A pre-visit video/question prompt list intervention to increase youth question-asking about attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during pediatric visits.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of an ADHD question prompt list with video intervention to increase youth question-asking and provider education about ADHD during visits. METHODS: English-speaking youth ages 11-17 with ADHD and their caregivers were enrolled from two pediatric clinics. Youth were randomized to intervention or usual care groups. Intervention group adolescents watched the video and then completed an ADHD question prompt list before their visits. Multivariable regression was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Twenty-one providers and 102 of their patients participated. Intervention group youth were significantly more likely to ask one or more questions about ADHD and its treatment than usual care youth (odds ratio=5.4, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI)= 1.8, 15.9). Providers were significantly more likely to educate youth who asked one or more questions during visits about more ADHD medication areas (unstandardized beta=0.98, 95 % CI=0.31 to 1.64) and more non-medication strategies for ADHD (unstandardized beta=0.50, 95 % CI=0.13 to 0.88). CONCLUSION: The intervention increased youth question-asking about ADHD and its treatment. Providers provided more education to youth who asked one or more questions about ADHD and its treatment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providers and practices should consider having youth complete ADHD question prompt lists and watch the video before visits to increase youth question-asking during visits.

A randomized controlled trial protocol for a virtual, scalable suicide prevention gatekeeper training program for community pharmacy staff (Pharm-SAVES).

Background: Suicide prevention gatekeeping is a skill that may support community (retail) pharmacists in managing patients who present with suicide warning signs. A brief, virtual, case-based training intervention was tailored to the retail setting (Pharm-SAVES). To test training effectiveness, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) protocol was developed for use in pharmacies across four states. Objective: To introduce the trial protocol for assessing the effectiveness for increasing the proportion of staff who recognize patients displaying warning signs and self-report engaging in gatekeeping, including asking if the patient is considering suicide. Methods: This study uses a parallel cluster-randomized controlled trial to recruit 150 pharmacy staff in community pharmacies in four states with two groups (intervention and control). The control group completes Pharm-SAVES online suicide prevention gatekeeper training and all assessment surveys at baseline after training and at 1-month follow-up. The experimental group completes all control group training and assessments plus interactive video role-play patient cases. Conclusion: We hypothesize that compared to those in the control group, experimental group trainees exposed to the interactive video role play patient cases will be more likely to recognize warning signs in patient cases and self-report engaging in gatekeeping.

African American patient-provider communication about glaucoma vision quality-of-life.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Little is known about African American patient-provider communication about glaucoma-related quality-of-life. The objectives of this study were to: (a) examine associations between patient socio-demographics and vision quality-of-life, (b) describe the extent to which eye care providers and patients discuss glaucoma-related quality-of-life, and (c) examine associations between patient and provider characteristics, whether the patient was in the intervention or usual care group, and whether the patient and provider discuss one or more glaucoma-related quality-of-life domains. METHODS: Adult African American patients with glaucoma who reported non-adherence to glaucoma medications were enrolled from three sites. Patients completed a vision quality-of-life VFQ-25 assessment. Patients were randomized into intervention and control groups with intervention group members receiving a glaucoma question prompt list and watching a video before a provider visit. Audio recordings from these visits were transcribed and assessed for glaucoma-related quality-of-life discussions. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-nine patients were enrolled. Glaucoma-related quality-of-life was discussed during 12.3% of visits (N = 23). Patients initiated discussion 56.5% (N = 13) of the time and providers 43.5% (N = 10) of the time. Patients with worse health literacy (p < 0.001), more depressive symptoms (p < 0.05), and more severe glaucoma (p < 0.001) were significantly more likely to have worse vision-related quality-of-life. Glaucoma-related quality-of-life was significantly more likely to be discussed when African American patients saw African American providers (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients and providers rarely discussed the patient's glaucoma-related quality-of-life. The intervention did not significantly increase communication about glaucoma-related quality-of-life. Residency programs should consider enhancing training regarding discussing patients' quality-of-life.

