Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Laryngoscope ; 134(3): 1077-1080, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37515512

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the relationship between chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps and microplastics. METHODS: A total of 80 patients participated in this prospectively planned study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 had 50 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps, whereas Group 2 had 30 healthy volunteers. The age and gender of the participants were noted. Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire was applied to the patients. The patients performed nasal lavage with saline. Microplastics were examined in the collected nasal lavage fluids, and their numbers were noted. The groups were compared on these values. RESULTS: The mean age was 38.06 ± 14.15 years in the chronic rhinosinusitis group without nasal polyps and 33.60 ± 11.68 years in the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age and gender. There was a significant difference in the number of microplastics between the chronic rhinosinusitis group without nasal polyps and the control group (p < 0.001). Microplastics were detected in all participants. CONCLUSIONS: We found more microplastics in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. According to this result, we can say that there may be a relationship between chronic rhinosinusitis and microplastics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:1077-1080, 2024.


Assuntos
Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Rinossinusite , Sinusite , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pólipos Nasais/complicações , Microplásticos , Plásticos , Rinite/complicações , Sinusite/complicações , Doença Crônica
4.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(12): 5363-5367, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37410148

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the relationship between microplastics, which are a worldwide health and environmental issue, and their relationship to allergic rhinitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 66 patients participated in this prospective study. The patients were divided into two groups. While there were 36 patients with allergic rhinitis in group 1, there were 30 healthy volunteers in group 2. The participants' age, gender and Score for Allergic Rhinitis results were noted. Microplastics were examined in the nasal lavage fluids of the patients and their numbers noted. The groups were compared on these values. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age and gender. There was a significant difference between the allergic rhinitis group and the control group in terms of the Score for Allergic Rhinitis results (p < 0.001). In the allergic rhinitis group, the microplastic density in the nasal lavage was significantly higher than in the control group (p = 0.027). Microplastics were detected in all participants. CONCLUSIONS: We found more microplastics in allergic rhinitis patients. According to this result, we can say that there is a relationship between allergic rhinitis and microplastics.


Assuntos
Rinite Alérgica , Rinite , Humanos , Microplásticos , Plásticos , Estudos Prospectivos , Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Líquido da Lavagem Nasal
5.
Future Microbiol ; 16: 697-702, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34223786

RESUMO

Aim: COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, started in December 2019 and has spread across the world. Materials & methods: We analyzed real-time PCR results of 10,000 samples from 2 April to 30 May 2020 in three neighbor cities located in the East of Turkey. The final study population was 7853 cases, after excluding screening tests. Results: Real-time PCR was performed to detect the SARS-CoV-2-specific RNA-dependent-RNA-polymerase gene fragment. The number of total positive samples out of 7853 were 487; however, the number of nonrepeating positive patient was 373 (4.8%). Cough and fever were the most common symptoms in positive cases. Conclusion: Epidemiologic studies should be performed about the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection to better understand the effect of the virus across the world.


Assuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , COVID-19/virologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Tosse/epidemiologia , Tosse/virologia , Feminino , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/virologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Turquia/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA