Combination of three cytotoxic agents in small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The established treatment for small-cell lung cancer has been a cisplatin-etoposide combination, as the most effective chemotherapy regimen. Paclitaxel has also been used in combination with cisplatin and etoposide but this has been unacceptable due to the toxicity. This toxicity could be attributed to the three consequent days of treatment with etoposide plus the doses of each of the three drugs. Our objectives were to determine an equal or longer survival and lower toxicity by administering all 3 drugs with low dosage on day one, compared to the established guideline of 3-day administration. METHODS: We tested the aforementioned three-drug combination and avoided the toxicity in the majority of patients by administering all 3 drugs on day one. Fifty-one patients (50 evaluable) were recruited from 4 oncology clinics. All patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed small-cell lung cancer with limited and extensive disease in 40 and 60 % of the patients, respectively. The treatment was: cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), etoposide 120 mg/m(2) (maximum 200 mg), and paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2). The agents were administered on day one and repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. RESULTS: The median survival was 15 months (95 % CI 13.6-16.4) (mean 16 months). Forty-five (90 %) patients achieved a response: 20 (40 %) patients, a complete response and 25 (50 %), a partial response. Adverse reactions included grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 12 and 2 % of the patients, respectively. Other side effects were of very low toxicity. CONCLUSION: The 1-day, three-agent (cisplatin-etoposide-paclitaxel) treatment of small-cell lung cancer is beneficial with respect to response rate and survival, and the toxicity is low and well-tolerated.

Synergistic antitumor activity of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic tumor-bearing mice.

Oxaliplatin (OX) and gemcitabine (GEM) are both drugs with proven clinical activity in various tumor types, have no overlapping toxic side effects and are different with respect to cellular metabolism. Therefore, we performed an in vivo study to determine the efficacy of the combination of these two drugs to optimize the scheduling of both substances using pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma PAN-02, subcutaneously growing in C57Bl mice. A total of 164 mice were used for cytotoxicity and antitumor studies. The combination therapy resulted in better results than those observed when the drugs were administered individually. GEM (58 mg/kg) and OX (1.0 mg/kg) achieved a 52% reduction in tumor size on day 28 after transplantation and a T/C value of 168% when the intermittent treatment schedule on days 1, 4 and 7 after inoculation was used. This treatment schedule was superior to other therapeutic schedules, producing a synergistic antitumor effect much higher than the one expected by the simple addition of the effects by OX and GEM acting independently.

Front-line paclitaxel and topotecan chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Based on previous experience, we combined topotecan with paclitaxel (weekly administration) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our primary objective was to determine the response rate and survival and our secondary objective, the safety of the regimen. METHODS: From October 2003, until March 2005, 45 patients all with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. All patients were chemotherapy and radiotherapy naive. Both agents were infused on day 1 of every week once for three consecutive weeks, every 28 days. Three infusions were considered as one course. The treatment plan was to give three courses (nine infusions) and then to evaluate the response. Topotecan (1.75 mg/m2) was infused for 30 min and paclitaxel (70 mg/m2) for 90 min; these doses had been established as the maximum tolerated dose in a previous phase I-II trial. RESULTS: Eighteen/45 (40%) patients responded, 2 (4.4%) complete responses and 16 (35.6%) partial responses. Twenty-one (46.7%) patients had stable disease, and 6 (13.3%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 8 months and median time to tumor progression 9 months. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in two patients (in these two patients, the dose of both drugs was reduced by 25% and G-CSF was given), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one patient and grade 4 anemia in one patient. CONCLUSION: This novel combination of topotecan-paclitaxel in a weekly administration rendered a 40% response rate, with very low toxicity in stages IIIA, IIIB and IV NSCLC patients.

Front-line paclitaxel and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II trial.