Do African American patients with glaucoma ask their eye providers the questions they have?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe what questions patients checked on a glaucoma question prompt list and how often patients asked the same checked questions during medical visits. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to test the effectiveness of a pre-visit video/glaucoma question prompt list intervention to increase African American patient question-asking during medical visits. METHODS: Adult African American patients with glaucoma and a history of non-adherence to glaucoma medications were enrolled and randomized into intervention and usual care groups from three glaucoma practices. Visits were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for the questions patients asked during their visits. Researchers collected the pre-visit question prompt lists from the intervention group and compared their checked questions to the questions patients asked during their visit. RESULTS: Ninety-three subjects were randomized to the question prompt list intervention group. Subjects checked an average of 6.77 questions on the prompt list. Of the subjects who checked at least one question, 54.8% asked their provider at least one of the questions they checked. The most common questions asked about glaucoma medications that they had checked were "What time(s) of day should I take my drops?" (50.0%, 9 out of 18) and "How many times a day do I use my glaucoma medicines?" (50.0%, 3 out of 6). CONCLUSION: Although African American subjects with glaucoma have questions about glaucoma and their medications, few asked all their questions during visits. Future research should focus on how to improve question asking using a question prompt list.

A Previsit Intervention's Influence on Glaucoma Topics Discussed between Black Patients and Providers.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to conduct a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a previsit glaucoma video/question prompt list intervention, and to examine the impact on how often providers educate Black patients about glaucoma and glaucoma medication topics during visits. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial of a glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention. PARTICIPANTS: Black patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma who are taking 1 or more glaucoma medications and report being nonadherent. METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine Black patients with glaucoma were enrolled and assigned to either a usual care or an intervention group where they watched a video emphasizing the importance of asking questions and received a glaucoma question prompt list to complete before clinic visits. Visits were audio-taped and patients were interviewed after visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether the provider educates about different glaucoma and glaucoma medication topics. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group were significantly more likely to ask providers 1 or more questions about glaucoma and its treatment. Providers were significantly more likely to educate intervention patients about their diagnosis (P = 0.001), intraocular pressure (P = 0.03), the likelihood of the need for long-term therapy (P = 0.001), and the physical changes associated with glaucoma (P = 0.001) than usual-care patients. Providers were also significantly more likely to educate intervention patients about the purpose of their medications (P = 0.03) and side effects (P = 0.001) than usual-care patients. Providers only educated 29% of patients about adherence (33% of intervention group patients and 25% of usual-care patients). Few providers educated patients about barriers and fears/concerns in using glaucoma medications, the cost of medications and insurance coverage, how to administer eye drops, and nasolacrimal occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention significantly increased provider education about many glaucoma and glaucoma medication topics. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Improving Black Patient Question-Asking and Provider Education During Glaucoma Visits.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to conduct a randomized, controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a previsit glaucoma video/question prompt list intervention to increase Black patient question-asking and provider education about glaucoma and glaucoma medications during visits. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial of a glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention. PARTICIPANTS: Black patients with a glaucoma diagnosis who were currently taking 1 or more glaucoma medications and reported being nonadherent. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-nine Black patients with glaucoma were enrolled into a randomized, controlled trial and assigned to either a usual care or an intervention group where they watched a video emphasizing the importance of asking questions and received a glaucoma question prompt list to complete before clinic visits. Visits were audiotaped and patients were interviewed after visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were if the patient asked 1 or more questions about glaucoma and glaucoma medications and the number of glaucoma and glaucoma medication areas the provider educated the patient about during the visit. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group were significantly more likely to ask 1 or more questions about glaucoma than patients in the usual care group (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-10.4). Patients in the intervention group were significantly more likely to ask 1 or more questions about glaucoma medications than patients in the usual care group (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.4). Patients in the intervention group were significantly more likely to receive more areas of education about glaucoma from their providers during visits (ß = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.49-1.4). Patients who asked 1 or more questions about glaucoma medications were significantly more likely to receive more areas of education about glaucoma medications from providers (ß = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention increased patient question-asking about glaucoma and glaucoma medications and provider education about glaucoma. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Provider use of a participatory decision-making style with African American patients with glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether non-adherent African American patients with glaucoma who received a question prompt list and video intervention were more likely to be given treatment options, have their input included into treatment regimens, and rate their providers as using more of a participatory decision-making style. METHODS: African American patients with glaucoma taking one or more glaucoma medications and reported being non-adherent were randomized to a pre-visit video and glaucoma question prompt list intervention or usual care. RESULTS: 189 African American patients with glaucoma participated. Providers gave patients treatment choices during 5.3% of visits and included patient input into treatment regimen decisions during 2.1% of visits. Male patients and patients with more years of education were significantly more likely to rate their providers as using more of a participatory decision-making style. CONCLUSION: African American patients with glaucoma rated their providers high on using a participatory decision-making style. Yet, providers infrequently presented non-adherent patients with medication treatment options, and it was rare for providers to include patient input into treatment decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providers should provide non-adherent patients with different glaucoma treatment options. Non-adherent African American patients with glaucoma should be encouraged to ask their providers for different medication treatment options.

