Frequency and correlates of subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive screening results in African American adults following COVID-19 infection.

Background: Subjective cognitive complaints are frequent following COVID-19 infection, but assessment of whether these complaints map onto objective cognitive findings may not be routine in busy clinical settings. Consequently, opportunities to confirm these complaints and to provide follow-up referrals and appropriate care may be missed, thereby impacting patients' functional independence and quality of life. African Americans are vulnerable to poor outcomes from COVID-19, and thus represent a minority group in whom subjective concerns are especially important to investigate. Towards this end, we examined the frequency and correlates of subjective complaints and objective screening results of African American patients referred to the Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) Clinic at Grady Memorial Hospital, a large county teaching hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. Methods: Eighty seven African American patients (mean age = 52.5, SD = 10.5, range = 30-73) were evaluated between January 28, 2021-October 14, 2021 in the Grady PASC clinic. They ranged from 1 to 17 months post positive SARS-COV-2 antigen testing. Patients were administered a subjective cognitive complaint questionnaire (PROMIS Cognitive Function Scale Short Form 8a) as well as cognitive screening measures including the Mini-Cog (3 item recall, clock) and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (timed visuomotor sequencing). Mood was assessed via the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and anxiety via the Generalized Anxiety Disorders Scale. Published norms were used to identify clinically elevated scores. Results: Sixty six (76%) patients denied experiencing meaningful cognitive concerns, and of these, 25 (38%) had positive cognitive screens indicating impaired performance on objective testing. Of 21 patients with subjectively elevated cognitive concerns, 17 (81%) also had positive cognitive screens. There were no significant differences in sociodemographic factors (p values = .07-.71), days post-acute positive SARS-COV-2 Antigen Test (p = .99), disease severity (p values = .67-.75), or COVID-19 comorbidity indices (medical conditions (p values = .20-.77), substance abuse (p = .79), psychiatric history (p values = .11-.99) in those with or without subjective complaints and objective cognitive findings. However, patients with subjective complaints and objective cognitive findings reported more post-COVID-19 anxiety (p = .02) and depression (p = .001). Conclusions: Findings indicate a high concordance between subjective complaints on the PROMIS Cognitive Scale and objectively confirmed cognitive impairments in African Americans. Further, almost 40% who reported no cognitive complaints screened positive for cognitive impairment. Although depression and anxiety are associated with subjective complaints, they do not account for positive cognitive screening results, as those patients without depressive complaints also had similar rates of positive objective screens. The findings suggest that cognitive screening using assessment tools should be routinely performed in African Americans, especially those reporting cognitive symptoms on outcome scales. While future studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes, we highly recommend follow-ups in those with positive screens to characterize the specific domains that are impacted and that could affect activities of daily living and quality of life.

Chronic inflammation, neutrophil activity, and autoreactivity splits long COVID.

While immunologic correlates of COVID-19 have been widely reported, their associations with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) remain less clear. Due to the wide array of PASC presentations, understanding if specific disease features associate with discrete immune processes and therapeutic opportunities is important. Here we profile patients in the recovery phase of COVID-19 via proteomics screening and machine learning to find signatures of ongoing antiviral B cell development, immune-mediated fibrosis, and markers of cell death in PASC patients but not in controls with uncomplicated recovery. Plasma and immune cell profiling further allow the stratification of PASC into inflammatory and non-inflammatory types. Inflammatory PASC, identifiable through a refined set of 12 blood markers, displays evidence of ongoing neutrophil activity, B cell memory alterations, and building autoreactivity more than a year post COVID-19. Our work thus helps refine PASC categorization to aid in both therapeutic targeting and epidemiological investigation of PASC.

Dysregulated naive B cells and de novo autoreactivity in severe COVID-19.

Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection1 has been associated with highly inflammatory immune activation since the earliest days of the COVID-19 pandemic2-5. More recently, these responses have been associated with the emergence of self-reactive antibodies with pathologic potential6-10, although their origins and resolution have remained unclear11. Previously, we and others have identified extrafollicular B cell activation, a pathway associated with the formation of new autoreactive antibodies in chronic autoimmunity12,13, as a dominant feature of severe and critical COVID-19 (refs. 14-18). Here, using single-cell B cell repertoire analysis of patients with mild and severe disease, we identify the expansion of a naive-derived, low-mutation IgG1 population of antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) reflecting features of low selective pressure. These features correlate with progressive, broad, clinically relevant autoreactivity, particularly directed against nuclear antigens and carbamylated proteins, emerging 10-15 days after the onset of symptoms. Detailed analysis of the low-selection compartment shows a high frequency of clonotypes specific for both SARS-CoV-2 and autoantigens, including pathogenic autoantibodies against the glomerular basement membrane. We further identify the contraction of this pathway on recovery, re-establishment of tolerance standards and concomitant loss of acute-derived ASCs irrespective of antigen specificity. However, serological autoreactivity persists in a subset of patients with postacute sequelae, raising important questions as to the contribution of emerging autoreactivity to continuing symptomology on recovery. In summary, this study demonstrates the origins, breadth and resolution of autoreactivity in severe COVID-19, with implications for early intervention and the treatment of patients with post-COVID sequelae.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggests an association between blood hyperviscosity and both propensity for thrombosis and disease severity in patients with COVID-19. This raises the possibility that increased viscosity may contribute to endothelial damage and multiorgan failure in COVID-19, and that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) to decrease viscosity may improve patient outcomes. Here we sought to share our experience using TPE in the first 6 patients treated for COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Six critically ill COVID-19 patients with plasma viscosity levels ranging from 2.6 to 4.2 centipoise (cP; normal range, 1.4-1.8 cP) underwent daily TPE for 2-3 treatments. RESULTS: TPE decreased plasma viscosity in all six patients (Pre-TPE median 3.75 cP, range 2.6-4.2 cP; Post-TPE median 1.6 cP, range 1.5-1.9 cP). TPE also decreased fibrinogen levels in all five patients for whom results were available (Pre-TPE median 739 mg/dL, range 601-1188 mg/dL; Post-TPE median 359 mg/dL, range 235-461 mg/dL); D-dimer levels in all six patients (Pre-TPE median 5921 ng/mL, range 1134-60 000 ng/mL; Post-TPE median 4893 ng/mL, range 620-7518 ng/mL); and CRP levels in five of six patients (Pre-TPE median 292 mg/L, range 136-329 mg/L; Post-TPE median 84 mg/L, range 31-211 mg/L). While the two sickest patients died, significant improvement in clinical status was observed in four of six patients shortly after TPE. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates the utility of TPE to rapidly correct increased blood viscosity in patients with COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity. Large randomized trials are needed to determine whether TPE may improve clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19.

