Reducing neurosurgical theatre start time delays by seventy minutes through application of the 'Golden Patient' initiative.

BACKGROUND: This project's focus was on improving neurosurgical theatre efficiency through the application of Javed et al's Golden Patient initiative to the emergency theatre setting. This initiative has not previously been used in neurosurgery, so we have had to consider how to adapt it. Phase I's primary objective was to quantify theatre start time delays. Phase II assessed whether introducing the initiative reduced the delays. METHODOLOGY: We performed an observational retrospective service evaluation project. Data was collected on weekday theatre start times over 12-week periods pre- and post-initiative. We quantified the delay in theatre start times and recorded the reasons for delays. Following the initiative's introduction, we repeated the evaluation process. Mean and median theatre start times were compared. An ANOVA test was used to confirm statistical significance. RESULTS: Data was collected on 49 days and on 48 days over 12-week periods in both Phase I and II respectively. Phase I of this project identified that there was on average an 86.7 minute delay in starting the theatre each day. The theatre start time was delayed in 91.7% of cases. A 72.3 minute reduction in the theatre start time delay was noted following the initiative's introduction (p < .0005), with an improvement in the average emergency theatre start time from 09:56 to 08:44 (08:30 is the recognised theatre start time). We have identified hospital-wide and doctor-related contributing factors which require further attention, most notably, relating to issues around transferring patients from the ward to theatre. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a statistically significant improvement in reducing theatre start time delays following the introduction of the initiative. This relatively simple intervention improved communication amongst the multidisciplinary team and led to a notable improvement in the service provided to patients by reducing start time delays. Through tackling identified areas, we hope to further reduce theatre start time delays leading not only to financial savings but also to further improvements in the quality of care provided to our neurosurgical patients.

A thoracic extradural chordoid meningioma: a unique case report and literature review.

We describe the unique case of a patient being diagnosed with a thoracic extradural chordoid meningioma following her presentation with mild lower limb pyramidal weakness and a T8 sensory level. This is the first report of an extradural chordoid meningioma being identified in the thoracic spine. The tumour was successfully resected through a posterior thoracic laminectomy approach. Post-operatively, her neurological deficit resolved and to date she has not experienced a radiological recurrence. In this report, we review the literature and discuss this unusual tumour's characteristics and prognostic significance.

Contralateral lumbosacral plexopathy following lumbar microdiscectomy.

We describe the unique case of a 51-year-old lady who developed a contralateral lumbosacral plexopathy two days after a lumbar microdiscectomy. This is the first report to date of this complication occurring following this procedure. We review the literature regarding lumbosacral plexopathy and discuss the evidence base behind investigating and managing this condition and the potential pathophysiological mechanisms which underlie its development. We draw comparisons with the more widely recognised post-operative brachial neuritis, characterised by delayed onset brachial plexopathy developing after cervical decompression, and propose an immune-mediated inflammatory mechanism linking the two conditions.

Assessment and Management of Preoperative Anxiety.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety has the potential to alter the dynamics of an elective procedure and has been shown to detrimentally affect patients both cognitively and physiologically. If mismanaged, it can lead to essential procedures being postponed or canceled, delay postoperative recovery, and increase patients' requirements for medical intervention postoperatively. These outcomes have harmful implications both clinically and economically. Our primary objective was to evaluate the levels of anxiety patients experience immediately before elective otorhinolaryngologic procedures. Our secondary outcome was to assess the subjects' views on potential management strategies to tackle their anxiety. METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional project evaluating 53 patients who were selected consecutively from a list of elective otorhinolaryngologic procedures. All procedures were to be completed under general anesthetic, and all patients had received the same preoperative assessment preparation. 29 male and 24 female patients were included, aged between 19 and 76 years (mean 45). The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was used to assess preoperative anxiety directly before the otorhinolaryngologic procedure. The Service Improvement questionnaire was used to assess whether patients would favor the introduction of anxiety-reduction measures. RESULTS: There was neither a significant increase in patient anxiety levels preoperatively (P = 0.37) nor a significant increase in anxiety levels preoperatively when results were stratified according to patient gender and age (P = 0.45 and P = 0.27). 54% of the patients felt that their anxiety would have been reduced if they had read a procedural information leaflet, and 22% felt it would have been reduced if they had received preoperative behavioral training. 17% of the patients wanted more information from the surgical team. However, 12% of the patients would have liked less information from the surgical team preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients did not have a significant increase in their anxiety levels preoperatively. On the basis of our findings, we will work to improve the information we provide to patients preoperatively and to identify patient subgroups that require additional preoperative support.

Consent for post-operative visual loss in prone spinal surgery: aligning clinical practice with legal standards.

In March 2015, the Supreme Court's landmark ruling on the common law case of Montgomery vs Lanarkshire Health Board established the doctrine of informed patient consent, setting the legal standards that doctors should abide by. In this review, our primary aim has been to establish whether, despite the well-publicised implications of the ruling in the legal community, the medical profession has altered its practice. To do this, we reviewed the consenting methods applied by surgeons within our field of neurosurgery. We chose the rare, but disabling, material risk of prone spinal surgery: post-operative visual loss (POVL), as our tool for assessment. Departmental and national surveys both identified a common theme - the vast majority of doctors consenting patients for prone spinal surgery either do not consider POVL to be a serious material risk, or alternatively are not aware that current legal standards require them to ensure that patients are made aware of 'any' material risk involved in their treatment. In light of this finding, we discuss the legal implications of the Montgomery ruling, the current regulatory guidance available to support doctors, suggest some strategies to align clinical practice with the legal standards advocated by the ruling, and highlight some of the challenges surrounding the consent process given the legal framework in which we now practice.

Cognitive improvement following repair of a basal encephalocele.

We report the case of a 55-year-old woman presenting with progressive memory impairment secondary to a transsphenoidal encephalocele involving her dominant medial temporal lobe. Her clinical deterioration was accompanied by radiological progression in the encephalocele's size and associated encephalomalacia. Through a temporal craniotomy, her encephalocele was resected and the defect closed. Baseline neuropsychological assessment indicated global cognitive impairment, but post-operatively, she reported improved memory and concentration. Standardized assessment reflected an improvement in perceptual skills and an associated improved recall of a complex figure. This is the first case report to date of a patient's memory improving following treatment of a basal encephalocele.