Single-step genomic predictions for heat tolerance of production yields in US Holsteins and Jerseys.

The physiological stress caused by excessive heat affects dairy cattle health and production. This study sought to investigate the effect of heat stress on test-day yields in US Holstein and Jersey cows and develop single-step genomic predictions to identify heat tolerant animals. Data included 12.8 million and 2.1 million test-day records, respectively, for 923,026 Holstein and 153,710 Jersey cows in 27 US states. From 2015 through 2021, test-day records from the first 5 lactations included milk, fat, and protein yields (kg). Cow records were included if they had at least 5 test-day records per lactation. Heat stress was quantified by analyzing the effect of a 5-d hourly average temperature-humidity index (THI5d¯) on observed test-day yields. Using a multiple trait repeatability model, a heat threshold (THI threshold) was determined fowr each breed based on the point that the average adjusted yields started to decrease, which was 69 for Holsteins and 72 for Jerseys. An additive genetic component of general production and heat tolerance production were estimated using a multiple trait reaction norm model and single-step genomic BLUP methodology. Random effects were regressed on a function of 5-d hourly average (THI5d¯) and THI threshold. The proportion of test-day records that occurred on or above the respective heat thresholds was 15% for Holstein and 10% for Jersey. Heritability of milk, fat, and protein yields under heat stress for Holsteins increased, with a small standard error, indicating that the additive genetic component for heat tolerance of these traits was observed. This was not as evident in Jersey traits. For Jersey, the permanent environment explained the same or more of the variation in fat and protein yield under heat stress indicating that nongenetic factors may determine heat tolerance for these Jersey traits. Correlations between the general genetic merit of production (in the absence of heat stress) and heat tolerance genetic merit of production traits were moderate in strength and negative. This indicated that selecting for general genetic merit without consideration of heat tolerance genetic merit of production may result in less favorable performance in hot and humid climates. A general genomic estimated breeding value for genetic merit and a heat tolerance genomic estimated breeding value were calculated for each animal. This study contributes to the investigation of the impact of heat stress on US dairy cattle production yields and offers a basis for the implementation of genomic selection. The results indicate that genomic selection for heat tolerance of production yields is possible for US Holsteins and Jerseys, but a study to validate the genomic predictions should be explored.

Nonparallel genome changes within subpopulations over time contributed to genetic diversity within the US Holstein population.

Maintaining genetic variation in a population is important for long-term genetic gain. The existence of subpopulations within a breed helps maintain genetic variation and diversity. The 20,990 genotyped animals, representing the breeding animals in the year 2014, were identified as the sires of animals born after 2010 with at least 25 progenies, and females measured for type traits within the last 2 yr of data. K-means clustering with 5 clusters (C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5) was applied to the genomic relationship matrix based on 58,990 SNP markers to stratify the selected candidates into subpopulations. The general higher inbreeding resulting from within-cluster mating than across-cluster mating suggests the successful stratification into genetically different groups. The largest cluster (C4) contained animals that were less related to each animal within and across clusters. The average fixation index was 0.03, indicating that the populations were differentiated, and allele differences across the subpopulations were not due to drift alone. Starting with the selected candidates within each cluster, a family unit was identified by tracing back through the pedigree, identifying the genotyped ancestors, and assigning them to a pseudogeneration. Each of the 5 families (F1, F2, F3, F4, and F5) was traced back for 10 generations, allowing for changes in frequency of individual SNPs over time to be observed, which we call allele frequencies change. Alternative procedures were used to identify SNPs changing in a parallel or nonparallel way across families. For example, markers that have changed the most in the whole population, markers that have changed differently across families, and genes previously identified as those that have changed in allele frequency. The genomic trajectory taken by each family involves selective sweeps, polygenic changes, hitchhiking, and epistasis. The replicate frequency spectrum was used to measure the similarity of change across families and showed that populations have changed differently. The proportion of markers that reversed direction in allele frequency change varied from 0.00 to 0.02 if the rate of change was greater than 0.02 per generation, or from 0.14 to 0.24 if the rate of change was greater than 0.005 per generation within each family. Cluster-specific SNP effects for stature were estimated using only females and applied to obtain indirect genomic predictions for males. Reranking occurs depending on SNP effects used. Additive genetic correlations between clusters show possible differences in populations. Further research is required to determine how this knowledge can be applied to maintain diversity and optimize selection decisions in the future.

Identifying influential sires and distinct clusters of selection candidates based on genomic relationships to reduce inbreeding in the US Holstein.

