Breech-strike on mulesed, clipped and unmulesed Merino ewes and hoggets in south-eastern Australia.

OBJECTIVE: Compare breech-strike on Merino ewes and hoggets that were mulesed, had breech and tail clips applied ('clipped') or left unmulesed and treated strategically with long-acting insecticide. DESIGN: A cohort study on two farms in southern Victoria. METHODS: Three treatment groups were established at lamb marking in 2008 and 2009 on each farm. The unmulesed group was treated with a long-acting insecticide in early spring. The prevalence of breech-strike and key risk factors, including presence of dag, urine stain and breech wrinkle, were compared between groups. RESULTS: Breech-strike was detected from October to December on 1.9% and 7.2% of mulesed, and on 14.8% and 12.5% of clipped ewes, respectively, on each farm. Thus, clipped ewes had a relative risk of breech-strike 7.8- and 1.7-fold that of mulesed ewes. Unmulesed ewes treated with insecticide had similar or less breech-strike compared with mulesed ewes (3.4% and 1.4%), but significantly more dag, stain and breech wrinkle. From January, breech-strike on unprotected unmulesed ewes was 8.5% and 2.8%, compared with 3.5% and 0% on mulesed ewes. CONCLUSION: Early-season treatment of unmulesed sheep prevented most breech-strikes during spring and early summer on both hoggets and breeding ewes, confirming it as a short- to medium-term option for the control of breech-strike. Some benefits were associated with the use of clips but, to control breech-strike, clipped sheep should be treated the same as unmulesed sheep. Genetic selection to reduce the prevalence of dag will be required for future strategies to control breech-strike on Merino sheep in south-eastern Australia.

Prevalence of breech-strike in mulesed, clipped and unmulesed Merino hoggets in south-eastern Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of breech flystrike ('breech-strike') on 12-20-month-old Merino hoggets that were mulesed, had breech and tail clips applied ('clipped') or were left unmulesed but treated strategically with long-acting insecticide. DESIGN: A cohort study on three farms in southern Victoria. METHODS: Three treatment groups were established at lamb marking on each farm. The unmulesed group was treated with dicyclanil when 12 months old in September or October ('early-season treatment'). The prevalence of breech-strike and key risk factors, including soiling of the breech with faeces ('dag') and urine ('stain'), and breech wrinkle, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Over all the farms, breech-strike occurred on 1.1% of mulesed sheep and 7.7% of clipped sheep. Clipped sheep had a relative risk of breech-strike of 18.2-, 16.8- and 3.0-fold that of mulesed sheep on the three farms. Unmulesed sheep treated with dicyclanil had a similar prevalence of breech-strike to that of mulesed sheep (overall 0.9%, range 0-2.5%), but had significantly more dag, stain and wrinkle. CONCLUSION: Early-season treatment of unmulesed sheep prevented most breech-strikes during the spring and early summer, and offers a short- to medium-term option for the control of breech-strike in south-eastern Australia. There were some benefits associated with using clips, namely less dag and stain, and a shorter time spent crutching. However, to control breech-strike the clipped sheep should be treated the same as unmulesed sheep. Reducing the prevalence and severity of dag will be a major component of strategies to control breech-strike of Merinos in this region.