Effects of coach extraversion and educational environment on transformational leadership and athlete outcomes: A moderated mediation model.

The importance of coach leadership to athlete development and performance has been identified in the literature. We respond to the call to investigate antecedents of coach transformational leadership and their indirect effects on athlete outcomes. We propose that coach extraversion as an antecedent of coach transformational leadership can indirectly impact follower cohesion and satisfaction. Building on this mediation model, we assert that educational environment (i.e., high school and university) may serve as a first-stage moderator between coach extraversion and transformational leadership. We used 48 coaches and their 570 athletes from competitive high school and university basketball teams to test this moderated mediation model. Our results indicate that coach extraversion indirectly impacts athlete cohesion and satisfaction via transformational leadership. Moreover, the indirect effects of coach extraversion on athlete outcomes via coach transformational leadership is conditionally significant only when coaches and athletes are in universities but not in high schools. Our findings highlight the importance of educational environment in determining the association between coach personality and leadership perception. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

When does paternalistic control positively relate to job satisfaction and citizenship behavior in Taiwan? The role of follower expectation.

Although prior research predicts mainly that followers expect leaders to exert less paternalistic control (such as emphasis on discipline, didactic instruction, and belittling followers), we argue that such an expectation may not be stable overtime or across settings. Based on the connectionist perspectives of implicit leadership theories, we propose a follower expectation model of paternalistic control, in which followers compare their perceived with expected levels of paternalistic control. Two inconsistent conditions-insufficient and excessive control-are identified, and the consistency between perceived and expected paternalistic control is predicted to relate to favorable follower outcomes. We examine this model by conducting two daily experience sampling studies in Taiwan. Our findings indicate that insufficient control is as unfavorable as excessive control in lowering followers' job satisfaction and citizenship behavior, and this pattern is particularly salient in terms of emphasis on discipline and the belittling of followers. A supplemental, qualitative analysis additionally demonstrated the conditions under which the expectation-perception consistency regarding belittling followers relates to favorable follower responses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

The effects of leadership for self-worth, inclusion, trust, and psychological safety on medical error reporting.

BACKGROUND: Although trust and psychological safety (PS) are critical for improving patient safety and medical error reporting, little is known about how they work together and how health care systems promote PS. PURPOSE: This study examined how leadership for self-worth, inclusion, and trust may work together to foster PS and how this influences medical error reporting. APPROACH: Data were collected in 2019 from 373 employees (24% response rate) in 85 hospital departments (54% response rate) in a nonprofit health care system in the eastern United States. Constructs were operationalized at the department level. RESULTS: Negative binomial path model results found several direct effects. Leadership for self-worth was positively associated with inclusion, inclusion was positively associated with trust and PS, trust was positively associated with reported medical errors, and PS was negatively associated with reported medical errors. Indirect effects uncovered leadership for self-worth was positively associated with PS by enhancing inclusion. In addition, leadership for self-worth increased inclusion, which increased trust and ultimately encouraged PS. Leadership for self-worth was associated with fewer reported medical errors through increasing inclusion, trust, and PS. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Trust encourages the formal reporting of medical errors whereas PS encourages learning from mistakes and improving care to reduce future errors (and consequently the number of reported errors). Leaders who understand employees' unique needs, express confidence in employees' abilities, and encourage employees to share their ideas, create inclusive and trusting work environments that encourage PS and ultimately help reduce reported medical errors.

A cross-level moderating effect of team trust on the relationship between transformational leadership and cohesion.

We draw on the concept of the shared mental model to explain the cross-level direct and moderating effects of team trust on the relationship between coach transformational leadership and cohesion. Using hierarchical linear modelling, we analysed 597 national level high school and university volleyball players to test our research model. Our results revealed that, (a) at the individual level, coach transformational leadership has a positive effect on athletes' perceptions on cohesion and (b) team trust, a group-level construct, is positively related to social cohesion and moderates the coach transformational leadership-cohesion relationship. The moderating effect demonstrates that the positive effect of coach transformational leadership on cohesion could be enhanced when high levels of team trust are shared within the group. Implications for coach education and sport psychology in terms of theory and research are discussed.