RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of rapid ART (RA) compared to delayed ART (DA) on viral load suppression (viral load <50 cp/mL) and loss to follow-up (LTFU) in a cohort of migrants living with HIV (MLWHs) in Italy. METHODS: Data were retrospectively gathered from MLWHs who began care at the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit of the Careggi University Hospital from January 2014 to December 2022. RA was defined as antiretrovirals prescribed within 7 days of HIV diagnosis. The study ended on April 30, 2023, or upon patient LTFU. Chi-square and non-parametric tests assessed differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis was performed to estimate the probability of loss to follow-up. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with a loss to follow-up. RESULTS: 87 MLWHs were enrolled: 20 (23%) on RA and 67 (77%) on DA. In the RA group there were more PLWH with a previous AIDS event (p < .001) however, there was no significant difference in the LTFU rates between the groups (aHR 0.6, 95%CI 0.1-3.1; p = .560; Logrank = 0.2823). Being an out-of-status MLWH was the only predictor of LTFU. By 6 months, virological suppression was achieved in 61.2% (n = 41) in DA and 70.0% in the RA group (n = 14) (Logrank p = .6747). CONCLUSIONS: RA did not significantly affect LTFU rates or the achievement of viral load suppression. The study suggests that further research is needed to assess the impact of RA in high income settings.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the real-world accuracy of Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) detected by the rapid, point-of-care FebriDx test during the second-wave pandemic in Italy in patients with acute respiratory infection (ARI) and a clinical suspicion of COVID-19. DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective, observational, diagnostic accuracy study whereby hospitalized patients with ARI were consecutively enrolled in a single tertiary care center in Italy from August 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021. RESULTS: COVID-19 was diagnosed in 136/200 (68.0%) patients and Non-COVID-19 was diagnosed in 64/200 (32.0%) patients. COVID-19 patients were younger and had a lower Charlson comorbidity index compared to Non-COVID-19 patients (p < 0.001). Concordance between FebriDx, MxA and rt-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 (gold standard) was good (k 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99). Overall sensitivity and specificity were 97.8% [95% CI 93.7-99.5] and 95.3% [95% CI 86.9%-99.0%], respectively. FebriDx demonstrated a negative predictive value of 95.3% (95% CI 86.9-99.0) for an observed disease prevalence of 68%. CONCLUSIONS: FebriDx MxA showed high diagnostic accuracy to identify COVID-19 and could be considered as a real-time triage tool to streamline the management of suspected COVID-19 patients. FebriDx also detected bacterial etiology in Non-COVID-19 patients suggesting good performance to distinguish bacterial from viral respiratory infection.