Extent of Surgery and Survival of Osteosarcoma: A Retrospective Population-Based Study.

Background Osteosarcoma (OSC) is the most common primary bone tumor and is often managed surgically. Few prior investigations have assessed differences in OSC survival by specific surgical techniques at a national registry level. We sought to compare survival based on surgical subtypes for OSC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methodology We searched the SEER database for malignant OSCs diagnosed between 2000 and 2019 which were surgically managed. Separate survival comparisons were made for one and five years for wide excision (local tumor destruction or resection versus partial resection) and radical excision (radical resection with limb-sparing versus limb amputation with or without girdle resection). Results A total of 4,303 patients were included, of whom 3,587 were surgically managed. There were no survival differences between local destruction and partial resection (hazard ratio = 0.826, p = 0.303). However, younger age, lower staging, and management without radiation were associated with improved survival. The radical excision comparison showed limb amputation was associated with worse survival than limb-sparing surgery (hazard ratio = 1.531, p < 0.001). Younger age, female sex, lower stage, receipt of chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant plus adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved survival while Black and American Indian or Alaska Native were associated with worse survival. Conclusions Our findings show that patients managed with limb-sparing radical resection survived significantly compared to limb amputation. There were no differences in survival for wide excision surgeries. The use of a combination of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy also yields improved survival. OSC survival may be optimized with limb-sparing surgery with a combination of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation to Treat Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Case Report.

A 67-year-old man presented with severe 9 of 10 intractable pain of the left shoulder joint after arthroplasty and revision surgeries, with associated weakness, atrophy, and limited range of motion in all directions. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) at the left C4, C5, and C6 levels was used after failed conservative and interventional measures, resulting in significant improvement in pain, function, and quality of life measures through 6 months postimplantation. Larger studies should examine if DRG-S is effective in treating chronic arthritic joint pain as well as chronic postsurgical pain of the shoulder that is not predominantly neuropathic.

Survey of Palliative Care Use in Primary Malignant Bone Tumors: A National Cancer Database Review.

Background/Objectives: Palliative care (PC) has been associated with reduced patient symptom burden, improved physician satisfaction, and reduced cost of care. However, its use in primary bone tumors has not been well classified. Design/Setting and Subjects: Patients diagnosed with primary malignant bone tumors (osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chordoma) between 2004 and 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Cross tabulations with chi-square analysis were performed to evaluate frequencies of PC use by patient, facility, and tumor characteristics. Multivariate logistic binary regression was performed to evaluate relationships between patient, treatment facility, and tumor characteristics and the use of PC. Results: Around 24,401 patients were identified. Overall, 2.52% had any form of PC utilization. Of those receiving PC, 55.5-65.1% were treated with only noncurative surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or any combination of these modalities. Odds of PC utilization were decreased for patients with chordomas, patients living >24 miles from the treatment facility, or patients with private insurance, Medicare, or unknown insurance status. Odds of PC utilization were increased in patients with greater tumor diameter or unknown tumor size, tumors in midline, increased tumor grade, stage IV tumors, or living in urban areas. Conclusion: PC use in patients with primary bone tumors increases with tumor stage, tumor grade, tumor size, and if the tumor is midline, and in patients living in urban areas. However, overall utilization remains markedly low. Future studies should be done to investigate these patterns of care and help expand the utilization of PC.

Odds of Stage IV Bone Cancer Diagnosis Based on Socioeconomic and Geographical Factors: A National Cancer Database (NCDB) Review.

BACKGROUND: There are significant differences in prognosis for osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and chordomas based on the stage at diagnosis. The five-year survival of these bone cancers varies from 75-87% at an early stage of diagnosis and falls to 27-55% at a late stage of diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated the odds of stage I vs stage IV cancer at the time of diagnosis in patients with primary malignant bone tumors (osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and chordoma) diagnosed in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2018. Cross tabulations with Chi-square analysis were performed to evaluate frequencies of different socioeconomic and geographical characteristics between patients with stage I vs stage IV cancer. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate relationships between socioeconomic and geographical factors and the odds of stage IV cancer at the time of diagnosis. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. RESULTS: 8882 patients with stage I and 3063 with stage IV primary malignant bone tumors were identified. The odds of stage IV bone cancer at diagnosis are increased for patients on Medicaid (odds ratio [OR] = 1.298, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.043-1.616) or Medicare (OR = 1.795, 1.411-2.284). Odds of stage IV bone cancer at diagnosis were decreased with female sex (OR = 0.733, 0.671-0.800), private insurance (OR = 0.738, 0.601-0.905), and those treated at community cancer programs (OR = 0.542, 0.369-0.797), comprehensive cancer program (OR = 0.312, 0.215-0.452), or academic/research facilities (OR = 0.370, 0.249-0.550). No significant relationship was identified between the stage at diagnosis and race, ethnicity, Charlson-Deyo score, or education level. Stage IV cancer at diagnosis showed was proportionally lower in chondrosarcomas (17.1%) and chordomas (2.1%) than osteosarcomas (45.0%) and Ewing sarcomas (35.8%). CONCLUSION: Odds of stage IV bone cancer at diagnosis are greater with male sex, Medicaid or Medicare insurance status, or treatment at community cancer programs. Providers should have a low suspicion for additional evaluation when treating patients with symptoms of bone cancer and should be aware of these disparities when treating people in these groups. This is to the authors' knowledge the first such study conducted through the NCDB.