Our purpose was to determine the efficacy of irinotecan plus paclitaxel administered on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks, in untreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In total, 56 patients with inoperable or metastatic stage III and IV NSCLC with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis were enrolled. None of the patients had undergone prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Treatment involved irinotecan 125 mg m(-2) and paclitaxel 135 mg m(-2) administered on day 1 and repeated every 2 weeks for a planned number of nine cycles. With a standard dose of paclitaxel at 135 mg m(-2), the dosage of irinotecan was escalated at four levels: 75, 100, 125 and 150 mg m(-2); 125 mg m(-2) was established as the maximum tolerated dose; this dosage was administered to 46 patients. A total of 52 patients (median age 65 years, range 38-77 years) were assessable for toxicity and survival and 46 for response rate. Out of 46 evaluable patients, 19 achieved partial response (41.3%), 17 had stable disease (37%) and 10 (21.7%) experienced disease progression. The median duration of response was 6 months (range 2-9+ months). The main adverse reactions were myelotoxicity (grades 3 and 4) in 10 (19.2%) patients and diarrhoea (grade 3) in four (7.7%) patients. Irinotecan combined with paclitaxel, administered every 2 weeks, appears to be an effective treatment for advanced-stage NSCLC.

Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, followed by CMF with or without paclitaxel, in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer: a randomized phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel primarily on disease-free survival (DFS) and secondarily on overall survival (OS) in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1997 until November 2000, 604 patients with T1-3N1M0 or T3N0M0 tumors were randomized to three cycles of epirubicin 110 mg/m2 followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 followed by three cycles of 'intensified' CMF (cyclophosphamide 840 mg/m2, methotrexate 47 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 840 mg/m2) (group A), or to four cycles of epirubicin followed by four cycles of CMF, as in group A (group B). All cycles were given every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. RESULTS: A total of 595 patients were eligible. Median follow-up was 61.7 months for group A and 62 months for group B. The 3-year DFS was 80% in group A and 77% in group B. Survival rates were 93% and 90%, respectively. The effect of treatment on the hazard of death was different according to hormonal receptor status. More specifically, in patients with negative receptor status the hazard of death was significantly higher for group B (hazard ratio 2.42). Both regimens were well tolerated and severe acute side-effects were infrequent. No cases of severe cardiotoxicity or acute leukemia were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to demonstrate a significant difference in DFS or OS between the two treatment groups. However, our study has shown clearly that high-dose paclitaxel can be safely incorporated to dose-dense sequential chemotherapy.

Irinotecan combined with docetaxel in pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: This is a phase II study where a novel chemotherapy combination was tested in pre-treated breast cancer patients: docetaxel and irinotecan have already been established as agents for breast and colorectal cancer, respectively. METHODS: Forty-eight (median age 54 years, range 26-77 year) patients, all evaluable, were enrolled. All patients had been pre-treated with anthracycline-combined chemotherapy, 30 of whom were also treated with paclitaxel and 2 with docetaxel. World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 0-2. The dominant metastasis was in the liver (54.17%), in the lungs (27.08%), in soft tissues (12.50%) and in the skeleton (6.25%). Treatment involved irinotecan infusion 200 mg/m(2) for 90 min and docetaxel infusion 80 mg/m(2) for 90 min, repeated once every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-five (52.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 37.95-66.21) patients showed responses: 3 complete (6.25%, 95% CI 0-13.05) and 22 (45.83%, 95% CI 31.74-59.92) partial; the most responsive metastases were observed at the liver site (53.85%). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 18 patients (37.50%); 14 (29.17%) patients developed anaemia and three (6.25%), thrombocytopenia. Concerning non-haematologic toxicity, alopecia and fatigue were common; grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only one (2.08%) patient. CONCLUSION: The irinotecan-docetaxel combination produces quite a high response rate in pre-treated advanced breast cancer patients.

Paclitaxel and epirubicin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: To compare survival between patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with epirubicin/paclitaxel (Taxol) or paclitaxel/carboplatin (Cp) chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to April 2002, 327 eligible patients with ABC were randomized to receive either paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) in a 3-h infusion followed by epirubicin (EPI) 80 mg/m(2) (group A) or paclitaxel, as in group A, followed by Cp at an AUC of 6 mg x min/ml (group B) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 23.5 months, median survival was not significantly different between the two groups (22.4 months versus 27.8 months, P=0.25), whereas median time to treatment failure was significantly longer in patients treated with paclitaxel/Cp (8.1 months in group A versus 10.8 months in group B, P=0.04). Both regimens were well tolerated. In total, 39 patients (24%) in group A and 46 (29%) in group B suffered at least one severe side-effect. Quality-of-life assessment and cost analysis did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the paclitaxel/Cp combination is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with ABC in which anthracycline administration has the potential of being harmful.