High relatedness in the US Holstein breed can be attributed to the increased rate of inbreeding that resulted from strong selection and the extensive use of a few bulls via reproductive biotechnology. The objectives of this study were to determine whether clustering could separate selected candidates into genetically different groups and whether such clustering could reduce the expected inbreeding of the next generation. A genomic relationship matrix composed of 1,145 sires with the most registered progeny in the breed born after 1985 was used for principal component analysis and k-means clustering. The 5 clusters reduced the variance by 25% and contained 171 (C1), 252 (C2), 200 (C3), 244 (C4), and 278 (C5) animals, respectively. The 2 most predominant families were C1 and C2, while C4 contained the most international animals. On average, C1 and C5 contained older animals; the average birth year per cluster was 1988 (C1), 1996 (C2 and C3), 1999 (C4), and 1990 (C5). Increasing to 10 clusters allowed the separation of the predominant sons. Statistically significant differences were observed for indices (net merit index, cheese merit index, and fluid merit index), daughter pregnancy rate, and production traits (milk, fat, and protein), with older clusters having lower merit for production but higher for reproduction. K-means clustering was also used for 20,099 animals considered as selection candidates. Based on the reduction in variance achieved by clustering, 5 to 7 clusters were appropriate. The number of animals in each cluster was 3,577 (C1), 3,073 (C2), 3,302 (C3), 5,931 (C4), and 4,216 (C5). The expected inbreeding from within or across cluster mating was calculated using the complete pedigree, assuming the mean inbreeding of animals born in the same year when parents are unknown. Generally, inbreeding was highest within cluster mating and lowest across cluster mating. Even when 10 clusters were used, one cluster always gave low inbreeding in all scenarios. This suggests that this cluster contains animals that differ from all other groups but still contains enough diversity within itself. Based on lower across cluster inbreeding, up to 7 clusters were appropriate. Statistically significant differences in genomic estimated breeding values were found between clusters. The rankings of clusters for different traits were mostly the same except for reproduction and fat. Results show that diversity within the population exists and clustering of selection candidates can reduce the expected inbreeding of the next generations.

Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.

Official multibreed genomic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States are based on multibreed BLUP evaluation followed by single-breed estimation of SNP effects. Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) allows the straight computation of genomic (G)EBV in a multibreed context. This work aimed to develop ssGBLUP multibreed genomic predictions for US dairy cattle using the algorithm for proven and young (APY) to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix. Only purebred Ayrshire (AY), Brown Swiss (BS), Guernsey (GU), Holstein (HO), and Jersey (JE) animals were considered. A 3-trait model with milk (MY), fat (FY), and protein (PY) yields was applied using about 45 million phenotypes recorded from January 2000 to June 2020. The whole data set included about 29.5 million animals, of which almost 4 million were genotyped. All the effects in the model were breed specific, and breed was also considered as fixed unknown parent groups. Evaluations were done for (1) each single breed separately (single); (2) HO and JE together (HO_JE); (3) AY, BS, and GU together (AY_BS_GU); (4) all the 5 breeds together (5_BREEDS). Initially, 15k core animals were used in APY for AY_BS_GU and 5_BREEDS, but larger core sets with more animals from the least represented breeds were also tested. The HO_JE evaluation had a fixed set of 30k core animals, with an equal representation of the 2 breeds, whereas HO and JE single-breed analysis involved 15k core animals. Validation for cows was based on correlations between adjusted phenotypes and (G)EBV, whereas for bulls on the regression of daughter yield deviations on (G)EBV. Because breed was correctly considered in the model, BLUP results for single and multibreed analyses were the same. Under ssGBLUP, predictability and reliability for AY, BS, and GU were on average 7% and 2% lower in 5_BREEDS compared with single-breed evaluations, respectively. However, validation parameters for these 3 breeds became better than in the single-breed evaluations when 45k animals were included in the core set for 5_BREEDS. Evaluations for Holsteins were more stable across scenarios because of the greatest number of genotyped animals and amount of data. Combining AY, BS, and GU into one evaluation resulted in predictions similar to the ones from single breed, especially when using about 30k core animals in APY. The results showed that single-step large-scale multibreed evaluations are computationally feasible, but fine tuning is needed to avoid a reduction in reliability when numerically dominant breeds are combined. Having evaluations for AY, BS, and GU separated from HO and JE may reduce inflation of GEBV for the first 3 breeds.

Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.

