Comparison of systemic immune-inflammation index levels in patients with isolated coronary artery ectasia versus patients with obstructive coronary artery disease and normal coronary angiogram.

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is associated with increased risk of mortality, equivalent to that of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Considering the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of CAE, we aimed to investigate whether there is an association between systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and isolated CAE. The study population included 510 patients of which 170 patients with isolated CAE, 170 patients with obstructive CAD and 170 patients with normal coronary angiograms (NCA). The severity of CAE was determined according to the Markis classification. Patients with isolated CAE had significantly higher SII values compared to those with obstructive CAD and NCA [median 550 IQR (404-821), median 526 IQR (383-661), and median 433 IQR (330-555), respectively, p < .001]. In multivariate analysis, SII (OR 1.032, 95% CI 1.020-1.044, p = .003), male gender (OR 2.083, p = .008), eGFR (OR 0.979, p = .016), and CRP (OR 1.105, p = .005) were independent factors of isolated CAE. Moreover, in the Spearman correlation analysis, there was a moderate but significant positive correlation between SII and CRP (r = 0.379, p < .001). In conclusion, higher SII levels were independently associated with the presence of isolated CAE. This result suggests that a more severe inflammatory process may play a role in the development of this variant of CAD.

Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts no-reflow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), on the basis of lymphocyte, neutrophil and platelet counts had been published to be a good prognostic factor in coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, the prognostic value of Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in a condition of no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) remains inconsistent, we evaluated the SII as a simple calculated tool for predicting the NRP among patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneus coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD: 510 consecutive acute STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI within 12 h from symptom onset from October 2015 to January 2020 were enrolled in our study. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cut-off value of SII to predict the no-reflow. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression, including covariates found to have a significant association with NRP in univariate analysis, was used to identify independent predictors of no-reflow. RESULTS: A ROC curve analysis showed that the best cut-off value of SII for predicting no-reflow was 1028, with sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 70, respectively (AUC, 0.839; 95% CI 0.797-0.881). An ROC curve comparison analysis was performed to compare the SII with NLR and PLR. Multivariate analysis revealed that SII ≥1028 value (OR = 6.622, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.802-11.627, p < .001), not using aspirin prior to admission (OR = 0.431, 95%CI: 0.236-0.786, p = .006), and CRP (OR = 1.004, 95%CI: 1.001-1.008, p = .041) were independent predictors related to occurrence of NRP after primary PCI in patients with acute STEMI. CONCLUSION: SII levels are independently associated with the NRP in patients undergoing primary PCI for acute STEMI. High SII may be a promising indicator for the prediction of NRP in these patients.