The use of point-of-care bedside lung ultrasound significantly reduces the number of radiographs and computed tomography scans in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Chest radiography has been reported to have low diagnostic accuracy in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and chest computed tomography (CT) scans require patients to be transported out of the ICU, putting them at risk of adverse events. In this study we assessed the efficacy of routine bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) in the evaluation of pleural effusions (PE) in the ICU. METHODS: Three hundred seventy-six patients admitted to the ICU for major trauma (46.3%), medical pathology (41.5%), and postsurgical complications (12.2%) (May 2008 to April 2009) were included in this study. Patients were placed into either the control group (group C) or the study group (group S), on the basis of the introduction of routine LUS performed by a single group of intensivists in 1 tertiary care ICU. To reduce provider bias, the physicians conducting the LUS were not aware of the study. Collected data included patient demographics, clinical course, and number of chest radiographs and CT scans performed. As a secondary goal, we assessed the reliability of Balik's formula in PE estimation. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the 2 groups with regard to their demographics and ICU clinical course. Group S had a significant reduction in the total number of chest radiographs obtained (-26%; P < 0.001) and CT scans (-47%; P < 0.001) in comparison with the comparison group C. A 6-month follow-up analysis of the ICU LUS protocol revealed a time-dependent decrease in the number of radiological examinations requested for patients with PE. Lastly, PE volume estimation using the LUS and Balik's formula correlates well with the effective volume drained (r = 0.65; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of LUS in the ICU setting can be associated with a reduction of the number of chest radiographs and CT scans performed.

Time needed to achieve completeness and accuracy in bedside lung ultrasound reporting in intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: The use of lung ultrasound (LUS) in ICU is increasing but ultrasonographic patterns of lung are often difficult to quantify by different operators. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and quality of LUS reporting after the introduction of a standardized electronic recording sheet. METHODS: Intensivists were trained for LUS following a teaching programme. From April 2008, an electronic sheet was designed and introduced in ICU database in order to uniform LUS examination reporting. A mark from 0 to 24 has been given for each exam by two senior intensivists not involved in the survey. The mark assigned was based on completeness of a precise reporting scheme, concerning the main finding of LUS. A cut off of 15 was considered sufficiency. RESULTS: The study comprehended 12 months of observations and a total of 637 LUS. Initially, although some improvement in the reports completeness, still the accuracy and precision of examination reporting was below 15. The time required to reach a sufficient quality was 7 months. A linear trend in physicians progress was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The uniformity in teaching programme and examinations reporting system permits to improve the level of completeness and accuracy of LUS reporting, helping physicians in following lung pathology evolution.