The objective of this study was to assess the reliability and bias of estimated breeding values (EBV) from traditional BLUP with unknown parent groups (UPG), genomic EBV (GEBV) from single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) with UPG for the pedigree relationship matrix (A) only (SS_UPG), and GEBV from ssGBLUP with UPG for both A and the relationship matrix among genotyped animals (A22; SS_UPG2) using 6 large phenotype-pedigree truncated Holstein data sets. The complete data included 80 million records for milk, fat, and protein yields from 31 million cows recorded since 1980. Phenotype-pedigree truncation scenarios included truncation of phenotypes for cows recorded before 1990 and 2000 combined with truncation of pedigree information after 2 or 3 ancestral generations. A total of 861,525 genotyped bulls with progeny and cows with phenotypic records were used in the analyses. Reliability and bias (inflation/deflation) of GEBV were obtained for 2,710 bulls based on deregressed proofs, and on 381,779 cows born after 2014 based on predictivity (adjusted cow phenotypes). The BLUP reliabilities for young bulls varied from 0.29 to 0.30 across traits and were unaffected by data truncation and number of generations in the pedigree. Reliabilities ranged from 0.54 to 0.69 for SS_UPG and were slightly affected by phenotype-pedigree truncation. Reliabilities ranged from 0.69 to 0.73 for SS_UPG2 and were unaffected by phenotype-pedigree truncation. The regression coefficient of bull deregressed proofs on (G)EBV (i.e., GEBV and EBV) ranged from 0.86 to 0.90 for BLUP, from 0.77 to 0.94 for SS_UPG, and was 1.00 ± 0.03 for SS_UPG2. Cow predictivity ranged from 0.22 to 0.28 for BLUP, 0.48 to 0.51 for SS_UPG, and 0.51 to 0.54 for SS_UPG2. The highest cow predictivities for BLUP were obtained with the most extreme truncation, whereas for SS_UPG2, cow predictivities were also unaffected by phenotype-pedigree truncations. The regression coefficient of cow predictivities on (G)EBV was 1.02 ± 0.02 for SS_UPG2 with the most extreme truncation, which indicated the least biased predictions. Computations with the complete data set took 17 h with BLUP, 58 h with SS_UPG, and 23 h with SS_UPG2. The same computations with the most extreme phenotype-pedigree truncation took 7, 36, and 15 h, respectively. The SS_UPG2 converged in fewer rounds than BLUP, whereas SS_UPG took up to twice as many rounds. Thus, the ssGBLUP with UPG assigned to both A and A22 provided accurate and unbiased evaluations, regardless of phenotype-pedigree truncation scenario. Old phenotypes (before 2000 in this data set) did not affect the reliability of predictions for young selection candidates, especially in SS_UPG2.

Reducing computational cost of large-scale genomic evaluation by using indirect genomic prediction.

Over half a million Holsteins are being genotyped annually in the United States. The computational cost of including all genotypes in single-step genomic (ssG)BLUP is high, although it is feasible to conduct large-scale genomic prediction using an efficient algorithm such as APY (algorithm for proven and young). An effective method to further reduce the computing cost could be the use of indirect genomic predictions (IGP) for genotyped animals when they have neither progeny nor phenotypes. These young genotyped animals have no effect on the other genotyped animals and could have their genomic prediction done indirectly. The main objective of this study was to calculate IGP for various groups of genotyped animals and investigate the reduction in computing time as well as bias and accuracy of the IGP. We compared IGP with genomic (G)EBV for 18 linear type traits in US Holsteins, including 2.3 million (M) genotyped animals. The full data set consisted of 10.9M records for 18 linear type traits up to 2018 calving, 13.6M animals in the pedigree, and 2.3M animals genotyped for 79K SNP. For IGP, ssGBLUP included all genotyped animals except those with neither progeny nor phenotypes by year from 2014 to 2018 (i.e., the target animals). The SNP marker effects were computed based on GEBV for genotyped animals that had progeny, or phenotypes, or both. Further, IGP were calculated for target genotyped animals in each year group. For all genotyped animal groups from 2014 to 2018, the coefficients of determination (R2) of a linear regression of GEBV on IGP were 0.960 for males and 0.954 for females for 18 traits on average. To reduce computing costs, the SNP marker effects were calculated based on GEBV from randomly selected genotyped animals from 15K to 60K. By randomly selecting a small number of genotyped animals, the computing time was dramatically reduced. As more genotyped animals were randomly selected to calculate SNP effects, R2 was higher (more accurate) and the regression coefficient was lower (more inflated IGP). In a practical genomic evaluation in US Holsteins, to get sufficient contributions from GEBV, 25K to 35K is a rational number of genotyped animals that can be randomly selected to compute SNP effects and obtain accurate and unbiased IGP. Considering the computing time and both unbiasedness and accuracy of IGP, genomic evaluation can be conducted separately in GEBV for genotyped animals with phenotypes or progeny and in IGP for young genotyped animals. This can be a practical solution when conducting a large-scale genomic evaluation and would enable more frequent evaluation at lower cost, especially when many genotyped animals have neither phenotypes nor progeny.