Adolescent asthma management self-efficacy and responsibility: impact on asthma control and quality-of-life.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which adolescent asthma management self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and asthma responsibility were associated with asthma control and quality-of-life. Adolescent self-efficacy and outcome expectations are important components of social cognitive theory, which guided this research. METHODS: English- and Spanish-speaking adolescents ages 11-17 with persistent asthma were recruited at four pediatric clinics. Adolescents were interviewed and parents completed questionnaires. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-nine adolescents were recruited. Older adolescent age, male gender, and higher adolescent asthma management self-efficacy were significantly associated with higher adolescent responsibility; outcome expectations were not significantly associated with responsibility. Adolescent ratings of their own responsibility were higher than parent ratings of their child's responsibility for almost all asthma management tasks. Adolescents with higher reported asthma management self-efficacy were significantly more likely to have better quality-of-life and controlled asthma. Adolescents with more positive outcome expectations were significantly more likely to have controlled asthma. Being Native American was associated with worse quality-of-life and asthma not being controlled. Being Black was associated with asthma not being controlled. CONCLUSIONS: Parents and providers should work to improve adolescent self-efficacy in managing their asthma because it is associated with asthma responsibility, asthma control, and quality-of-life. Providers need to especially work with Native American and Black adolescents to improve quality-of-life and asthma control.

Addressing the opioid epidemic through community pharmacy engagement: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the authority to dispense naloxone, pharmacists have been reluctant to offer and dispense it, often due to discomfort communicating about the sensitive topic of opioid overdose. Because existing online naloxone trainings do not sufficiently address how to communicate effectively with patients about naloxone, Nalox-Comm, a training module designed to improve pharmacists' self-efficacy to engage in naloxone discussions, was developed. OBJECTIVE: To describe the study protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nalox-Comm training module on naloxone dispensing rates. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial, which began in July 2021, is used to evaluate the pre-post Nalox-Comm training intervention. Sixty pharmacists are being recruited from 62 pharmacies part of a single grocery store chain in rural counties of the southeastern United States. After completing a baseline survey, pharmacists are observed by simulated patients (SPs) who rate the quality of their pre-training naloxone communication. Pharmacists are then invited to complete either a basic online naloxone training module (control group) or a newly developed Nalox-Comm training (experimental group), after which they complete a post-training survey and are observed a second time by SPs. Three months post-training, study participants complete a final follow-up survey. Naloxone dispensing records are obtained from each participating pharmacy to assess change in naloxone dispensing rates. CONCLUSION: Informed by rural pharmacist stakeholders, the Nalox-Comm training module addresses communication barriers specific to rural communities. Compared to those in the control group, we hypothesize that pharmacies in the experimental group will dispense more naloxone in the three months post-training intervention.

Acceptance of a Pre-visit Intervention to Engage African American Glaucoma Patients during Visits.

