Impact of initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor treatment on the development of arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardiac devices.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been associated with improved prognosis in patients with heart failure, but their impact on atrial arrhythmic (AA) and ventricular arrhythmic (VA) events is not fully understood. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators who initiated treatment with SGLT2i. AA and VA events were compared in 2 time periods for each patient: 1 year before and 1 year after starting SGLT2i. RESULTS: The study included 195 patients (66.8 [61.3-73.1] years, 18.5% women). In the post-SGLT2i period, there was a reduction in the percentage of patients with any VA (pre: 52.3% vs post: 30.3%; P<.001) and clinically relevant VA (excluding nonsustained ventricular tachycardia) (pre: 21.5% vs post: 8.7%; P<.001). There was also a decrease in the number of episodes per patient/y of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (pre: 2 (1-5) vs post: 1 (0-2); P<.001) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (pre: 1 (1-3) vs post: 0 (0-2); P=0.046). However, no differences were observed in the prevalence of AA (24.7% vs 18.8%; P=.117) or the burden of atrial fibrillation (pre: 0% (0-0.1) vs post: 0% (0-0); P=.097). CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of SGLT2i treatment was associated with a decrease in the percentage of patients with relevant VA but this effect was not observed for AA.

Sex-gender disparities in nonagenarians with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of mortality for women, increasing with age. There is an unmet need regarding this condition in a fast-growing and predominantly female population, such as nonagenarians. HYPOTHESIS: Our aim is to compare sex-based differences in ACS management and long-term clinical outcomes between women and men in a cohort of nonagenarians. METHODS: We included consecutive nonagenarian patients with ACS admitted at four academic centers between 2005 and 2018. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of each center. RESULTS: A total of 680 nonagenarians were included (59% females). Of them, 373 (55%) patients presented with non-ST-segment elevation ACS and 307 (45%) with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Men presented a higher disease burden compared to women. Conversely, women were frailer with higher disability and severe cognitive impairment. In the STEMI group, women were less likely than men to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (60% vs. 45%; p = .01). Overall mortality rates were similar in both groups but PCI survival benefit at 1-year was greater in women compared to their male counterparts (82% vs. 68%; p = .008), persisting after sensitivity analyses using propensity-score matching (80% vs. 64%; p = .03). CONCLUSION: Sex-gender disparities have been observed in nonagenarians. Despite receiving less often invasive approaches, women showed better clinical outcomes. Our finding may help increase awareness and reduce the current gender gap in ACS management at any age.

Effect of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and lopinavir/ritonavir on the QT corrected interval in patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Administration of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prolongs QTc corrected interval (QTc). The effect and safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in combination with these therapies have seldom been studied. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate changes in QTc in patients receiving double (Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin) and triple therapy (Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin + Lopinavir/Ritonavir) to treat COVID-19. Secondary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital all-cause mortality. METHODS: Patients under treatment with double (DT) and triple therapy (TT) for COVID-19 were consecutively included in this prospective observational study. Serial in-hospital electrocardiograms were performed to measure QTc at baseline and during therapy. RESULTS: 168 patients (±66.2 years old) were included: 32.1% received DT and 67.9% received TT. The mean baseline QTc was 410.33 ms. Patients under DT and TT prolonged QTc interval respect baseline values (p < 0.001), without significant differences between both therapy groups (p = 0.748). Overall, 33 patients (19.6%) had a peak QTc and/or an increase QTc 60 ms from baseline, with a higher prevalence among those with hypokalemia (p = 0.003). All-cause mortality was similar between both strategy groups (p = 0.093) and high risk QTc prolongation was no related to clinical events in this series. CONCLUSIONS: DT and TT prolong the QTc in patients with COVID-19. Addition of Lopinavir/Ritonavir on top of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin did not increase QTc compared to DT.

Clinical Outcomes Following Urgent vs. Elective Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.

AIM: To examine procedural and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) within an admission for acute-decompensated heart failure (ADHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective registry of all consecutive patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) grade 3+ or 4+ who underwent PMVR our centre and classified in 2 groups: elective group and urgent PMVR group (within the index admission for ADHF). Echocardiographic, procedural and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. 85 patients (median age 77.0 [67.8-83.4] years, 64.7% male) were treated within the recruitment period. Among them, 17 (20%) underwent urgent MitraClip®. Urgent PMVR were at a higher risk for conventional surgery (p = 0.002) and had worse estimated prognosis according to HF risk scores (p < 0.001). Overall technical success was 100%, without differences between groups. At 30 days, no differences were found in mortality, MR reduction and in NYHA functional improvement between groups. Cumulative estimated survival free from all-cause death was 92.9% (82.4% vs. 95.6%), 89.4% (82.4% vs. 91.1%), 76.3% (82.4 vs. 74.9%) at 6 months, 1-year and 2-years, respectively, with no significant differences between urgent or elective PMVR (p = 0.769). CONCLUSION: MitraClip® implantation can be considered as an urgent therapy during admission for ADHF.