Bias in genomic predictions by mating practices for linear type traits in a large-scale genomic evaluation.

The objective of this study was to clarify how bias in genomic predictions is created by investigating a relationship among selection intensity, a change in heritability (Δh2), and assortative mating (ASM). A change in heritability, resulting from selection, reflects the impact that the Bulmer effect has on the reduction in between-family variation, whereas assortative mating impacts the within-family variance or Mendelian sampling variation. A partial data set up to 2014, including 841K genotyped animals, was used to calculate genomic predictions with a single-step genomic model for 18 linear type traits in US Holsteins. A full data set up to 2018, including 2.3 million genotyped animals, was used to calculate benchmark genomic predictions. Inbreeding and unknown parent groups for missing parents of animals were included in the model. Genomic evaluation was performed using 2 different genetic parameters: those estimated 14 yr ago, which have been used in the national genetic evaluation for linear type traits in the United States, and those newly estimated with recent records from 2015 to 2018 and those corresponding pedigrees. Genetic trends for 18 type traits were estimated for bulls with daughters and cows with phenotypes in 2018. Based on selection intensity and mating decisions, these traits can be categorized into 3 groups: (a) high directional selection, (b) moderate selection, and (c) intermediate optimum selection. The first 2 categories can be explained by positive assortative mating, and the last can be explained by negative assortative or disassortative mating. Genetic progress was defined by genetic gain per year based on average standardized genomic predictions for cows from 2000 to 2014. Traits with more genetic progress tended to have more "inflated" genomic predictions (i.e., "inflation" means here that genomic predictions are larger in absolute values than expected, whereas "deflation" means smaller than expected). Heritability estimates for 14 out of 18 traits declined in the last 16 yr, and Δh2 ranged from -0.09 to 0.04. Traits with a greater decline in heritability tended to have more deflated genomic predictions. Biases (inflation or deflation) in genomic predictions were not improved by using the latest genetic parameters, implying that bias in genomic predictions due to preselection was not substantial for a large-scale genomic evaluation. Moreover, the strong selection intensity was not fully responsible for bias in genomic predictions. The directional selection can decrease heritability; however, positive assortative mating, which was strongly associated with large genetic gains, could minimize the decline in heritability for a trait under strong selection and could affect bias in genomic predictions.

Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.

The objectives of this study were to investigate bias in genomic predictions for dairy cattle and to find a practical approach to reduce the bias. The simulated data included phenotypes, pedigrees, and genotypes, mimicking a dairy cattle population (i.e., cows with phenotypes and bulls with no phenotypes) and assuming selection by breeding values or no selection. With the simulated data, genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were calculated with a single-step genomic BLUP and compared with true breeding values. Phenotypes and genotypes were simulated in 10 generations and in the last 4 generations, respectively. Phenotypes in the last generation were removed to predict breeding values for those individuals using only genomic and pedigree information. Complete pedigrees and incomplete pedigrees with 50% missing dams were created to construct the pedigree-based relationship matrix with and without inbreeding. With missing dams, unknown parent groups (UPG) were assigned in relationship matrices. Regression coefficients (b1) and coefficients of determination (R2) of true breeding values on (G)EBV were calculated to investigate inflation and accuracy in GEBV for genotyped animals, respectively. In addition to the simulation study, 18 linear type traits of US Holsteins were examined. For the 18 type traits, b1 and R2 of GEBV with full data sets on GEBV with partial data sets for young genotyped bulls were calculated. The results from the simulation study indicated inflation in GEBV for genotyped males that were evaluated with only pedigree and genomic information under BLUP selection. However, when UPG for only pedigree-based relationships were included, the inflation was reduced, accuracy was highest, and genetic trends had no bias. For the linear type traits, when UPG for only pedigree-based relationships were included, the results were generally in agreement with those from the simulation study, implying less bias in genetic trends. However, when including no UPG, UPG in pedigree-based relationships, or UPG in genomic relationships, inflation and accuracy in GEBV were similar. The results from the simulation and type traits suggest that UPG must be defined accurately to be estimable and inbreeding should be included in pedigree-based relationships. In dairy cattle, known pedigree information with inbreeding and estimable UPG plays an important role in improving compatibility between pedigree-based and genomic relationship matrices, resulting in more reliable genomic predictions.

Single-step genome-wide association for longitudinal traits of Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey dairy cattle.

