Baseline Echocardiography and Laboratory Findings in MIS-C and Associations with Clinical Illness Severity.

Children with COVID-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) may develop severe disease. We explored the association of admission echocardiographic and laboratory parameters with MIS-C disease severity. This retrospective, single center study of consecutive MIS-C patients (4/2020-12/2021) excluded those with preexisting cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, or prior cardiotoxic therapy. Our hypothesis was that worse admission echocardiographic and laboratory parameters were associated with more severe disease based on vasoactive medication use. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models assessed the association between vasoactive medication use and baseline variables. Of 118 MIS-C patients, median age was 7.8 years (IQR 4.6, 11.8), 48% received vasoactive medication. Higher admission brain natriuretic peptide [OR 1.07 (95% CI 1.02,1.14), p = 0.019], C-reactive protein [OR 1.08 (1.03,1.14), p = 0.002], troponin [OR 1.05 (1.02,1.1), p = 0.015]; lower left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF, OR 0.96 (0.92,1), p = 0.042], and worse left atrial reservoir strain [OR 0.96 (0.92,1), p = 0.04] were associated with vasoactive medication use. Only higher CRP [OR 1.07 (1.01, 1.11), p = 0.034] and lower LVEF [0.91 (0.84,0.98), p = 0.015] remained independently significant. Among those with normal admission LVEF (78%, 92/118), 43% received vasoactive medication and only higher BNP [OR 1.09 (1.02,1.19), p = 0.021 per 100 pg/mL] and higher CRP [OR 1.07 (1.02,1.14), p = 0.013] were associated with use of vasoactive medication. Nearly half of all children admitted for MIS-C subsequently received vasoactive medication, including those admitted with a normal LVEF. Similarly, admission strain parameters were not discriminatory. Laboratory markers of systemic inflammation and cardiac injury may better predict early MIS-C disease severity.

Development and Validation of a Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Flare Measure: Ascertaining Flare in Patients With Inactive Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop and validate a composite disease flare definition for juvenile spondyloarthritis (SpA) that would closely approximate the clinical decision made to reinitiate or not reinitiate systemic therapy after therapy de-escalation. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews of children with SpA who underwent systemic therapy de-escalation of biologic or conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were used to develop and validate the flare outcome. Data on independent cohorts for development (1 center) and validation (4 centers) were collected from large tertiary health care systems. Core measure thresholds and candidate disease flare outcomes were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs), and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), with physician assessment of active disease plus re-initiation of standard dose of systemic therapy as the reference standard. RESULTS: Of the candidate definitions, clinically meaningful worsening in ≥3 of the following 5 core measures performed best: caregiver/patient assessment of well-being; physician assessment of disease activity; caregiver/patient assessment of pain, physical function, and active joint count. The ROC AUC was 0.91, PPV 87.5%, NPV 98.1%, sensitivity 82.4%, and specificity 98.7%. Cronbach's α was 0.81, signifying internal consistency, and factor analysis demonstrated that the outcome measured 1 construct. The Juvenile SpA Flare measure had face validity according to 21 surveyed pediatric rheumatologists. Juvenile SpA Flare had an ROC AUC of 0.85, a PPV of 92.3%, and an NPV of 96.8% in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: There is initial support for the validity of the Juvenile SpA Flare measure as a tool to identify disease flare in juvenile SpA patients de-escalating therapy, and the measure is potentially applicable in clinical practice, observational studies, and therapeutic trials.

Variation of Diagnostic Approaches and Treatment Practices for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome Among Pediatric Subspecialists.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic and treatment practices among a variety of subspecialists at pediatric institutions in the US. STUDY DESIGN: Using a web-based survey, we assessed the consultation, diagnostic, and treatment preferences of providers from the different pediatric subspecialties who care for pediatric patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)/macrophage activating syndrome (MAS). Domains included demographics, provider training level and specialty, experience and comfort level with the diagnosis and treatment of HLH/MAS, and institutional approaches toward the diagnosis and management of HLH/MAS. Participants also were given 2 case scenarios: one describing Epstein-Barr virus-associated HLH and another describing an underlying rheumatologic condition with MAS. RESULTS: Of 263 respondents, 23%, 29%, 39%, and 7% identified as hematology/oncology, rheumatology, general pediatrics/critical care/hospitalist, and allergy/immunology, respectively. For Epstein-Barr virus/HLH, hematology/oncology was the preferred first consultant by most respondents other than rheumatologists, of whom only 47% agreed. For MAS, 92% of respondents from all specialties favored a rheumatology consultation. Preferred diagnostic tests varied by subspecialty, with hematology/oncology more likely than rheumatology to order an infectious workup, natural killer cell function, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, bone marrow biopsy, and genetic testing. First-line therapy also varied, with hematology/oncology preferring dexamethasone and etoposide and rheumatology more often preferring methylprednisolone and anakinra. One-half of respondents were unaware of institutional algorithms for diagnosis and treatment of HLH/MAS. Most (85.6%) favored the development of treatment algorithms for HLH/MAS, and 90% supported a multidisciplinary approach. CONCLUSIONS: Current consulting patterns, diagnostic workup, and treatment approaches of HLH/MAS vary by specialty, highlighting the need for standardized management algorithms and institutional multidisciplinary HLH/MAS teams.