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on cytokines in peripheral blood for healthy participants: a prospective, single-blinded Study.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of exercise on cytokines may improve muscle strength. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a muscle-preserving therapy that benefits patients unable to participate in active exercise. How NMES alters cytokines is unclear. The aim of this study was to study the effects of 1 NMES session on cytokines associated with protein metabolism during exercise. METHODS: We evaluated the effects of NMES on IL-1, IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α levels in peripheral blood. Participants received NMES to bilateral lower extremity muscles (quadriceps, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius) for 30 min. Blood samples immediately pre- and post-NMES were drawn at 15-min intervals to 2-h follow-up, and the mean values of pre-NMES levels were compared to peak and trough post-NMES levels. For cytokines with significant changes, we conducted a repeated-measures linear regression analysis. We also measured post-NMES lactate and creatine kinase levels. RESULTS: We enrolled nine eligible participants. There was a significant increase in peak IL-6 from the mean pre-NMES value [0·65 (0·89) to 1·04 (0·89) pg ml-1 , P = 0·001] and a significant decrease in trough IL-1 [0·08 (0·07) to 0·02 (0·02) pg ml-1 , P = 0·041] and TNF-α [2·42 (0·54) to 2·16 (0·59) pg ml-1 , P = 0·021]. In repeated-measures regression analysis, we identified significantly higher mean IL-6 values throughout the full 120 min post-NMES period, and a significantly higher mean IL-1 value at 30 min post-NMES. There were no significant differences in peak IL-10, trough IL-6, lactate, or creatine kinase values. CONCLUSIONS: In nine healthy humans, 30 min of NMES was temporally associated with changes in cytokines similar to the effects of active exercise and may mediate NMES' observed effects on reducing muscle weakness.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial with blinded outcome assessment.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to compare neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) vs sham on leg strength at hospital discharge in mechanically ventilated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized pilot study of NMES vs sham applied to 3 bilateral lower extremity muscle groups for 60 minutes daily in the intensive care unit (ICU). Between June 2008 and March 2013, we enrolled adults who were receiving mechanical ventilation within the first week of ICU stay and who could transfer independently from bed to chair before hospital admission. The primary outcome was lower extremity muscle strength at hospital discharge using Medical Research Council score (maximum, 30). Secondary outcomes at hospital discharge included walking distance and change in lower extremity strength from ICU awakening. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00709124. RESULTS: We stopped enrollment early after 36 patients due to slow patient accrual and the end of research funding. For NMES vs sham, mean (SD) lower extremity strength was 28 (2) vs 27 (3), P = .072. Among secondary outcomes, NMES vs sham patients had a greater mean (SD) walking distance (514 [389] vs 251 [210] ft, P = .050) and increase in muscle strength (5.7 [5.1] vs 1.8 [2.7], P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot randomized trial, NMES did not significantly improve leg strength at hospital discharge. Significant improvements in secondary outcomes require investigation in future research.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for intensive care unit-acquired weakness: protocol and methodological implications for a randomized, sham-controlled, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: As the population ages and critical care advances, a growing number of survivors of critical illness will be at risk for intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness. Bed rest, which is common in the ICU, causes adverse effects, including muscle weakness. Consequently, patients need ICU-based interventions focused on the muscular system. Although emerging evidence supports the benefits of early rehabilitation during mechanical ventilation, additional therapies may be beneficial. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), which can provide some muscular activity even very early during critical illness, is a promising modality for patients in the ICU. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this article are to discuss the implications of bed rest for patients with critical illness, summarize recent studies of early rehabilitation and NMES in the ICU, and describe a protocol for a randomized, phase II pilot study of NMES in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: The study was a randomized, sham-controlled, concealed, phase II pilot study with caregivers and outcome assessors blinded to the treatment allocation. SETTING: The study setting will be a medical ICU. PARTICIPANTS: The study participants will be patients who are receiving mechanical ventilation for 1 day or more, who are expected to stay in the ICU for an additional 2 days or more, and who meet no exclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: The intervention will be NMES (versus a sham [control] intervention) applied to the quadriceps, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius muscles for 60 minutes per day. MEASUREMENTS: Lower-extremity muscle strength at hospital discharge will be the primary outcome measure. LIMITATIONS: Muscle strength is a surrogate measure, not a patient-centered outcome. The assessments will not include laboratory, genetic, or histological measures aimed at a mechanistic understanding of NMES. The optimal duration or dose of NMES is unclear. CONCLUSIONS: If NMES is beneficial, the results of the study will help advance research aimed at reducing the burden of muscular weakness and physical disability in survivors of critical illness.