De novo Donor-specific Anti-human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody and Its Outcome in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single-center Experience in India.

Development of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (dnDSA) is associated with poor graft survival in adults. However, there is a paucity of data about its prevalence and outcome in Indian children. We retrospectively assessed the proportion and spectrum of dnDSA and its outcome on antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft function. Children ≤18 years who were transplanted between November 2016 and October 2019 were included in this study. Pretransplant donor-specific antibody (DSA) was screened by complement-dependent cytotoxicity, flow cytometry crossmatch, and single antigen bead (SAB) class I and II by Luminex platform. Either antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab was used as induction. Tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisolone were used for the maintenance of immunosuppression. SAB screening was done at 1, 3, 6 months, and yearly in seven children and at the time of acute graft dysfunction in eight. Mean fluorescence intensity ≥1000 was considered positive. Protocol biopsies were done at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter in seven children. Fifteen children, all males with a median age (interquartile range) of 13 years (11; 15.5) were analyzed. Only one child had pretransplant DSA who developed dnDSA posttransplant. Overall, 8 (53%) developed dnDSA over a median follow-up of 18 months. Seven (87%) had Class II, one Class I and 3 (37%) both Class I and II. Six had dQ and two had DR. All children with dnDSA had ABMR, of these two had subclinical rejection. DSAs persisted despite treatment, though graft function improved. Children with DSA and ABMR had lower graft function than those without DSA. The proportion of dnDSA was high in our study, majority against DQ. The detection of dnDSA prompted early diagnosis and treatment of ABMR.

Berberine mediates tumor cell death by skewing tumor-associated immunosuppressive macrophages to inflammatory macrophages.

BACKGROUND: Berberine is a plant-derived alkaloid with potent anti-cancer activities. Berberine may redirect the tumor-promoting immunosuppressive M2 macrophages, to tumoricidal activated M1 macrophages. But such an anti-tumor function remains to be demonstrated. HYPOTHESIS: Polarization of macrophages to an immunosuppressive phenotype within the tumor microenvironment promotes tumor growth and contributes to resistance to chemotherapy. We examined if berberine would target macrophage polarization to reinstate anti-tumor immune response. STUDY DESIGN: Using a B16F10 mouse melanoma model, we assessed berberine-induced re-polarization of immunosuppressive M2 macrophages to anti-tumor M1 macrophages and subsequent T-cell activation within the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. METHODS: The B16F10 culture supernatant along with tumor antigen was used as tumor mimicking conditioned medium (CM). The bone marrow-derived macrophages were cultured in CM for 5 days. The CM-induced skewing of macrophages to M2-like phenotype was confirmed by flow cytometry and ELISA. The T-cells were co-cultured with macrophages to decipher the effect of berberine on T-cell differentiation. In vivo efficacy of berberine was analyzed using melanoma model of solid tumor. RESULTS: Berberine inhibited rIL-6-induced STAT-3 phosphorylation and IL-10 release from B16F10 cells. It enhanced tumor antigen-induced IL-1ß, IL-12 and TNFα, but suppressed IL-6 and TGF-ß release. Berberine significantly prevented the tumor antigen-mediated IL-10-enhanced IL-6 and TGF-ß expression. The CM skewed the bone marrow-derived macrophages to CD206-high but MHC-II-low M2-like tumor-associated macrophages. Berberine partially prevented the generation of these macrophages and was associated with reduced C/EBPß and Egr2 mRNA expression and lowered IL-10 and TGF-ß production. Berberine significantly reduced Arginase-1 expression in CM-treated M1 and M2-like macrophages. Berberine increased MHC-II and CD40 expression on the macrophages augmenting the CTL activity and the number of IFNγ-producing CD4+ T-cells. Berberine significantly lowered tumor volume, weight and enhanced the frequency of M1-like macrophages in mice. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that berberine interferes with pro-tumor macrophage polarization and IL-10 and TGF-ß release but restores Tcell anti-tumor cytotoxicity in the tumor microenvironment.

Seventy-seven kidney paired donation transplantations at a single transplant centre in India led to an increase in living donor kidney transplantations in 2015.