Estimating single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects over time is essential to identify and validate candidate genes (or quantitative trait loci) associated with time-dependent variation of economically important traits and to better understand the underlying mechanisms of lactation biology. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to estimate time-dependent effects of SNP and identifying candidate genes associated with milk (MY), fat (FY), and protein (PY) yields, and somatic cell score (SCS) in the first 3 lactations of Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey breeds, as well as suggest their potential pattern of phenotypic effect over time. Random regression coefficients for the additive direct genetic effect were estimated for each animal using single-step genomic BLUP, based on 2 random regression models: one considering MY, FY, and PY in the first 3 lactations and the other considering SCS in the first 3 lactations. Thereafter, SNP solutions were obtained for random regression coefficients, which were used to estimate the SNP effects over time (from 5 to 305 d in lactation). The top 1% of SNP that showed a high magnitude of SNP effect in at least 1 d in lactation were selected as relevant SNP for further analyses of candidate genes, and clustered according to the trajectory of their SNP effects over time. The majority of SNP selected for MY, FY, and PY increased the magnitude of their effects over time, for all breeds. In contrast, for SCS, most selected SNP decreased the magnitude of their effects over time, especially for the Holstein and Jersey breeds. In general, we identified a different set of candidate genes for each breed, and similar genes were found across different lactations for the same trait in the same breed. For some of the candidate genes, the suggested pattern of phenotypic effect changed among lactations. Among the lactations, candidate genes (and their suggested phenotypic effect over time) identified for the second and third lactations were more similar to each other than for the first lactation. Well-known candidate genes with major effects on milk production traits presented different suggested patterns of phenotypic effect across breeds, traits, and lactations in which they were identified. The candidate genes identified in this study can be used as target genes in studies of gene expression.

Use of a single-step approach for integrating foreign information into national genomic evaluation in Holstein cattle.

The use of multi-trait across-country evaluation (MACE) and the exchange of genomic information among countries allows national breeding programs to combine foreign and national data to increase the size of the training populations and potentially increase accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values. By including genotyped and nongenotyped animals simultaneously in the evaluation, the single-step genomic BLUP (GBLUP) approach has the potential to deliver more accurate and less biased genomic evaluations. A single-step genomic BLUP approach, which enables integration of data from MACE evaluations, can be used to obtain genomic predictions while avoiding double-counting of information. The objectives of this study were to apply a single-step approach that simultaneously includes domestic and MACE information for genomic evaluation of workability traits in Canadian Holstein cattle, and compare the results obtained with this methodology with those obtained using a multi-step approach (msGBLUP). By including MACE bulls in the training population, msGBLUP led to an increase in reliability of genomic predictions of 4.8 and 15.4% for milking temperament and milking speed, respectively, compared with a traditional evaluation using only pedigree and phenotypic information. Integration of MACE data through a single-step approach (ssGBLUPIM) yielded the highest reliabilities compared with other considered methods. Integration of MACE data also helped reduce bias of genomic predictions. When using ssGBLUPIM, the bias of genomic predictions decreased by half compared with msGBLUP using domestic and MACE information. Therefore, the reliability and bias of genomic predictions for both traits improved substantially when a single-step approach was used for evaluation compared with a multi-step approach. The use of a single-step approach with integration of MACE information provides an alternative to the current method used in Canadian genomic evaluations.

Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.

Test-day traits are important for genetic evaluation in dairy cattle and are better modeled by multiple-trait random regression models (RRM). The reliability and bias of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) predicted using multiple-trait RRM via single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) were investigated in the 3 major dairy cattle breeds in Canada (i.e., Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey). Individual additive genomic random regression coefficients for the test-day traits were predicted using 2 multiple-trait RRM: (1) one for milk, fat, and protein yields in the first, second, and third lactations, and (2) one for somatic cell score in the first, second, and third lactations. The predicted coefficients were used to derive GEBV for each lactation day and, subsequently, the daily GEBV were compared with traditional daily parent averages obtained by BLUP. To ensure compatibility between pedigree and genomic information for genotyped animals, different scaling factors for combining the inverse of genomic (G-1) and pedigree (A-122) relationship matrices were tested. In addition, the inclusion of only genotypes from animals with accurate breeding values (defined in preliminary analysis) was compared with the inclusion of all available genotypes in the analyzes. The ssGBLUP model led to considerably larger validation reliabilities than the BLUP model without genomic information. In general, scaling factors used to combine the G-1 and A-122 matrices had small influence on the validation reliabilities. However, a greater effect was observed in the inflation of GEBV. Less inflated GEBV were obtained by the ssGBLUP compared with the parent average from traditional BLUP when using optimal scaling factors to combine the G-1 and A-122 matrices. Similar results were observed when including either all available genotypes or only genotypes from animals with accurate breeding values. These findings indicate that ssGBLUP using multiple-trait RRM increases reliability and reduces bias of breeding values of young animals when compared with parent average from traditional BLUP in the Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey breeds.

Relationships among mortality, performance, and disorder traits in broiler chickens: a genetic and genomic approach.

