The suitability of reconstructed human epidermis models for medical device irritation assessment: A comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo testing results.

The ISO 10993 standards on biocompatibility assessment of medical devices discourage the use of animal tests when reliable and validated in vitro methods are available. A round robin validation study of in vitro reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) assays was performed as potential replacements for rabbit skin irritation testing. The RhE assays were able to accurately identify strong irritants in dilute medical device extracts. However, there was some uncertainty about whether RhE tissues accurately predicted the results of the rabbit skin patch or intracutaneous irritation test. To address that question, this paper presents in vivo data from the round robin and subsequent follow-up studies. The follow-up studies included simultaneous in vitro RhE model and in vivo testing of round robin polymer samples and the results of dual in vitro/in vivo testing of currently marketed medical device components/materials. Our results show for the first time that for both pure chemicals and medical device extracts the intracutaneous rabbit test is more sensitive to detect irritant activity than the rabbit skin patch test. The studies showed that the RhE models produced results that were essentially equivalent to those from the intracutaneous rabbit skin irritation test. Therefore, it is concluded that RhE in vitro models are acceptable replacements for the in vivo rabbit intracutaneous irritation test for evaluating the irritant potential of medical devices.

Assessment of test method variables for in vitro skin irritation testing of medical device extracts.

Skin irritation is an important component of the biological safety evaluation of medical devices. This testing has typically been performed using in vivo models. However, in an effort to reduce the need for in vivo testing, alternative methods for assessing skin irritation potential in vitro have been developed using a Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) model. During the development of the protocol for the round robin validation of in vitro irritation testing for medical device extracts, it became clear that there were three points in the procedure where different options may be validated within each laboratory for routine testing: sample exposure time (18 vs 24h), SDS positive control concentration, and cytokine (IL-1α) release testing. The goal of our study was to evaluate the effect of these variables. EpiDerm™ tissues were exposed to extracts of three plain polymer samples, and four polymers embedded with known irritant chemicals. Exposures were performed for 18 and 24h. Resulting tissue viability was assessed by MTT reduction and IL-1α release was assessed by ELISA. Testing was also performed using various concentrations of SDS ranging from 0.5 to 1% (w/v). Overall, results were similar for samples tested and 18 and 24h, but the 18h exposure time has the potential to have an impact on the results of some sample types. IL-1α testing was shown to be useful to clarify conflicting tissue viability results. Use of a lower concentration of SDS as a positive control can help prevent issues that arise from excessive tissue damage often caused by 1% SDS.