BACKGROUND: To ascertain the validity of kidney paired donations (KPDs) as an alternative strategy for increasing living donor kidney transplantations (LDKTs) in an LDKT-dominated transplant programme since directed kidney transplantation, ABO-incompatible or crossmatch-positive pairs are not feasible due to costs and infectious complications. METHODS: This was a prospective single-centre study of 77 KPD transplantations (25 two-way, 7 three-way and 1 six-way exchange) from 1 January 2015 to 1 January 2016 of 158 registered donor recipient pairs. During this period, a total of 380 kidney transplantations [71 deceased donor kidney transplantations (DDKTs), 309 LDKTs] were performed. The reasons for opting for KPD were ABO incompatibility (n = 45), sensitization (n = 26) and better matching (n = 6). RESULTS: KPD matching was facilitated in 62% (n = 98) of transplants. In all, 48.7% (n = 77) of the transplants were completed in 2015, whereas 13.3% (n = 21) of the matched patients were to undergo transplant surgery in early 2016 after getting legal permission. The waiting time for KPD was shorter compared with DDKT. The death-censored graft survival and patient survival were 98.7% (n = 76) and 93.5% (n = 72), respectively. In all, 14.2% (n = 11) of patients had acute rejection. Match rates among sensitized (n = 60) and O group patients (n = 62) were 58.3% (n = 35) and 41.9% (n = 26), respectively. Of these, 43.3% (n = 26) and 29% (n = 18) of transplants were completed and 15% (n = 9) and 12.9% (n = 8), respectively, are waiting for legal permission. CONCLUSIONS: LDKT increased by 25% in 1 year in our single-centre KPD programme. Our key to success was the formation of a KPD registry, awareness and active counselling programs and developing a dedicated team.

Past, present and future of kidney paired donation transplantation in India.

One third of healthy willing living kidney donors are rejected due to ABO blood group incompatibility and donor specific antibody. This increases pre-transplant dialysis duration leading to increased morbidity and mortality on the kidney transplantation waiting list. Over the last decade kidney paired donation is most rapidly increased source of living kidney donors. In a kidney transplantation program dominated by living donor kidney transplantation, kidney paired donation is a legal and valid alternative strategy to increase living donor kidney transplantation. This is more useful in countries with limited resources where ABO incompatible kidney transplantation or desensitization protocol is not feasible because of costs/infectious complications and deceased donor kidney transplantation is in initial stages. The matching allocation, ABO blood type imbalance, reciprocity, simultaneity, geography were the limitation for the expansion of kidney paired donation. Here we describe different successful ways to increase living donor kidney transplantation through kidney paired donation. Compatible pairs, domino chain, combination of kidney paired donation with desensitization or ABO incompatible transplantation, international kidney paired donation, non-simultaneous, extended, altruistic donor chain and list exchange are different ways to expand the donor pool. In absence of national kidney paired donation program, a dedicated kidney paired donation team will increase access to living donor kidney transplantation in individual centres with team work. Use of social networking sites to expand donor pool, HLA based national kidney paired donation program will increase quality and quantity of kidney paired donation transplantation. Transplant centres should remove the barriers to a broader implementation of multicentre, national kidney paired donation program to further optimize potential of kidney paired donation to increase transplantation of O group and sensitized patients. This review assists in the development of similar programs in other developing countries.

International kidney paired donation transplantations to increase kidney transplant of O group and highly sensitized patient: First report from India.

AIM: To report the first international living related two way kidney paired donation (KPD) transplantation from India which occurred on 17th February 2015 after legal permission from authorization committee. METHODS: Donor recipient pairs were from Portugal and India who were highly sensitized and ABO incompatible with their spouse respectively. The two donor recipient pairs had negative lymphocyte cross-matching, flow cross-match and donor specific antibody in two way kidney exchange with the intended KPD donor. Local KPD options were fully explored for Indian patient prior to embarking on international KPD. RESULTS: Both pairs underwent simultaneous uneventful kidney transplant surgeries and creatinine was 1 mg/dL on tacrolimus based immunosuppression at 11 mo follow up. The uniqueness of these transplantations was that they are first international KPD transplantations in our center. CONCLUSION: International KPD will increases quality and quantity of living donor kidney transplantation. This could be an important step to solving the kidney shortage with additional benefit of reduced costs, improved quality and increased access for difficult to match incompatible pairs like O blood group patient with non-O donor and sensitized patient. To the best of our knowledge this is first international KPD transplantation from India.

Impact of single centre kidney paired donation transplantation to increase donor pool in India: a cohort study.