Four performance-related traits [growth trait (GROW), feed efficiency trait 1 (FE1) and trait 2 (FE2), and dissection trait (DT)] and 4 categorical traits [mortality (MORT) and 3 disorder traits (DIS1, DIS2, and DIS3)] were analyzed using linear and threshold single- and multi-trait models. Field data included 186,596 records of commercial broilers from Cobb-Vantress, Inc. Average-information restricted maximum likelihood and Gibbs sampling-based methods were used to obtain estimates of the (co)variance components, heritabilities, and genetic correlations in a traditional approach using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). The ability to predict future breeding values (measured as realized accuracy) was checked in the last generation when traditional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP were used. Heritability estimates for GROW, FE1, and FE2 in single- and multi-trait models were similar and moderate (0.22 to 0.26) but high for DT (0.48 to 0.50). For MORT, DIS1, and DIS2, heritabilities were 0.13, 0.24, and 0.34, respectively. Estimates from single- and multi-trait models were also very similar. However, heritability for DIS3 was higher from the single-trait threshold model than for the multi-trait linear-threshold model (0.29 vs. 0.19). Genetic correlations between growth traits and MORT were weak, except for maternal GROW, which had a moderate negative correlation (-0.50) with MORT. The genetic correlation between MORT and DIS1 was strong and positive (0.77). Feed efficiency 1, which was moderately heritable (0.25) and is highly selected for, was not genetically related to MORT of broilers and other disorders. Broiler MORT also had moderate heritability (0.13), which suggests that MORT and FE1 can be improved through selection without negatively impacting other important traits. Selection of heavier maternal GROW also may decrease offspring MORT.

Reaction norm for yearling weight in beef cattle using single-step genomic evaluation.

When the environment on which the animals are raised is very diverse, selecting the best sires for different environments may require the use of models that account for genotype by environment interaction (G × E). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the existence of G × E for yearling weight (YW) in Nellore cattle using reaction norm models with only pedigree and pedigree combined with genomic relationships. Additionally, genomic regions associated with each environment gradient were identified. A total of 67,996 YW records were used in reaction norm models to calculate EBV and genomic EBV. The method of choice for genomic evaluations was single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Traditional and genomic models were tested on the ability to predict future animal performance. Genetic parameters for YW were obtained with the average information restricted maximum likelihood method, with and without adding genomic information for 5,091 animals. Additive genetic variances explained by windows of 200 adjacent SNP were used to identify genomic regions associated with the environmental gradient. Estimated variance components for the intercept and the slope in traditional and genomic models were similar. In both models, the observed changes in heritabilities and genetic correlations for YW across environments indicate the occurrence of genotype by environment interactions. Both traditional and genomic models were capable of identifying the genotype by environment interaction; however, the inclusion of genomic information in reaction norm models improved the ability to predict animals' future performance by 7.9% on average. The proportion of genetic variance explained by the top SNP window was 0.77% for the regression intercept (BTA5) and 0.82% for the slope (BTA14). Single-step GBLUP seems to be a suitable model to predict genetic values for YW in different production environments.

Implications of SNP weighting on single-step genomic predictions for different reference population sizes.

We investigated the importance of SNP weighting in populations with 2,000 to 25,000 genotyped animals. Populations were simulated with two effective sizes (20 or 100) and three numbers of QTL (10, 50 or 500). Pedigree information was available for six generations; phenotypes were recorded for the four middle generations. Animals from the last three generations were genotyped for 45,000 SNP. Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) and weighted ssGBLUP (WssGBLUP) were used to estimate genomic EBV using a genomic relationship matrix (G). The WssGBLUP performed better in small genotyped populations; however, any advantage for WssGBLUP was reduced or eliminated when more animals were genotyped. WssGBLUP had greater resolution for genome-wide association (GWA) as did increasing the number of genotyped animals. For few QTL, accuracy was greater for WssGBLUP than ssGBLUP; however, for many QTL, accuracy was the same for both methods. The largest genotyped set was used to assess the dimensionality of genomic information (number of effective SNP). The number of effective SNP was considerably less in weighted G than in unweighted G. Once the number of independent SNP is well represented in the genotyped population, the impact of SNP weighting becomes less important.

Genomic analysis of cow mortality and milk production using a threshold-linear model.

