RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Profiling sperm DNA present on vaginal swabs taken from rape victims often contributes to identifying and incarcerating rapists. Large amounts of the victim's epithelial cells contaminate the sperm present on swabs, however, and complicate this process. The standard method for obtaining relatively pure sperm DNA from a vaginal swab is to digest the epithelial cells with Proteinase K in order to solubilize the victim's DNA, and to then physically separate the soluble DNA from the intact sperm by pelleting the sperm, removing the victim's fraction, and repeatedly washing the sperm pellet. An alternative approach that does not require washing steps is to digest with Proteinase K, pellet the sperm, remove the victim's fraction, and then digest the residual victim's DNA with a nuclease. METHODS: The nuclease approach has been commercialized in a product, the Erase Sperm Isolation Kit (PTC Labs, Columbia, MO, USA), and five crime laboratories have tested it on semen-spiked female buccal swabs in a direct comparison with their standard methods. Comparisons have also been performed on timed post-coital vaginal swabs and evidence collected from sexual assault cases. RESULTS: For the semen-spiked buccal swabs, Erase outperformed the standard methods in all five laboratories and in most cases was able to provide a clean male profile from buccal swabs spiked with only 1,500 sperm. The vaginal swabs taken after consensual sex and the evidence collected from rape victims showed a similar pattern of Erase providing superior profiles. CONCLUSIONS: In all samples tested, STR profiles of the male DNA fractions obtained with Erase were as good as or better than those obtained using the standard methods.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is a heterogeneous cell population derived from the adipose tissue. There is still a lack of information concerning the characterization of the cell subpopulations constituting the SVF as well as its mesenchymal and haematopoietic potential. Furthermore there are great variations in its phenotypical characterization. METHODS: Composition of SVF was investigated by FACS analysis, cytological and "in vitro" assays. We studied CD34+ population by combining FACS with human CFC (colony-forming-cell haematopoietic assay). The endothelial fraction was investigated by quantifying the co-expression of specific markers (CD146, CD105, CD31 and UEA-1). Mesenchymal potential was assessed by CFU-F assay and cultured AT-MSC were characterized by a 5-color FACS analysis. The multipotent differentiation potential (osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic) was investigated both at cellular and molecular level. RESULTS: We identified in the SVF two CD34+ populations with a marked difference in the intensity of antigen expression, the majority of the cells expressing CD34 at low intensity. Moreover, two CD146+ cell populations were clearly distinguishable in the SVF:a CD146 dim accounting for 9.9% of the total SVF cells and a CD146+ bright cell population accounting for about 39.3%. The frequency of CFC clones was comparable with the one reported for peripheral blood. Endothelial cells account for about 7.7% of the SVF cells. AT-MSC differenced in the osteogenic adipogenic and chondrogenic lineage. CONCLUSION: The SVF is not a homogeneous cell population, and its final composition could be influenced both by the flow cytometric technique analysis and the SVF extraction steps. The CFU-F frequency in the SVF was 1/4880, a value about seven times greater than the data reported for bone marrow. The antigenic profile of AT-MSC was comparable with bone-marrow derived MSC. AT-MSC were able to differentiate along the osteogenic adipogenic and chondrogenic lineages. The data here reported, further contribute to the characterization of SVF, a tissue providing an alternative as a source of MSC for clinical applications.