In a living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) dominated transplant programme, kidney paired donation (KPD) may be a cost-effective and valid alternative strategy to increase LDKT in countries with limited resources where deceased donation kidney transplantation (DDKT) is in the initial stages. Here, we report our experience of 300 single-centre KPD transplantations to increase LDKT in India. Between January 2000 and July 2016, 3616 LDKT and 561 DDKT were performed at our transplantation centre, 300 (8.3%) using KPD. The reasons for joining KPD among transplanted patients were ABO incompatibility (n = 222), positive cross-match (n = 59) and better matching (n = 19). A total of 124 two-way (n = 248), 14 three-way (n = 42), one four-way (n = 4) and one six-way exchange (n = 6) yielded 300 KPD transplants. Death-censored graft and patient survival were 96% (n = 288) and 83.3% (n = 250), respectively. The mean serum creatinine was 1.3 mg/dl at a follow-up of 3 ± 3 years. We credit the success of our KPD programme to maintaining a registry of incompatible pairs, counselling on KPD, a high-volume LDKT programme and teamwork. KPD is legal, cost effective and rapidly growing for facilitating LDKT with incompatible donors. This study provides large-scale evidence for the expansion of single-centre LDKT via KPD when national programmes do not exist.

Six end-stage renal disease patients benefited from first non-simultaneous single center 6-way kidney exchange transplantation in India.

AIM: To avoid desensitization protocols and ABO incompatible kidney transplantation (KT) due to high costs and increased risk of infections from intense immunosuppression. METHODS: We present institutional ethical review board - approved study of single center 6-way kidney exchange transplantation. The participants comprised ABO incompatibility (n = 1); positive cross-match and/or presence of donor specific antibody (n = 5). The average time required from registration in kidney paired donation (KPD) registry to find suitable donors was 45 d and time required to perform transplants after legal permission was 2 mo. RESULTS: Graft and patient survival were 100%, and 100%, respectively. One patient had biopsy-proven acute borderline T cell rejection (Banff update 2013, type 3). Mean serum creatinine was 0.8 mg/dL at 9 mo follow-up. The waiting time in KPD was short as compared to deceased donor KT. CONCLUSION: We report first non-simultaneous, single center, 6-way kidney exchange transplantation from India. Our experience will encourage other centers in India to undertake this practice.

Increasing access to kidney transplantation for sensitized recipient through three-way kidney paired donation with desensitization: The first Indian report.

The combination of kidney paired donation (KPD) with desensitization represents a promising method of increasing the rate of living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) in immunologically challenging patients. Patients who are difficult to match and desensitize due to strong donor specific antibody are may be transplanted by a combination of desensitization and KPD protocol with more immunologically favorable donor. We present our experience of combination of desensitization protocol with three-way KPD which contributed to successful LDKT in highly sensitized end stage renal disease patient. All recipients were discharged with normal and stable allograft function at 24 mo follow up. We believe that this is first report from India where three-way KPD exchange was performed with the combination of KPD and desensitization. The combination of desensitization protocol with KPD improves access and outcomes of LDKT.

Kidney transplantation with positive complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch with negative flow crossmatching and Luminexx donor-specific antibodies.

The presence of positive anti-human, globulin-enhanced, complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches (AHG-CDC-XM) generally has been considered as a contraindication to kidney transplantation (KTx). Flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) and solid phase antibody screening are most sensitive and specific methods for immunological assessment. The outcome effect of donor-specific antibody (DSA) positive by Luminexx platform and CDCXM negative has been evaluated, but not the outcome of CDCXM positive and DSA negative. This is a case report describing KTx in a patient with pre-transplant positive AHG-CDC-XM but negative FCXM and without detectable DSA by Luminexx single antigen beads. CDCXM, FCXM, DSA were negative after transplantation, and kidney allograft biopsy did not show immune injury with negative C4d. Our report suggests that KTx with positive AHG-CDC-XM can be considered if FCXM and DSA were negative with careful immunological monitoring after transplantation. In our case, the IgM-antibodies were responsible for the positive AHG-CDC-XM result. The patient with positive CDC XM has a good outcome in the absence of DSA. Further work is needed to determine under what circumstances CDCXM positive transplants can be performed with FCXM and DSA negative.

Single-center experience on renal transplantation in primary focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis using hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in thymus, bone marrow, portal and peripheral circulation.