Modified Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index (JSpADA), and modified versions thereof, in a North American cohort of patients with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA). METHODS: We utilized the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry database ERA cohort to validate the JSpADA and its modifications (JSpADA6-no Schober, no C-reactive protein [CRP]/erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]; JSpADA7-no Schober; and JSpADA7-no CRP/ESR) using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology principles of face validity, discriminative validity, and responsiveness to change. RESULTS: There were 51 subjects (64 visits) with complete JSpADA data with a mean age of 13.7 years and disease duration of 30.9 months. Subjects were predominantly White (84.3%), and 56.9% were male and 50% were HLA-B27 positive. The JSpADA showed high correlation with the clinical 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (cJADAS10; r = 0.81), moderate-to-high correlation with physician global assessment (PGA; r = 0.69), and low-to-fair correlation with Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ; r = 0.22). The modifications of the JSpADA (JSpADA7-no Schober; JSpADA7-no CRP/ESR; and JSpADA6-no Schober, no CRP/ESR) performed similarly with high correlation with cJADAS10 (r = 0.81, 0.79, and 0.80, respectively), moderate-to-high correlation with PGA (r = 0.65, 0.67, 0.64, respectively), and low-to-fair correlation with CHAQ (r = 0.35, 0.34, 0.39, respectively). All modified versions of JSpADA had good responsiveness to change. All versions of JSpADA had excellent discriminative validity. CONCLUSION: We propose the term modified JSpADA for the modification of JSpADA with 6 elements (JSpADA6-no Schober, no CRP/ESR). This shorter disease activity index may improve implementation of JSpADA in both clinical practice and research trials.

Mental Health in Pediatric Rheumatology: An Opportunity to Improve Outcomes.

Mental health problems are more common in children with pediatric rheumatologic diseases (PRDs) than healthy peers. Mental health problems affect disease-related outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQOL), so addressing these problems can improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes. Mental health screening tools are available, and there are resources available to aid in integrating mental health care into the clinical setting. By implementing these tools, mental health problems can be recognized and addressed.

Advances in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.

PURPOSE: To provide an overview of recent studies on pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA). RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies show differences in gut microbiome in patients with JSpA in comparison to healthy controls. There is increased recognition of the impact of the innate immune system on disease pathology. Normative reference on MRI of sacroiliac (SI) joints in children is now available. However, there is significant variability in interpretation of MRI of SI joints in children and a need for standardization. NSAIDs, physical therapy, and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors (TNFi) remain the mainstay of management for patients with JIA who have polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, and/or enthesitis as per recent ACR guidelines. Newer therapeutic options beyond TNFi are needed to manage patients who fail TNFi. This review highlights some of the recent advances in our knowledge of JSpA pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. It also identifies areas in need of further research and standardization to improve our understanding and outcomes in JSpA.

Childhood Sjögren syndrome: features of an international cohort and application of the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Sjögren syndrome in children is a poorly understood autoimmune disease. We aimed to describe the clinical and diagnostic features of children diagnosed with Sjögren syndrome and explore how the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria apply to this population. METHODS: An international workgroup retrospectively collected cases of Sjögren syndrome diagnosed under 18 years of age from 23 centres across eight nations. We analysed patterns of symptoms, diagnostic workup, and applied the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. RESULTS: We identified 300 children with Sjögren syndrome. The majority of patients n = 232 (77%) did not meet 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, but n = 110 (37%) did not have sufficient testing done to even possibly achieve the score necessary to meet criteria. Even among those children with all criteria items tested, only 36% met criteria. The most common non-sicca symptoms were arthralgia [n = 161 (54%)] and parotitis [n = 140 (47%)] with parotitis inversely correlating with age. CONCLUSION: Sjögren syndrome in children can present at any age. Recurrent or persistent parotitis and arthralgias are common symptoms that should prompt clinicians to consider the possibility of Sjögren syndrome. The majority of children diagnosed with Sjögren syndromes did not meet 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Comprehensive diagnostic testing from the 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria are not universally performed. This may lead to under-recognition and emphasizes a need for further research including creation of paediatric-specific classification criteria.

Prioritized Agenda for Mental Health Research in Pediatric Rheumatology from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Mental Health Workgroup.

OBJECTIVE: Mental health problems are prevalent in youth with rheumatologic disease. Gaps in knowledge exist regarding their effect, as well as strategies for detection and effective treatment. To address these gaps, the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Mental Health Workgroup developed and prioritized an agenda of research topics. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature and identified 5 major research domains in further need of study: (A) mental health burden and relationship to pediatric rheumatologic disease, (B) effect of mental health disorders on outcomes, (C) mental health awareness and education, (D) mental health screening, and (E) mental health treatment. Research topics within these areas were developed by workgroup leaders and refined by the workgroup. Members were surveyed to prioritize the topics by importance, feasibility of study, and actionability. RESULTS: Fifty-nine members (57%) completed the survey. Among the proposed research topics, 31/33 were rated as highly important and 4/33 were rated highly for importance, feasibility, and actionability. Topics rated most important related to (A) mental health burden and relationship to rheumatologic disease, and (B) the effect of mental health on outcomes. Topics rated most feasible and actionable were related to (D) mental health screening. CONCLUSION: Addressing gaps in knowledge regarding mental health in youth with rheumatologic disease is essential for improving care. We have identified high priority research topics regarding mental health of pediatric rheumatology patients in need of further investigation that are feasible to study and believed to lead to actionable results in patient care.