Front-line paclitaxel-vinorelbine versus paclitaxel-carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial of advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was designed to compare a standard treatment such as carboplatin (CRP)-paclitaxel (PCT) with a new combination, vinorelbine (VRL)-PCT-two agents acting in microtubules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty patients (stage IIIa, IIIb and IV) were included and evaluated for response rate, survival and toxicity. Arm A patients were treated with the control combination of CRP 6 AUC and PCT 175 mg/m(2) repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles, and arm B with the investigational combination of VRL 25 mg/m(2) and PCT 135 mg/m(2) repeated every 2 weeks for nine cycles. The patients were well balanced with respect to gender, disease stage and performance status. Arm A received 849 cycles (mean 4.59 per patient) and arm B 951 cycles (mean 5.39 per patient). RESULTS: Complete and partial response rates were 45.95% and 42.86% for arms A and B, respectively. Median survival was 11 and 10 months, 1-year survival 42.7% and 37.85% and 2-year survival 10.12% and 19% for arms A and B, respectively. Toxicity was similar in all patients, except for neutropenia, which was significantly greater in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: PCT combined with VRL produces similar (non-significant) response rates, survival and toxicity (except for neutropenia, as noted above) to standard CRP-PCT treatment in untreated advanced-stage NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: To determine the activity and safety of the combination of paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter phase II study. Thirty-five newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced breast cancer were included in the study. Histological or cytological diagnosis was necessary for inclusion. Median age was 54 years (range 26-73 years). Fifteen patients were premenopausal and 20 postmenopausal. Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 175 mg/m(2) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 35 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (71%) responded. Six (17%) had a complete response, 19 (54%) had a partial response, four remained stable, two progressed and four were not evaluated for response due to discontinuation of chemotherapy. Three patients had a pathologically complete response. A total of 173 cycles were administered. The primary toxicity observed was skin toxicity. Grade 3 skin toxicity was noted in four patients (11%). Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) grade 3 was experienced by three (9%). Two patients presented with PPE and skin toxicity. Hematological toxicities included grade 3 leukopenia in four patients (3%). Other grade 3 toxicities were uncommon and included only alopecia in 29 patients (83%). Grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity was not observed in any patient. Dose reduction was necessary in seven patients; in six due to skin toxicity and in one due to neutropenia. Four patients discontinued treatment due to skin toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and paclitaxel was active in locally advanced breast cancer. The primary toxicity was cutaneous toxicity and it was manageable.

Randomized comparison of early versus late hyperfractionated thoracic irradiation concurrently with chemotherapy in limited disease small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG).

BACKGROUND: Concurrent platinum etoposide chemotherapy given in combination with hyperfractionated thoracic radiation therapy (HTRT) in limited disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is associated with a high response rate and significant prolongation of survival. Given these results, the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) performed a multicenter randomized phase II study in patients with LD SCLC to evaluate the timing of HTRT (early vs. late) when given concurrently with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To be eligible for the study, patients were required to have histologically or cytologically proven LD SCLC, confined to one hemithorax and/or ipsilateral mediastinal or supraclavicular lymphnodes and absence of pleural effusion or controlateral supraclavicular lymphnode involvement. Moreover, patients had to have a good performance status and adequate haematological, liver and renal function. Patients with LD SCLC were randomized to receive HTRT either concurrently with the first (Group A) or with the fourth (Group B) cycle of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin administered at an AUC of six given as an i.v. 1-hour-infusion immediately followed by etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m2 i.v. as a two-hour infusion for three consecutive days every three weeks up to a total of six cycles. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was also given to patients achieving a complete response. RESULTS: 42 and 39 patients, were eligible for efficacy evaluation in group A and B respectively. The overall response rate was 76% in group A and 92.5% in group B (P = 0.07) with a complete response rate of 40.5% and 56.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 35 months, time to progression was 9.5 months in group A and 10.5 in group B (NS) while overall median survival was 17.5 and 17 months respectively (NS). The 2-year survival was 36% in group A and 29% in group B (NS) and the 3-year survival 22% and 13%, respectively (NS). The distant relapse rate was 38% in group A and 61% in group B (P = 0.046). Severe grade 3 4 anemia was recorded in 19% of group A and 12.5% of group B (NS), while severe leucopenia was recorded in 35.5% and 20.5% (P = 0.09) and neutropenic fever in 5% and 2.5% (NS), respectively. Severe thrombocytopenia did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups being 21.5% and 23%, respectively. Severe grade 2-3 esophageal toxicity was 19% in group A and 23% in group B (NS), while grade 3 lung toxicity was 5% and 7.5% (NS), respectively. No toxicity-related deaths were recorded. CONCLUSION: Concurrent administration of HTRT with carboplatin etoposide is associated with a high response and survival rate. Although a trend for higher response rate was recorded in the group of patients who received late HTRT, the overall median, 2-year and 3-year survival rates did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. The toxicity of this promising therapeutic approach was acceptable. Comparative phase III studies with an adequate number of patients are recommended in order to answer this question.