Recurrence of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is an important cause of graft loss after renal transplantation (RTx). We report our experience in 34 patients with primary FSGS who underwent RTx between April 1999 and June 2009, using hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). They belonged to four groups: group 1 (n = 12) received high-dose HSCT in periphery, thymus, bone-marrow, and portal circulation with low-dose non-myeloablative conditioning; group 2 (n = 7) was modified with HSCT without marrow/thymic infusion; and group 3 (n = 3) received HSCT and proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib replacing conditioning. Group 4 (n = 12), were controls who opted for RTx under standard triple-drug immunosuppression. Patient/donor demographics were comparable in all. No recurrence was noted in group 1 with mean follow-up of 8.1 years, whereas 28.6% of group 2, 33.3% of group 3, and 36.4% of group 4 had recurrence over mean follow-up of 2.6, 1.1, and 6.5 years, respectively. Mean serum creatinine was 1.62, 1.69, 1.41, and 1.73 mg%, respectively. Rejections were noted in 41.7%, 28.6%, 0%, and 45.5% grafts, respectively. Groups 1 and 4 had 25% patient loss each, group 2 had 28.6% loss, and no loss was observed in group 3. Graft loss was noted in 33.3% in group 1, 14.3% in group 2, nil in group 3, and 16.7% in the last group. Recurrent FSGS was prevented in RTx with HSCT in thymic, marrow infusion under low-dose non-myeloablative conditioning compared to controls and Bortezomib group, thus suggesting potential role of central tolerance in FSGS.

Desensitization protocol for highly sensitized renal transplant patients: a single-center experience.

Highly sensitized patients are destined to remain untransplanted for long. Early transplantation results in cost-saving, reduced morbidity/mortality and improved quality of life. We carried out a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of desensitization protocol vis-à-vis patient/graft survival in living donor renal transplantation in highly sensitized patients. Between December 2008 and April 2010, 34 renal transplant (RTx) patients underwent desensitization protocol. An anti-human globulin-enhanced lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch assay (AHG-CDC) ≥25% and T-cell median channel shift (MCS) >50, B-cell MCS >100 [flow crossmatch (FXM)] were considered crossmatch (XM) positive. All patients were administered bortezomib (1.3 mg/m 2 , days 1, 4, 8, 11), plasmapheresis, rabbit-anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). LCXM and FXM were repeated post-protocol. In the event of persistent sensitization, additional bortezomib cycle was repeated along with plasmapheresis, IVIg, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and rituximab. If the cross match (CMX) was negative or acceptable, patients underwent RTx. Post-transplant immunosuppression consisted of prednisone, CNI and MMF. Biopsy was performed in the event of graft dysfunction and treated accordingly. There were 18 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 37.4 years. Mean dialysis duration was 14.9 ± 17.6 months. Average third party transfusions were 6.2 ± 4.5, 17.6% had autoimmune diseases, 20.6% were multi-para. Pre-protocol AHGXM was 55.3 ± 24.5%, T-cell crossmatch (TCXM) was 122.4 ± 91.4 MCS and B-cell crossmatch (BCXM) was 279 ± 142.9 MCS. Totally, 85.3% responded within 1 month with reduction in AHG-CDC to 19.9 ± 5.2%, TCXM to 24.7 ± 19.4 MCS and BCXM to 74.7 ± 34.8 MCS. Side effects noted in 38.2% were manageable. Over follow-up of 0.92 ± 0.8 years, patient/graft survival was 100%/88.2% and mean serum creatinine was 1.27 ± 0.32 mg/dL. Acute rejections were noted in 24.1%, who responded to steroids + rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG). Five (14.7%) patients were transplanted after changing donors. Our desensitization protocol seems to be safe and effective. Bortezomib may offer new possibilities in desensitization protocols.

Abrogation of anti-HLA antibodies via proteasome inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Current treatments for autoantibody-mediated diseases (i.e., systemic lupus erythematosus) and alloantibodies (in transplant) are minimally effective. Although they deplete naïve B cells, plasmablasts, and transiently reduce antibody concentrations, they are minimally effective against long-lived, antibody-producing plasma cells. In transplantation, plasma cells produce antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens causing poor allograft survival. We report the first clinical experience with a plasma cell depleting therapy, bortezomib, to abrogate anti-HLA antibodies in transplantation (outside of rejection) in an attempt to improve long-term allograft survival. METHODS: Eleven patients with anti-HLA alloantibodies were treated with bortezomib. All patients underwent plasmapheresis to aid in removal of antibodies and to determine the effect of bortezomib. Serial measurements of anti-HLA antibody levels were conducted weekly by single antigen bead on Luminex platform. RESULTS: Bortezomib treatment elicited substantial reduction in both donor-specific antibody (DSA) and non-DSA levels. Antibodies were directed against DSA in 8 of 11 cases. Mean time to antibody appearance was 2 months posttransplant. Within 22 days (median) from treatment initiation, 9 of 11 patients' antibody levels dropped to less than 1000 mean fluorescence intensity. Of two patients without successful depletion, all had peak mean fluorescence intensity more than 10,000. At a mean follow-up of approximately 4 months posttreatment, all patients have stable graft function. Minimal transient side effects were noticed with bortezomib in the form of gastrointestinal toxicity, thrombocytopenia, and paresthesias. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib therapy effectively abrogates anti-HLA antibodies. Hence, removal of antibodies, by proteasome inhibition, represents a new treatment strategy for transplantation and may have benefit in autoimmune-related disease.

