[Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease with a misleading laryngeal presentation]. / Une maladie de Rosai­Dorfman­Destombes de présentation laryngée trompeuse.

Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease is a rare non-Langerhansian cell histiocytosis characterized by the accumulation of large activated histiocytes in the affected tissues with images of emperipolesis. The diagnosis is not really problematic in the classical forms, with a lymph node presentation, whose histology is very suggestive. However, it can be much more difficult in the extra-nodal forms, which are misleading in both their clinical and histological presentation. We report here a case illustrating this diagnostic difficulty. Firstly, clinically, the disease was revealed by an unusual laryngeal location, responsible for acute obstructive respiratory distress and requiring urgent surgical management. Secondly, histologically, the diagnosis was not evoked in the first instance by analysis of the laryngeal lesion. Indeed, there was a not specific appearing polymorphic infiltrate, associating small lymphocytes, plasma cells and numerous histiocytes, without evidence for a lymphoma after immunohistochemistry and lymphocyte clonality analysis. However, after re-examination of the slides, the histiocytes sometimes appeared large or xanthomised and have a PS100+, CD1a-, langerhine- phenotype, with rare images of emperipolesis. These aspects finally suggested the diagnosis of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease, then confirmed by a cervical lymph node biopsy showing characteristic histological features. Simultaneously, NGS analysis of the laryngeal lesion showed a mutation in the MAP2K1 gene, in accordance with the diagnosis. The patient was treated with revlimid and dexamethasone for 6 months, with complete remission, and is currently undergoing maintenance treatment with revlimid.

(123)I-BZA2 as a melanin-targeted radiotracer for the identification of melanoma metastases: results and perspectives of a multicenter phase III clinical trial.

UNLABELLED: Our group has developed a new radiopharmaceutical, (123)I - N-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-2-iodobenzamide ((123)I-BZA2), a benzamide derivative able to bind to melanin pigment in melanoma cells. In a prospective and multicentric phase III clinical study, the value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (123)I-BZA2 scintigraphy was compared for melanoma staging. METHODS: Patients with a past history of cutaneous or ocular melanoma were included from 8 hospitals. (18)F-FDG imaging was performed according to a standard PET protocol. Whole-body, static planar, and SPECT/CT (if available) images were acquired 4 h after injection of a 2 MBq/kg dose of (123)I-BZA2. (18)F-FDG and (123)I-BZA2 sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of melanoma metastasis were calculated and compared on both a lesion basis and a patient basis. True-positive and true-negative lesion status was determined after 6 mo of clinical follow-up or according to lesion biopsies (if available). Melanin content in biopsies was evaluated with the standard Fontana-Masson silver method and was correlated with (123)I-BZA2 uptake. Based on statistical analysis, the number of inclusions was estimated at 186. RESULTS: In all, 87 patients were enrolled from 2008 to 2010. Of these, 45 (52%) had metastases. A total of 338 imaging abnormalities were analyzed; 86 lesions were considered metastases, and 20 of 25 lesion biopsies found melanoma metastases. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG for diagnosis of melanoma metastases was higher than that of (123)I-BZA2, at 87% and 39%, respectively (P < 0.05). For specificity, (18)F-FDG and (123)I-BZA2 were not statistically different, at 78% and 94%, respectively. In a lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG was statistically higher than that of (123)I-BZA2 (80% vs. 23%, P < 0.05). The specificity of (18)F-FDG was lower than that of (123)I-BZA2 (54% vs. 86%, P < 0.05). According to biopsy analysis, only 9 of 20 metastatic lesions (45%) were pigmented with high melanin content. (123)I-BZA2 imaging was positive for 6 of 8 melanin-positive lesions, fairly positive for 3 of 10 melanin-negative lesions, and negative for 7 of 10 melanin-negative lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of (123)I-BZA2 for the diagnosis of melanin-positive lesions were 75% and 70%, respectively. Because of a low (123)I-BZA2 sensitivity, this clinical trial was prematurely closed after 87 patients had been included. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for melanoma staging and strengthens the high accuracy of (123)I-BZA2 for diagnosis of melanin-positive metastatic melanoma. Moreover, benzamide derivatives radiolabeled with therapeutic radionuclide may offer a new strategy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma patients harboring melanin-positive metastases.

Prognostic value of PET-CT after first-line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma: a pooled analysis of central scan review in three multicentre studies.

BACKGROUND: The value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT (PET) imaging in response assessment after first-line rituximab chemotherapy for follicular lymphoma has been documented. We analysed the application of the five-point Deauville scale (5PS; used to score FDG uptake on PET images) in a large cohort derived from three studies, to assess the correlation between post-induction PET status and survival in patients with follicular lymphoma. METHODS: In this pooled analysis, we used data from three multicentre prospective studies of first-line rituximab chemotherapy for patients with high-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma (the PRIMA study, the PET-Folliculaire study, and the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi FOLL05 study). Patients included in this analysis received at least six cycles of rituximab and chemotherapy before response assessment with conventional contrast-enhanced CT and PET low-dose CT (PET). We included only patients who had a PET scan within 3 months of the last dose of induction rituximab. Patient data, including conventional CT-based response assessment, were recorded for all patients undergoing PET review. Scans undergoing central PET review were scored independently by three reviewers according to the 5PS. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival according to the 5PS score of post-induction PET scan (ie, positive [≥4 points] or negative [<4 points]), analysed in the central review population. FINDINGS: Between Dec 24, 2004, and Sept 22, 2010, 439 of the patients enrolled in the three studies underwent local PET assessment, 246 of whom had centrally reviewed post-induction scans. 41 (17%) of 246 patients had a positive post-induction PET scan according to a cutoff of 4 or higher on the 5PS, with substantial reporter concordance. With a median follow-up of 54·8 months (IQR 39·7-68·5; range 7·7-90·1), the hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival for patients with a positive PET scan versus those with a negative PET scan was 3·9 (95% CI 2·5-5·9; p<0·0001), and for overall survival was 6·7 (2·4-18·5; p=0·0002). For patients with a positive PET scan, 23·2% (95% CI 11·1-37·9) of patients were progression free at 4 years compared with 63·4% (55·9-70·0) of those who had a negative PET scan (p<0·0001); 4-year overall survival was 87·2% (95% CI 71·9-94·5) versus 97·1% (93·2-98·8), respectively (p<0·0001). Conventional CT-based response (ie, complete response or unconfirmed complete response vs partial response) was weakly predictive of progression-free survival (HR 1·7 [95% CI 1·1-2·5]; p=0·017). INTERPRETATION: PET-CT rather than contrast-enhanced CT scanning should be considered as a new standard for response assessment of follicular lymphoma in clinical practice, and could help guide response-adapted therapy. FUNDING: Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (Paris, France), now LYSA (Lymphoma Study Association), Direction de la Recherche Clinique de l'Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, and the Italian Ministry of Health.