Usefulness of a mobile app to improve performance of specialists in responding correctly to CRC screening and surveillance clinical scenarios.

Background and study aims The adherence to and knowledge of physicians about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance guidelines is still suboptimal, threatening the effectiveness of CRC screening. This study assessed the usefulness of a mobile decision support system (MDSS) to improve physician ability to recommend proper timing of and intervals for CRC screening and surveillance. Patients and methods This was a binational, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial including gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons from Argentina and Uruguay. The specialists were invited to respond to a questionnaire with 10 CRC screening and surveillance clinical scenarios, randomized into two groups, with and without access to a dedicated app (CaPtyVa). The main outcome measure was the proportion of physicians correctly solving at least 60 % of the clinical cases according to local guidelines. Results A total of 213 physicians were included. The proportion of physicians responding correctly at least 60 % of the vignettes was higher in the app group as compared to the control group (90 % versus 56 %) (relative risk [RR] 1.6 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.34-1.91). The performance was also higher in the app group for both vignette categories: CRC screening (93 % vs 75 % RR 1.24, 95 %CI 1.01-1.40) and surveillance (85 % vs 47 % RR 1.81 95 %CI 1.46-2.22), respectively. Physicians considered the app easy to use and of great utility in daily practice. Conclusions A MDSS was shown to be a useful tool that improved specialist performance in solving CRC screening and surveillance clinical scenarios. Its implementation in daily practice may facilitate the adherence of physicians to CRC screening and surveillance guidelines.

Los adenomas metacrónicos de colon presentan un patrón de desarrollo diferente en pacientes obesos.

INTRODUCTION: XSome authors have assessed the link between obesity and colon adenoma risk. Moreover, it has been reported that obesity could increase the risk of proximal adenoma development. Accordingly, obese patients may have a distinctive pattern of adenoma recurrence. AIM: To determine whether metachronous adenoma features differ between obese and non-obese subjects submitted to colonoscopy surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated all patients over 18 years old that underwent surveillance colonoscopy at our institution between June 2013 and June 2014. Date of prior colonoscopy was registered. A body mass index ≥ 30 was used to define obesity. Analysis looking for variables significantly associated with metachronous adenoma was performed. Metachronous adenoma rate was compared between obese and non-obese subjects, as well as size, location, morphological and histopathological characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 825 subjects were enrolled. Median time of surveillance colonoscopy was 38.9 months. Obesity was statistically more frequent in those subjects with metachronous adenomas (40% vs 25.71%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, obesity [OR 1.7 (1.01-2.9)] and age [OR 1.02 (1-1.05)] were independently associated with metachronous adenoma presence. Obesity was also significantly associated with a higher risk of right colon adenomas [OR 2.4 (1.76-3.26)] and advanced adenoma [OR 1.99 (1.29-3.06)]. The risk is significantly higher in men and in those with a family history of colorectal cancer/adenoma. CONCLUSION: Obesity was associated with a higher risk of metachronous adenomas on surveillance colonoscopy. A higher risk of right-sided lesions and advanced adenomas was also found in this population.