Diagnosis of acute humoral rejection using immunofluorescence in renal allograft biopsies- one step towards better understanding!

Immunofluorescence (IF) studies are important diagnostic tool in understanding pathogenesis involved in graft injury. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) associated with circulating donor-specific cytotoxic antibodies, is a poor prognosticator for graft survival. It can be diagnosed by staining for C4d antibody using indirect IF technique. C4d staining required to diagnose AHR was made mandatory for reporting renal allograft biopsies in 7th Banff conference. We present 2 years experience of IF studies using C4d polyclonal antibody on 546 renal allograft biopsies belonging to two groups of patients; 464 from group A (tolerance induction protocol) and 82 from group B (controls). We observed C4d focal positivity in 4 (0.9%) biopsies from group A and 4 (4.9%) from group B. We conclude that it is advisable to collect simultaneous core biopsy samples for IF studies and light microscopy to give better definition of allograft injury and thereby support in clinical management.

A strategy to achieve donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in cadaver renal allograft recipients by donor haematopoietic stem cell transplantation into the thymus and periphery.

INTRODUCTION: We designed a prospective, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the immune response to thymic and peripheral infusions of donor haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to create tolerance in recipients of cadaver renal allografts. METHOD: We divided 24 patients into two equal groups. For group A, 350 ml of unfractionated bone marrow (BM) was aspirated from the anterior iliac crests of donor cadavers. A 2 ml aliquot of concentrated marrow was infused into the thymus of the subject and 100 ml into the BM before surgery; the remaining 250 ml was infused peripherally post-transplantation. The mean nucleated cell count inoculated into the thymus was 3.3 x 10(4) cells/cm(3) and into the periphery 8.6 x 10(7) cells/kg body weight. Group B (controls) underwent renal transplantation directly. Recipients were lymphocytotoxicity cross-match negative in both groups. Group A received low dose prednisolone and cyclosporin; controls also received azathioprine. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 703 days for both groups, group A had significantly better graft function with minimum acute rejection episodes or cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, a mean serum creatinine (SCr) of 1.23 mg/dl and no graft or patient loss. Group B, with a mean SCr of 2.19 mg/dl had three patients with single acute rejection episodes, two of whom died following uncontrolled rejection-associated infections. The third patient maintained an SCr of 2.5 mg%. Actuarial graft survival was 87.5% in controls at the end of 2 years compared with group A with 100% graft survival at the end of 2 years. CONCLUSION: This novel approach of introducing unfractionated HSCs into the thymus and periphery to create tolerance is safe and efficacious and gives significantly better graft function, minimum acute rejection and no CMV disease with monotherapy.

High-dose peripheral blood stem cell infusion: a strategy to induce donor-specific hyporesponsiveness to allografts in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

We designed and implemented a clinical trial to achieve zero-rejection status in pediatric renal allograft recipients, using granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-stimulated peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion. We studied 44 consecutive patients: 24 volunteers in a treated group (Tn) and 20 in a control group (Cn). Both groups were comparable with respect to clinical and laboratory parameters. The Tn group had 70.8% one haplo-match donors and the Cn group had 80% one haplo-match donors. Patients in the Tn group received cyclosporin A (CsA) and 0.4 mg/kg body weight prednisolone as immunosuppressants; azathioprine was added for patients of the Cn group, who received 1 mg/kg body weight prednisolone together with CsA. Living-related donors (LRD) of patients in the Tn group received GM-CSF 450 microg on four consecutive days followed by leucopheresis and immediate transfusion of unmodified PBSC into the recipient. This procedure was repeated once/twice, with one portal and one/two systemic infusions. Our aim was to maximize the dose of PBSC. The total average dose was 22 x 10(8) cells/kg body weight. Lymphocyte cross-match (LCM) was performed before GM-CSF injection and after the last PBSC infusion. Follow-up over an 18-month period revealed 100% graft survival with sustained low serum creatinine (SCr) values in patients of the Tn group as compared with 80% graft survival in patients of the control group who had marginally higher SCr levels. Absence of graft vs. host disease (GvHD), acute rejection episodes, and low incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease were the principal benefits of this protocol.