RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Relaxin (RLX)-2, produced by the corpus luteum and placenta, is known to be potentially effective in fibrotic diseases of the heart, lungs, kidneys, and bladder; however, its effectiveness in endometriosis has not yet been investigated. In the present study, we conducted a comprehensive study on the effect of RLX-2 on endometriosis. We checked the expressions of LGR-7, a primary receptor of RLX-2, in endometriomas using immunohistochemistry. Endometriotic stromal cells (ESCs) purified from surgical specimens were used in in vitro experiments. The effects of RLX-2 on ESCs were evaluated by quantitative-PCR, ELISA, and Western blotting. Gel contraction assay was used to assess the contraction suppressive effect of RLX-2. The effect of RLX-2 was also examined in the endometriosis mouse model. LGR-7 was expressed in endometriotic lesions. In ESCs, RLX-2 increased the production of cAMP and suppressed the secretion of interleukin-8, an inflammatory cytokine, by 15% and mRNA expression of fibrosis-related molecules, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and collagen-I by approximately 50% (p < 0.05). In the gel contraction assay, RLX-2 significantly suppressed the contraction of ESCs, which was cancelled by removing RLX-2 from the medium or by adding H89, a Protein Kinase A (PKA) inhibitor. In ESCs stimulated with RLX-2, p38 MAPK phosphorylation was significantly suppressed. In the endometriosis mouse model, administration of RLX-2 significantly decreased the area of the endometriotic-like lesion with decreasing fibrotic component compared to non-treated control (p = 0.01). RLX-2 may contribute to the control of endometriotic lesion by suppressing fibrosis, scar formation, and inflammation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The importance of peritoneal washing cytology status both as a sign of irresectability and as a prognostic factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains controversial. The purpose of this nationwide, cancer registry-based study was to clarify the clinical implications of operative resection in patients who had positive cytology status. METHODS: Clinical data from 1,970 patients who underwent tumor resection were collected from the Pancreatic Cancer Registry in Japan. Clinicopathologic factors and overall survival curves were analyzed, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 1,970 patients analyzed, positive cytology status was found in 106 patients and negative cytology status was found in 1,864 patients. The positive cytology status group had a greater frequency of pancreatic body and tail cancer and greater preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels than the negative cytology status group (P < .001 each). The ratio of peritoneal recurrence tended to be greater in the positive cytology status group (14% vs 43%; P < .001). Overall median survival times were less in the positive cytology status group (17.5 months vs 29.4 months; P < .001). The 5-year survival rates were 13.7% and 31.1% in the positive cytology status and negative cytology status groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis of positive cytology status patients revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Positive cytology status was an adverse prognostic factor in patients who underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma but did not preclude attempted curative resection. Curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy may contribute to long-term prognosis in patients with positive cytology status.