The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of genomic evaluation for cow mortality and milk production using a single-step methodology. Genomic relationships between cow mortality and milk production were also analyzed. Data included 883,887 (866,700) first-parity, 733,904 (711,211) second-parity, and 516,256 (492,026) third-parity records on cow mortality (305-d milk yields) of Holsteins from Northeast states in the United States. The pedigree consisted of up to 1,690,481 animals including 34,481 bulls genotyped with 36,951 SNP markers. Analyses were conducted with a bivariate threshold-linear model for each parity separately. Genomic information was incorporated as a genomic relationship matrix in the single-step BLUP. Traditional and genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were obtained with Gibbs sampling using fixed variances, whereas reliabilities were calculated from variances of GEBV samples. Genomic EBV were then converted into single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker effects. Those SNP effects were categorized according to values corresponding to 1 to 4 standard deviations. Moving averages and variances of SNP effects were calculated for windows of 30 adjacent SNP, and Manhattan plots were created for SNP variances with the same window size. Using Gibbs sampling, the reliability for genotyped bulls for cow mortality was 28 to 30% in EBV and 70 to 72% in GEBV. The reliability for genotyped bulls for 305-d milk yields was 53 to 65% to 81 to 85% in GEBV. Correlations of SNP effects between mortality and 305-d milk yields within categories were the highest with the largest SNP effects and reached >0.7 at 4 standard deviations. All SNP regions explained less than 0.6% of the genetic variance for both traits, except regions close to the DGAT1 gene, which explained up to 2.5% for cow mortality and 4% for 305-d milk yields. Reliability for GEBV with a moderate number of genotyped animals can be calculated by Gibbs samples. Genomic information can greatly increase the reliability of predictions not only for milk but also for mortality. The existence of a common region on Bos taurus autosome 14 affecting both traits may indicate a major gene with a pleiotropic effect on milk and mortality.

Accuracy of breeding values in small genotyped populations using different sources of external information-A simulation study.

Genetically linked small and large dairy cattle populations were simulated to test the effect of different sources of information from foreign populations on the accuracy of predicting breeding values for young animals in a small population. A large dairy cattle population (PL) with >20 generations was simulated, and a small subpopulation (PS) with 3 generations was formed as a related population, including phenotypes and genomic information. Predicted breeding values for young animals in the small population were calculated using BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in 4 different scenarios: (S1) 3,166 phenotypes, 22,855 pedigree animals, and 1,000 to 6,000 genotypes for PS; (S2) S1 plus genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for 4,475 sires from PL as external information; (S3) S1 plus 221,580 phenotypes, 402,829 pedigree animals, and 53,558 genotypes for PL; and (S4) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects calculated based on PL data. The ability to predict true breeding value was assessed in the youngest third of the genotyped animals in the small population. When data only from the small population were used and 1,000 animals were genotyped, the accuracy of GEBV was only 1 point greater than the estimated breeding value accuracy (0.32 vs. 0.31). Adding external GEBV for sires from PL did not considerably increase accuracy (0.33 vs. 0.32 in S1). Combining phenotypes, pedigree, and genotypes for PS and PL was beneficial for predicting accuracy of GEBV in the small population, and the prediction accuracy of GEBV in this scenario was 0.38 compared with 0.31 from estimated breeding values. When SNP effects from PL were used to predict GEBV for young genotyped animals from PS, accuracy was greatest (0.56). With 6,000 genotyped animal in PS, accuracy was greatest (0.61) with the combined populations. In a small population with few genotypes, the highest accuracy of evaluation may be obtained by using SNP effects derived from a related large population.

Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient.

This paper evaluates an efficient implementation to multiply the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals () by a vector (). The computation is required for solving mixed model equations in single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) with the preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG). The inverse can be decomposed into sparse matrices that are blocks of the sparse inverse of a numerator relationship matrix () including genotyped animals and their ancestors. The elements of were rapidly calculated with the Henderson's rule and stored as sparse matrices in memory. Implementation of was by a series of sparse matrix-vector multiplications. Diagonal elements of , which were required as preconditioners in PCG, were approximated with a Monte Carlo method using 1,000 samples. The efficient implementation of was compared with explicit inversion of with 3 data sets including about 15,000, 81,000, and 570,000 genotyped animals selected from populations with 213,000, 8.2 million, and 10.7 million pedigree animals, respectively. The explicit inversion required 1.8 GB, 49 GB, and 2,415 GB (estimated) of memory, respectively, and 42 s, 56 min, and 13.5 d (estimated), respectively, for the computations. The efficient implementation required <1 MB, 2.9 GB, and 2.3 GB of memory, respectively, and <1 sec, 3 min, and 5 min, respectively, for setting up. Only <1 sec was required for the multiplication in each PCG iteration for any data sets. When the equations in ssGBLUP are solved with the PCG algorithm, is no longer a limiting factor in the computations.

Sexual dimorphism in livestock species selected for economically important traits.