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the treatment of joint pain with predominantly nociceptive characteristics: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has recently emerged as a novel therapy in neuromodulation that demonstrated a higher rate of success than spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in a prospective, head-to-head randomized comparative trial to treat complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and causalgia. In contrast to SCS, DRG-S also shows promise in treating conditions that are not purely neuropathic such as axial low back pain, which has a prominent nociplastic pain component. It is not known to what extent the effectiveness of DRG-S for such indications is due to effective treatment of the neuropathic pain component versus the effects of DRG-S on mechanical pain. Although rarely studied, reporting outcomes of DRG-S to treat predominantly mechanical/nociceptive pain may help point toward expanding the utility of this therapy. Here, we present five cases of refractory mechanical pain treated with DRG-S. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a successful DRG-S trial and implant between September 2017 and September 2021 at our institute was performed. Patients who had intractable joint pain without strong evidence of neuropathic pain were included in this case series. The Budapest criteria for CRPS, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4) survey, or a definable nerve injury were used to determine the presence of neuropathic pain. Baseline assessments for pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), function (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D]), and other applicable joint surveys were extracted from pre-trial baseline and follow-up appointments. RESULTS: Five patients were identified and included. Patient diagnoses consisted of refractory joint pain of the hip, knee, or ankle. Mean NRS pain scores improved by 74% from 9.2 at baseline to 2.4 at the last follow-up (mean = 28 months post-implant). From baseline to the last follow-up, mean ODI scores improved by 65% from 66 to 23 and EQ-5D scores more than doubled from an average of 0.371 to 0.797. CONCLUSION: This clinical report illustrates the potential utility DRG-S has in treating pain that clinically presents as predominantly refractory mechanical joint pain without a significant neuropathic component. The physiological reasons for our observations may be that DRG-S is able to directly influence the conduction of nociceptive signaling at the DRG and within the spinal cord. Further investigations are warranted to determine if DRG-S is a potential treatment option for chronic mechanical pain.

Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation to Treat Focal Postsurgical and Diffuse Chronic Pain: A Case Report.

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is widely accepted for treating focal pain syndromes. We present the case of a 46-year-old woman with severe lumbar radiculopathy with an implanted spinal cord stimulator (SCS) that had lost efficacy. She developed an incisional hernia after undergoing a minimally invasive, extreme lateral interbody fusion and SCS explant. After herniorrhaphy, she presented with severe pain at the T10-T11 dermatomes, which we treated with DRG-S. One-year after lumbar fusion, her refractory lumbar and radicular pain returned, which we ultimately treated with bilateral T12+S1 DRG-S. DRG-S was thus used to successfully treat focal postsurgical and diffuse chronic pain.

Intermittent Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Is as Efficacious as Standard Continuous Dosing in Treating Chronic Pain: Results From a Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a form of neuromodulation used to treat chronic pain. A spinal cord stimulation (SCS) method with paresthesia-free waveform used in the dorsal columns, burst-SCS, recently demonstrated efficacy using intermittent stimulation, where stimulation is cycled on and off for set durations. Tonic SCS is a paresthesia-based therapy that is ineffective at sub-perception levels and when delivered in a cycled manner. DRG-S also uses a tonic waveform, yet unlike tonic SCS, it is effective at sub-perception levels. This study aimed to determine whether the cycling of stimulation at the DRG could maintain DRG-S efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study followed a prospective, randomized, and balanced, double-blinded (assessor) protocol. Twenty DRG-S responders were randomized to a sequence of three programs for consecutive two-week intervals: continuous stimulation; 1 minute on:1 minute off; or 1 minute on:2 minutes off. The primary outcome of this study was change in pain ratings with the cycled programs compared with continuous stimulation. Secondary outcomes included changes in function and scores for quality of life, and stimulation program preference. RESULTS: Mean scores were similar at the end of each two-week stimulation program for Numerical Rating Scale pain (continuous = 2.9 ± 0.8, 1:1 on-off = 2.6 ± 0.7, and 1:2 on-off = 2.7 ± 0.7 cm, p = 0.39), disability (p = 0.72), and general health (p = 0.95). No clinically significant differences were found from the upper boundaries of the 95% confidence intervals of the mean difference in pain, disability, and general health for each intermittent stimulation program vs the continuous program. At the end of the study, the continuous stimulation, 1:1 on-off dosing, and 1:2 on-off dosing programs were preferred by a similar number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent DRG-S produces comparable results to continuous stimulation over a two-week period. Intermittent delivery may extend battery life and facilitate a smaller implantable pulse generator.