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair Vs. Stand-Alone Medical Therapy in Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a common finding among patients with heart failure (HF) and it is related to adverse events. Outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) are still a matter of debate. We performed a meta-analysis to assess mid- and long-term outcomes of patients with FMR treated with MitraClip® compared to medical management. METHODS: We conducted an electronic database search of all published data PubMed Central, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. The secondary end-points were hospitalizations for HF, need for heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device, unplanned mitral valve surgery, myocardial infarction and stroke. RESULTS: Five studies (n = 1513 patients) were included in the analysis. The summary estimate including all the available studies showed a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality favoring MitraClip® (HR 0.56, CI 95% [0.38-0.84]) and HF hospitalizations (HR 0.65; CI 95% [0.46-0.92]). A significant reduction in the indication for advanced HF therapies (OR 0.48; CI 95% [0.25-0.90]) or the need for unplanned mitral valve surgery (OR 0.20; CI 95% [0.07-0.57]) was also found in the group of patients that underwent TMVR. No differences in the incidence of myocardial infarction or stroke were found between both groups of treatment. No publication bias was detected. CONCLUSION: TMVR with MitraClip® system was related to a significant reduction in all-cause mortality, hospitalizations for HF and the need for HF transplant, left ventricular assist device or unplanned surgery beyond 1-year follow up.

Effect of Successful Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair on Ventricular Arrhythmic Burden in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Implantable Cardiac Devices.

Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) may be present in up to half of patients with heart failure (HF) and it is associated with adverse cardiac remodeling and myocardial stretch. These are potential triggers for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients with HF, and therefore MR may enhance electrical ventricular vulnerability. Our aim was to evaluate VA burden before and after percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) in patients with implantable cardiac devices. We conducted a prospective registry of all consecutive patients (n = 34, age 69.0 ± 12.2 years, 77% male) with significant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) who underwent MitraClip implantation in 2 centers between June 2014 and July 2018. VA burden was defined as the total number of events during device follow-up before and after PMVR. Among patients presenting VA during follow-up before or after PMVR, device success at hospital discharge was related to a significant reduction in the incidence of Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT, p = 0.002) and any sustained VT or rapid VT/ventricular fibrillation (p = 0.034). Regarding implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies, successful PMVR was related to a reduction in incidence of either antitachycardia pacing or appropriate shocks (p = 0.045) and in the occurrence of any defibrillation shocks (p = 0.045). Overall, effective repair lead to a significant reduction in the VA burden, with a significant decrease in the occurrence of any VA (p = 0.004) and any ICD therapies (p = 0.045). In conclusion, device success after PMVR was related to a reduction in overall arrhythmic burden and ICD therapies in our cohort.

First Magnetic Resonance Managed by a Cardiology Department in the Spanish Public Healthcare System. Experience and Difficulties of an Innovative Model.

Magnetic resonance (MR) is considered the gold standard in the assessment of myocardial morphology, function, perfusion, and viability. However, its main limitation is its scarce availability. In 2014, we installed the first MR scanner exclusively managed by a cardiology department within the publicly-funded Spanish healthcare system with the aim of improving patient-care, training and research in the department. In the time interval analyzed, July 2014 to May 2017, 3422 cardiac MR scans were performed (32minutes used per study; 96% with good quality; 75% with contrast media administration). The most prevalent clinical indications were cardiomyopathy (29%) and ischemic heart disease (12%). Twenty-five percent of studies were conducted in the context of research protocols. Follow-up studies predominated among outpatients, while pretherapeutic assessment was more common in hospitalized patients. The presumptive diagnosis was changed by cardiac MR scanning in up to 20% of patients investigated for ischemic heart disease. The installation and operative management of an MR scanner in our cardiology department has allowed us to integrate this technique into daily clinical practice, modify our clinical protocols, optimize access to this technology among cardiac patients, improve training, and conduct clinical research.