Prevalence of zygomatic air cell defects in a North American population.

Zygomatic air cell defects (ZACDs) are asymptomatic defects present in the zygomatic process and articular eminence of the temporal bone. This defect is considered a normal anatomical variant and can be detected on routine panoramic images. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, dominant type, and location of ZACDs in a North American population. A total of 1724 panoramic images of adult patients were analyzed by a third-year dental student in conjunction with an oral and maxillofacial radiologist. Patient demographics (age and sex) as well as ZACD location (unilateral right/left or bilateral) and appearance (unilocular or multilocular) were evaluated. Statistical analyses included the Clopper-Pearson method to calculate the 95% CI, Student t test for independent samples, and Fisher exact test. The prevalence of ZACDs in this study population was 2.1%. A total of 24 women (2.3%) and 12 men (1.7%) were affected, with no statistically significant difference between the sexes. The mean (SD) age of patients presenting with a ZACD was 56.6 (17.7) years, while that of patients without a ZACD was 53.0 (16.3) years, with no statistically significant difference between groups. Among the 36 patients with ZACDs, 28 (1.6%) had unilateral and 8 (0.5%) had bilateral lesions. One patient with bilateral ZACDs had a unilocular lesion on the right side and a multilocular lesion on the left, so there were a total of 31 unilocular lesions (1.8%) and 6 multilocular lesions (0.3%). The results of this study indicate that the prevalence of ZACDs in the study population was 2.1%, without any statistically significant differences based on the sex or age of the patient or laterality or appearance of the lesions.

Investigating Dental Aptitude Test (DAT) results as predictors for preclinical and clinical scores in dental school.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to determine whether 2 current admission criteria, the perceptual ability test (PAT) and the manual dexterity test (MDT) can predict success in dental school within the Université de Montréal population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the records of 854 students who graduated between 2005 and 2015. For each student, PAT and MDT scores were compared to 5 preclinical and 3 clinical classes using the Pearson correlation coefficient and regression models. T-tests were used to compare students above and below a 5-point increase in cut-off scores (PAT = 15, MDT = 10). RESULTS: The strongest relationship was found to be between PAT and preclinical scores (r = 0.329, P < 0.01). The regression analysis determined that gender, PAT and MDT predicted more of the variability of preclinical (12.7%) than of clinical scores (2.7%). Students scoring ≥10 on the MDT performed better in preclinical and clinical courses, and those scoring ≥15 on the PAT performed better in preclinical courses. However, when comparing these students to the entire group, only those scoring ≥15 on PAT differed from the group's average for preclinical scores (P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the PAT and MDT have some power in predicting success in preclinical, and to a lesser extent clinical courses, and supports their use as criteria in the admissions process. There is some evidence that suggests that increasing the cut-off score may decrease the number of students with difficulties in preclinical courses.

Influence of Experience and Training on Dental Students' Examination Performance Regarding Panoramic Images.

Physician training has greatly benefitted from insights gained in understanding the manner in which experts search medical images for abnormalities. The aims of this study were to compare the search patterns of 30 fourth-year dental students and 15 certified oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMRs) over panoramic images and to determine the most robust variables for future studies involving image visualization. Eye tracking was used to capture the eye movement patterns of both subject groups when examining 20 panoramic images classified as normal or abnormal. Abnormal images were further subclassified as having an obvious, intermediate, or subtle abnormality. The images were presented in random order to each participant, and data were collected on duration of the participants' observations and total distance tracked, time to first eye fixation, and total duration and numbers of fixations on and off the area of interest (AOI). The results showed that the OMRs covered greater distances than the dental students (p<0.001) for normal images. For images of pathosis, the OMRs required less total time (p<0.001), made fewer eye fixations (p<0.01) with fewer saccades (p<0.001) than the students, and required less time before making the first fixation on the AOI (p<0.01). Furthermore, the OMRs covered less distance (p<0.001) than the dental students for obvious pathoses. For investigations of images of pathosis, time to first fixation is a robust parameter in predicting ability. For images with different levels of subtlety of pathoses, the number of fixations, total time spent, and numbers of revisits are important parameters to analyze when comparing observer groups with different levels of experience.