A comparative study on cytogenetic and antineoplastic effects induced by two modified steroidal alkylating agents.

We investigated the effects of two newly synthesized steroidal derivatives of nitrogen mustard on sister chromatid exchange rates and on human lymphocyte proliferation kinetics. The compound 33-hydroxy-5alpha,22alpha-spirostan- 12-one-p-(N,N-bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)phenylacetate(1) was, on a molar basis, less effective in inducing sister chromatid exchange and suppressing cell proliferation rate indices than compound 3beta-hydroxy-12alpha-aza-C-homo-5alpha,22alpha-spirostan-12-one-p-(N,N-bis(2-chloroethyl)amino)phenylacetate(2). A correlation was observed between the magnitude of the sister chromatid exchange response and the depression of cell proliferation index. We also studied the effects of the aforementioned compounds on Lewis lung carcinoma. The order of the percent inhibition of tumor growth achieved by the compounds coincides with the order of the cytogenetic effects they induce.

Weekly paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab in patients with advanced breast cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group phase II study.

AIM: To evaluate the activity and acute toxicity of the combination of weekly paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab, in patients with HER-2/neu overexpressing advanced breast cancer (ABC). BACKGROUND: Weekly paclitaxel has been shown to be a well tolerated treatment with considerable activity in patients with ABC. Clinical trials with transtuzumab, a humanized anti-p185 HER-2/neu monoclonal antibody have demonstrated that this agent produces objective responses in patients with ABC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1998 to April 2000, 34 patients with HER-2/neu overexpressing ABC were treated with weekly paclitaxel; given by one-hour infusion at a dose of 90 mg/m2 immediately followed by trastuzumab, 4 mg/kg as a loading dose and 2 mg/kg i.v. given over 30 min, thereafter weekly for at least 12 weeks. Expression of HER-2/neu was determined by immunohistochemical analysis on fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Eligible patients were required to have > or = 25% stained tumor cells. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients completed at least 12 weeks of combined treatment. After completion of the 12th week of treatment, four patients (12%) achieved complete and 17 (50%) partial response. Median duration of response was 11.6 months. More frequent side effects included anemia (56%). neutropenia (27%), peripheral neuropathy (78%), diarrhea (30%), alopecia (70%), arthralgias/myalgias (62%), fatigue (59%) and hypersensitivity reactions (62%). Median time to progression was nine months while median survival had not been reached CONCLUSIONS: The combination of weekly paclitaxel and trastuzumab is a safe and active regimen for patients with HER-2/neu overexpressing ABC. Randomized phase III studies with this combination are warranted.

Synergistic antineoplastic and cytogenetic effects by the combined action of two homo-aza-steroidal esters of nitrogen mustards on P388 and L1210 leukaemias in vivo and in vitro.

In order to increase the damaging effects on specific DNA sequences and decrease the subsequent toxicity, the use of homo-aza-steroidal esters of nitrogen mustards is already known. Two specific homo-aza-steroidal esters were mixed at different proportions and the resultant final mixtures were tested in vivo and in vitro. The effects of these on P388 and L1210 leukaemias, on SCE rates and on human lymphocyte proliferation kinetics were studied. The results demonstrate that the combined substances enhanced SCE induction (p < 0.05) and antitumour activity (p < 0.02) in a synergistic manner. A correlation was observed (p < 0.001) between the magnitude of the SCE response and the depression of the cell proliferation index.

Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized study. Preliminary results. Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus carboplatin are active and well tolerated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, showing similar rates of response and survival. The Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a randomized phase III trial comparing gemcitabine plus paclitaxel with paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 plus carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) on day I. Group B received paclitaxel in identical fashion to group A plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days I and 8 every 3 weeks. A minimum of two cycles and a maximum of six cycles was allowed. To date, 127 eligible patients (63 in group A and 64 in group B) have been randomized; the median follow-up time is 4.6 months. Preliminary results suggest that both combinations can be given in full doses and are well tolerated. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was mild but more prominent in group A (10% v 3%, respectively) while thrombocytopenia was not significant for either group. Moreover, severe neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, or cardiac toxicity has not been observed in the vast majority of patients in either group. Although patients in group B experienced higher response rates (37.5%) than those in group A (21.8%), the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Definite conclusions about this study cannot be made until more data are available.

Effects on blood coagulation of adjuvant CNF (cyclophosphamide, novantrone, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy in stage II breast cancer patients.

We prospectively studied the alterations of coagulation during adjuvant CNF (Cyclophosphamide, Novantrone--Mitoxantrone, 5-Fluorouracil) chemotherapy in patients with stage II breast cancer. In 50 consecutive stage II breast cancer patients (pre-peri-postmenopausal), and 50 controls, serial coagulation parameters including prothrombin time (P.T.), partial thromboplastin time (P.T.T.), fibrinogen, fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products (F.D.P.), protein C, protein S, antithrombin III (AT-III) and platelet count were performed. Blood samples for coagulation tests were collected at pretherapy, midtherapy (before the 3rd course), before the 6th course of chemotherapy, and 2 months after the cessation of therapy (post-therapy) of 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, Novantrone 10 mg/m2, 5-Fluorouracil 500 mg/m2). Chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks. None of our stage II breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant CNF chemotherapy developed thromboembolic complications. Before any treatment all the tested coagulation parameters were within the normal limits as compared to controls. No statistically significant changes of FDP were noted throughout the study. Fibrinogen, plasma protein C, protein S and AT-III were significantly decreased during chemotherapy. This decline was more evident at midtherapy. Their levels returned to the pretherapy values 2 months after the completion of chemotherapy. The P.T. was statistically shortened, while the P.T.T. showed a statistically significant prolongation during chemotherapy. In conclusion, it appears that monitoring stage II breast cancer with sophisticated coagulation tests during adjuvant CNF chemotherapy can not identify patients at high risk for thromboembolic events. These serially performed coagulation tests, could be considered as a cost-intensive monitoring and not justifiable as a screening for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the increasing number of reports of life-threatening and sometimes fatal thromboembolic events following chemotherapy or hormonochemotherapy are of great concern. Our results suggest caution when using chemotherapeutic agents in patients with other thrombosis risk factors, since a significant decrease of protein C and protein S was observed in all patients. Additional studies are required to determine the exact association between chemotherapy and/or hormonochemotherapy and thrombotic events.

Platinum-based induction chemotherapy followed by radiation as definitive treatment for patients with locally advanced cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx and hypopharynx. A retrospective analysis of 32 cases.

Thirty-two patients with locally advanced cancer of oral cavity, oropharynx and hypopharynx were treated with three cycles of platinum-based induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy. After completion of the combined treatment 50% of the patients were in complete response (CR) and 28% in partial response (PR). So far, 24 patients have died. Local progression occurred in 20 patients. Survival is 29% at 24 months. Seven (22%) patients remain alive and have been disease-free for 22-59 months. In conclusion, induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy may omit radical surgery, without compromising survival, in some patients with locally advanced cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx and hypopharynx.

High-dose leucovorin, fluorouracil and oral dipyridamole in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Fifty-five patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with the combination of leucovorin (LV), fluorouracil (FU) and dipyridamole (DP). Two (4%) patients achieved a clinical complete remission, 4 (7%) a partial remission, 24 (44%) had stable disease while 25 (45%) patients progressed during the chemotherapy period. Median survival was 47 weeks and median time to progression 19.5 weeks. Major toxicities included diarrhea (66%), leukopenia (45%), anemia (50%) and nausea/vomiting (44%). In conclusion, the addition of oral DP does not appear to improve the efficacy of the standard LV/FU regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.