SIGNIFICANCE: The glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention was well received by patients. Eighty-seven percent of patients recommended that other patients should watch the educational video before their visits, and 89% said that other patients should complete the question prompt list before visits. PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to (a) describe patient feedback on a glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention designed to motivate African American patients to be more engaged during visits and (b) examine patient demographics associated with acceptance of the intervention. METHODS: We are conducting a randomized controlled trial of a glaucoma question prompt list/video intervention. African American patients with glaucoma were enrolled and assigned to a control group or an intervention group where they watched a video emphasizing the importance of asking questions and received a prompt list to complete before visits. All patients were interviewed after visits and are being followed up for 12 months. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine African American patients with glaucoma were enrolled into the larger trial. Of the 93 patients randomized to the intervention group, 89% said that patients should complete the prompt lists before visits, and 87% recommended that patients should watch the video before visits. Older patients were significantly less likely to believe that other patients should watch the video before their visits (t = -3.7, P = .04). Patients with fewer years of education were significantly more likely to rate the video as being more useful than patients with more years of education (Pearson correlation, -0.27; P = .01). Patients who reported being less adherent on the visual analog scale were more likely to rate the video as being more useful (Pearson correlation, -0.23; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the question prompt list/video was accepted by the majority of African American patients who received the intervention.

Trends in Adolescent Asthma Responsibility Over a 12-Month Study Period.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess factors that influence adolescent asthma responsibility and how patient- and parent-reported asthma responsibility changes over a 12-month period. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four adolescents and their parents completed questionnaires at baseline and 12 months, including the asthma responsibility questionnaire, in which higher scores indicate greater adolescent responsibility. Multiple linear regression was used to assess how baseline asthma responsibility, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and demographic characteristics were associated with 12-month asthma responsibility. RESULTS: Asthma responsibility as reported by both adolescents and parents shifted significantly toward the adolescent over the study period (p < .001). Most individual scale items (e.g., noticing signs and symptoms of asthma, starting treatment when symptoms occur) also showed significant shifts toward greater adolescent responsibility. In the regression models, higher baseline asthma responsibility and older age were significant predictors of both higher adolescent- and parent-reported 12-month asthma responsibility, while female gender and mild asthma severity also predicted higher parent-reported asthma responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma responsibility shifted toward adolescents over a 12-month period. Regardless of age and gender, all types of adolescents were able to improve their responsibility level based on adolescent-reported results. Older females, according to parent-reported results, were more likely to improve their responsibility. Providers need to make sure adolescents are learning all the necessary skills to manage asthma independently before they reach adulthood.

Communication About Adolescent and Caregiver Smoking and Vaping During Pediatric Asthma Visits: Implications for Providers.

INTRODUCTION: Although rates of cigarette smoking among U.S. adolescents have declined, rates of vaping (i.e., using e-cigarettes) have increased. We conducted a secondary analysis of 359 transcripts of medical visits of adolescents with asthma to examine communication about caregiver and adolescent smoking and vaping. METHOD: Adolescents aged 11-17 years with persistent asthma and their parents were enrolled from four pediatric clinics in 2015-2017. Youth were randomized to the intervention or usual care groups. Intervention group adolescents watched a video and then completed an asthma question prompt list before their visits. RESULTS: Forty providers and 359 patients participated. Providers, adolescents, and caregivers discussed smoking during 38.2% of their visits. Vaping was never discussed. DISCUSSION: There is room to improve how often providers in a primary care setting discuss smoking and vaping. Further investigation might focus on how a smoking and vaping prompt list for adolescents could increase tobacco discussions during visits.

Provider-adolescent discussion and provider education about asthma triggers during pediatric visits: results of a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: We examined how an asthma question prompt list with video intervention influenced discussion of and provider education about asthma triggers. METHODS: English or Spanish-speaking adolescents ages 11-17 with persistent asthma and their caregivers were enrolled from four pediatric clinics. Adolescents were randomized to the intervention or usual care groups. Adolescents in the intervention group watched the video on an iPad and then completed a one-page asthma question prompt list before their visits. All visits were audio-recorded. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to predict the number of trigger areas discussed and the number of areas providers educated adolescents about during visits. RESULTS: Forty providers and 359 patients participated. Triggers were discussed during 89% of intervention group visits and 81% of usual care visits; providers educated adolescents about triggers during 59% of intervention group visits and 46% of usual care visits. More triggers were significantly more likely to be discussed and providers educated about more trigger areas during visits of adolescents in the intervention group and when adolescents asked one or more questions during visits. More trigger areas were significantly more likely to be discussed if the adolescent was White and male. Providers were significantly more likely to educate adolescents whose family spoke Spanish at home about more trigger areas than adolescents who spoke English at home. CONCLUSIONS: More trigger areas were significantly more likely to be discussed and providers educated about more trigger areas during visits of adolescents who received the intervention and when adolescents asked one or more questions.