Most breeding companies evaluate economically important traits in males and females as a single trait, assuming genetic correlation of 1 between phenotypes measured in both sexes. This assumption may not be true because genes may be differently expressed in males and females. We estimated genetic correlations between males and females for growth and efficiency traits in broiler chickens, growth traits in American Angus beef cattle, and birth weight and preweaning mortality in purebred pigs; therefore, each trait was treated differently in males and females. Variance components were estimated in single- and multiple-trait models, jointly or separated into both sexes. Furthermore, we calculated traditional and genomic evaluations, and we correlated EBV or genomic EBV (GEBV) from joint and separate evaluations for males and females. For broiler chickens, genetic correlations ranged from 0.86 to 0.94. For Angus cattle, genetic correlations ranged from 0.86 to 0.98 for early growth traits and were less, ranging from 0.68 to 0.84, for postweaning gain. In pigs, genetic correlations ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 for birth weight and from 0.71 to 0.73 for preweaning mortality. For some models in all 3 animal species, the joint and separate analyses had different heritabilities. Despite differences in heritability, the correlations within the sex-specific trait EBV and between the sex-specific and the joint trait EBV were very strong, regardless of the model or inclusion of genomic information. Males and females differed for traits measured late in the animal's life; however, strong traditional EBV correlations and also GEBV correlations indicate that considering the traits equal in males and females may have no negative impact on selection.

Modeling response to heat stress in pigs from nucleus and commercial farms in different locations in the United States.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of seasonal losses due to heat stress in different environments and genetic group combinations. Data were available for 2 different swine populations: purebred Duroc animals raised in nucleus farms in Texas and North Carolina and crosses of Duroc and F females (Landrace × Large White) raised in commercial farms in Missouri and North Carolina; pedigrees provided links between animals from different states. Traits included BW at harvest age for purebred animals and HCW for crossbred animals. Weather data were collected at airports located close to the farms. Heat stress was quantified by a heat load function, defined by the units of temperature-humidity of temperature-humidity index (THI) greater than a certain threshold for 30 to 70 d before phenotype collection. Heat stress responses were quantified by a linear regression of phenotype on heat load. The greatest coefficient of determination occurred with a length of 30 d before phenotype measurements for all states and genetic groups. In the crossbreed data, THI thresholds were 67 in Missouri and 72 in North Carolina. For pure breeds, heat load had the best fit for THI thresholds greater than 70 in North Carolina, although differences in coefficient of determinations were negligible. On the other hand, no optimal THI threshold existed in Texas. In this study, heat stress had a greater impact in commercial farms than in nucleus farms and the effect of heat stress on weight varied by year and state.

Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.

Combining purebreed and crossbreed information is beneficial for genetic evaluation of some livestock species. Genetic evaluations can use relationships based on genomic information, relying on allele frequencies that are breed specific. Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) does not account for different allele frequencies, which could limit the genetic gain in crossbreed evaluations. In this study, we tested the performance of different breed-specific genomic relationship matrices () in ssGBLUP for crossbreed evaluations; we also tested the importance of genotyping crossbred animals. Genotypes were available for purebreeds (AA and BB) and crossbreeds (F) in simulated and real pig populations. The number of genotyped animals was, on average, 4,315 for the simulated population and 15,798 for the real population. Cross-validation was performed on 1,200 and 3,117 F animals in the simulated and real populations, respectively. Simulated scenarios were under no artificial selection, mass selection, or BLUP selection. Two genomic relationship matrices were constructed based on breed-specific allele frequencies: 1) , a genomic relationship matrix centered by breed-specific allele frequencies, and 2) , a genomic relationship matrix centered and scaled by breed-specific allele frequencies. All (the across-breed genomic relationship matrix), , and were also tuned to account for selective genotyping. Using breed-specific allele frequencies reduced the number of negative relationships between 2 purebreeds, pulling the average closer to 0, as in the pedigree-based relationship matrix. For simulated populations that included mass selection, genomic EBV (GEBV) in F, when using and , were, on average, 10% more accurate than ; however, after tuning to account for selective genotyping, provided the same accuracy as for breed-specific genomic relationship matrices. For the real population, accuracies for litter size in F were 0.62 for , , and , and tuning had no impact on accuracy, except for , which was 1 percentage point less accurate. Accuracy of GEBV for number of stillborns in F1 was 0.5 for all tested genomic relationship matrices with no changes after tuning. We observed that genotyping F increased accuracies of GEBV for the same animals by up to 39% compared with having genotypes for only AA and BB. In crossbreed evaluations, accounting for breed-specific allele frequencies promoted changes in G that were not influential enough to improve accuracy of GEBV. Therefore, the best performance of ssGBLUP for crossbreed evaluations requires genotypes for pure- and crossbreeds and no breed-specific adjustments in the realized relationship matrix.