 5.806; 95% confidence interval, 1.406 to 23.974) and greater sella-nasion-point A angle (adjusted odds ratio, 1.453; 95% confidence interval, 1.127 to 1.871) were significantly associated (P < .05) with an increased prevalence of DJC-TMJ. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that in female patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion, poor sleep quality could increase the prevalence of DJC-TMJ. Future cohort studies are required to support that sleep disturbance can increase DJC-TMJ in the general population.