The impact of a question prompt list and video intervention on teen asthma control and quality-of-life one year later: results of a randomized trial.

Objective: This study examined whether youth who received an asthma question prompt list/video intervention were more likely to have their asthma controlled and better quality-of-life at 12 months than youth who received usual care.Methods: English or Spanish-speaking youth ages 11-17 were enrolled and randomized to intervention or usual care. The 185 youth and parents in the intervention group watched the video on an iPad and then received a one-page asthma question prompt list to complete before their visits. One hundred seventy-four received usual care. Baseline and 6-month visits were audio-tape recorded. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to predict a youth's quality-of-life and whether asthma was controlled at 12 months.Results: Asthma control and quality-of-life improved significantly from baseline to 12-month follow-up in both intervention and usual care groups. Baseline asthma control and quality-of-life were significantly associated with 12-month asthma control and quality-of-life, respectively. Adolescents on a control medication at baseline were significantly more likely to have their asthma controlled at 12 months.Conclusions: Asthma control and quality-of-life did not improve significantly more in the intervention group than in the usual care group.

Questions and reported medication problems from pediatric patients and caregivers after intervention.

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of an asthma question prompt list with video intervention to increase question-asking during pediatric office visits among youth who reported medication problems was evaluated. METHODS: English- or Spanish-speaking youth age 11-17 years with persistent asthma and their caregivers were enrolled from 4 pediatric clinics in a randomized controlled trial. Youth were randomized to intervention or usual care groups. Youth in the intervention group watched an educational video with their caregivers on an iPad. The youth then received a 1-page asthma question prompt list to complete before their visits. The audio of all baseline medical visits was recorded. Youth were interviewed and caregivers completed questionnaires at baseline and 6 months later. RESULTS: A total of 40 providers and 359 of their patients participated. Youth who reported at least 1 medication problem who were in the intervention group were significantly more likely to ask 1 or more questions about medications during their visits than youth in the usual care group (odds ratio = 3.1, 95% confidence interval = 2.0, 4.1). Seventy-four percent of youth and 71% caregivers who reported the youth had problems using asthma medications at baseline still reported 1 or more problems 6 months later. CONCLUSION: Among youth who reported 1 or more problems with using their asthma medications, the intervention significantly increased youth question-asking. Many youth- and caregiver-reported problems with using asthma medications persisted over time.

Effect of an Asthma Question Prompt List and Video Intervention on Adolescents' Medication Adherence 12 Months Later.

BACKGROUND: Many adolescents do not obtain the maximum benefit from their asthma medications. Improving patient-provider communication may improve adolescents' asthma knowledge, adherence, and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine how a question prompt list and educational video intervention affect youth- and caregiver-reported medication adherence and self-reported medication problems. METHODS: Adolescents with persistent asthma (n = 359; 56.4% with moderate to severe asthma) and their caregivers were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial at 4 pediatric clinics. Intervention group families received a question prompt list and watched a short video before seeing the provider; control families received usual care. Youth- and caregiver-reported medication adherence was measured with a Visual Analog Scale, ranging from 0 to 100. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine how the intervention and covariates were associated with medication adherence and reported problems at 12 months. RESULTS: The intervention was not a significant predictor of medication adherence at 12 months. Higher caregiver education was associated with higher youth-reported adherence (ß = 1.1; 95% CI = 0.1, 2.1; P = 0.036) and caregiver-reported adherence (ß = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.3, 2.0; P = 0.006). The intervention was associated with fewer caregiver-reported problems at 12 months (ß = -0.32; 95% CI = -0.48, -0.16; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A question prompt list and educational video decreased the number of caregiver-reported medication problems, but did not significantly affect medication adherence. Further research is needed to develop more effective interventions to improve medication adherence and outcomes.

Factors associated with adolescent and caregiver reported problems in using asthma medications.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to: (a) describe the types of medication problems/concerns youth with asthma and their caregivers reported and (b) examine the association between sociodemographic characteristics and youth and caregiver reported medication problems/concerns. METHODS: English- and Spanish-speaking youth ages 11-17 with persistent asthma were recruited at four pediatric clinics. Youth were interviewed and caregivers completed questionnaires about reported asthma medication concerns/problems. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-nine youth were recruited. Eighty percent of youth and 70% of caregivers reported one or more problems in using asthma medications. The most commonly reported problems by youth were: (a) hard to remember when to take the asthma medication (54%) and (b) hard to use asthma medication at school (34%). Younger children were significantly more likely to report difficulty in understanding their asthma medication's directions and difficulty reading the print on the medication's package. Caregivers' top-reported problem was that it is hard for their child to remember to take their asthma medications (49%). Caregivers without Medicaid were significantly more likely to express difficulty paying for their child's asthma medications. CONCLUSIONS: Difficulty remembering to take asthma medication was a significant problem for youth and their caregivers. Providers should work with youth and their caregivers to identify asthma medication problems and discuss strategies to address those problems.

Provider use of a participatory decision-making style with youth and caregivers and satisfaction with pediatric asthma visits.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of an asthma question prompt list with video intervention to engage the youth during clinic visits. We examined whether the intervention was associated with 1) providers including youth and caregiver inputs more into asthma treatment regimens, 2) youth and caregivers rating providers as using more of a participatory decision-making style, and 3) youth and caregivers being more satisfied with visits. METHODS: English- or Spanish-speaking youth aged 11-17 years with persistent asthma and their caregivers were recruited from four pediatric clinics and randomized to the intervention or usual care groups. The youth in the intervention group watched the video with their caregivers on an iPad and completed a one-page asthma question prompt list before their clinic visits. All visits were audiotaped. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Forty providers and their patients (n=359) participated in this study. Providers included youth input into the asthma management treatment regimens during 2.5% of visits and caregiver input during 3.3% of visits. The youth in the intervention group were significantly more likely to rate their providers as using more of a participatory decision-making style (odds ratio=1.7, 95% confidence interval=1.1, 2.5). White caregivers were significantly more likely to rate the providers as more participatory (odds ratio=2.3, 95% confidence interval=1.2, 4.4). Youth (beta=4.9, 95% confidence interval=3.3, 6.5) and caregivers (beta=7.5, 95% confidence interval=3.1, 12.0) who rated their providers as being more participatory were significantly more satisfied with their visits. Youth (beta=-1.9, 95% confidence interval=-3.4, -0.4) and caregivers (beta=-8.8, 95% confidence interval=-16.2, -1.3) who spoke Spanish at home were less satisfied with visits. CONCLUSION: The intervention did not increase the inclusion of youth and caregiver inputs into asthma treatment regimens. However, it did increase the youth's perception of participatory decision-making style of the providers, and this in turn was associated with greater satisfaction.

Reported Problems and Adherence in Using Asthma Medications Among Adolescents and Their Caregivers.

BACKGROUND: Many factors affect youth adherence to asthma medications. Better understanding of the relationship between problems reported by youth in using asthma medications, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and adherence is needed. OBJECTIVE: The study examined the relationship between youth and caregiver problems in using asthma medications, asthma management self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and youth- and caregiver-reported adherence to asthma controller medications. METHODS: Adolescents with persistent asthma and their caregivers were recruited at 4 pediatric practices. Youth were interviewed after their medical visit while caregivers completed a questionnaire. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Of 359 participating youth, 319 were on controller medications. Youth reported 60% average adherence, whereas caregivers reported 69%. Youth who reported difficulty using their inhaler correctly and youth who reported difficulty remembering to take their medications were significantly less likely to be adherent. Caregivers who reported that it was hard to remember when to give the asthma medications were significantly less likely to report their child being adherent. Both youth and caregivers with higher outcome expectations were significantly more likely to self-report being adherent. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists and other health care providers should consider asking youth and caregivers about problems in using asthma medications, self-efficacy in managing asthma, and outcome expectations for following treatment regimens, so that they can help youth overcome difficulties they might have in managing their asthma.